drm/amd/pm: fix a double-free in amdgpu_parse_extended_power_table

The amdgpu_free_extended_power_table is called in every error-handling
paths of amdgpu_parse_extended_power_table. However, after the following
call chain of returning:

amdgpu_parse_extended_power_table
|-> kv_dpm_init / si_dpm_init
(the only two caller of amdgpu_parse_extended_power_table)
|-> kv_dpm_sw_init / si_dpm_sw_init
(the only caller of kv_dpm_init / si_dpm_init, accordingly)
|-> kv_dpm_fini / si_dpm_fini
(goto dpm_failed in xx_dpm_sw_init)
|-> amdgpu_free_extended_power_table

As above, the amdgpu_free_extended_power_table is called twice in this
returning chain and thus a double-free is triggered. Similarily, the
last kfree in amdgpu_parse_extended_power_table also cause a double free
with amdgpu_free_extended_power_table in kv_dpm_fini.

Fixes: 84176663e70d ("drm/amd/pm: create a new holder for those APIs used only by legacy ASICs(si/kv)")
Signed-off-by: Zhipeng Lu <alexious@zju.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

drm/amd/pm: Replace all non-returning strlcpy with strscpy

strlcpy() reads the entire source buffer first.
This read may exceed the destination size limit.
This is both inefficient and can lead to linear read
overflows if a source string is not NUL-terminated [1].
In an effort to remove strlcpy() completely [2], replace
strlcpy() here with strscpy().
No return values were used, so direct replacement is safe.

[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strlcpy
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/89

Signed-off-by: Azeem Shaikh <azeemshaikh38@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230522155245.2336818-1-azeemshaikh38@gmail.com

drm/amd/pm: fix the deadlock issue observed on SI

The adev->pm.mutx is already held at the beginning of
amdgpu_dpm_compute_clocks/amdgpu_dpm_enable_uvd/amdgpu_dpm_enable_vce.
But on their calling path, amdgpu_display_bandwidth_update will be
called and thus its sub functions amdgpu_dpm_get_sclk/mclk. They
will then try to acquire the same adev->pm.mutex and deadlock will
occur.

By placing amdgpu_display_bandwidth_update outside of adev->pm.mutex
protection(considering logically they do not need such protection) and
restructuring the call flow accordingly, we can eliminate the deadlock
issue. This comes with no real logics change.

Fixes: 3712e7a49459 ("drm/amd/pm: unified lock protections in amdgpu_dpm.c")
Reported-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Reported-by: Arthur Marsh <arthur.marsh@internode.on.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/9e689fea-6c69-f4b0-8dee-32c4cf7d8f9c@molgen.mpg.de/
BugLink: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1957
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

drm/amd/pm: fix the deadlock issue observed on SI

The adev->pm.mutx is already held at the beginning of
amdgpu_dpm_compute_clocks/amdgpu_dpm_enable_uvd/amdgpu_dpm_enable_vce.
But on their calling path, amdgpu_display_bandwidth_update will be
called and thus its sub functions amdgpu_dpm_get_sclk/mclk. They
will then try to acquire the same adev->pm.mutex and deadlock will
occur.

By placing amdgpu_display_bandwidth_update outside of adev->pm.mutex
protection(considering logically they do not need such protection) and
restructuring the call flow accordingly, we can eliminate the deadlock
issue. This comes with no real logics change.

Fixes: 3712e7a49459 ("drm/amd/pm: unified lock protections in amdgpu_dpm.c")
Reported-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Reported-by: Arthur Marsh <arthur.marsh@internode.on.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/9e689fea-6c69-f4b0-8dee-32c4cf7d8f9c@molgen.mpg.de/
BugLink: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1957
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

drm/amd/pm: revise the performance level setting APIs

Avoid cross callings which make lock protection enforcement
on amdgpu_dpm_force_performance_level() impossible.

Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

drm/amd/pm: relocate the power related headers

Instead of centralizing all headers in the same folder. Separate them into
different folders and place them among those source files those who really
need them.

Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>