#
8c949515 |
|
08-Nov-2022 |
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> |
drm/i915: use i915_sg_dma_sizes() for all backends We rely on page_sizes.sg in setup_scratch_page() reporting the correct value if the underlying sgl is not contiguous, however in get_pages_internal() we are only looking at the layout of the created pages when calculating the sg_page_sizes, and not the final sgl, which could in theory be completely different. In such a situation we might incorrectly think we have a 64K scratch page, when it is actually only 4K or similar split over multiple non-contiguous entries, which could lead to broken behaviour when touching the scratch space within the padding of a 64K GTT page-table. For most of the other backends we already just call i915_sg_dma_sizes() on the final mapping, so rather just move that into __i915_gem_object_set_pages() to avoid such issues coming back to bite us later. v2: Update missing conversion in gvt Suggested-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com> Cc: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221108103238.165447-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
|
#
bc99f120 |
|
11-Jul-2022 |
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> |
drm/i915/ttm: fix sg_table construction If we encounter some monster sized local-memory page that exceeds the maximum sg length (UINT32_MAX), ensure that don't end up with some misaligned address in the entry that follows, leading to fireworks later. Also ensure we have some coverage of this in the selftests. v2(Chris): - Use round_down consistently to avoid udiv errors v3(Nirmoy): - Also update the max_segment in the selftest Fixes: f701b16d4cc5 ("drm/i915/ttm: add i915_sg_from_buddy_resource") Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/6379 Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Cc: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220711085859.24198-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
|
#
aff1e0b0 |
|
11-Jul-2022 |
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> |
drm/i915/ttm: fix sg_table construction If we encounter some monster sized local-memory page that exceeds the maximum sg length (UINT32_MAX), ensure that don't end up with some misaligned address in the entry that follows, leading to fireworks later. Also ensure we have some coverage of this in the selftests. v2(Chris): - Use round_down consistently to avoid udiv errors v3(Nirmoy): - Also update the max_segment in the selftest Fixes: f701b16d4cc5 ("drm/i915/ttm: add i915_sg_from_buddy_resource") Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/6379 Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Cc: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220711085859.24198-1-matthew.auld@intel.com (cherry picked from commit bc99f1209f19fefa3ee11e77464ccfae541f4291) Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
#
ecbf2060 |
|
15-Mar-2022 |
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> |
drm/i915/ttm: wire up the object offset For the ttm backend we can use existing placements fpfn and lpfn to force the allocator to place the object at the requested offset, potentially evicting stuff if the spot is currently occupied. Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220315181425.576828-5-matthew.auld@intel.com
|
#
9b78b5da |
|
15-Mar-2022 |
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> |
drm/i915: add i915_gem_object_create_region_at() Add a generic interface for allocating an object at some specific offset, and convert stolen over. Later we will want to hook this up to different backends. Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220315181425.576828-4-matthew.auld@intel.com
|
#
30b9d1b3 |
|
25-Feb-2022 |
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> |
drm/i915: add I915_BO_ALLOC_GPU_ONLY If the user doesn't require CPU access for the buffer, then ALLOC_GPU_ONLY should be used, in order to prioritise allocating in the non-mappable portion of LMEM, on devices with small BAR. v2(Thomas): - The BO_ALLOC_TOPDOWN naming here is poor, since this is pure lies on systems that don't even have small BAR. A better name is GPU_ONLY, which is accurate regardless of the configuration. Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220225145502.331818-3-matthew.auld@intel.com
|
#
235582ca |
|
25-Feb-2022 |
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> |
drm/i915: add io_size plumbing With small LMEM-BAR we need to be able to differentiate between the total size of LMEM, and how much of it is CPU mappable. The end goal is to be able to utilize the entire range, even if part of is it not CPU accessible. v2: also update intelfb_create Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220225145502.331818-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
|
#
8b1f7f92 |
|
22-Nov-2021 |
Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> |
