| #
331722 |
|
29-Mar-2018 |
eadler |
Revert r330897:
This was intended to be a non-functional change. It wasn't. The commit
message was thus wrong. In addition it broke arm, and merged crypto
related code.
Revert with prejudice.
This revert skips files touched in r316370 since that commit was since
MFCed. This revert also skips files that require $FreeBSD$ property
changes.
Thank you to those who helped me get out of this mess including but not
limited to gonzo, kevans, rgrimes.
Requested by: gjb (re)
|
| #
275819 |
|
16-Dec-2014 |
ed |
Rename cpack*() to CMPLX*().
The C11 standard introduced a set of macros (CMPLX, CMPLXF, CMPLXL) that
can be used to construct complex numbers from a pair of real and
imaginary numbers. Unfortunately, they require some compiler support,
which is why we only define them for Clang and GCC>=4.7.
The cpack() function in libm performs the same task as CMPLX(), but
cannot be used to generate compile-time constants. This means that all
invocations of cpack() can safely be replaced by C11's CMPLX(). To keep
the code building with GCC 4.2, provide copies of CMPLX() that can at
least be used to generate run-time complex numbers.
This makes it easier to build some of the functions outside of libm.
|
| #
181374 |
|
07-Aug-2008 |
das |
Use cpack() and the gcc extension __imag__ to implement cimag() and
conj() instead of using expressions like z * I. The latter is bad for
several reasons:
1. It is implemented using arithmetic, which is unnecessary, and can
generate floating point exceptions, contrary to the requirements on
these functions.
2. gcc implements complex multiplication using a formula that breaks
down for infinities, e.g., it gives INFINITY * I == nan + inf I.
|
| #
129864 |
|
30-May-2004 |
stefanf |
Add implementations for cimag{,f,l}, creal{,f,l} and conj{,f,l}. They are
needed for cases where GCC's builtin functions cannot be used and for
compilers that don't know about them.
Approved by: das (mentor)
|