drm/i915/huc: Allow for very slow HuC loading

A failure to load the HuC is occasionally observed where the cause is
believed to be a low GT frequency leading to very long load times.

So a) increase the timeout so that the user still gets a working
system even in the case of slow load. And b) report the frequency
during the load to see if that is the cause of the slow down.

Also update the similar code on the GuC load to not use uncore->gt
when there is a local gt available. The two should match, but no need
for unnecessary de-referencing.

Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240102222202.310495-1-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com

drm/i915/guc: Dump perf_limit_reasons for debug

GuC load takes longer sometimes due to GT frequency not ramping up.
Add perf_limit_reasons to the existing warn print to see if frequency
is being throttled.

v2: Review comments (Ashutosh)

Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230627191336.319381-1-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com

drm/i915/guc: Print status register when waiting for GuC to load

If the GuC load is taking an excessively long time, the wait loop
currently prints the GT frequency. Extend that to include the GuC
status as well so we can see if the GuC is actually making progress or
not.

Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230502234007.1762014-3-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com

drm/i915/guc: Decode another GuC load failure case

Explain another potential firmware failure mode and early exit the
long wait if hit.

Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230502234007.1762014-2-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com

drm/i915/guc: Allow for very slow GuC loading

A failure to load the GuC is occasionally observed where the GuC log
actually showed that the GuC had loaded just fine. The implication
being that the load just took ever so slightly longer than the 200ms
timeout. Given that the actual time should be tens of milliseconds at
the slowest, this should never happen. So far the issue has generally
been caused by a bad IFWI resulting in low frequencies during boot
(depsite the KMD requesting max frequency). However, the issue seems
to happen more often than one would like.

So a) increase the timeout so that the user still gets a working
system even in the case of slow load. And b) report the frequency
during the load to see if that is the case of the slow down.

v2: Reduce timeout in non-debug builds, add references (Daniele)

References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/7931
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8060
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8083
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8136
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8137
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Tested-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230316220632.3312218-3-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com

drm/i915/guc: Improve GuC load error reporting

There are multiple ways in which the GuC load can fail. The driver was
reporting the status register as is, but not everyone can read the
matrix unfiltered. So add decoding of the common error cases.

Also, remove the comment about interrupt based load completion
checking being not recommended. The interrupt was removed from the GuC
firmware some time ago so it is no longer an option anyway. While at
it, also abort the timeout if a known error code is reported. No need
to keep waiting if the GuC has already given up the load.

v2: Fix mis-matched case and confusing 'success' variable (Daniele).

Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230316220632.3312218-2-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com

drm/i915: Fix GEN8_MISCCPCTL

Register 0x9424 is not replicated on any platform, so it shouldn't be
declared with REG_MCR(). Declaring it with _MMIO() is basically
duplicate of the GEN7 version, so just remove the GEN8 and change all
the callers to use the right functions.

Old versions of the gen8 bspec page used to contain a table with MCR
registers, apparently implying 0x9400 - 0x94ff registers were
replicated. However that table went away and there is no information
related to the ranges for gen8 anymore. Moreover the current behavior of
the driver wouldn't do anything special for 0x9424 since there is no
equivalent table in intel_gt_mcr.c: the driver would just fallback to
intel_uncore_{read,write}(). Therefore, do not care about the possible
special case for gen8 and just use the register as non-MCR for all the
platforms.

One place doing read + write is also converted to intel_uncore_rmw().

v2: Reword commit message adding the justification wrt gen8

Fixes: a9e69428b1b4 ("drm/i915: Define MCR registers explicitly")
Cc: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230206165410.3056073-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com

drm/i915: Fix GEN8_MISCCPCTL

Register 0x9424 is not replicated on any platform, so it shouldn't be
declared with REG_MCR(). Declaring it with _MMIO() is basically
duplicate of the GEN7 version, so just remove the GEN8 and change all
the callers to use the right functions.

Old versions of the gen8 bspec page used to contain a table with MCR
registers, apparently implying 0x9400 - 0x94ff registers were
replicated. However that table went away and there is no information
related to the ranges for gen8 anymore. Moreover the current behavior of
the driver wouldn't do anything special for 0x9424 since there is no
equivalent table in intel_gt_mcr.c: the driver would just fallback to
intel_uncore_{read,write}(). Therefore, do not care about the possible
special case for gen8 and just use the register as non-MCR for all the
platforms.