drm/i915/ttm: Drop region reference counting There is an interesting refcounting loop: struct intel_memory_region has a struct ttm_resource_manager, ttm_resource_manager->move may hold a reference to i915_request, i915_request may hold a reference to intel_context, intel_context may hold a reference to drm_i915_gem_object, drm_i915_gem_object may hold a reference to intel_memory_region. Break this loop by dropping region reference counting. In addition, Have regions with a manager moving fence make sure that all region objects are released before freeing the region. v6: - Fix a code comment. Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211122214554.371864-4-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
|
#
cad7109a |
|
01-Nov-2021 |
Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> |
drm/i915: Introduce refcounted sg-tables As we start to introduce asynchronous failsafe object migration, where we update the object state and then submit asynchronous commands we need to record what memory resources are actually used by various part of the command stream. Initially for three purposes: 1) Error capture. 2) Asynchronous migration error recovery. 3) Asynchronous vma bind. At the time where these happens, the object state may have been updated to be several migrations ahead and object sg-tables discarded. In order to make it possible to keep sg-tables with memory resource information for these operations, introduce refcounted sg-tables that aren't freed until the last user is done with them. The alternative would be to reference information sitting on the corresponding ttm_resources which typically have the same lifetime as these refcountes sg_tables, but that leads to other awkward constructs: Due to the design direction chosen for ttm resource managers that would lead to diamond-style inheritance, the LMEM resources may sometimes be prematurely freed, and finally the subclassed struct ttm_resource would have to bleed into the asynchronous vma bind code. v3: - Address a number of style issues (Matthew Auld) v4: - Dont check for st->sgl being NULL in i915_ttm_tt__shmem_unpopulate(), that should never happen. (Matthew Auld) v5: - Fix a Potential double-free (Matthew Auld) Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211101122444.114607-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
|
#
c654dc37 |
|
19-Oct-2021 |
Ran Jianping <ran.jianping@zte.com.cn> |
drm/i915/selftests: remove duplicate include in mock_region.c 'drm/ttm/ttm_placement.h' included in 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_region.c' is duplicated. It is also included on the 9 line. Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Ran Jianping <ran.jianping@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211019090205.1003458-1-ran.jianping@zte.com.cn
|
#
d22632c8 |
|
25-Jun-2021 |
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> |
drm/i915: support forcing the page size with lmem For some specialised objects we might need something larger than the regions min_page_size due to some hw restriction, and slightly more hairy is needing something smaller with the guarantee that such objects will never be inserted into any GTT, which is the case for the paging structures. This also fixes how we setup the BO page_alignment, if we later migrate the object somewhere else. For example if the placements are {SMEM, LMEM}, then we might get this wrong. Pushing the min_page_size behaviour into the manager should fix this. v2(Thomas): push the default page size behaviour into buddy_man, and let the user override it with the page-alignment, which looks cleaner v3: rebase on ttm sys changes Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210625103824.558481-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
|
#
13c2ceb6 |
|
16-Jun-2021 |
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> |
drm/i915/ttm: restore min_page_size behaviour We now have bo->page_alignment which perfectly describes what we need if we have min page size restrictions for lmem. We can also drop the flag here, since this is the default behaviour for all objects. v2(Thomas): - bo->page_alignment is in page units Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210616152501.394518-7-matthew.auld@intel.com
|
#
d53ec322 |
|
16-Jun-2021 |
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> |
drm/i915/ttm: switch over to ttm_buddy_man Move back to the buddy allocator for managing device local memory, and restore the lost mock selftests. Keep around the range manager related bits, since we likely need this for managing stolen at some point. For stolen we also don't need to reserve anything so no need to support a generic reserve interface. v2(Thomas): - bo->page_alignment is in page units, not bytes Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210616152501.394518-6-matthew.auld@intel.com
|
#
687c7d0f |
|
16-Jun-2021 |
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> |
drm/i915/ttm: remove node usage in our naming Now that ttm_resource_manager just returns a generic ttm_resource we don't need to reference the mm_node stuff anymore which mostly only makes sense for drm_mm_node. In the next few patches we want switch over to the ttm_buddy_man which is just another type of ttm_resource so reflect that in the naming. Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210616152501.394518-5-matthew.auld@intel.com
|
#
d1487389 |
|
02-Jun-2021 |
Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> |
