powerpc/bpf: use bpf_jit_binary_pack_[alloc|finalize|free]

Use bpf_jit_binary_pack_alloc in powerpc jit. The jit engine first
writes the program to the rw buffer. When the jit is done, the program
is copied to the final location with bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize.
With multiple jit_subprogs, bpf_jit_free is called on some subprograms
that haven't got bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize() yet. Implement custom
bpf_jit_free() like in commit 1d5f82d9dd47 ("bpf, x86: fix freeing of
not-finalized bpf_prog_pack") to call bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize(),
if necessary. As bpf_flush_icache() is not needed anymore, remove it.

Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20231020141358.643575-6-hbathini@linux.ibm.com

powerpc/64: vmlinux support building with PCREL addresing

PC-Relative or PCREL addressing is an extension to the ELF ABI which
uses Power ISA v3.1 PC-relative instructions to calculate addresses,
rather than the traditional TOC scheme.

Add an option to build vmlinux using pcrel addressing. Modules continue
to use TOC addressing.

- TOC address helpers and r2 are poisoned with -1 when running vmlinux.
r2 could be used for something useful once things are ironed out.

- Assembly must call C functions with @notoc annotation, or the linker
complains aobut a missing nop after the call. This is done with the
CFUNC macro introduced earlier.

- Boot: with the exception of prom_init, the execution branches to the
kernel virtual address early in boot, before any addresses are
generated, which ensures 34-bit pcrel addressing does not miss the
high PAGE_OFFSET bits. TOC relative addressing has a similar
requirement. prom_init does not go to the virtual address and its
addresses should not carry over to the post-prom kernel.

- Ftrace trampolines are converted from TOC addressing to pcrel
addressing, including module ftrace trampolines that currently use the
kernel TOC to find ftrace target functions.

- BPF function prologue and function calling generation are converted
from TOC to pcrel.

- copypage_64.S has an interesting problem, prefixed instructions have
alignment restrictions so the linker can add padding, which makes the
assembler treat the difference between two local labels as
non-constant even if alignment is arranged so padding is not required.
This may need toolchain help to solve nicely, for now move the prefix
instruction out of the alternate patch section to work around it.

This reduces kernel text size by about 6%.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20230408021752.862660-6-npiggin@gmail.com

powerpc/bpf: Perform complete extra passes to update addresses

BPF core calls the jit compiler again for an extra pass in order
to properly set subprog addresses.

Unlike other architectures, powerpc only updates the addresses
during that extra pass. It means that holes must have been left
in the code in order to enable the maximum possible instruction
size.

In order to avoid waste of space, and waste of CPU time on powerpc
processors on which the NOP instruction is not 0-cycle, perform
two real additional passes.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d484a4ac95949ff55fc4344b674e7c0d3ddbfcd5.1675245773.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu

powerpc/inst: Remove PPC_INST_BL

Convert last users of PPC_INST_BL to PPC_RAW_BL()

And remove PPC_INST_BL.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d9eacb758e7ae7cf224211ebe3f6f7d409a333be.1652074503.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu

powerpc: Replace PPC64_ELF_ABI_v{1/2} by CONFIG_PPC64_ELF_ABI_V{1/2}

Replace all uses of PPC64_ELF_ABI_v1 and PPC64_ELF_ABI_v2 by
resp CONFIG_PPC64_ELF_ABI_V1 and CONFIG_PPC64_ELF_ABI_V2.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ba13d59e8c50bc9aa6328f1c7f0c0d0278e0a3a7.1652074503.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu

powerpc/bpf: Simplify bpf_to_ppc() and adopt it for powerpc64

Convert bpf_to_ppc() to a macro to help simplify its usage since
codegen_context is available in all places it is used. Adopt it also for
powerpc64 for uniformity and get rid of the global b2p structure.

Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/09f0540ce3e0cd4120b5b33993b5e73b6ef9e979.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com

powerpc/bpf: Cleanup bpf_jit.h

- PPC_EX32() is only used by ppc32 JIT. Move it to bpf_jit_comp32.c
- PPC_LI64() is only valid in ppc64. #ifdef it
- PPC_FUNC_ADDR() is not used anymore. Remove it.

Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/58f5b66b2f8546bbbee620f62103a8e97a63eb7c.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com

powerpc/bpf: Rename PPC_BL_ABS() to PPC_BL()

PPC_BL_ABS() is just doing a relative branch with link. The name
suggests that it is for branching to an absolute address, which is
incorrect. Rename the macro to a more appropriate PPC_BL().

Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f0e57b6c7a6ee40dba645535b70da46f46e8af5e.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com

powerpc64/bpf elfv1: Do not load TOC before calling functions

BPF helpers always reside in core kernel and all BPF programs use the
kernel TOC. As such, there is no need to load the TOC before calling
helpers or other BPF functions. Drop code to do the same.

Add a check to ensure we don't proceed if this assumption ever changes
in future.

Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/a3cd3da4d24d95d845cd10382b1af083600c9074.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com

powerpc/bpf: Handle large branch ranges with BPF_EXIT

In some scenarios, it is possible that the program epilogue is outside
the branch range for a BPF_EXIT instruction. Instead of rejecting such
programs, emit epilogue as an alternate exit point from the program.
Track the location of the same so that subsequent exits can take either
of the two paths.

Reported-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/33aa2e92645a92712be23b18035a2c6dcb92ff8d.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com

powerpc/bpf: Skip branch range validation during first pass

During the first pass, addrs[] is still being populated. So, all
branches to following instructions will appear to be going to the start
of the JIT program. Ignore branch range validation for such instructions
and assume those to be in range. Branch range validation will happen
during the second pass after addrs[] is setup properly.

Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/bc517413d11636e20dbfc88503dad14bcbe391e2.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com

powerpc/bpf: Always reallocate BPF_REG_5, BPF_REG_AX and TMP_REG when possible

BPF_REG_5, BPF_REG_AX and TMP_REG are mapped on non volatile registers
because there are not enough volatile registers, but they don't need
to be preserved on function calls.

So when some volatile registers become available, those registers can
always be reallocated regardless of whether SEEN_FUNC is set or not.

Suggested-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Reviewed-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b04c246874b716911139c04bc004b3b14eed07ef.1641817763.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu

bpf ppc32: Add BPF_PROBE_MEM support for JIT

BPF load instruction with BPF_PROBE_MEM mode can cause a fault
inside kernel. Append exception table for such instructions
within BPF program.

Unlike other archs which uses extable 'fixup' field to pass dest_reg
and nip, BPF exception table on PowerPC follows the generic PowerPC
exception table design, where it populates both fixup and extable
sections within BPF program. fixup section contains 3 instructions,
first 2 instructions clear dest_reg (lower & higher 32-bit registers)
and last instruction jumps to next instruction in the BPF code.
extable 'insn' field contains relative offset of the instruction and
'fixup' field contains relative offset of the fixup entry. Example
layout of BPF program with extable present:

+------------------+
| |
| |
0x4020 -->| lwz r28,4(r4) |
| |
| |
0x40ac -->| lwz r3,0(r24) |
| lwz r4,4(r24) |
| |
| |
|------------------|
0x4278 -->| li r28,0 | \
| li r27,0 | | fixup entry
| b 0x4024 | /
0x4284 -->| li r4,0 |
| li r3,0 |
| b 0x40b4 |
|------------------|
0x4290 -->| insn=0xfffffd90 | \ extable entry
| fixup=0xffffffe4 | /
0x4298 -->| insn=0xfffffe14 |
| fixup=0xffffffe8 |
+------------------+

(Addresses shown here are chosen random, not real)

Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211012123056.485795-8-hbathini@linux.ibm.com

bpf ppc64: Add BPF_PROBE_MEM support for JIT

BPF load instruction with BPF_PROBE_MEM mode can cause a fault
inside kernel. Append exception table for such instructions
within BPF program.

Unlike other archs which uses extable 'fixup' field to pass dest_reg
and nip, BPF exception table on PowerPC follows the generic PowerPC
exception table design, where it populates both fixup and extable
sections within BPF program. fixup section contains two instructions,
first instruction clears dest_reg and 2nd jumps to next instruction
in the BPF code. extable 'insn' field contains relative offset of
the instruction and 'fixup' field contains relative offset of the
fixup entry. Example layout of BPF program with extable present:

+------------------+
| |
| |
0x4020 -->| ld r27,4(r3) |
| |
| |
0x40ac -->| lwz r3,0(r4) |
| |
| |
|------------------|
0x4280 -->| li r27,0 | \ fixup entry
| b 0x4024 | /
0x4288 -->| li r3,0 |
| b 0x40b0 |
|------------------|
0x4290 -->| insn=0xfffffd90 | \ extable entry
| fixup=0xffffffec | /
0x4298 -->| insn=0xfffffe14 |
| fixup=0xffffffec |
+------------------+

(Addresses shown here are chosen random, not real)

Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211012123056.485795-6-hbathini@linux.ibm.com

powerpc/ppc-opcode: introduce PPC_RAW_BRANCH() macro

Define and use PPC_RAW_BRANCH() macro instead of open coding it. This
macro is used while adding BPF_PROBE_MEM support.

Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211012123056.485795-5-hbathini@linux.ibm.com

bpf powerpc: Remove extra_pass from bpf_jit_build_body()

In case of extra_pass, usual JIT passes are always skipped. So,
extra_pass is always false while calling bpf_jit_build_body() and
can be removed.

Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211012123056.485795-3-hbathini@linux.ibm.com

bpf powerpc: Remove unused SEEN_STACK

SEEN_STACK is unused on PowerPC. Remove it. Also, have
SEEN_TAILCALL use 0x40000000.

Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211012123056.485795-2-hbathini@linux.ibm.com

powerpc/bpf: Validate branch ranges

Add checks to ensure that we never emit branch instructions with
truncated branch offsets.

Suggested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Acked-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/71d33a6b7603ec1013c9734dd8bdd4ff5e929142.1633464148.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com

powerpc/lib: Add helper to check if offset is within conditional branch range

Add a helper to check if a given offset is within the branch range for a
powerpc conditional branch instruction, and update some sites to use the
new helper.

Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/442b69a34ced32ca346a0d9a855f3f6cfdbbbd41.1633464148.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com

powerpc/ebpf32: Use standard function call for functions within 32M distance

If the target of a function call is within 32 Mbytes distance, use a
standard function call with 'bl' instead of the 'lis/ori/mtlr/blrl'
sequence.

In the first pass, no memory has been allocated yet and the code
position is not known yet (image pointer is NULL). This pass is there
to calculate the amount of memory to allocate for the EBPF code, so
assume the 4 instructions sequence is required, so that enough memory
is allocated.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/74944a1e3e5cfecc141e440a6ccd37920e186b70.1618227846.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu

powerpc/bpf: Reallocate BPF registers to volatile registers when possible on PPC32

When the BPF routine doesn't call any function, the non volatile
registers can be reallocated to volatile registers in order to
avoid having to save them/restore on the stack.

Before this patch, the test #359 ADD default X is:

0: 7c 64 1b 78 mr r4,r3
4: 38 60 00 00 li r3,0
8: 94 21 ff b0 stwu r1,-80(r1)
c: 60 00 00 00 nop
10: 92 e1 00 2c stw r23,44(r1)
14: 93 01 00 30 stw r24,48(r1)
18: 93 21 00 34 stw r25,52(r1)
1c: 93 41 00 38 stw r26,56(r1)
20: 39 80 00 00 li r12,0
24: 39 60 00 00 li r11,0
28: 3b 40 00 00 li r26,0
2c: 3b 20 00 00 li r25,0
30: 7c 98 23 78 mr r24,r4
34: 7c 77 1b 78 mr r23,r3
38: 39 80 00 42 li r12,66
3c: 39 60 00 00 li r11,0
40: 7d 8c d2 14 add r12,r12,r26
44: 39 60 00 00 li r11,0
48: 7d 83 63 78 mr r3,r12
4c: 82 e1 00 2c lwz r23,44(r1)
50: 83 01 00 30 lwz r24,48(r1)
54: 83 21 00 34 lwz r25,52(r1)
58: 83 41 00 38 lwz r26,56(r1)
5c: 38 21 00 50 addi r1,r1,80
60: 4e 80 00 20 blr

After this patch, the same test has become:

0: 7c 64 1b 78 mr r4,r3
4: 38 60 00 00 li r3,0
8: 94 21 ff b0 stwu r1,-80(r1)
c: 60 00 00 00 nop
10: 39 80 00 00 li r12,0
14: 39 60 00 00 li r11,0
18: 39 00 00 00 li r8,0
1c: 38 e0 00 00 li r7,0
20: 7c 86 23 78 mr r6,r4
24: 7c 65 1b 78 mr r5,r3
28: 39 80 00 42 li r12,66
2c: 39 60 00 00 li r11,0
30: 7d 8c 42 14 add r12,r12,r8
34: 39 60 00 00 li r11,0
38: 7d 83 63 78 mr r3,r12
3c: 38 21 00 50 addi r1,r1,80
40: 4e 80 00 20 blr