One place doing read + write is also converted to intel_uncore_rmw().

v2: Reword commit message adding the justification wrt gen8

Fixes: a9e69428b1b4 ("drm/i915: Define MCR registers explicitly")
Cc: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230206165410.3056073-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 869bace73ae2b4227e57ee3fd994bfa7d4808938)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

drm/i915/guc: Update GuC messages in intel_guc_fw.c

Use new macros to have common prefix that also include GT#.

Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230128195907.1837-6-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

drm/i915/gt: Always use MCR functions on multicast registers

Rather than relying on the implicit behavior of intel_uncore_*()
functions, let's always use the intel_gt_mcr_*() functions to operate on
multicast/replicated registers.

v2:
- Add TLB invalidation registers

v3:
- Switch more uncore operations in mmio_invalidate_full() to MCR
operations for Xe_HP. (Bala)

Cc: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221014230239.1023689-10-matthew.d.roper@intel.com

drm/i915/gen8: Create separate reg definitions for new MCR registers

Gen8 was the first time our hardware had multicast registers (or at
least the first time the multicast nature was exposed and MMIO accesses
could be steered). There are some registers that transitioned from
singleton behavior to multicast during the gen7 -> gen8 transition;
let's duplicate the register definitions for those registers in
preparation for upcoming patches that will handle MCR registers in a
special manner.

The registers adjusted are:
* MISCCPCTL
* SAMPLER_INSTDONE
* ROW_INSTDONE
* ROW_CHICKEN2
* HALF_SLICE_CHICKEN1
* HALF_SLICE_CHICKEN3

v2:
- Use the gen8 version of HALF_SLICE_CHICKEN3 in GVT's gen9 engine MMIO
list. (Bala)
- Update to the gen8 version of MISCCPCTL in a couple new workarounds
that were recently added for DG2/PVC. (Bala)

Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221014230239.1023689-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com

drm/i915: Move GT registers to their own header file

This is a huge, chaotic mass of registers copied over as-is without any
real cleanup. We'll come back and organize these better, align on
consistent coding style, remove dead code, etc. in separate patches
later that will be easier to review.

v2:
- Add missing include in intel_pxp_irq.c
v3:
- Correct a few indentation errors (Lucas)
- Minor conflict resolution

Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220127234334.4016964-6-matthew.d.roper@intel.com

drm/i915/guc: Update guc shim control programming on newer platforms

Starting from xehpsdv, bit 0 of the GuC shim control register has
been repurposed, while bit 2 is now reserved, so we need to avoid
setting those for their old meaning on newer platforms.

Cc: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
Cc: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220120222436.3449778-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

drm/i915/guc: Improve GuC loading status check/error reports

If the GuC fails to load, it is useful to know what firmware file /
version was attempted. So move the version info report to before the
load attempt rather than only after a successful load.

If the GuC does fail to load, then make the error messages visible
rather than being 'debug' prints that do not appears in dmesg output
by default.

When waiting for the GuC to load, it used to be necessary to check for
two different states - READY and (LAPIC_DONE | MIA_CORE). Apparently
the second signified init complete on RC6 exit. However, in more
recent GuC versions the RC6 exit sequence now finishes with status
READY as well. So the test can be simplified.

Also, add an enum giving all the current status codes that GuC loading
can report as a reference without having to pull and search through
the GuC source files.

Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220107000622.292081-4-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com

drm/i915/guc: Temporarily bump the GuC load timeout

There is a known (but exceedingly unlikely) race condition where the
asynchronous frequency management code could reduce the GT clock while
a GuC reload is in progress (during a full GT reset). A fix is in
progress but there are complex locking issues to be resolved. In the
meantime bump the timeout to 200ms. Even at slowest clock, this
should be sufficient. And in the working case, a larger timeout makes
no difference.

Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220107000622.292081-2-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com

drm/i915/guc: support bigger RSA keys

Some of the newer HW will use bigger RSA keys to authenticate the GuC
binary. On those platforms the HW will read the key from memory instead
of the RSA registers, so we need to copy it in a dedicated vma, like we
do for the HuC. The address of the key is provided to the HW via the
first RSA register.

v2: clarify that the RSA behavior is hardcoded in the bootrom (Matt)

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211211000756.1698923-4-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

drm/i915/uc: correctly track uc_fw init failure

The FAILURE state of uc_fw currently implies that the fw is loadable
(i.e init completed), so we can't use it for init failures and instead
need a dedicated error code.

Note that this currently does not cause any issues because if we fail to
init any of the firmwares we abort the load, but better be accurate
anyway in case things change in the future.

