drm/i915/panel: move panel fixed EDID to struct intel_panel

It's a bit confusing to have two cached EDIDs in struct intel_connector
with slightly different purposes. Make the distinction a bit clearer by
moving the EDID cached for eDP and LVDS panels at connector init time to
struct intel_panel, and name it fixed_edid. That's what it is, a fixed
EDID for the panels.

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/328350ef918638928a8286cdbab3107c8258332d.1674643465.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

drm/i915: Introduce intel_panel_init_alloc()

Introduce a place where we can initialize connector->panel
after it's been allocated. We already have a intel_panel_init()
so had to get creative with the name and came up with
intel_panel_init_alloc().

Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221125173156.31689-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com

drm/i915: Simplify intel_panel_add_edid_alt_fixed_modes()

Since commit a5810f551d0a ("drm/i915: Allow more varied alternate
fixed modes for panels") intel_panel_add_edid_alt_fixed_modes()
no longer considers vrr vs. drrs separately. So no reason to
pass them as separate parameters either.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220927180615.25476-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

drm/i915: Simplify intel_panel_add_edid_alt_fixed_modes()

Since commit a5810f551d0a ("drm/i915: Allow more varied alternate
fixed modes for panels") intel_panel_add_edid_alt_fixed_modes()
no longer considers vrr vs. drrs separately. So no reason to
pass them as separate parameters either.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220927180615.25476-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit eb89e83c152b122a94e79527d63cb7c79823c37e)
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>

drm/i915: Add intel_panel_highest_mode()

Add a function to get the fixed_mode with the highest clock.
The plan is to use this for the link bw calculation on seamless
DRRS panels so that we alwasy end up with the same link params
regardless of the requested refresh rate. This will allow fastset
to do seamless refresh rate changes based on userspace request
instead of having to go for a full modeset.

TODO: the function name isn't great

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220907091057.11572-15-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com

drm/i915: Accept more fixed modes with VRR panels

It seem that when dealing with VRR capable eDP panels we need
to accept fixed modes with variable vblank length (which is what
VRR varies dynamically). Typically the preferred mode seems to be
a non-VRR more (lowish dotclock/refresh rate + short vblank).

We also have examples where it looks like even the hblank length
is a bit different between the preferred mode vs. VRR mode(s).
So let's just accept anything that has matching hdisp+vdisp+flags.

v2: Document that is_alt_drrs_mode() is a subset of is_alt_vrr_mode() (Jani)

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/125
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220531191844.11313-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com

drm/i915: Combine the EDID fixed_mode+downclock_mode lookup into one

The intel_panel_add_edid_fixed_mode() vs.
intel_panel_add_edid_downclock_mode() split is not really
helpful. Let's just roll those into a single function so
that the connector init code doesn't have to care too much
about this. All we need to know is whether DRRS should be
allowed or not.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220331112822.11462-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

drm/i915: Put fixed modes directly onto the panel's fixed_modes list

Rather than having the connector init get the fixed mode back from
intel_panel and then feed it straight back into intel_panel_init()
let's just make the fixed mode lookup put the mode directly onto
the panel's fixed_modes list. Avoids the pointless round trip and
opens the door for further enhancements to the fixed mode handling.

v2: Make the debug message correct by using intel_panel_drrs_type() (Jani)

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220331112822.11462-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

drm/i915: Extract intel_panel_encoder_fixed_mode()

Apart from the EDID and VBT based mechanism we also sometimes
use the encoder's current mode as the panel fixed mode. We
currently have the same code for that duplicated in two places.
Let's unify.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220323182935.4701-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

drm/i915: Extract intel_panel_vbt_sdvo_fixed_mode()

We have a function for duplicating the VBT LFP mode. Add the same
for the VBT SDVO mode.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220323182935.4701-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

drm/i915: Rename intel_panel_vbt_fixed_mode()

Rename intel_panel_vbt_fixed_mode() to
intel_panel_vbt_lfp_fixed_mode() to be more descriptive.
We'll have another VBT fixed mode function soon and we
don't want to confuse the two.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220323182935.4701-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

drm/i915: Pass intel_connector to intel_panel_{init,fini}()

All the other intel_panel functions take struct intel_connector,
so might as well make init()/fini() take one as well.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220323182935.4701-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

drm/i915: Introduce intel_panel_drrs_type()

Add a helper to determine which type of DRRS the panel supports.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220311172428.14685-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

drm/i915: Introduce intel_panel_preferred_fixed_mode()

There are a couple of cases where we essentially just want to
get/check the preferred fixed mode of the panel. Add a small
helper for that to abstract away the direct pointer lookup.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220311172428.14685-9-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

drm/i915: Introduce intel_panel_get_modes()

Several connectors want to return the fixed_mode from .get_modes(),
add a helper to do that (and hide the details inside intel_panel.c).

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220311172428.14685-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

drm/i915: Introduce intel_panel_{fixed,downclock}_mode()

Abstract away the details on where we store the fixed/downclock
modes, and also how we select them. Will be useful for static
DRRS (aka. allowing the user to select the refresh rate for the
panel).

We pass in the user requested mode to intel_panel_fixed_mode()
so that in the future it may try to match the refresh rate.
And intel_panel_downclock_mode() gets passed the adjusted_mode
we actually chose to use so that it may find a suitable lower
resresh rate variant.

v2: Hook it up for all encoders
s/fixed_mode/adjusted_mode/ in intel_panel_downclock_mode() (Jani)
Elaborate on the choice or arguments for the functions (Jani)

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220311172428.14685-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

drm/i915: Introduce intel_panel_compute_config()

Let's introduce a compute_config() helper for fixed mode panels.
For now all it does is the fixed_mode->adjusted_mode copy.

