arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_UNMAP_KERNEL_AT_EL0

In arm64_kernel_unmapped_at_el0() we use cpus_have_const_cap() to check
for ARM64_UNMAP_KERNEL_AT_EL0, but this is only necessary so that
arm64_get_bp_hardening_vector() and this_cpu_set_vectors() can run prior
to alternatives being patched. Otherwise this is not necessary and
alternative_has_cap_*() would be preferable.

For historical reasons, cpus_have_const_cap() is more complicated than
it needs to be. Before cpucaps are finalized, it will perform a bitmap
test of the system_cpucaps bitmap, and once cpucaps are finalized it
will use an alternative branch. This used to be necessary to handle some
race conditions in the window between cpucap detection and the
subsequent patching of alternatives and static branches, where different
branches could be out-of-sync with one another (or w.r.t. alternative
sequences). Now that we use alternative branches instead of static
branches, these are all patched atomically w.r.t. one another, and there
are only a handful of cases that need special care in the window between
cpucap detection and alternative patching.

Due to the above, it would be nice to remove cpus_have_const_cap(), and
migrate callers over to alternative_has_cap_*(), cpus_have_final_cap(),
or cpus_have_cap() depending on when their requirements. This will
remove redundant instructions and improve code generation, and will make
it easier to determine how each callsite will behave before, during, and
after alternative patching.

The ARM64_UNMAP_KERNEL_AT_EL0 cpucap is a system-wide feature that is
detected and patched before any translation tables are created for
userspace. In the window between detecting the ARM64_UNMAP_KERNEL_AT_EL0
cpucap and patching alternatives, most users of
arm64_kernel_unmapped_at_el0() do not need to know that the cpucap has
been detected:

* As KVM is initialized after cpucaps are finalized, no usaef of
arm64_kernel_unmapped_at_el0() in the KVM code is reachable during
this window.

* The arm64_mm_context_get() function in arch/arm64/mm/context.c is only
called after the SMMU driver is brought up after alternatives have
been patched. Thus this can safely use cpus_have_final_cap() or
alternative_has_cap_*().

Similarly the asids_update_limit() function is called after
alternatives have been patched as an arch_initcall, and this can
safely use cpus_have_final_cap() or alternative_has_cap_*().

Similarly we do not expect an ASID rollover to occur between cpucaps
being detected and patching alternatives. Thus
set_reserved_asid_bits() can safely use cpus_have_final_cap() or
alternative_has_cap_*().

* The __tlbi_user() and __tlbi_user_level() macros are not used during
this window, and only need to invalidate additional entries once
userspace translation tables have been active on a CPU. Thus these can
safely use alternative_has_cap_*().

* The xen_kernel_unmapped_at_usr() function is not used during this
window as it is only used in a late_initcall. Thus this can safely use
cpus_have_final_cap() or alternative_has_cap_*().

* The arm64_get_meltdown_state() function is not used during this
window. It only used by arm64_get_meltdown_state() and KVM code, both
of which are only used after cpucaps have been finalized. Thus this
can safely use cpus_have_final_cap() or alternative_has_cap_*().

* The tls_thread_switch() uses arm64_kernel_unmapped_at_el0() as an
optimization to avoid zeroing tpidrro_el0 when KPTI is enabled
and this will be trampled by the KPTI trampoline. It doesn't matter if
this continues to zero the register during the window between
detecting the cpucap and patching alternatives, so this can safely use
alternative_has_cap_*().

* The sdei_arch_get_entry_point() and do_sdei_event() functions aren't
reachable at this time as the SDEI driver is registered later by
acpi_init() -> acpi_ghes_init() -> sdei_init(), where acpi_init is a
subsys_initcall. Thus these can safely use cpus_have_final_cap() or
alternative_has_cap_*().

* The uses under drivers/ aren't reachable at this time as the drivers
are registered later:

- TRBE is registered via module_init()
- SMMUv3 is registred via module_driver()
- SPE is registred via module_init()

* The arm64_get_bp_hardening_vector() and this_cpu_set_vectors()
functions need to run on boot CPUs prior to patching alternatives.
As these are only called during the onlining of a CPU, it's fine to
perform a system_cpucaps bitmap test using cpus_have_cap().

