kernel/vm: Whitespace cleanup only.

Allocate VMKernelAddressRange and VMKernelArea in their own object
caches to reduce slab area fragmentation.


git-svn-id: file:///srv/svn/repos/haiku/haiku/trunk@43136 a95241bf-73f2-0310-859d-f6bbb57e9c96

* Introduced {malloc,memalign,free}_etc() which take an additional "flags"
argument. They replace the previous special-purpose allocation functions
(malloc_nogrow(), vip_io_request_malloc()).
* Moved the I/O VIP heap to heap.cpp accordingly.
* Added quite a bit of passing around of allocation flags in the VM,
particularly in the VM*AddressSpace classes.
* Fixed IOBuffer::GetNextVirtualVec(): It was ignoring the VIP flag and always
allocated on the normal heap.


git-svn-id: file:///srv/svn/repos/haiku/haiku/trunk@35316 a95241bf-73f2-0310-859d-f6bbb57e9c96

* Renamed VMAddressSpace::ResizeArea{Head,Tail}() to ShrinkArea{Head,Tail}()
to clarify that they never enlarge the area.
* Reimplemented VMKernelAddressSpace. It is somewhat inspired by Bonwick's
vmem resource allocator (though we have different requirements):
- We consider the complete address space to be divided into contiguous
ranges of type free, reserved, or area, each range being represented by
a VMKernelAddressRange object.
- The range objects are managed in an AVL tree and a doubly linked list
(the latter only for faster iteration) sorted by address. This provides
O(log(n)) lookup, insertion and removal.
- For each power of two size we maintain a list of free ranges of at least
that size. Thus for the most common case of B_ANY*_ADDRESS area
allocation, we find a free range in constant time (the rest of the
processing being O(log(n))) with a rather good fit. This should also
help avoiding address space fragmentation.
While the new implementation should be faster, particularly with an
increasing number of areas, I couldn't measure any difference in the -j2
haiku build. From a cursory test the -j8 build hasn't tangibly benefitted
either.


git-svn-id: file:///srv/svn/repos/haiku/haiku/trunk@34528 a95241bf-73f2-0310-859d-f6bbb57e9c96

* Added VMArea subclasses VM{Kernel,User}Area and moved the address space list
link to them.
* VM{Kernel,User}AddressSpace manage the respective VMArea subclass now, and
VMAddressSpace has grown factory methods {Create,Delete}Area.


git-svn-id: file:///srv/svn/repos/haiku/haiku/trunk@34493 a95241bf-73f2-0310-859d-f6bbb57e9c96

Allocate VMKernelAddressRange and VMKernelArea in their own object
caches to reduce slab area fragmentation.


git-svn-id: file:///srv/svn/repos/haiku/haiku/trunk@43136 a95241bf-73f2-0310-859d-f6bbb57e9c96

* Introduced {malloc,memalign,free}_etc() which take an additional "flags"
argument. They replace the previous special-purpose allocation functions
(malloc_nogrow(), vip_io_request_malloc()).
* Moved the I/O VIP heap to heap.cpp accordingly.
* Added quite a bit of passing around of allocation flags in the VM,
particularly in the VM*AddressSpace classes.
* Fixed IOBuffer::GetNextVirtualVec(): It was ignoring the VIP flag and always
allocated on the normal heap.


git-svn-id: file:///srv/svn/repos/haiku/haiku/trunk@35316 a95241bf-73f2-0310-859d-f6bbb57e9c96

* Renamed VMAddressSpace::ResizeArea{Head,Tail}() to ShrinkArea{Head,Tail}()
to clarify that they never enlarge the area.
* Reimplemented VMKernelAddressSpace. It is somewhat inspired by Bonwick's
vmem resource allocator (though we have different requirements):
- We consider the complete address space to be divided into contiguous
ranges of type free, reserved, or area, each range being represented by
a VMKernelAddressRange object.
- The range objects are managed in an AVL tree and a doubly linked list
(the latter only for faster iteration) sorted by address. This provides
O(log(n)) lookup, insertion and removal.
- For each power of two size we maintain a list of free ranges of at least
that size. Thus for the most common case of B_ANY*_ADDRESS area
allocation, we find a free range in constant time (the rest of the
processing being O(log(n))) with a rather good fit. This should also
help avoiding address space fragmentation.
While the new implementation should be faster, particularly with an
increasing number of areas, I couldn't measure any difference in the -j2
haiku build. From a cursory test the -j8 build hasn't tangibly benefitted
either.


git-svn-id: file:///srv/svn/repos/haiku/haiku/trunk@34528 a95241bf-73f2-0310-859d-f6bbb57e9c96

* Added VMArea subclasses VM{Kernel,User}Area and moved the address space list
link to them.
* VM{Kernel,User}AddressSpace manage the respective VMArea subclass now, and
VMAddressSpace has grown factory methods {Create,Delete}Area.


git-svn-id: file:///srv/svn/repos/haiku/haiku/trunk@34493 a95241bf-73f2-0310-859d-f6bbb57e9c96