x86/cpu/topology: Get rid of cpuinfo::x86_max_cores

Now that __num_cores_per_package and __num_threads_per_package are
available, cpuinfo::x86_max_cores and the related math all over the place
can be replaced with the ready to consume data.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240213210253.176147806@linutronix.de

x86/cpu/topology: Rename smp_num_siblings

It's really a non-intuitive name. Rename it to __max_threads_per_core which
is obvious.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240213210253.011307973@linutronix.de

x86/cpu/topology: Use topology bitmaps for sizing

Now that all possible APIC IDs are tracked in the topology bitmaps, its
trivial to retrieve the real information from there.

This gets rid of the guesstimates for the maximal packages and dies per
package as the actual numbers can be determined before a single AP has been
brought up.

The number of SMT threads can now be determined correctly from the bitmaps
in all situations. Up to now a system which has SMT disabled in the BIOS
will still claim that it is SMT capable, because the lowest APIC ID bit is
reserved for that and CPUID leaf 0xb/0x1f still enumerates the SMT domain
accordingly. By calculating the bitmap weights of the SMT and the CORE
domain and setting them into relation the SMT disabled in BIOS situation
reports correctly that the system is not SMT capable.

It also handles the situation correctly when a hybrid systems boot CPU does
not have SMT as it takes the SMT capability of the APs fully into account.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240213210252.681709880@linutronix.de

x86/cpu: Provide an AMD/HYGON specific topology parser

AMD/HYGON uses various methods for topology evaluation:

- Leaf 0x80000008 and 0x8000001e based with an optional leaf 0xb,
which is the preferred variant for modern CPUs.

Leaf 0xb will be superseded by leaf 0x80000026 soon, which is just
another variant of the Intel 0x1f leaf for whatever reasons.

- Subleaf 0x80000008 and NODEID_MSR base

- Legacy fallback

That code is following the principle of random bits and pieces all over the
place which results in multiple evaluations and impenetrable code flows in
the same way as the Intel parsing did.

Provide a sane implementation by clearly separating the three variants and
bringing them in the proper preference order in one place.

This provides the parsing for both AMD and HYGON because there is no point
in having a separate HYGON parser which only differs by 3 lines of
code. Any further divergence between AMD and HYGON can be handled in
different functions, while still sharing the existing parsers.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212153625.020038641@linutronix.de

x86/cpu: Provide cpu_init/parse_topology()

Topology evaluation is a complete disaster and impenetrable mess. It's
scattered all over the place with some vendor implementations doing early
evaluation and some not. The most horrific part is the permanent
overwriting of smt_max_siblings and __max_die_per_package, instead of
establishing them once on the boot CPU and validating the result on the
APs.

The goals are:

- One topology evaluation entry point

- Proper sharing of pointlessly duplicated code

- Proper structuring of the evaluation logic and preferences.

- Evaluating important system wide information only once on the boot CPU

- Making the 0xb/0x1f leaf parsing less convoluted and actually fixing
the short comings of leaf 0x1f evaluation.

Start to consolidate the topology evaluation code by providing the entry
points for the early boot CPU evaluation and for the final parsing on the
boot CPU and the APs.

Move the trivial pieces into that new code:

- The initialization of cpuinfo_x86::topo

- The evaluation of CPUID leaf 1, which presets topo::initial_apicid

- topo_apicid is set to topo::initial_apicid when invoked from early
boot. When invoked for the final evaluation on the boot CPU it reads
the actual APIC ID, which makes apic_get_initial_apicid() obsolete
once everything is converted over.

Provide a temporary helper function topo_converted() which shields off the
not yet converted CPU vendors from invoking code which would break them.
This shielding covers all vendor CPUs which support SMP, but not the
historical pure UP ones as they only need the topology info init and
eventually the initial APIC initialization.

Provide two new members in cpuinfo_x86::topo to store the maximum number of
SMT siblings and the number of dies per package and add them to the debugfs
readout. These two members will be used to populate this information on the
boot CPU and to validate the APs against it.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212153624.581436579@linutronix.de

x86/cpu: Provide debug interface

Provide debug files which dump the topology related information of
cpuinfo_x86. This is useful to validate the upcoming conversion of the
topology evaluation for correctness or bug compatibility.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Tested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230814085113.353191313@linutronix.de