This patch modifies this_cpu_set_vectors() to use cpus_have_cap(), and
replaced all other use of cpus_have_const_cap() with
alternative_has_cap_unlikely(), which will avoid generating code to test
the system_cpucaps bitmap and should be better for all subsequent calls
at runtime. The ARM64_UNMAP_KERNEL_AT_EL0 cpucap is added to
cpucap_is_possible() so that code can be elided entirely when this is
not possible.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

arm64: delete dead code in this_cpu_set_vectors()

The "slot" variable is an enum, and in this context it is an unsigned
int. So the type means it can never be negative and also we never pass
invalid data to this function. If something did pass invalid data then
this check would be insufficient protection.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/73859c9e-dea0-4764-bf01-7ae694fa2e37@kili.mountain
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

arm64: factor out EL1 SSBS emulation hook

Currently call_undef_hook() is used to handle UNDEFINED exceptions from
EL0 and EL1. As support for deprecated instructions may be enabled
independently, the handlers for individual instructions are organised as
a linked list of struct undef_hook which can be manipulated dynamically.
As this can be manipulated dynamically, the list is protected with a
raw_spinlock which must be acquired when handling UNDEFINED exceptions
or when manipulating the list of handlers.

This locking is unfortunate as it serialises handling of UNDEFINED
exceptions, and requires RCU to be enabled for lockdep, requiring the
use of RCU_NONIDLE() in resume path of cpu_suspend() since commit:

a2c42bbabbe260b7 ("arm64: spectre: Prevent lockdep splat on v4 mitigation enable path")

The list of UNDEFINED handlers largely consist of handlers for
exceptions taken from EL0, and the only handler for exceptions taken
from EL1 handles `MSR SSBS, #imm` on CPUs which feature PSTATE.SSBS but
lack the corresponding MSR (Immediate) instruction. Other than this we
never expect to take an UNDEFINED exception from EL1 in normal
operation.

This patch reworks do_el0_undef() to invoke the EL1 SSBS handler
directly, relegating call_undef_hook() to only handle EL0 UNDEFs. This
removes redundant work to iterate the list for EL1 UNDEFs, and removes
the need for locking, permitting EL1 UNDEFs to be handled in parallel
without contention.

The RCU_NONIDLE() call in cpu_suspend() will be removed in a subsequent
patch, as there are other potential issues with the use of
instrumentable code and RCU in the CPU suspend code.

I've tested this by forcing the detection of SSBS on a CPU that doesn't
have it, and verifying that the try_emulate_el1_ssbs() callback is
invoked.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221019144123.612388-4-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

arm64: Add AMPERE1 to the Spectre-BHB affected list

Per AmpereOne erratum AC03_CPU_12, "Branch history may allow control of
speculative execution across software contexts," the AMPERE1 core needs the
bhb clearing loop to mitigate Spectre-BHB, with a loop iteration count of
11.

Signed-off-by: D Scott Phillips <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221011022140.432370-1-scott@os.amperecomputing.com
Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

arm64: alternatives: proton-pack: prepare for cap changes

The spectre patching callbacks use cpus_have_final_cap(), and subsequent
patches will make it invalid to call cpus_have_final_cap() before
alternatives patching has completed.

In preparation for said change, this patch modifies the spectre patching
callbacks use cpus_have_cap(). This is not subject to patching, and will
dynamically check the cpu_hwcaps array, which is functionally equivalent
to the existing behaviour.

There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220912162210.3626215-4-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

arm64: spectre: increase parameters that can be used to turn off bhb mitigation individually

In our environment, it was found that the mitigation BHB has a great
impact on the benchmark performance. For example, in the lmbench test,
the "process fork && exit" test performance drops by 20%.
So it is necessary to have the ability to turn off the mitigation
individually through cmdline, thus avoiding having to compile the
kernel by adjusting the config.

