History log of /linux-master/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wait_user_fence.c
Revision Date Author Comments
# 264ed178 02-Jan-2024 Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>

drm/xe: Fix spelling mistake "gueue" -> "queue"

There is a spelling mistake in a drm_info message. Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240102092014.3347566-1-colin.i.king@gmail.com


# 717cf0a7 18-Dec-2023 Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>

drm/xe: Fix warning on impossible condition

Having a different value for op is not possible: this is already kept
out of user-visible warning by the check in xe_wait_user_fence_ioctl()
if op > MAX_OP. The warning is useful as if this switch() is not update
when a new op is added, it should be triggered.

Fix warning as reported by 0-DAY CI Kernel:

drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wait_user_fence.c:46:2: warning: variable 'passed' is used uninitialized whenever switch default is taken [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]

Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312170357.KPSinwPs-lkp@intel.com/
Fixes: dd08ebf6c352 ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs")
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231218163301.3453285-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>


# 315acff5 18-Dec-2023 Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>

drm/xe: Fix warning on impossible condition

Having a different value for op is not possible: this is already kept
out of user-visible warning by the check in xe_wait_user_fence_ioctl()
if op > MAX_OP. The warning is useful as if this switch() is not update
when a new op is added, it should be triggered.

Fix warning as reported by 0-DAY CI Kernel:

drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wait_user_fence.c:46:2: warning: variable 'passed' is used uninitialized whenever switch default is taken [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]

Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312170357.KPSinwPs-lkp@intel.com/
Fixes: dd08ebf6c352 ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs")
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231218163301.3453285-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>


# e670f0b4 15-Dec-2023 Bommu Krishnaiah <krishnaiah.bommu@intel.com>

drm/xe/uapi: Return correct error code for xe_wait_user_fence_ioctl

Currently xe_wait_user_fence_ioctl is not checking exec_queue state
and blocking until timeout, with this patch wakeup the blocking wait
if exec_queue reset happen and returning proper error code

Signed-off-by: Bommu Krishnaiah <krishnaiah.bommu@intel.com>
Cc: Oak Zeng <oak.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Kempczynski Zbigniew <Zbigniew.Kempczynski@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Acked-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Acked-by: Mateusz Naklicki <mateusz.naklicki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>


# 9212da07 15-Dec-2023 Bommu Krishnaiah <krishnaiah.bommu@intel.com>

drm/xe/uapi: add exec_queue_id member to drm_xe_wait_user_fence structure

remove the num_engines/instances members from drm_xe_wait_user_fence
structure and add a exec_queue_id member

Right now this is only checking if the engine list is sane and nothing
else. In the end every operation with this IOCTL is a soft check.
So, let's formalize that and only use this IOCTL to wait on the fence.

exec_queue_id member will help to user space to get proper error code
from kernel while in exec_queue reset

Signed-off-by: Bommu Krishnaiah <krishnaiah.bommu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
Acked-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Acked-by: Mateusz Naklicki <mateusz.naklicki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>


# 4a349c86 14-Nov-2023 Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

drm/xe/uapi: Differentiate WAIT_OP from WAIT_MASK

On one hand the WAIT_OP represents the operation use for waiting such
as ==, !=, > and so on. On the other hand, the mask is applied to the
value used for comparision. Split those two to bring clarity to the uapi.

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>


# 3ac4a789 14-Nov-2023 Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>

drm/xe/uapi: Add _FLAG to uAPI constants usable for flags

Most constants defined in xe_drm.h which can be used for flags are
named DRM_XE_*_FLAG_*, which is helpful to identify them. Make this
systematic and add _FLAG where it was missing.

Signed-off-by: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>


# b21ae51d 14-Sep-2023 Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>

drm/xe/uapi: Kill DRM_XE_UFENCE_WAIT_VM_ERROR

This is not used nor does it align VM async document, kill this.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>


# e2e2d963 21-Sep-2023 Fei Yang <fei.yang@intel.com>

drm/xe: timeout needs to be a signed value

In xe_wait_user_fence_ioctl, the timeout is currently defined as
unsigned long. That could potentially pass a negative value to
the schedule_timeout() call because nsecs_to_jiffies() returns an
unsigned long which gets used as signed long.