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211211000756.1698923-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

drm/i915/guc: put all guc objects in lmem when available

The firmware binary has to be loaded from lmem and the recommendation is
to put all other objects in there as well. Note that we don't fall back
to system memory if the allocation in lmem fails because all objects are
allocated during driver load and if we have issues with lmem at that point
something is seriously wrong with the system, so no point in trying to
handle it.

Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
Cc: Radoslaw Szwichtenberg <radoslaw.szwichtenberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210916162819.27848-3-matthew.brost@intel.com

drm/i915/gt: replace IS_GEN and friends with GRAPHICS_VER

This was done by the following semantic patch:

@@ expression i915; @@
- INTEL_GEN(i915)
+ GRAPHICS_VER(i915)

@@ expression i915; expression E; @@
- INTEL_GEN(i915) >= E
+ GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= E

@@ expression dev_priv; expression E; @@
- !IS_GEN(dev_priv, E)
+ GRAPHICS_VER(dev_priv) != E

@@ expression dev_priv; expression E; @@
- IS_GEN(dev_priv, E)
+ GRAPHICS_VER(dev_priv) == E

@@
expression dev_priv;
expression from, until;
@@
- IS_GEN_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until)
+ IS_GRAPHICS_VER(dev_priv, from, until)

@def@
expression E;
identifier id =~ "^gen$";
@@
- id = GRAPHICS_VER(E)
+ ver = GRAPHICS_VER(E)

@@
identifier def.id;
@@
- id
+ ver

It also takes care of renaming the variable we assign to GRAPHICS_VER()
so to use "ver" rather than "gen".

Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210605155356.4183026-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com

drm/i915/uc: Squelch load failure error message

The caller determines if the failure is an error or not, so avoid
warning when we will try again and succeed. For example,

<7> [111.319321] [drm:intel_guc_fw_upload [i915]] GuC status 0x20
<3> [111.319340] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* GuC load failed: status = 0x00000020
<3> [111.319606] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* GuC load failed: status: Reset = 0, BootROM = 0x10, UKernel = 0x00, MIA = 0x00, Auth = 0x00
<7> [111.320045] [drm:__uc_init_hw [i915]] GuC fw load failed: -110; will reset and retry 2 more time(s)
<7> [111.322978] [drm:intel_guc_fw_upload [i915]] GuC status 0x8002f0ec

should not have been reported as a _test_ failure, as the GuC was
successfully loaded on the second attempt and the system remained
operational.

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2797
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201214100949.11387-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

drm/i915/guc: Improved reporting when GuC fails to load

Rather than just saying 'GuC failed to load: -110', actually print out
the GuC status register and break it down into the individual fields.

Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201028145826.2949180-3-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com

drm/i915/huc: make "support huc" reflect HW capabilities

We currently initialize HuC support based on GuC being enabled in
modparam; this means that huc_is_supported() can return false on HW that
does have a HuC when enable_guc=0. The rationale for this behavior is
that HuC requires GuC for authentication and therefore is not supported
by itself. However, we do not allow defining HuC fw wthout GuC fw and
selecting HuC in modparam implicitly selects GuC as well, so we can't
actually hit a scenario where HuC is selected alone. Therefore, we can
flip the support check to reflect the HW capabilities and fw
availability, which is more intuitive and will make it cleaner to log
HuC the difference between not supported in HW and not selected.

Removing the difference between GuC and HuC also allows us to simplify
the init_early, since we don't need to differentiate the support based
on the type of uC.

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200326181121.16869-4-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

drm/i915/uc: Drop explicit gt param in some uc_fw functions

There is no need to pass explicit gt since we already have
a trick to get parent gt from uc_fw, we only need to use it.

Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191211124549.59516-3-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

drm/i915/uc: Log fw status changes only under debug config

We don't care about internal firmware status changes unless
we are doing some real debugging. Note that our CI is not
using DRM_I915_DEBUG_GUC config by default so use it.

v2: protect against accidental overwrites (Chris)

Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190813081559.23936-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

drm/i915/uc: Update copyright and license

Include 2019 in copyright years and start using SPDX tag.

Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190812092935.21048-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

drm/i915/uc: HuC firmware can't be supported without GuC

There is no point in selecting HuC firmware if GuC is unsupported
or it was already disabled, as we need GuC to authenticate HuC.

While around, make uc_fw_init_early work without direct access
to whole i915, pass only needed platform/rev info.

Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190807170034.8440-3-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

drm/i915/uc: Unify uC firmware upload

The way we load the firmwares is the same for both GuC and HuC, the only
difference is in the wopcm destination address and the dma flags, so we
easily can move the logic to a common function and pass in offset and
flags. The only other difference in the uplaod path are some the extra
steps that guc does before and after the xfer, but those don't require
the guc fw to be pinned in ggtt and can safely be performed before
calling the uc_upload function.

