x86/shstk: Delay signal entry SSP write until after user accesses

When a signal is being delivered, the kernel needs to make accesses to
userspace. These accesses could encounter an access error, in which case
the signal delivery itself will trigger a segfault. Usually this would
result in the kernel killing the process. But in the case of a SEGV signal
handler being configured, the failure of the first signal delivery will
result in *another* signal getting delivered. The second signal may
succeed if another thread has resolved the issue that triggered the
segfault (i.e. a well timed mprotect()/mmap()), or the second signal is
being delivered to another stack (i.e. an alt stack).

On x86, in the non-shadow stack case, all the accesses to userspace are
done before changes to the registers (in pt_regs). The operation is
aborted when an access error occurs, so although there may be writes done
for the first signal, control flow changes for the signal (regs->ip,
regs->sp, etc) are not committed until all the accesses have already
completed successfully. This means that the second signal will be
delivered as if it happened at the time of the first signal. It will
effectively replace the first aborted signal, overwriting the half-written
frame of the aborted signal. So on sigreturn from the second signal,
control flow will resume happily from the point of control flow where the
original signal was delivered.

The problem is, when shadow stack is active, the shadow stack SSP
register/MSR is updated *before* some of the userspace accesses. This
means if the earlier accesses succeed and the later ones fail, the second
signal will not be delivered at the same spot on the shadow stack as the
first one. So on sigreturn from the second signal, the SSP will be
pointing to the wrong location on the shadow stack (off by a frame).

Pengfei privately reported that while using a shadow stack enabled glibc,
the “signal06” test in the LTP test-suite hung. It turns out it is
testing the above described double signal scenario. When this test was
compiled with shadow stack, the first signal pushed a shadow stack
sigframe, then the second pushed another. When the second signal was
handled, the SSP was at the first shadow stack signal frame instead of
the original location. The test then got stuck as the #CP from the twice
incremented SSP was incorrect and generated segfaults in a loop.

Fix this by adjusting the SSP register only after any userspace accesses,
such that there can be no failures after the SSP is adjusted. Do this by
moving the shadow stack sigframe push logic to happen after all other
userspace accesses.

Note, sigreturn (as opposed to the signal delivery dealt with in this
patch) has ordering behavior that could lead to similar failures. The
ordering issues there extend beyond shadow stack to include the alt stack
restoration. Fixing that would require cross-arch changes, and the
ordering today does not cause any known test or apps breakages. So leave
it as is, for now.

[ dhansen: minor changelog/subject tweak ]

Fixes: 05e36022c054 ("x86/shstk: Handle signals for shadow stack")
Reported-by: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@intel.com>
Cc:stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231107182251.91276-1-rick.p.edgecombe%40intel.com
Link: https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/master/testcases/kernel/syscalls/signal/signal06.c

x86/shstk: Handle signals for shadow stack

When a signal is handled, the context is pushed to the stack before
handling it. For shadow stacks, since the shadow stack only tracks return
addresses, there isn't any state that needs to be pushed. However, there
are still a few things that need to be done. These things are visible to
userspace and which will be kernel ABI for shadow stacks.

One is to make sure the restorer address is written to shadow stack, since
the signal handler (if not changing ucontext) returns to the restorer, and
the restorer calls sigreturn. So add the restorer on the shadow stack
before handling the signal, so there is not a conflict when the signal
handler returns to the restorer.

The other thing to do is to place some type of checkable token on the
thread's shadow stack before handling the signal and check it during
sigreturn. This is an extra layer of protection to hamper attackers
calling sigreturn manually as in SROP-like attacks.

For this token the shadow stack data format defined earlier can be used.
Have the data pushed be the previous SSP. In the future the sigreturn
might want to return back to a different stack. Storing the SSP (instead
of a restore offset or something) allows for future functionality that
may want to restore to a different stack.

So, when handling a signal push
- the SSP pointing in the shadow stack data format
- the restorer address below the restore token.

In sigreturn, verify SSP is stored in the data format and pop the shadow
stack.

Co-developed-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@intel.com>
Tested-by: John Allen <john.allen@amd.com>
Tested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230613001108.3040476-32-rick.p.edgecombe%40intel.com

x86/shstk: Add user control-protection fault handler

A control-protection fault is triggered when a control-flow transfer
attempt violates Shadow Stack or Indirect Branch Tracking constraints.
For example, the return address for a RET instruction differs from the copy
on the shadow stack.

There already exists a control-protection fault handler for handling kernel
IBT faults. Refactor this fault handler into separate user and kernel
handlers, like the page fault handler. Add a control-protection handler
for usermode. To avoid ifdeffery, put them both in a new file cet.c, which
is compiled in the case of either of the two CET features supported in the
kernel: kernel IBT or user mode shadow stack. Move some static inline
functions from traps.c into a header so they can be used in cet.c.

Opportunistically fix a comment in the kernel IBT part of the fault
handler that is on the end of the line instead of preceding it.

Keep the same behavior for the kernel side of the fault handler, except for
converting a BUG to a WARN in the case of a #CP happening when the feature
is missing. This unifies the behavior with the new shadow stack code, and
also prevents the kernel from crashing under this situation which is
potentially recoverable.

The control-protection fault handler works in a similar way as the general
protection fault handler. It provides the si_code SEGV_CPERR to the signal
handler.

Co-developed-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@intel.com>
Tested-by: John Allen <john.allen@amd.com>
Tested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230613001108.3040476-28-rick.p.edgecombe%40intel.com

x86/signal/compat: Move sigaction_compat_abi() to signal_64.c

Also remove the now-empty signal_compat.c.

Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221219193904.190220-3-brgerst@gmail.com
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

x86/signal: Move siginfo field tests

Move the tests to the appropriate signal_$(BITS).c file.

Convert them to use static_assert(), removing the need for a dummy
function.

Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221219193904.190220-2-brgerst@gmail.com
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

x86/signal/64: Move 64-bit signal code to its own file

[ bp: Fixup merge conflict caused by changes coming from the kbuild tree. ]

Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220606203802.158958-9-brgerst@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>