History log of /linux-master/arch/powerpc/platforms/82xx/Makefile
Revision Date Author Comments
# ad46ad2d 24-Feb-2023 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>

powerpc: drop MPC8272-ADS and PowerQUICC II FADS shared code.

With the two platforms depending on this shared code, and no others,
we can remove the orphaned code and Kconfigs

Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20230224204959.17425-4-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com


# 859b21a0 24-Feb-2023 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>

powerpc: drop PowerQUICC II Family ADS platform support

Based on documentation revision dates, this MPC82xx pq2fads system
predates the MPC8272-ADS variant by about a year and only has 1/2
the amount of RAM (32MB) -- largely making it useless with a modern
v6.x kernel from today.

Similar to the MPC8272-ADS the pq2fads also supported other 82xx CPU
variants, had 8MB flash, and like the 8272 ADS platform, was on a fairly
large PCB in order to have space for breakout connectors for all features.

These 82xx platforms are two decades old, and originally made for a
small group of industry related people in order to assist in new OEM
board designs. Given that, it makes sense to remove support today.

Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20230224204959.17425-3-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com


# 33777a4e 24-Feb-2023 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>

powerpc: drop MPC8272_ADS platform support

The MPC8272-ADS also supported other 82xx CPU variants, had 64MB RAM,
8MB flash, and like the 85xx ADS platforms, was on a fairly large PCB
in order to have space for breakout connectors for all the features.

These 82xx platforms are two decades old, and originally made for a
small group of industry related people in order to assist in new OEM
board designs. Given that, it makes sense to remove support today.

Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20230224204959.17425-2-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com


# b2441318 01-Nov-2017 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license

Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.

By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.

Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.

This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.

How this work was done:

Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
- file had no licensing information it it.
- file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
- file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,

Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.

The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.

The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
- Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
- Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
lines of source
- File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
lines).

All documentation files were explicitly excluded.

The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
identifiers to apply.

- when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
COPYING file license applied.

For non */uapi/* files that summary was:

SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 11139

and resulted in the first patch in this series.

If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was:

SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930

and resulted in the second patch in this series.

- if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
it (per prior point). Results summary:

SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270
GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17
LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15
GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14
((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5
LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4
LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1

and that resulted in the third patch in this series.

- when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
the concluded license(s).

- when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.

- In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).

- When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

- If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
in time.

In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The
Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
they are related.

Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
in about 15000 files.

In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
correct identifier.

Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
version early this week with:
- a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
license ids and scores
- reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
- reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
SPDX license was correct

This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This
worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
different types of files to be modified.

These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to
parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg
based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
generate the patches.

Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>


# c513e7c9 09-Mar-2011 Holger Brunck <holger.brunck@keymile.com>

powerpc/82xx: rename and update mgcoge board support

The mgcoge board from keymile is now base for some other
similar boards. Therefore the board specific name mgcoge
was renamed to a generic name km82xx. Additionally some
enhancements were made:
- rework partition table in dts file
- add cpm2_pio_c gpio controller in dts file
- update defconfig
- add pin description for SCC1
- add pin description and configuration for USB

Signed-off-by: Holger Brunck <holger.brunck@keymile.com>
Acked-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
CC: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>


# 63716633 18-Jun-2008 Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>

powerpc: Add support for mpc8247 based board MGCOGE from keymile.

Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>


# 0dde1a1d 17-Jan-2008 Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>

[POWERPC] 82xx: Embedded Planet EP8248E support

This board is also resold by Freescale under the names
"QUICCStart MPC8248 Evaluation System" and "CWH-PPC-8248N-VE".

Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>


# 3611f2ad 05-Sep-2007 Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>

[POWERPC] mpc82xx: Add pq2fads board support.

Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>


# e00c5498 14-Sep-2007 Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>

[POWERPC] mpc82xx: Update mpc8272ads, and factor out PCI and reset.

1. PCI and reset are factored out into pq2.c. I renamed them from m82xx
to pq2 because they won't work on the Integrated Host Processor line of
82xx chips (i.e. 8240, 8245, and such).

2. The PCI PIC, which is nominally board-specific, is used on multiple
boards, and thus is used into pq2ads-pci-pic.c.

3. The new CPM binding is used.

4. General cleanup.

Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>


# d1df4471 26-Jul-2007 Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>

[POWERPC] mpc82xx: Rename mpc82xx_ads to mpc8272_ads.

This is just a rename patch; internal references to mpc82xx_ads will be
changed in the next one.

Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>


# 4ff62e1c 27-Aug-2007 Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>

[POWERPC] mpc82xx: Remove a bunch of cruft that duplicates generic functionality.

m82xx_calibrate_decr(), mpc82xx_ads_show_cpuinfo(), and mpc82xx_halt() do
anything useful beyond what the generic code does.

Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>


# 91bd6109 02-Oct-2006 Vitaly Bordug <vbordug@ru.mvista.com>

POWERPC: mpc82xx merge: board-specific/platform stuff(resend)

This intruduces 82xx family in arch/powerpc/platforms,
and has all the board-specific code to represent regression-less
transaction from ppc. The functionality is apparently the same, including
PCI controller.

Signed-off-by: Vitaly Bordug <vbordug@ru.mvista.com>