Note that this patch re-introduces the dma xfer wait for guc loading that
was removed with "drm/i915/guc: Propagate the fw xfer timeout". This is
not going to slow us down on a successful load (the dma has to complete
before fw init can start), but could slightly increase the timeout in case
of a fw init error.

v2: use _fw variants for uncore accesses (Chris), fix guc_fw status on
failed wait.

v3: use dev_err and print DMA_CTRL (Chris)

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725001813.4740-9-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

drm/i915/uc: Plumb the gt through fw_upload

The gt is our new central structure for uc-related code, so we can use
that instead of jumping back to i915 via the fw object. Since we have it
in the upload function it is easy to pass it through the lower levels of
the xfer process instead of continuosly jumping via uc_fw->uc->gt, which
will also make things a bit cleaner for the next patch.

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725001813.4740-8-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

drm/i915/uc: Move xfer rsa logic to common function

The way we copy the RSA is the same for GuC and HuC, so we can move the
logic in a common function. this will also make any update needed for
local memory easier.

v2: return the number of copied bytes and check it (Chris)

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> #v1
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725001813.4740-6-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

drm/i915/uc: Unify uc_fw status tracking

We currently track fetch and load status separately, but the 2 are
actually sequential in the uc lifetime (fetch must complete before we
can attempt the load!). Unifying the 2 variables we can better follow
the sequential states and improve our trackng of the uC state.

Also, sprinkle some GEM_BUG_ON to make sure we transition correctly
between states.

v2: rename states, add the running state (Michal), drop some logs in
the fetch path (Michal, Chris)

v3: re-rename states, extend early status check to all helpers (Michal)

Suggested-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725001813.4740-5-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

drm/i915/uc: Unify uC FW selection

Instead of having 2 identical functions for GuC and HuC firmware
selection, we can unify the selection logic and just use different lists
based on FW type.

Note that the revid is not relevant for current blobs, but the upcoming
CML will be identified as CFL rev 5, so by considering the revid we're
ready for that.

v2: rework blob list defs (Michal), add order check (Chris), fuse GuC
and HuC lists into one.

v3: remove difference between no uC HW and no uC FW, simplify related
selection code, check the whole fw list (Michal)

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> #v2
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725001813.4740-4-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

drm/i915: Fix handling of non-supported uC

There are 2 issues around handling of missing uC support:

- We treat lack of uC HW and lack of uC FW definition as 2 different
cases, but both of them mean that we don't support the uC on the
platform we're running on.

- We rely on the modparam to decide if we can take uC paths or not, but
we don't sanitize it if it is set incorrectly on platform with no uC
support.

To fix both of them, unify the 2 cases in a single one and sanitize the
modparam on invalid configuration (after printing an error message).
The log has been adapted as well, since the user doesn't care why we
don't support GuC/HuC (no HW or no FW), just that we do not. Developers
can easily find the answer based on the platform, so we can simplify the
log.

Correcting the modparam has been preferred over failing the load since
this is what we usually do for non-supported feature (e.g. the now gone
enable_ppgtt would fall back to the highest supported PPGTT mode if the
selected one was not available).

Note that this patch purposely doesn't change the behavior for platforms
that do have uC support, in which case we will still fail if enable_guc
is set and the firmware is not available on the system.

Suggested-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725001813.4740-3-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

drm/i915/uc: Unify uC platform check

We have several HAS_* checks for GuC and HuC but we mostly use HAS_GUC
and HAS_HUC, with only 1 exception. Since our HW always has either
both uC or neither of them, just replace all the checks with a unified
HAS_UC.

v2: use HAS_GT_UC (Michal)
v3: fix comment (Michal)

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725001813.4740-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

drm/i915/uc: kill <g,h>uc_to_i915

Get rid of them to avoid more users being added while the guc code
transitions to use gt more than i915.

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190713100016.8026-11-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

drm/i915/uc: prefer intel_gt over i915 in GuC/HuC paths

With our HW interface logic moving from i915 to gt and with GuC and HuC
being part of the gt HW, it makes sense to use the intel_gt structure
instead of i915 as our reference object in GuC/HuC paths.

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190713100016.8026-9-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

drm/i915/uc: move GuC and HuC files under gt/uc/

Both microcontrollers are part of the GT HW and are closely related to
GT operations. To keep all the files cleanly together, they've been
placed in their own subdir inside the gt/ folder

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190713100016.8026-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>