| #
284085 |
|
06-Jun-2015 |
markj |
libdtrace: allow D libraries to declare dependencies on kernel modules
The "depends_on module" pragma can be used to declare a dependency on a
DTrace module, which for kernel probes corresponds to a KLD. Such
dependencies cannot be checked if the KLD is compiled into the kernel.
Therefore, allow a module dependency to be satisfied if either a kernel
module or a KLD with the specified name is loaded.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2653
Reviewed by: gnn, rpaulo
Reported by: gnn
|
| #
275011 |
|
25-Nov-2014 |
markj |
The module load address always needs to be included when setting the dm_*_va
fields of dt_module_t. Previously, this was only done on architectures where
kernel modules have type ET_REL; this change fixes that. As a result, symbol
name resolution in the stack() action now works properly for kernel modules
on i386.
Reported by: Shrikanth Kamath <shrikanth07@gmail.com>
Tested by: Shrikanth Kamath
Discussed with: avg
MFC after: 2 weeks
|
| #
210425 |
|
23-Jul-2010 |
avg |
dtrace: correctly map sections to addresses in elf object modules (amd64)
Unlike for modules with dso type, in elf object modules all the sections
have virtual address of zero. So, it is insufficient to add module base
address to section virtual address (as recorded in section header) to
get section address in kernel memory.
Instead, we should apply the same calculations that are performed by
kernel loaders (in boot code and in kernel) when they lay out sections
in memory.
Also, unlike OpenSolaris, the sections are not collapsed into just .text,
.data and .bss by module loaders, so we need to take additional care
about other sections.
Note that in-kernel symbol-to-address mapping worked just fine, e.g. fbt
provider could correctly find the functions, etc. It's only in userland
that the mapping in both direction worked incorrectly, e.g. in stack()
output addresses of functions in kernel modules were not translated to
their names.
Reviewed by: rpaulo
MFC after: 3 weeks
|