um: Only disable SSE on clang to work around old GCC bugs

As part of the Rust support for UML, we disable SSE (and similar flags)
to match the normal x86 builds. This both makes sense (we ideally want a
similar configuration to x86), and works around a crash bug with SSE
generation under Rust with LLVM.

However, this breaks compiling stdlib.h under gcc < 11, as the x86_64
ABI requires floating-point return values be stored in an SSE register.
gcc 11 fixes this by only doing register allocation when a function is
actually used, and since we never use atof(), it shouldn't be a problem:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99652

Nevertheless, only disable SSE on clang setups, as that's a simple way
of working around everyone's bugs.

Fixes: 884981867947 ("rust: arch/um: Disable FP/SIMD instruction to match x86")
Reported-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-um/6df2ecef9011d85654a82acd607fdcbc93ad593c.camel@huaweicloud.com/
Tested-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com>
Tested-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Arthur Grillo <arthurgrillo@riseup.net>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>

rust: arch/um: Disable FP/SIMD instruction to match x86

The kernel disables all SSE and similar FP/SIMD instructions on
x86-based architectures (partly because we shouldn't be using floats in
the kernel, and partly to avoid the need for stack alignment, see:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53383 )

UML does not do the same thing, which isn't in itself a problem, but
does add to the list of differences between UML and "normal" x86 builds.

In addition, there was a crash bug with LLVM < 15 / rustc < 1.65 when
building with SSE, so disabling it fixes rust builds with earlier
compiler versions, see:
https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/pull/881

Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Sergio González Collado <sergio.collado@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>

kbuild: remove --include-dir MAKEFLAG from top Makefile

I added $(srctree)/ to some included Makefiles in the following commits:

- 3204a7fb98a3 ("kbuild: prefix $(srctree)/ to some included Makefiles")
- d82856395505 ("kbuild: do not require sub-make for separate output tree builds")

They were a preparation for removing --include-dir flag.

I have never thought --include-dir useful. Rather, it _is_ harmful.

For example, run the following commands:

$ make -s ARCH=x86 mrproper defconfig
$ make ARCH=arm O=foo dtbs
make[1]: Entering directory '/tmp/linux/foo'
HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep
Error: kernelrelease not valid - run 'make prepare' to update it
UPD include/config/kernel.release
make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/linux/foo'

The first command configures the source tree for x86. The next command
tries to build ARM device trees in the separate foo/ directory - this
must stop because the directory foo/ has not been configured yet.

However, due to --include-dir=$(abs_srctree), the top Makefile includes
the wrong include/config/auto.conf from the source tree and continues
building. Kbuild traverses the directory tree, but of course it does
not work correctly. The Error message is also pointless - 'make prepare'
does not help at all for fixing the issue.

This commit fixes more arch Makefile, and finally removes --include-dir
from the top Makefile.

There are more breakages under drivers/, but I do not volunteer to fix
them all. I just moved --include-dir to drivers/Makefile.

With this commit, the second command will stop with a sensible message.

$ make -s ARCH=x86 mrproper defconfig
$ make ARCH=arm O=foo dtbs
make[1]: Entering directory '/tmp/linux/foo'
SYNC include/config/auto.conf.cmd
***
*** The source tree is not clean, please run 'make ARCH=arm mrproper'
*** in /tmp/linux
***
make[2]: *** [../Makefile:646: outputmakefile] Error 1
/tmp/linux/Makefile:770: include/config/auto.conf.cmd: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** [/tmp/linux/Makefile:793: include/config/auto.conf.cmd] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/linux/foo'
make: *** [Makefile:226: __sub-make] Error 2

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

um: allow not setting extra rpaths in the linux binary

There doesn't seem to be any reason for the rpath being set in
the binaries, at on systems that I tested on. On the other hand,
setting rpath is actually harming binaries in some cases, e.g.
if using nix-based compilation environments where /lib & /lib64
are not part of the actual environment.

