#
49afe913 |
|
27-Oct-2023 |
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> |
drm/amd: Fix UBSAN array-index-out-of-bounds for Powerplay headers For pptable structs that use flexible array sizes, use flexible arrays. Link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2039926 Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
#
1f9f09da |
|
01-Aug-2023 |
Ran Sun <sunran001@208suo.com> |
drm/amd/pm: Clean up errors in vega10_pptable.h Fix the following errors reported by checkpatch: ERROR: open brace '{' following struct go on the same line Signed-off-by: Ran Sun <sunran001@208suo.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
#
c3af46fc |
|
10-Feb-2021 |
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> |
drm/amd/pm: Replace one-element array with flexible-array in struct _ATOM_Vega10_GFXCLK_Dependency_Table There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. Use flexible-array member in struct _ATOM_Vega10_GFXCLK_Dependency_Table, instead of one-element array. Also, this helps with the ongoing efforts to enable -Warray-bounds and fix the following warning: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/powerplay/hwmgr/vega10_hwmgr.c: In function ‘vega10_get_pp_table_entry_callback_func’: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/powerplay/hwmgr/vega10_hwmgr.c:3113:30: warning: array subscript 4 is above array bounds of ‘ATOM_Vega10_GFXCLK_Dependency_Record[1]’ {aka ‘struct _ATOM_Vega10_GFXCLK_Dependency_Record[1]’} [-Warray-bounds] 3113 | gfxclk_dep_table->entries[4].ulClk; | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~ [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/79 Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/109 Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/6023ff3d.WY3sSCkGRQPdPlVo%25lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
#
e098bc96 |
|
13-Aug-2020 |
Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> |
drm/amd/pm: optimize the power related source code layout The target is to provide a clear entry point(for power routines). Also this can help to maintain a clear view about the frameworks used on different ASICs. Hopefully all these can make power part more friendly to play with. Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|