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b94562d7d2bb21aec89de0c40bb3cd91054b65a2.1616430991.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu

powerpc/bpf: Implement extended BPF on PPC32

Implement Extended Berkeley Packet Filter on Powerpc 32

Test result with test_bpf module:

test_bpf: Summary: 378 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [354/366 JIT'ed]

Registers mapping:

[BPF_REG_0] = r11-r12
/* function arguments */
[BPF_REG_1] = r3-r4
[BPF_REG_2] = r5-r6
[BPF_REG_3] = r7-r8
[BPF_REG_4] = r9-r10
[BPF_REG_5] = r21-r22 (Args 9 and 10 come in via the stack)
/* non volatile registers */
[BPF_REG_6] = r23-r24
[BPF_REG_7] = r25-r26
[BPF_REG_8] = r27-r28
[BPF_REG_9] = r29-r30
/* frame pointer aka BPF_REG_10 */
[BPF_REG_FP] = r17-r18
/* eBPF jit internal registers */
[BPF_REG_AX] = r19-r20
[TMP_REG] = r31

As PPC32 doesn't have a redzone in the stack, a stack frame must always
be set in order to host at least the tail count counter.

The stack frame remains for tail calls, it is set by the first callee
and freed by the last callee.

r0 is used as temporary register as much as possible. It is referenced
directly in the code in order to avoid misusing it, because some
instructions interpret it as value 0 instead of register r0
(ex: addi, addis, stw, lwz, ...)

The following operations are not implemented:

case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_DIV | BPF_X: /* dst /= src */
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_X: /* dst %= src */
case BPF_STX | BPF_XADD | BPF_DW: /* *(u64 *)(dst + off) += src */

The following operations are only implemented for power of two constants:

case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_K: /* dst %= imm */
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_DIV | BPF_K: /* dst /= imm */

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/61d8b149176ddf99e7d5cef0b6dc1598583ca202.1616430991.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu

powerpc/bpf: Change values of SEEN_ flags

Because PPC32 will use more non volatile registers,
move SEEN_ flags to positions 0-2 which corresponds to special
registers.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/608faa1dc3ecfead649e15392abd07b00313d2ba.1616430991.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu

powerpc/bpf: Move common functions into bpf_jit_comp.c

Move into bpf_jit_comp.c the functions that will remain common to
PPC64 and PPC32 when we add support of EBPF for PPC32.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2c339d77fb168ef12b213ccddfee3cb6c8ce8ae1.1616430991.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu

powerpc/bpf: Move common helpers into bpf_jit.h

Move functions bpf_flush_icache(), bpf_is_seen_register() and
bpf_set_seen_register() in order to reuse them in future
bpf_jit_comp32.c

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/28e8d5a75e64807d7e9d39a4b52658755e259f8c.1616430991.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu

powerpc/ppc-opcode: Consolidate powerpc instructions from bpf_jit.h

Move macro definitions of powerpc instructions from bpf_jit.h to
ppc-opcode.h and adopt the users of the macros accordingly. `PPC_MR()`
is defined twice in bpf_jit.h, remove the duplicate one.

Signed-off-by: Balamuruhan S <bala24@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200624113038.908074-5-bala24@linux.ibm.com

powerpc/bpf_jit: Reuse instruction macros from ppc-opcode.h

Remove duplicate macro definitions from bpf_jit.h and reuse the macros
from ppc-opcode.h

Signed-off-by: Balamuruhan S <bala24@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200624113038.908074-4-bala24@linux.ibm.com

powerpc/bpf: use unsigned division instruction for 64-bit operations

BPF_ALU64 div/mod operations are currently using signed division, unlike
BPF_ALU32 operations. Fix the same. DIV64 and MOD64 overflow tests pass
with this fix.

Fixes: 156d0e290e969c ("powerpc/ebpf/jit: Implement JIT compiler for extended BPF")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.8+
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>

treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 441

Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):

this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by
the free software foundation version 2 of the license

extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier

GPL-2.0-only

has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 315 file(s).

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Reviewed-by: Armijn Hemel <armijn@tjaldur.nl>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190531190115.503150771@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

powerpc: bpf: Fix generation of load/store DW instructions

Yauheni Kaliuta pointed out that PTR_TO_STACK store/load verifier test
was failing on powerpc64 BE, and rightfully indicated that the PPC_LD()
macro is not masking away the last two bits of the offset per the ISA,
resulting in the generation of 'lwa' instruction instead of the intended
'ld' instruction.

Segher also pointed out that we can't simply mask away the last two bits
as that will result in loading/storing from/to a memory location that
was not intended.