[ 187.732238] schedule_timeout: wrong timeout value fffffffffffffc18
[ 187.733180] CPU: 0 PID: 792 Comm: test_thread_dim Tainted: G U 6.4.0-xe #1
[ 187.734251] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2007
[ 187.735019] Call Trace:
[ 187.735373] <TASK>
[ 187.735687] dump_stack_lvl+0x92/0xb0
[ 187.736193] schedule_timeout+0x348/0x430
[ 187.736739] ? __might_fault+0x67/0xd0
[ 187.737255] ? check_chain_key+0x224/0x2d0
[ 187.737812] ? __pfx_schedule_timeout+0x10/0x10
[ 187.738429] ? __might_fault+0x6b/0xd0
[ 187.738946] ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10
[ 187.739512] ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10
[ 187.740080] wait_woken+0x86/0x100
[ 187.740556] xe_wait_user_fence_ioctl+0x34b/0xe00 [xe]
[ 187.741281] ? __pfx_xe_wait_user_fence_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [xe]
[ 187.742075] ? lock_acquire+0x169/0x3d0
[ 187.742601] ? check_chain_key+0x224/0x2d0
[ 187.743158] ? drm_dev_enter+0x9/0xe0 [drm]
[ 187.743740] ? __pfx_woken_wake_function+0x10/0x10
[ 187.744388] ? drm_dev_exit+0x11/0x50 [drm]
[ 187.744969] ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10
[ 187.745536] ? __might_fault+0x67/0xd0
[ 187.746052] ? check_chain_key+0x224/0x2d0
[ 187.746610] drm_ioctl_kernel+0x172/0x250 [drm]
[ 187.747242] ? __pfx_xe_wait_user_fence_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [xe]
[ 187.748037] ? __pfx_drm_ioctl_kernel+0x10/0x10 [drm]
[ 187.748729] ? __pfx_xe_wait_user_fence_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [xe]
[ 187.749524] ? __pfx_xe_wait_user_fence_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [xe]
[ 187.750319] drm_ioctl+0x35e/0x620 [drm]
[ 187.750871] ? __pfx_drm_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [drm]
[ 187.751495] ? restore_fpregs_from_fpstate+0x99/0x140
[ 187.752172] ? __pfx_restore_fpregs_from_fpstate+0x10/0x10
[ 187.752901] ? mark_held_locks+0x24/0x90
[ 187.753438] __x64_sys_ioctl+0xb4/0xf0
[ 187.753954] do_syscall_64+0x3f/0x90
[ 187.754450] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
[ 187.755127] RIP: 0033:0x7f4e6651aaff
[ 187.755623] Code: 00 48 89 44 24 18 31 c0 48 8d 44 24 60 c7 04 24 10 00 00 00 48 89 44 24 08 48 8d 44 24 20 48 89 44 24 10 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <41> 89 c0 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 1f 48 8b 44 24 18 64 48 2b 04 25 28 00
[ 187.757995] RSP: 002b:00007fff05f37a50 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
[ 187.758995] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055eca47c8130 RCX: 00007f4e6651aaff
[ 187.759935] RDX: 00007fff05f37b60 RSI: 00000000c050644b RDI: 0000000000000004
[ 187.760874] RBP: 0000000000000017 R08: 0000000000000017 R09: 7fffffffffffffff
[ 187.761814] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
[ 187.762753] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007f4e65d19ce0
[ 187.763694] </TASK>

Fixes: 5572a0046857 ("drm/xe: Use nanoseconds instead of jiffies in uapi for user fence")
Signed-off-by: Fei Yang <fei.yang@intel.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Zbigniew Kempczyński <zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230921220500.994558-2-fei.yang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>


# 99fea682 27-Jul-2023 Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>

drm/xe: Prefer WARN() over BUG() to avoid crashing the kernel

Replace calls to XE_BUG_ON() with calls XE_WARN_ON() which in turn calls
WARN() instead of BUG(). BUG() crashes the kernel and should only be
used when it is absolutely unavoidable in case of catastrophic and
unrecoverable failures, which is not the case here.

