History log of /linux-master/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-sofef00.c
Revision Date Author Comments
# f8c37b88 04-Aug-2023 Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>

drm/panel: Don't store+check prepared/enabled for simple cases

As talked about in commit d2aacaf07395 ("drm/panel: Check for already
prepared/enabled in drm_panel"), we want to remove needless code from
panel drivers that was storing and double-checking the
prepared/enabled state. Even if someone was relying on the
double-check before, that double-check is now in the core and not
needed in individual drivers.

This pile of panel drivers appears to be simple to handle. Based on
code inspection they seemed to be using the prepared/enabled state
simply for double-checking that nothing else in the kernel called them
inconsistently. Now that the core drm_panel is doing the double
checking (and warning) it should be very clear that these devices
don't need their own double-check.

Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230804140605.RFC.1.Ia54954fd2f7645c1b86597494902973f57feeb71@changeid


# 722d4f06 14-Jul-2023 Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

drm: Explicitly include correct DT includes

The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate
of_platform_bus_type before it as merged into the regular platform bus.
As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they
"temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h
and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include
files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and
replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to
explicitly include the correct includes.

Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Acked-by: Robert Foss <rfoss@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230714174545.4056287-1-robh@kernel.org


# fd40749a 16-Jan-2023 Richard Acayan <mailingradian@gmail.com>

drm/panel: sofef00: Use 16-bit brightness function

These panels communicate brightness in big endian. This is not a quirk
of the panels themselves, but rather, a part of the MIPI standard. Use
the new mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_brightness_large() function that
properly handles 16-bit brightness instead of doing special processing
of the brightness values.

Signed-off-by: Richard Acayan <mailingradian@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Caleb Connolly <caleb@connolly.tech>
Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230116224909.23884-3-mailingradian@gmail.com


# 5040d554 07-Jan-2023 Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>

drm/panel-samsung-sofef00: Drop custom DSI write macro

There is a macro for this already in the <drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h> header, use
that instead and delete the custom DSI write macro defined in the driver.

Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230107191822.3787147-10-javierm@redhat.com


# 79abca2b 08-Jul-2022 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

drm/mipi-dsi: Make remove callback return void

All implementations return 0 and the return value of mipi_dsi_drv_remove()
is ignored anyhow.

So change the prototype of the remove function to return no value. This
way driver authors are not tempted to assume that passing an error to
the upper layer is a good idea. All drivers are adapted accordingly.
There is no intended change of behaviour.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220708094922.1408248-4-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de


# d60b93917 16-Sep-2021 Cai Huoqing <caihuoqing@baidu.com>

drm/panel: sofef00: Make use of the helper function dev_err_probe()

When possible use dev_err_probe help to properly deal with the
PROBE_DEFER error, the benefit is that DEFER issue will be logged
in the devices_deferred debugfs file.
And using dev_err_probe() can reduce code size, the error value
gets printed.

Signed-off-by: Cai Huoqing <caihuoqing@baidu.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210916104635.11675-1-caihuoqing@baidu.com


# 9bf7123b 23-Sep-2021 Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>

drm/panel: Delete panel on mipi_dsi_attach() failure

Many DSI panel drivers fail to clean up their panel references on
mipi_dsi_attach() failure, so we're leaving a dangling drm_panel
reference to freed memory. Clean that up on failure.

Noticed by inspection, after seeing similar problems on other drivers.
Therefore, I'm not marking Fixes/stable.

Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210923173336.3.If9e74fa9b1d6eaa9e0e5b95b2b957b992740251c@changeid


# 5933baa3 12-Nov-2020 Caleb Connolly <caleb@connolly.tech>

drm/panel/samsung-sofef00: Add panel for OnePlus 6/T devices

The OnePlus 6/T devices use different panels however they are
functionally identical with the only differences being the resolution.
The panels also don't seem to be used by any other devices, just combine
them into one driver.

The panels are: samsung,sofef00
and samsung,s6e3fc2x01

Signed-off-by: Caleb Connolly <caleb@connolly.tech>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
[fixed checkpatch warnings]
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201112161920.2671430-2-caleb@connolly.tech