History log of /linux-master/drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c
Revision Date Author Comments
# 95996a67 01-Apr-2022 Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>

cpufreq: Prepare cleanup of powerpc's asm/prom.h

powerpc's asm/prom.h brings some headers that it doesn't
need itself.

In order to clean it up, first add missing headers in
users of asm/prom.h

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>


# 4a27aa9c 15-Jul-2020 Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>

cpufreq: pasemi: Include header file for {check,restore}_astate prototypes

If function callers and providers do not share the same prototypes the
compiler complains of missing prototypes. Fix this by including the
correct platforms header file.

Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):

drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c:109:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘check_astate’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
109 | int check_astate(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c:114:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘restore_astate’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
114 | void restore_astate(int cpu)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Suggested-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>


# e0a12445 16-Jul-2019 Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>

cpufreq/pasemi: fix use-after-free in pas_cpufreq_cpu_init()

The cpu variable is still being used in the of_get_property() call
after the of_node_put() call, which may result in use-after-free.

Fixes: a9acc26b75f6 ("cpufreq/pasemi: fix possible object reference leak")
Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>


# c4dcc8a1 15-Jul-2019 Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

cpufreq: Make cpufreq_generic_init() return void

It always returns 0 (success) and its return type should really be void.

Over that, many drivers have added error handling code based on its
return value, which is not required at all.

Change its return type to void and update all the callers.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>


# de6cc651 27-May-2019 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 153

Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):

this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by
the free software foundation either version 2 or at your option any
later version this program is distributed in the hope that it will
be useful but without any warranty without even the implied warranty
of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose see the gnu
general public license for more details you should have received a
copy of the gnu general public license along with this program if
not write to the free software foundation inc 675 mass ave cambridge
ma 02139 usa

extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier

GPL-2.0-or-later

has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 77 file(s).

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Reviewed-by: Armijn Hemel <armijn@tjaldur.nl>
Reviewed-by: Richard Fontana <rfontana@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527070032.837555891@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>


# a9acc26b 31-Mar-2019 Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>

cpufreq/pasemi: fix possible object reference leak

The call to of_get_cpu_node returns a node pointer with refcount
incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented after the last
usage.

Detected by coccinelle with the following warnings:
./drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c:212:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 147, but without a corresponding object release within this function.
./drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c:220:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 147, but without a corresponding object release within this function.

Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>


# ffd81dcf 29-Jan-2018 Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>

cpufreq: Add and use cpufreq_for_each_{valid_,}entry_idx()

Pointer subtraction is slow and tedious. Therefore, replace all instances
where cpufreq_for_each_{valid_,}entry loops contained such substractions
with an iteration macro providing an index to the frequency_table entry.

Suggested-by: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180120020237.GM13338@ZenIV.linux.org.uk
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>


# d04e31a2 16-May-2017 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

cpufreq/pasemi: Adjust system_state check

To enable smp_processor_id() and might_sleep() debug checks earlier, it's
required to add system states between SYSTEM_BOOTING and SYSTEM_RUNNING.

Adjust the system_state check in pas_cpufreq_cpu_exit() to handle the extra
states.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170516184735.620023128@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>


# 041526f9 25-Apr-2014 Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>

cpufreq: Use cpufreq_for_each_* macros for frequency table iteration

The cpufreq core now supports the cpufreq_for_each_entry and
cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry macros helpers for iteration over the
cpufreq_frequency_table, so use them.

It should have no functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
Acked-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>


# 7f4b0461 28-Mar-2014 Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

cpufreq: create another field .flags in cpufreq_frequency_table

Currently cpufreq frequency table has two fields: frequency and driver_data.
driver_data is only for drivers' internal use and cpufreq core shouldn't use
it at all. But with the introduction of BOOST frequencies, this assumption
was broken and we started using it as a flag instead.

There are two problems due to this:
- It is against the description of this field, as driver's data is used by
the core now.
- if drivers fill it with -3 for any frequency, then those frequencies are
never considered by cpufreq core as it is exactly same as value of
CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ, i.e. ~2.

The best way to get this fixed is by creating another field flags which
will be used for such flags. This patch does that. Along with that various
drivers need modifications due to the change of struct cpufreq_frequency_table.

Reviewed-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>


# e0b3165b 10-Mar-2014 Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

cpufreq: add 'freq_table' in struct cpufreq_policy

freq table is not per CPU but per policy, so it makes more sense to
keep it within struct cpufreq_policy instead of a per-cpu variable.

This patch does it. Over that, there is no need to set policy->freq_table
to NULL in ->exit(), as policy structure is going to be freed soon.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>


# d4019f0a 14-Aug-2013 Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

cpufreq: move freq change notifications to cpufreq core

Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:

struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...

cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);

/* Change rate here */

cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);

This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.

There are few special cases though, like exynos5440, which doesn't do everything
on the call to ->target_index() routine and call some kind of bottom halves for
doing this work, work/tasklet/etc..

They may continue doing notification from their own code as flag:
CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION is already set for them.

All drivers are also modified in this patch to avoid breaking 'git bisect', as
double notification would happen otherwise.

Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Tested-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>


# 9c0ebcf7 25-Oct-2013 Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

cpufreq: Implement light weight ->target_index() routine

Currently, the prototype of cpufreq_drivers target routines is:

int target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int target_freq,
unsigned int relation);

And most of the drivers call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() to get a valid
index of their frequency table which is closest to the target_freq. And they
don't use target_freq and relation after that.

So, it makes sense to just do this work in cpufreq core before calling
cpufreq_frequency_table_target() and simply pass index instead. But this can be
done only with drivers which expose their frequency table with cpufreq core. For
others we need to stick with the old prototype of target() until those drivers
are converted to expose frequency tables.

This patch implements the new light weight prototype for target_index() routine.
It looks like this:

int target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index);

CPUFreq core will call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() before calling this
routine and pass index to it. Because CPUFreq core now requires to call routines
present in freq_table.c CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE must be enabled all the time.

This also marks target() interface as deprecated. So, that new drivers avoid
using it. And Documentation is updated accordingly.

It also converts existing .target() to newly defined light weight
.target_index() routine for many driver.

Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>


# e315bb73 03-Oct-2013 Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

cpufreq: pasemi: use cpufreq_generic_init()

Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code
here.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>


# 57174310 03-Oct-2013 Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

cpufreq: pasemi: Use generic cpufreq routines

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the pasemi driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>


# 5af50730 17-Sep-2013 Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>

drivers: clean-up prom.h implicit includes

Powerpc is a mess of implicit includes by prom.h. Add the necessary
explicit includes to drivers in preparation of prom.h cleanup.

Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>


# 2e4633e4 16-Sep-2013 Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

cpufreq: pasemi: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show()

Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling
cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>


# adc97d6a 06-Aug-2013 Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

cpufreq: Drop the owner field from struct cpufreq_driver

We don't need to set .owner = THIS_MODULE any more in cpufreq drivers
as this field isn't used any more by the cpufreq core.

This patch removes it and updates all dependent drivers accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>


# 7fb6a53d 04-Apr-2013 Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

cpufreq: powerpc: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq

Move cpufreq driver of powerpc platform to drivers/cpufreq.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>