Add a new Kconfig option (under EXPERT, for less user confusion)
that allows disabling the rpath additions.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>

x86, powerpc: Remove -funit-at-a-time compiler option entirely

GCC 4.6 manual says:

-funit-at-a-time
This option is left for compatibility reasons. -funit-at-a-time has
no effect, while -fno-unit-at-a-time implies -fno-toplevel-reorder
and -fno-section-anchors. Enabled by default.

Remove it.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@sigma-star.at>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1541990120-9643-3-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com

x86/um: Remove -fno-unit-at-a-time workaround for pre-4.0 GCC

Commit

cafa0010cd51 ("Raise the minimum required gcc version to 4.6")

bumped the minimum GCC version to 4.6 for all architectures.

'$(call cc-option,-fno-unit-at-a-time)' is now dead code since
'$(cc-version) -lt 0400' is always false. Remove it.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1541990120-9643-2-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com

kbuild: rename LDFLAGS to KBUILD_LDFLAGS

Commit a0f97e06a43c ("kbuild: enable 'make CFLAGS=...' to add
additional options to CC") renamed CFLAGS to KBUILD_CFLAGS.

Commit 222d394d30e7 ("kbuild: enable 'make AFLAGS=...' to add
additional options to AS") renamed AFLAGS to KBUILD_AFLAGS.

Commit 06c5040cdb13 ("kbuild: enable 'make CPPFLAGS=...' to add
additional options to CPP") renamed CPPFLAGS to KBUILD_CPPFLAGS.

For some reason, LDFLAGS was not renamed.

Using a well-known variable like LDFLAGS may result in accidental
override of the variable.

Kbuild generally uses KBUILD_ prefixed variables for the internally
appended options, so here is one more conversion to sanitize the
naming convention.

I did not touch Makefiles under tools/ since the tools build system
is a different world.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>

um: remove redundant 'export LDFLAGS' in arch/x86/Makefile.um

This is already exported by the top-level Makefile.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>

License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license

Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.

By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.

Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.

This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.

How this work was done:

Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
- file had no licensing information it it.
- file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
- file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,

Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.

The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.

The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
- Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
- Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
lines of source
- File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
lines).

All documentation files were explicitly excluded.

The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
identifiers to apply.

- when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
COPYING file license applied.

For non */uapi/* files that summary was:

SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 11139

and resulted in the first patch in this series.

If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was:

SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930

and resulted in the second patch in this series.

- if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
it (per prior point). Results summary:

SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270
GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17
LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15
GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14
((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5
LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4
LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1

and that resulted in the third patch in this series.

- when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
the concluded license(s).

- when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.

- In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).

- When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

- If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
in time.

In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The
Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
they are related.

Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
in about 15000 files.

In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
correct identifier.

Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
version early this week with:
- a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
license ids and scores
- reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
- reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
SPDX license was correct

This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This
worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
different types of files to be modified.

These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to
parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg
based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
generate the patches.

Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

kbuild: use relative path more to include Makefile

Prior to this commit, it was impossible to use relative path to
include Makefiles from the top level Makefile because the option
"--include-dir=$(srctree)" becomes effective when Make enters into
sub Makefiles.

To use relative path in any places, this commit moves the option
above the "sub-make" target.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>

kbuild: do not add $(call ...) to invoke cc-version or cc-fullversion

The macros cc-version, cc-fullversion and ld-version take no argument.
It is not necessary to add $(call ...) to invoke them.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
Acked-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> [parisc]
Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>

um: fix linker script generation

while we can't just use -U$(SUBARCH), we still need to kill idiotic define
(implicit -Di386=1), both for SUBARCH=i386 and SUBARCH=x86/CONFIG_64BIT=n
builds.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

um: most of the SUBARCH uses can be killed

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
[richard@nod.at: Re-export SUBARCH in arch/um/Makefile]
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>

um: take arch/um/sys-x86 to arch/x86/um

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>