Signed-off-by: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>


# b8c1ba83 17-Jul-2023 Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>

drm/xe: Prevent flooding the kernel log with XE_IOCTL_ERR

Lower log level of XE_IOCTL_ERR macro to debug in order to prevent flooding
kernel log.

v2: Rename XE_IOCTL_ERR to XE_IOCTL_DBG (Rodrigo Vivi)
v3: Rebase
v4: Fix style, remove unrelated change about __FILE__ and __LINE__

Link: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-xe/2023-May/004704.html
Signed-off-by: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>


# 5572a004 27-Jun-2023 Zbigniew Kempczyński <zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com>

drm/xe: Use nanoseconds instead of jiffies in uapi for user fence

Using jiffies as a timeout from userspace is weird even if
theoretically exists possiblity of acquiring jiffies via getconf.
Unfortunately this method is unreliable and the returned
value may vary from the one configured in the kernel config.

Now timeout is expressed in nanoseconds and its interpretation depends
on setting DRM_XE_UFENCE_WAIT_ABSTIME flag. Relative timeout (flag
is not set) means fence expire at now() + timeout. Absolute timeout
(flag is set) means that the fence expires at exact point of time.
Passing negative timeout means we will wait "forever" by setting
wait time to MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT.

Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230628055141.398036-2-zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Zbigniew Kempczyński <zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>


# 2e60442a 26-Jun-2023 Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>

drm/xe: properly check bounds for xe_wait_user_fence_ioctl()

If !no_engines, then we use copy_from_user to copy to the 'eci' array,
which has XE_HW_ENGINE_MAX_INSTANCE members. The amount of members
copied is given by the user in args->num_engines, so add code to check
that args->num_engines does not exceed XE_HW_ENGINE_MAX_INSTANCE. It's
an unsigned value so there's no need to check for negative values.

Fixes error messages such as:

Buffer overflow detected (54 < 18446744073709551520)!

Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230626212221.136640-2-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>


# ee6ad137 13-Jun-2023 Janga Rahul Kumar <janga.rahul.kumar@intel.com>

drm/Xe: Use EOPNOTSUPP instead of ENOTSUPP

ENOTSUPP is not a standard Unix error should use
EOPNOTSUPP instead.

v2: Update commit description (Aravind)

Reviewed-by: Aravind Iddamsetty <aravind.iddamsetty@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Janga Rahul Kumar <janga.rahul.kumar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>


# 1799c761 24-May-2023 Christopher Snowhill <kode54@gmail.com>

drm/xe: Validate uAPI padding and reserved fields

Padding and reserved fields are declared such that they must be
zeroed, so verify that they're all zero in the respective ioctl
functions.

Derived from original patch by mlankhorst.

v2:
Removed extensions checks where there were none originally. (José)
Moved extraneous parentheses to the correct places. (Lucas)

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Christopher Snowhill <kode54@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>


# cb30cfdc 21-Feb-2023 Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>

drm/xe: Add missing include xe_wait_user_fence.h

Make xe_wait_user_fence.c include xe_wait_user_fence.h so it doesn't
rely on indirect includes and also doesn't fail the build due to missing
prototype for xe_wait_user_fence_ioctl().

Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>


# 671ca05d 21-Feb-2023 Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>

drm/xe: Make local functions static

A few static functions not being declared like that break the build with
W=1, like e.g.

cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[2]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:250: drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.o] Error 1
../drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c:240:6: error: no previous prototype for ‘guc_write_params’ [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
240 | void guc_write_params(struct xe_guc *guc)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Make them static.

Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>


# dd08ebf6 30-Mar-2023 Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>

drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs

Xe, is a new driver for Intel GPUs that supports both integrated and
discrete platforms starting with Tiger Lake (first Intel Xe Architecture).

The code is at a stage where it is already functional and has experimental
support for multiple platforms starting from Tiger Lake, with initial
support implemented in Mesa (for Iris and Anv, our OpenGL and Vulkan
drivers), as well as in NEO (for OpenCL and Level0).

The new Xe driver leverages a lot from i915.

As for display, the intent is to share the display code with the i915
driver so that there is maximum reuse there. But it is not added
in this patch.

This initial work is a collaboration of many people and unfortunately
the big squashed patch won't fully honor the proper credits. But let's
get some git quick stats so we can at least try to preserve some of the
credits:

Co-developed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Philippe Lecluse <philippe.lecluse@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Co-developed-by: Faith Ekstrand <faith.ekstrand@collabora.com>
Co-developed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Co-developed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>