Signed-off-by: Liu Song <liusong@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1661514050-22263-1-git-send-email-liusong@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

arm64/sysreg: Standardise naming for ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1 fields

In preparation for converting the ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1 system register
defines to automatic generation, rename them to follow the conventions
used by other automatically generated registers:

* Add _EL1 in the register name.

* Rename fields to match the names in the ARM ARM:
* LOR -> LO
* HPD -> HPDS
* VHE -> VH
* HADBS -> HAFDBS
* SPECSEI -> SpecSEI
* VMIDBITS -> VMIDBits

There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.

Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220905225425.1871461-11-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

arm64/sysreg: Add _EL1 into ID_AA64PFR0_EL1 definition names

Normally we include the full register name in the defines for fields within
registers but this has not been followed for ID registers. In preparation
for automatic generation of defines add the _EL1s into the defines for
ID_AA64PFR0_EL1 to follow the convention. No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220905225425.1871461-7-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

arm64: Add part number for Arm Cortex-A78AE

Add the MIDR part number info for the Arm Cortex-A78AE[1] and add it to
spectre-BHB affected list[2].

[1]: https://developer.arm.com/Processors/Cortex-A78AE
[2]: https://developer.arm.com/Arm%20Security%20Center/Spectre-BHB

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Chanho Park <chanho61.park@samsung.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220407091128.8700-1-chanho61.park@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

arm64: prevent instrumentation of bp hardening callbacks

We may call arm64_apply_bp_hardening() early during entry (e.g. in
el0_ia()) before it is safe to run instrumented code. Unfortunately this
may result in running instrumented code in two cases:

* The hardening callbacks called by arm64_apply_bp_hardening() are not
marked as `noinstr`, and have been observed to be instrumented when
compiled with either GCC or LLVM.

* Since arm64_apply_bp_hardening() itself is only marked as `inline`
rather than `__always_inline`, it is possible that the compiler
decides to place it out-of-line, whereupon it may be instrumented.

For example, with defconfig built with clang 13.0.0,
call_hvc_arch_workaround_1() is compiled as:

| <call_hvc_arch_workaround_1>:
| d503233f paciasp
| f81f0ffe str x30, [sp, #-16]!
| 320183e0 mov w0, #0x80008000
| d503201f nop
| d4000002 hvc #0x0
| f84107fe ldr x30, [sp], #16
| d50323bf autiasp
| d65f03c0 ret

... but when CONFIG_FTRACE=y and CONFIG_KCOV=y this is compiled as:

| <call_hvc_arch_workaround_1>:
| d503245f bti c
| d503201f nop
| d503201f nop
| d503233f paciasp
| a9bf7bfd stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
| 910003fd mov x29, sp
| 94000000 bl 0 <__sanitizer_cov_trace_pc>
| 320183e0 mov w0, #0x80008000
| d503201f nop
| d4000002 hvc #0x0
| a8c17bfd ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16
| d50323bf autiasp
| d65f03c0 ret

... with a patchable function entry registered with ftrace, and a direct
call to __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc(). Neither of these are safe early
during entry sequences.

This patch avoids the unsafe instrumentation by marking
arm64_apply_bp_hardening() as `__always_inline` and by marking the
hardening functions as `noinstr`. This avoids the potential for
instrumentation, and causes clang to consistently generate the function
as with the defconfig sample.

Note: in the defconfig compilation, when CONFIG_SVE=y, x30 is spilled to
the stack without being placed in a frame record, which will result in a
missing entry if call_hvc_arch_workaround_1() is backtraced. Similar is
true of qcom_link_stack_sanitisation(), where inline asm spills the LR
to a GPR prior to corrupting it. This is not a significant issue
presently as we will only backtrace here if an exception is taken, and
in such cases we may omit entries for other reasons today.

