sockets: make pr_shutdown fully protocol specific method

Disassemble a one-for-all soshutdown() into protocol specific methods.
This creates a small amount of copy & paste, but makes code a lot more
self documented, as protocol specific method would execute only the code
that is relevant to that protocol and nothing else. This also fixes a
couple recent regressions and reduces risk of future regressions. The
extended KPI for the new pr_shutdown removes need for the extra pr_flush
which was added for the sake of SCTP which could not perform its shutdown
properly with the old one. Particularly for SCTP this change streamlines
a lot of code.

Some notes on why certain parts of code were copied or were not to certain
protocols:
* The (SS_ISCONNECTED | SS_ISCONNECTING | SS_ISDISCONNECTING) check is
needed only for those protocols that may be connected or disconnected.
* The above reduces into only SS_ISCONNECTED for those protocols that
always connect instantly.
* The ENOTCONN and continue processing hack is left only for datagram
protocols.
* The SOLISTENING(so) block is copied to those protocols that listen(2).
* sorflush() on SHUT_RD is copied almost to every protocol, but that
will be refactored later.
* wakeup(&so->so_timeo) is copied to protocols that can make a non-instant
connect(2), can SO_LINGER or can accept(2).

There are three protocols (netgraph(4), Bluetooth, SDP) that did not have
pr_shutdown, but old soshutdown() would still perform sorflush() on
SHUT_RD for them and also wakeup(9). Those protocols partially supported
shutdown(2) returning EOPNOTSUP for SHUT_WR/SHUT_RDWR, now they fully lost
shutdown(2) support. I'm pretty sure netgraph(4) and Bluetooth are okay
about that and SDP is almost abandoned anyway.

Reviewed by: tuexen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D43413

sockets: don't malloc/free sockaddr memory on getpeername/getsockname

Just like it was done for accept(2) in cfb1e92912b4, use same approach
for two simplier syscalls that return socket addresses. Although,
these two syscalls aren't performance critical, this change generalizes
some code between 3 syscalls trimming code size.

Following example of accept(2), provide VNET-aware and INVARIANT-checking
wrappers sopeeraddr() and sosockaddr() around protosw methods.

Reviewed by: tuexen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D42694

sockets: don't malloc/free sockaddr memory on accept(2)

Let the accept functions provide stack memory for protocols to fill it in.
Generic code should provide sockaddr_storage, specialized code may provide
smaller structure.

While rewriting accept(2) make 'addrlen' a true in/out parameter, reporting
required length in case if provided length was insufficient. Our manual
page accept(2) and POSIX don't explicitly require that, but one can read
the text as they do. Linux also does that. Update tests accordingly.

Reviewed by: rscheff, tuexen, zlei, dchagin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D42635

sys: Remove $FreeBSD$: two-line .h pattern

Remove /^\s*\*\n \*\s+\$FreeBSD\$$\n/

spdx: The BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD identifier is obsolete, drop -FreeBSD

The SPDX folks have obsoleted the BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD identifier. Catch
up to that fact and revert to their recommended match of BSD-2-Clause.

Discussed with: pfg
MFC After: 3 days
Sponsored by: Netflix

protocols: init with standard SYSINIT(9) or VNET_SYSINIT

The historical BSD network stack loop that rolls over domains and
over protocols has no advantages over more modern SYSINIT(9).
While doing the sweep, split global and per-VNET initializers.

Getting rid of pr_init allows to achieve several things:
o Get rid of ifdef's that protect against double foo_init() when
both INET and INET6 are compiled in.
o Isolate initializers statically to the module they init.
o Makes code easier to understand and maintain.

Reviewed by: melifaro
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D33537

HyperV socket implementation for FreeBSD

This change adds Hyper-V socket feature in FreeBSD. New socket address
family AF_HYPERV and its kernel support are added.

Submitted by: Wei Hu <weh@microsoft.com>
Reviewed by: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
Relnotes: yes
Sponsored by: Microsoft
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24061