Note that with sDVO we have to ask the external encoder chip
to spit out our actual display timings for us, so the fixed_mode
to adjusted_mode copy done by intel_panel_compute_config() is
redundant, but we still want to use it to do other checks for us
later. We'll be fine so long as we only call it before
intel_sdvo_get_preferred_input_mode() overwrites adjusted_mode
with the timings from the encoder.

v2: Use intel_panel_compute_config() with sDVO

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210927185207.13620-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

drm/i915: Extract intel_panel_mode_valid()

Extract intel_panel_mode_valid() from the eDP code to a generic helper.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210923200109.4459-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

drm/i915/panel: mass rename functions to have intel_panel_ prefix

Follow the usual naming conventions. Also pull HAS_GMCH() check to
intel_panel_fitting(). No functional changes.

Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/9ff6e42e377bdb0c9349f50d9ea79671059633c7.1629888677.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

drm/i915/backlight: extract backlight code to a separate file

In a long overdue refactoring, split out backlight code to new
intel_backlight.[ch]. Simple code movement, leave renames for follow-up
work. No functional changes.

Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/97d310848f03061473b9b2328e2c5c4dcf263cfa.1629888677.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

drm/i915/panel: move intel_panel_use_ssc() out of headers

There's no performance reason to have it as static inline; move it out
of intel_display_types.h to reduce clutter and dependency on i915_drv.h.

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/6f2c05005e4fa43a5572b02b3f41363725ffdb4f.1629281426.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

drm/i915/dp: Enable Intel's HDR backlight interface (only SDR for now)

So-recently a bunch of laptops on the market have started using DPCD
backlight controls instead of the traditional DDI backlight controls.
Originally we thought we had this handled by adding VESA backlight
control support to i915, but the story ended up being a lot more
complicated then that.

Simply put-there's two main backlight interfaces Intel can see in the
wild. Intel's proprietary HDR backlight interface, and the standard VESA
backlight interface. Note that many panels have been observed to report
support for both backlight interfaces, but testing has shown far more
panels work with the Intel HDR backlight interface at the moment.
Additionally, the VBT appears to be capable of reporting support for the
VESA backlight interface but not the Intel HDR interface which needs to
be probed by setting the right magic OUI.

On top of that however, there's also actually two different variants of
the Intel HDR backlight interface. The first uses the AUX channel for
controlling the brightness of the screen in both SDR and HDR mode, and
the second only uses the AUX channel for setting the brightness level in
HDR mode - relying on PWM for setting the brightness level in SDR mode.

For the time being we've been using EDIDs to maintain a list of quirks
for panels that safely do support the VESA backlight interface. Adding
support for Intel's HDR backlight interface in addition however, should
finally allow us to auto-detect eDP backlight controls properly so long
as we probe like so:

* If the panel's VBT reports VESA backlight support, assume it really
does support it
* If the panel's VBT reports DDI backlight controls:
* First probe for Intel's HDR backlight interface
* If that fails, probe for VESA's backlight interface
* If that fails, assume no DPCD backlight control
* If the panel's VBT reports any other backlight type: just assume it
doesn't have DPCD backlight controls

Changes since v4:
* Fix checkpatch issues
Changes since v3:
* Stop using drm_device and use drm_i915_private instead
* Don't forget to return from intel_dp_aux_hdr_get_backlight() if we fail
to read the current backlight mode from the DPCD
* s/uint8_t/u8/
* Remove unneeded parenthesis in intel_dp_aux_hdr_enable_backlight()
* Use drm_dbg_kms() in intel_dp_aux_init_backlight_funcs()

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: thaytan@noraisin.net
Cc: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210114221709.2261452-4-lyude@redhat.com

drm/i915: Reduce INTEL_DISPLAY_ENABLED to just treat outputs as disconnected

Since the display hardware is all there even when INTEL_DISPLAY_ENABLED
return false we have to be capable of shutting it down cleanly so
as to not anger the hw. To that end let's reduce the effect of
!INTEL_DISPLAY_ENABLE to just treating all outputs as disconnected.
Should prevent anyone from automagically enabling any of them, while
still allowing us to cleanly shut them down.

v2: Put the check into the right place for CRT

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200910164256.25983-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

drm/i915: Have pfit calculations return an error code

Change intel_{gmch,pch}_panel_fitting() to return a normal
error vs. success int. We'll need this later to validate that
the margin properties aren't misconfigured.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200422161917.17389-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>

drm/i915: Pass connector state to pfit calculations

Pass the entire connector state to intel_{gmch,pch}_panel_fitting().
For now we just need to get at .scaling_mode but in the future we'll
want access to the margin properties as well.

v2: Deal with intel_dp_ycbcr420_config()

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200422161917.17389-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>

drm/i915: s/pipe_config/crtc_state/ in pfit functions

Follow the new naming convention and call the crtc state
"crtc_state", and while at it drop the redundant crtc argument.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200422161917.17389-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>

drm/i915: Pass atomic state to encoder hooks

We're going to want access to the atomic state for iterating
the slave crtcs when enabling the port sync master crtc. Pass
the atomic state all the way down.

The alternative would be yet another encoder hook which we'll
have to call after all the normal modeset stuff is done. Not
really a fan of yet another hook just for this.

Note that during readout state sanitation we are now going
to pass NULL as the atomic state since we don't have one.
We need to change that and then we can also s/crtc_state/crtc/
and s/conn_state/conn/ for the encoder hooks as well.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200313164831.5980-13-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>

drm/i915: move modesetting output/encoder code under display/

Add a new subdirectory for display code, and start off by moving
modesetting output/encoder code. Judging by the include changes, this is
a surprisingly clean operation.

v2:
- move intel_sdvo_regs.h too
- use tabs for Makefile file lists and sort them

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190613084416.6794-2-jani.nikula@intel.com