History log of /linux-master/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-gxp.c
Revision Date Author Comments
# 59738ab2 14-Jul-2023 Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

I2C: Explicitly include correct DT includes

The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate
of_platform_bus_type before it as merged into the regular platform bus.
As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they
"temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h
and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include
files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and
replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to
explicitly include the correct includes.

Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>


# e190a0c3 08-May-2023 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

i2c: Convert to platform remove callback returning void

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Alain Volmat <alain.volmat@foss.st.com>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Acked-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jochen Friedrich <jochen@scram.de>
Acked-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Acked-by: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Asmaa Mnebhi <asnaa@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Reviewed-by: Chris Pringle <chris.pringle@phabrix.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>
Reviewed-by: Tali Perry <tali.perry@nuvoton.com>
Reviewed-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>


# 5d388143 03-Apr-2023 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

i2c: gxp: fix build failure without CONFIG_I2C_SLAVE

The gxp_i2c_slave_irq_handler() is hidden in an #ifdef, but the
caller uses an IS_ENABLED() check:

drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-gxp.c: In function 'gxp_i2c_irq_handler':
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-gxp.c:467:29: error: implicit declaration of function 'gxp_i2c_slave_irq_handler'; did you mean 'gxp_i2c_irq_handler'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

It has to consistently use one method or the other to avoid warnings,
so move to IS_ENABLED() here for readability and build coverage, and
move the #ifdef in linux/i2c.h to allow building it as dead code.

Fixes: 4a55ed6f89f5 ("i2c: Add GXP SoC I2C Controller")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Nick Hawkins <nick.hawkins@hpe.com>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>


# 65609d32 27-Feb-2023 Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>

i2c: gxp: fix an error code in probe

This is passing IS_ERR() instead of PTR_ERR() so instead of an error
code it prints and returns the number 1.

Fixes: 4a55ed6f89f5 ("i2c: Add GXP SoC I2C Controller")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Hawkins <nick.hawkins@hpe.com>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>


# 4b3dfb0e 20-Feb-2023 Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>

i2c: gxp: return proper error on address NACK

According to Documentation/i2c/fault-codes.rst, NACK after sending an
address should be -ENXIO.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>


# 1d092308 17-Feb-2023 Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>

i2c: gxp: remove "empty" switch statement

There used to be error messages which had to go. Now, it only consists
of 'break's, so it can go.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>


# 4a55ed6f 17-Feb-2023 Nick Hawkins <nick.hawkins@hpe.com>

i2c: Add GXP SoC I2C Controller

The GXP SoC supports 10 I2C engines. Each I2C engine is completely
independent and can function both as an I2C master and I2C slave. The
I2C master can operate in a multi master environment. The engines support
a scalable speed from 8kHZ to 1.5 Mhz.

Signed-off-by: Nick Hawkins <nick.hawkins@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>