RISC-V: KVM: Modify SBI extension handler to return SBI error code

Currently, the SBI extension handle is expected to return Linux error code.
The top SBI layer converts the Linux error code to SBI specific error code
that can be returned to guest invoking the SBI calls. This model works
as long as SBI error codes have 1-to-1 mappings between them.
However, that may not be true always. This patch attempts to disassociate
both these error codes by allowing the SBI extension implementation to
return SBI specific error codes as well.

The extension will continue to return the Linux error specific code which
will indicate any problem *with* the extension emulation while the
SBI specific error will indicate the problem *of* the emulation.

Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>

RISC-V: KVM: Remove redundant includes of asm/csr.h

We should include asm/csr.h only where required so let us remove
redundant includes of this header.

Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>

RISC-V: KVM: Add remote HFENCE functions based on VCPU requests

The generic KVM has support for VCPU requests which can be used
to do arch-specific work in the run-loop. We introduce remote
HFENCE functions which will internally use VCPU requests instead
of host SBI calls.

Advantages of doing remote HFENCEs as VCPU requests are:
1) Multiple VCPUs of a Guest may be running on different Host CPUs
so it is not always possible to determine the Host CPU mask for
doing Host SBI call. For example, when VCPU X wants to do HFENCE
on VCPU Y, it is possible that VCPU Y is blocked or in user-space
(i.e. vcpu->cpu < 0).
2) To support nested virtualization, we will be having a separate
shadow G-stage for each VCPU and a common host G-stage for the
entire Guest/VM. The VCPU requests based remote HFENCEs helps
us easily synchronize the common host G-stage and shadow G-stage
of each VCPU without any additional IPI calls.

This is also a preparatory patch for upcoming nested virtualization
support where we will be having a shadow G-stage page table for
each Guest VCPU.

Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>

RISC-V: KVM: Add common kvm_riscv_vcpu_sbi_system_reset() function

We rename kvm_sbi_system_shutdown() to kvm_riscv_vcpu_sbi_system_reset()
and move it to vcpu_sbi.c so that it can be shared by SBI v0.1 shutdown
and SBI v0.3 SRST extension.

Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>

RISC-V: KVM: remove unneeded semicolon

Eliminate the following coccicheck warning:
./arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_v01.c:117:2-3: Unneeded semicolon

Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>

RISC-V: Do not use cpumask data structure for hartid bitmap

Currently, SBI APIs accept a hartmask that is generated from struct
cpumask. Cpumask data structure can hold upto NR_CPUs value. Thus, it
is not the correct data structure for hartids as it can be higher
than NR_CPUs for platforms with sparse or discontguous hartids.

Remove all association between hartid mask and struct cpumask.

Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> (For Linux RISC-V changes)
Acked-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> (For KVM RISC-V changes)
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>

RISC-V: KVM: Reorganize SBI code by moving SBI v0.1 to its own file

With SBI v0.2, there may be more SBI extensions in future. It makes more
sense to group related extensions in separate files. Guest kernel will
choose appropriate SBI version dynamically.

Move the existing implementation to a separate file so that it can be
removed in future without much conflict.

Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com>