The relevant hardening functions were introduced in commits:

ec82b567a74fbdff ("arm64: Implement branch predictor hardening for Falkor")
b092201e00206141 ("arm64: Add ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1 BP hardening support")

... and these were subsequently moved in commit:

d4647f0a2ad71110 ("arm64: Rewrite Spectre-v2 mitigation code")

The arm64_apply_bp_hardening() function was introduced in commit:

0f15adbb2861ce6f ("arm64: Add skeleton to harden the branch predictor against aliasing attacks")

... and was subsequently moved and reworked in commit:

6279017e807708a0 ("KVM: arm64: Move BP hardening helpers into spectre.h")

Fixes: ec82b567a74fbdff ("arm64: Implement branch predictor hardening for Falkor")
Fixes: b092201e00206141 ("arm64: Add ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1 BP hardening support")
Fixes: d4647f0a2ad71110 ("arm64: Rewrite Spectre-v2 mitigation code")
Fixes: 0f15adbb2861ce6f ("arm64: Add skeleton to harden the branch predictor against aliasing attacks")
Fixes: 6279017e807708a0 ("KVM: arm64: Move BP hardening helpers into spectre.h")
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220224181028.512873-1-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

arm64: proton-pack: Include unprivileged eBPF status in Spectre v2 mitigation reporting

The mitigations for Spectre-BHB are only applied when an exception is
taken from user-space. The mitigation status is reported via the spectre_v2
sysfs vulnerabilities file.

When unprivileged eBPF is enabled the mitigation in the exception vectors
can be avoided by an eBPF program.

When unprivileged eBPF is enabled, print a warning and report vulnerable
via the sysfs vulnerabilities file.

Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>

arm64: Use the clearbhb instruction in mitigations

Future CPUs may implement a clearbhb instruction that is sufficient
to mitigate SpectreBHB. CPUs that implement this instruction, but
not CSV2.3 must be affected by Spectre-BHB.

Add support to use this instruction as the BHB mitigation on CPUs
that support it. The instruction is in the hint space, so it will
be treated by a NOP as older CPUs.

Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>

arm64: Mitigate spectre style branch history side channels

Speculation attacks against some high-performance processors can
make use of branch history to influence future speculation.
When taking an exception from user-space, a sequence of branches
or a firmware call overwrites or invalidates the branch history.

The sequence of branches is added to the vectors, and should appear
before the first indirect branch. For systems using KPTI the sequence
is added to the kpti trampoline where it has a free register as the exit
from the trampoline is via a 'ret'. For systems not using KPTI, the same
register tricks are used to free up a register in the vectors.

For the firmware call, arch-workaround-3 clobbers 4 registers, so
there is no choice but to save them to the EL1 stack. This only happens
for entry from EL0, so if we take an exception due to the stack access,
it will not become re-entrant.

For KVM, the existing branch-predictor-hardening vectors are used.
When a spectre version of these vectors is in use, the firmware call
is sufficient to mitigate against Spectre-BHB. For the non-spectre
versions, the sequence of branches is added to the indirect vector.

Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>

arm64: proton-pack: Report Spectre-BHB vulnerabilities as part of Spectre-v2

Speculation attacks against some high-performance processors can
make use of branch history to influence future speculation as part of
a spectre-v2 attack. This is not mitigated by CSV2, meaning CPUs that
previously reported 'Not affected' are now moderately mitigated by CSV2.

Update the value in /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/spectre_v2
to also show the state of the BHB mitigation.

Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>

arm64: entry: Add vectors that have the bhb mitigation sequences

Some CPUs affected by Spectre-BHB need a sequence of branches, or a
firmware call to be run before any indirect branch. This needs to go
in the vectors. No CPU needs both.

While this can be patched in, it would run on all CPUs as there is a
single set of vectors. If only one part of a big/little combination is
affected, the unaffected CPUs have to run the mitigation too.

Create extra vectors that include the sequence. Subsequent patches will
allow affected CPUs to select this set of vectors. Later patches will
modify the loop count to match what the CPU requires.

Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>

arm64: spectre: Rename spectre_v4_patch_fw_mitigation_conduit

The spectre-v4 sequence includes an SMC from the assembly entry code.
spectre_v4_patch_fw_mitigation_conduit is the patching callback that
generates an HVC or SMC depending on the SMCCC conduit type.

As this isn't specific to spectre-v4, rename it
smccc_patch_fw_mitigation_conduit so it can be re-used.

Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>

arm64: add C wrappers for SET_PSTATE_*()

To make callsites easier to read, add trivial C wrappers for the
SET_PSTATE_*() helpers, and convert trivial uses over to these. The new
wrappers will be used further in subsequent patches.

There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201113124937.20574-3-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

arm64: spectre: Consolidate spectre-v3a detection

The spectre-v3a mitigation is split between cpu_errata.c and spectre.c,
with the former handling detection of the problem and the latter handling
enabling of the workaround.

Move the detection logic alongside the enabling logic, like we do for the
other spectre mitigations.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201113113847.21619-10-will@kernel.org

arm64: spectre: Rename ARM64_HARDEN_EL2_VECTORS to ARM64_SPECTRE_V3A

Since ARM64_HARDEN_EL2_VECTORS is really a mitigation for Spectre-v3a,
rename it accordingly for consistency with the v2 and v4 mitigation.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201113113847.21619-9-will@kernel.org

KVM: arm64: Allocate hyp vectors statically

The EL2 vectors installed when a guest is running point at one of the
following configurations for a given CPU:

- Straight at __kvm_hyp_vector
- A trampoline containing an SMC sequence to mitigate Spectre-v2 and
then a direct branch to __kvm_hyp_vector
- A dynamically-allocated trampoline which has an indirect branch to
__kvm_hyp_vector
- A dynamically-allocated trampoline containing an SMC sequence to
mitigate Spectre-v2 and then an indirect branch to __kvm_hyp_vector

The indirect branches mean that VA randomization at EL2 isn't trivially
bypassable using Spectre-v3a (where the vector base is readable by the
guest).

Rather than populate these vectors dynamically, configure everything
statically and use an enumerated type to identify the vector "slot"
corresponding to one of the configurations above. This both simplifies
the code, but also makes it much easier to implement at EL2 later on.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
[maz: fixed double call to kvm_init_vector_slots() on nVHE]
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201113113847.21619-8-will@kernel.org

arm64: proton-pack: Add KRYO2XX silver CPUs to spectre-v2 safe-list

KRYO2XX silver (LITTLE) CPUs are based on Cortex-A53
and they are not affected by spectre-v2.

Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201104232218.198800-4-konrad.dybcio@somainline.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

arm64: alternatives: Split up alternative.h

asm/alternative.h contains both the macros needed to use alternatives,
as well the type definitions and function prototypes for applying them.

Split the header in two, so that alternatives can be used from core
header files such as linux/compiler.h without the risk of circular
includes

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

KVM: arm64: ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1 doesn't return SMCCC_RET_NOT_REQUIRED

According to the SMCCC spec[1](7.5.2 Discovery) the
ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1 function id only returns 0, 1, and
SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED.

0 is "workaround required and safe to call this function"
1 is "workaround not required but safe to call this function"
SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED is "might be vulnerable or might not be, who knows, I give up!"

SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED might as well mean "workaround required, except
calling this function may not work because it isn't implemented in some
cases". Wonderful. We map this SMC call to

0 is SPECTRE_MITIGATED
1 is SPECTRE_UNAFFECTED
SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED is SPECTRE_VULNERABLE

For KVM hypercalls (hvc), we've implemented this function id to return
SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED, 0, and SMCCC_RET_NOT_REQUIRED. One of those
isn't supposed to be there. Per the code we call
arm64_get_spectre_v2_state() to figure out what to return for this
feature discovery call.

0 is SPECTRE_MITIGATED
SMCCC_RET_NOT_REQUIRED is SPECTRE_UNAFFECTED
SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED is SPECTRE_VULNERABLE

Let's clean this up so that KVM tells the guest this mapping:

0 is SPECTRE_MITIGATED
1 is SPECTRE_UNAFFECTED
SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED is SPECTRE_VULNERABLE

Note: SMCCC_RET_NOT_AFFECTED is 1 but isn't part of the SMCCC spec

Fixes: c118bbb52743 ("arm64: KVM: Propagate full Spectre v2 workaround state to KVM guests")
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0028/latest [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201023154751.1973872-1-swboyd@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

arm64: proton-pack: Update comment to reflect new function name

The function detect_harden_bp_fw() is gone after commit d4647f0a2ad7
("arm64: Rewrite Spectre-v2 mitigation code"). Update this comment to
reflect the new state of affairs.