This patch addresses this by using ldx/stdx if the offset is not
word-aligned. We load the offset into a temporary register (TMP_REG_2)
and use that as the index register in a subsequent ldx/stdx. We fix
PPC_LD() macro to mask off the last two bits, but enhance PPC_BPF_LL()
and PPC_BPF_STL() to factor in the offset value and generate the proper
instruction sequence. We also convert all existing users of PPC_LD() and
PPC_STD() to use these macros. All existing uses of these macros have
been audited to ensure that TMP_REG_2 can be clobbered.

Fixes: 156d0e290e96 ("powerpc/ebpf/jit: Implement JIT compiler for extended BPF")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.9+

Reported-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <yauheni.kaliuta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>

ppc: bpf: implement jitting of JMP32

This patch implements code-gen for new JMP32 instructions on ppc.

For JMP32 | JSET, instruction encoding for PPC_RLWINM_DOT is added to check
the result of ANDing low 32-bit of operands.

Cc: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

ppc: bpf: implement jitting of BPF_ALU | BPF_ARSH | BPF_*

This patch implements code-gen for BPF_ALU | BPF_ARSH | BPF_*.

Cc: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

bpf, ppc64: implement jiting of BPF_J{LT, LE, SLT, SLE}

This work implements jiting of BPF_J{LT,LE,SLT,SLE} instructions
with BPF_X/BPF_K variants for the ppc64 eBPF JIT.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

powerpc/bpf: Introduce __PPC_SH64()

Introduce __PPC_SH64() as a 64-bit variant to encode shift field in some
of the shift and rotate instructions operating on double-words. Convert
some of the BPF instruction macros to use the same.

Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>

powerpc/bpf: Implement support for tail calls

Tail calls allow JIT'ed eBPF programs to call into other JIT'ed eBPF
programs. This can be achieved either by:
(1) retaining the stack setup by the first eBPF program and having all
subsequent eBPF programs re-using it, or,
(2) by unwinding/tearing down the stack and having each eBPF program
deal with its own stack as it sees fit.

To ensure that this does not create loops, there is a limit to how many
tail calls can be done (currently 32). This requires the JIT'ed code to
maintain a count of the number of tail calls done so far.

Approach (1) is simple, but requires every eBPF program to have (almost)
the same prologue/epilogue, regardless of whether they need it. This is
inefficient for small eBPF programs which may not sometimes need a
prologue at all. As such, to minimize impact of tail call
implementation, we use approach (2) here which needs each eBPF program
in the chain to use its own prologue/epilogue. This is not ideal when
many tail calls are involved and when all the eBPF programs in the chain
have similar prologue/epilogue. However, the impact is restricted to
programs that do tail calls. Individual eBPF programs are not affected.

We maintain the tail call count in a fixed location on the stack and
updated tail call count values are passed in through this. The very
first eBPF program in a chain sets this up to 0 (the first 2
instructions). Subsequent tail calls skip the first two eBPF JIT
instructions to maintain the count. For programs that don't do tail
calls themselves, the first two instructions are NOPs.

Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>

powerpc/ebpf/jit: Implement JIT compiler for extended BPF

PPC64 eBPF JIT compiler.

Enable with:
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
or
echo 2 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable

... to see the generated JIT code. This can further be processed with
tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm.

With CONFIG_TEST_BPF=m and 'modprobe test_bpf':

test_bpf: Summary: 305 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [297/297 JIT'ed]

... on both ppc64 BE and LE.

The details of the approach are documented through various comments in
the code.

Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>

powerpc/bpf/jit: Isolate classic BPF JIT specifics into a separate header

Break out classic BPF JIT specifics into a separate header in
preparation for eBPF JIT implementation. Note that ppc32 will still need
the classic BPF JIT.

Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>

powerpc/bpf/jit: A few cleanups

1. Per the ISA, ADDIS actually uses RT, rather than RS. Though
the result is the same, make the usage clear.
2. The multiply instruction used is a 32-bit multiply. Rename PPC_MUL()
to PPC_MULW() to make the same clear.
3. PPC_STW[U] take the entire 16-bit immediate value and do not require
word-alignment, per the ISA. Change the macros to use IMM_L().
4. A few white-space cleanups to satisfy checkpatch.pl.

Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>

powerpc/bpf/jit: Introduce rotate immediate instructions

Since we will be using the rotate immediate instructions for extended
BPF JIT, let's introduce macros for the same. And since the shift
immediate operations use the rotate immediate instructions, let's redo
those macros to use the newly introduced instructions.

Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>

powerpc/bpf/jit: Optimize 64-bit Immediate loads

Similar to the LI32() optimization, if the value can be represented
in 32-bits, use LI32(). Also handle loading a few specific forms of
immediate values in an optimum manner.

Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>

powerpc/bpf/jit: Fix/enhance 32-bit Load Immediate implementation

The existing LI32() macro can sometimes result in a sign-extended 32-bit
load that does not clear the top 32-bits properly. As an example,
loading 0x7fffffff results in the register containing
0xffffffff7fffffff. While this does not impact classic BPF JIT
implementation (since that only uses the lower word for all operations),
we would like to share this macro between classic BPF JIT and extended
BPF JIT, wherein the entire 64-bit value in the register matters. Fix
this by first doing a shifted LI followed by ORI.

An additional optimization is with loading values between -32768 to -1,
where we now only need a single LI.

The new implementation now generates the same or less number of
instructions.

Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>

ppc: bpf: Add SKF_AD_CPU for ppc32

Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

ppc: bpf: update jit to use compatibility macros

Use helpers from the asm-compat.h to wrap up assembly mnemonics

Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

PPC: bpf_jit_comp: add SKF_AD_PKTTYPE instruction

Add BPF extension SKF_AD_PKTTYPE to ppc JIT to load
skb->pkt_type field.

Before:
[ 88.262622] test_bpf: #11 LD_IND_NET 86 97 99 PASS
[ 88.265740] test_bpf: #12 LD_PKTTYPE 109 107 PASS

After:
[ 80.605964] test_bpf: #11 LD_IND_NET 44 40 39 PASS
[ 80.607370] test_bpf: #12 LD_PKTTYPE 9 9 PASS

CC: Alexei Starovoitov<alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
CC: Michael Ellerman<mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org>
Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>

v2: Added test rusults
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

powerpc/bpf: Support MOD operation

commit b6069a9570 (filter: add MOD operation) added generic
support for modulus operation in BPF.

This patch brings JIT support for PPC64

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin <murzin.v@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>

powerpc/bpf: BPF JIT compiler for 64-bit Little Endian

This enables the Berkeley Packet Filter JIT compiler
for the PowerPC running in 64bit Little Endian.

Signed-off-by: Philippe Bergheaud <felix@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>

PPC: net: bpf_jit_comp: add XOR instruction for BPF JIT

This patch is a follow-up for patch "filter: add XOR instruction for use
with X/K" that implements BPF PowerPC JIT parts for the BPF XOR operation.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel.borkmann@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
Cc: Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Acked-by: Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

powerpc: Start using ___PPC_RA/B/S/T where necessary

Now have ___PPC_RA/B/S/T we can use it in some places. These are
places where we can't use the existing defines which will soon enforce
R0-R31 usage.

The macros being changed here are being used in inline asm, which
can't convert to enforce the R0-R31 usage.

bpf_jit uses a mix of both generated and non-generated with the same
code, so just convert all these to use the ___PPC_R versions which
won't enforce R usage later.

Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>

bpf jit: Let the powerpc jit handle negative offsets

Now the helper function from filter.c for negative offsets is exported,
it can be used it in the jit to handle negative offsets.

First modify the asm load helper functions to handle:
- know positive offsets
- know negative offsets
- any offset

then the compiler can be modified to explicitly use these helper
when appropriate.

This fixes the case of a negative X register and allows to lift
the restriction that bpf programs with negative offsets can't
be jited.

Tested-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Jan Seiffert <kaffeemonster@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

net: filter: BPF 'JIT' compiler for PPC64

An implementation of a code generator for BPF programs to speed up packet
filtering on PPC64, inspired by Eric Dumazet's x86-64 version.

Filter code is generated as an ABI-compliant function in module_alloc()'d mem
with stackframe & prologue/epilogue generated if required (simple filters don't
need anything more than an li/blr). The filter's local variables, M[], live in
registers. Supports all BPF opcodes, although "complicated" loads from negative
packet offsets (e.g. SKF_LL_OFF) are not yet supported.

There are a couple of further optimisations left for future work; many-pass
assembly with branch-reach reduction and a register allocator to push M[]
variables into volatile registers would improve the code quality further.

This currently supports big-endian 64-bit PowerPC only (but is fairly simple
to port to PPC32 or LE!).

Enabled in the same way as x86-64:

echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable

Or, enabled with extra debug output:

echo 2 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable

Signed-off-by: Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>