drm/i915/ttm Initialize the ttm device and memory managers Temporarily remove the buddy allocator and related selftests and hook up the TTM range manager for i915 regions. Also modify the mock region selftests somewhat to account for a fragmenting manager. Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210602083818.241793-2-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
|
#
c471748d |
|
23-Mar-2021 |
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> |
drm/i915: Move HAS_STRUCT_PAGE to obj->flags We want to remove the changing of ops structure for attaching phys pages, so we need to kill off HAS_STRUCT_PAGE from ops->flags, and put it in the bo. This will remove a potential race of dereferencing the wrong obj->ops without ww mutex held. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> [danvet: apply with wiggle] Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210323155059.628690-8-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
|
#
97d55396 |
|
14-Jan-2021 |
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> |
drm/i915/region: convert object_create into object_init Give more flexibility to the caller, if they already have an allocated object, in case they wish to apply some transformation to the object prior to handing it over to the region specific initialisation step, like in gem_create_ext where we would like to first apply the extensions to the object. Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210114182402.840247-3-matthew.auld@intel.com
|
#
09a729b1 |
|
21-Oct-2020 |
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> |
drm/i915/region: fix max size calculation We are incorrectly limiting the max allocation size as per the mm max_order, which is effectively the largest power-of-two that we can fit in the region size. However, it's normal to setup the region or allocator with a non-power-of-two size(for example 3G), which we should already handle correctly, except it seems for the early too-big-check. v2: make sure we also exercise the I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS path, which is quite different, since for that we are actually limited by the largest power-of-two that we can fit within the region size. (Chris) Fixes: b908be543e44 ("drm/i915: support creating LMEM objects") Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201021103606.241395-1-matthew.auld@intel.com (cherry picked from commit 83ebef47f8ebe320d5c5673db82f9903a4f40a69) Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
#
83ebef47 |
|
21-Oct-2020 |
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> |
drm/i915/region: fix max size calculation We are incorrectly limiting the max allocation size as per the mm max_order, which is effectively the largest power-of-two that we can fit in the region size. However, it's normal to setup the region or allocator with a non-power-of-two size(for example 3G), which we should already handle correctly, except it seems for the early too-big-check. v2: make sure we also exercise the I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS path, which is quite different, since for that we are actually limited by the largest power-of-two that we can fit within the region size. (Chris) Fixes: b908be543e44 ("drm/i915: support creating LMEM objects") Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201021103606.241395-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
|
#
7d192daa |
|
29-May-2020 |
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> |
drm/i915/gem: Give each object class a friendly name Name the object classes and their offspring for easier lockdep debugging. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200529183204.16850-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
#
7867d709 |
|
22-Oct-2019 |
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> |
drm/i915/gem: Distinguish each object type Separate each object class into a separate lock type to avoid lockdep cross-contamination between paths (i.e. userptr!). Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191022144501.26486-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
#
2f0b97ca |
|
08-Oct-2019 |
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> |
drm/i915/region: support contiguous allocations Some kernel internal objects may need to be allocated as a contiguous block, also thinking ahead the various kernel io_mapping interfaces seem to expect it, although this is purely a limitation in the kernel API...so perhaps something to be improved. Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michael J Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191008160116.18379-3-matthew.auld@intel.com
|
#
232a6eba |
|
08-Oct-2019 |
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> |
drm/i915: introduce intel_memory_region Support memory regions, as defined by a given (start, end), and allow creating GEM objects which are backed by said region. The immediate goal here is to have something to represent our device memory, but later on we also want to represent every memory domain with a region, so stolen, shmem, and of course device. At some point we are probably going to want use a common struct here, such that we are better aligned with say TTM. Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191008160116.18379-2-matthew.auld@intel.com
|