drm/nouveau/gpio/tu102-: prepare for GSP-RM

- disable GPIO completely when GSP-RM detected

Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230918202149.4343-13-skeggsb@gmail.com

drm/nouveau/gpio: switch to instanced constructor

Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>

drm/nouveau: mark symbols static where possible

We get a few warnings when building kernel with W=1:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/fan.c:29:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvbios_fan_table' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/fan.c:56:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvbios_fan_entry' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gt215.c:184:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'gt215_clk_info' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgt215.c:99:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'gt215_link_train_calc' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgt215.c:153:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'gt215_link_train' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgt215.c:271:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'gt215_link_train_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
....

In fact, both functions are only used in the file in which they are
declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static.
So this patch marks these functions with 'static'.

Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

drm/nouveau/gpio: convert to new-style nvkm_subdev

Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

drm/nouveau/gpio: switch to device pri macros

Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

drm/nouveau/gpio: namespace + nvidia gpu names (no binary change)

The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_,
which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being
done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a
given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the
DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt).

Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is
as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset
naming to ease collaboration with them.

A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes.

Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>