#
267654 |
|
19-Jun-2014 |
gjb |
Copy stable/9 to releng/9.3 as part of the 9.3-RELEASE cycle.
Approved by: re (implicit) Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation |
#
225736 |
|
22-Sep-2011 |
kensmith |
Copy head to stable/9 as part of 9.0-RELEASE release cycle.
Approved by: re (implicit)
|
#
191910 |
|
08-May-2009 |
sepotvin |
Change the internal buffer used to store input lines from a static buffer to a dynamically allocated one in order to support input lines of arbitrary length.
Approved by: kan (mentor) MFC after: 1 month
|
#
105017 |
|
12-Oct-2002 |
kris |
Prevent stack-smashing buffer overflows in -D and -r options by using buffer-safe string functions. The rest of the code is still probably unsafe.
MFC after: 1 week
|
#
95601 |
|
27-Apr-2002 |
gad |
Add many prototypes and ANSI-ize 'patch. Not a complete job of it, but it gets our patch to look a little more like NetBSD's, and has the nice characteristic that the object code is exactly the same after the change as before it (even in patch.c and pch.c, which have pesky 'assert' statements in them).
Reviewed by: /sbin/md5 on i386, alpha, sparc64 MFC after: 3 days
|
#
90379 |
|
08-Feb-2002 |
mike |
Add -i option (SUSv3) to patch(1). This allows one to specify a patch file on command line instead of stdin.
Submitted by: Joseph Mallett <jmallett@xMach.org> MFC after: 1 month
|
#
64156 |
|
02-Aug-2000 |
kbyanc |
Fix previous commit such that only -S/--skip ignores errors when applying a patch, returning -f/--force and -t/--batch to their previous semantics.
Pointed out by: asami
|
#
64120 |
|
02-Aug-2000 |
kbyanc |
Fix patch such that skipping files does not count as a failure. Previously, using -S/--skip, -f/--force, or -t/--batch to skip a patch in a patchset still registers a failure which causes patch to return a non-zero exit code. This is particularly undesirable with regards to ports as there is no way to ignore the non-zero code. (Luckily, we don't currently have any ports that make use of any of these options.)
The PR (yes, my own) is slightly incorrect: It states that -f does indeed properly skip patches. It does, but it still sets the failure flag causing patch to return non-zero.
PR: 19638 Submitted by: kbyanc@posi.net
|
#
50965 |
|
05-Sep-1999 |
peter |
Clean up some $Log$ debris, including some real messes.
|
#
50488 |
|
28-Aug-1999 |
peter |
$Header$ -> $FreeBSD$
|
#
32698 |
|
22-Jan-1998 |
ache |
Add PATCH_INDEX_FIRST environment variable to do the same as -I option
|
#
32674 |
|
21-Jan-1998 |
ache |
Update usage line with new option
|
#
32673 |
|
21-Jan-1998 |
ache |
Add -I or --index-first option to take Index: precedence over context diff, as it was in hacked FreeBSD version
|
#
32672 |
|
21-Jan-1998 |
ache |
Resurrect patch 2.1 without FreeBSD Index: hack
|