Fixes: d4647f0a2ad7 ("arm64: Rewrite Spectre-v2 mitigation code")
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201020214544.3206838-3-swboyd@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

arm64: spectre-v2: Favour CPU-specific mitigation at EL2

Spectre-v2 can be mitigated on Falkor CPUs either by calling into
firmware or by issuing a magic, CPU-specific sequence of branches.
Although the latter is faster, the size of the code sequence means that
it cannot be used in the EL2 vectors, and so there is a need for both
mitigations to co-exist in order to achieve optimal performance.

Change the mitigation selection logic for Spectre-v2 so that the
CPU-specific mitigation is used only when the firmware mitigation is
also available, rather than when a firmware mitigation is unavailable.

Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

arm64: Add support for PR_SPEC_DISABLE_NOEXEC prctl() option

The PR_SPEC_DISABLE_NOEXEC option to the PR_SPEC_STORE_BYPASS prctl()
allows the SSB mitigation to be enabled only until the next execve(),
at which point the state will revert back to PR_SPEC_ENABLE and the
mitigation will be disabled.

Add support for PR_SPEC_DISABLE_NOEXEC on arm64.

Reported-by: Anthony Steinhauser <asteinhauser@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

arm64: Pull in task_stack_page() to Spectre-v4 mitigation code

The kbuild robot reports that we're relying on an implicit inclusion to
get a definition of task_stack_page() in the Spectre-v4 mitigation code,
which is not always in place for some configurations:

| arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c:329:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'task_stack_page' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
| task_pt_regs(task)->pstate |= val;
| ^
| arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:268:36: note: expanded from macro 'task_pt_regs'
| ((struct pt_regs *)(THREAD_SIZE + task_stack_page(p)) - 1)
| ^
| arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c:329:2: note: did you mean 'task_spread_page'?

Add the missing include to fix the build error.

Fixes: a44acf477220 ("arm64: Move SSBD prctl() handler alongside other spectre mitigation code")
Reported-by: Anthony Steinhauser <asteinhauser@google.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202009260013.Ul7AD29w%lkp@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

KVM: arm64: Allow patching EL2 vectors even with KASLR is not enabled

Patching the EL2 exception vectors is integral to the Spectre-v2
workaround, where it can be necessary to execute CPU-specific sequences
to nobble the branch predictor before running the hypervisor text proper.

Remove the dependency on CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE and allow the EL2 vectors
to be patched even when KASLR is not enabled.

Fixes: 7a132017e7a5 ("KVM: arm64: Replace CONFIG_KVM_INDIRECT_VECTORS with CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202009221053.Jv1XsQUZ%lkp@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

arm64: Rewrite Spectre-v4 mitigation code

Rewrite the Spectre-v4 mitigation handling code to follow the same
approach as that taken by Spectre-v2.

For now, report to KVM that the system is vulnerable (by forcing
'ssbd_state' to ARM64_SSBD_UNKNOWN), as this will be cleared up in
subsequent steps.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

arm64: Move SSBD prctl() handler alongside other spectre mitigation code

As part of the spectre consolidation effort to shift all of the ghosts
into their own proton pack, move all of the horrible SSBD prctl() code
out of its own 'ssbd.c' file.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

arm64: Rewrite Spectre-v2 mitigation code

The Spectre-v2 mitigation code is pretty unwieldy and hard to maintain.
This is largely due to it being written hastily, without much clue as to
how things would pan out, and also because it ends up mixing policy and
state in such a way that it is very difficult to figure out what's going
on.

Rewrite the Spectre-v2 mitigation so that it clearly separates state from
policy and follows a more structured approach to handling the mitigation.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

arm64: Introduce separate file for spectre mitigations and reporting

The spectre mitigation code is spread over a few different files, which
makes it both hard to follow, but also hard to remove it should we want
to do that in future.

Introduce a new file for housing the spectre mitigations, and populate
it with the spectre-v1 reporting code to start with.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>