History log of /freebsd-10.3-release/lib/libutil/kinfo_getproc.3
Revision Date Author Comments
(<<< Hide modified files)
(Show modified files >>>)
# 296373 04-Mar-2016 marius

- Copy stable/10@296371 to releng/10.3 in preparation for 10.3-RC1
builds.
- Update newvers.sh to reflect RC1.
- Update __FreeBSD_version to reflect 10.3.
- Update default pkg(8) configuration to use the quarterly branch.

Approved by: re (implicit)

# 287439 03-Sep-2015 jhb

MFC 283622:
Add <sys/user.h> to the SYNOPSIS of the kinfo_get*() functions since these
functions all return types that are defined in that header.


# 256281 10-Oct-2013 gjb

Copy head (r256279) to stable/10 as part of the 10.0-RELEASE cycle.

Approved by: re (implicit)
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation


# 247534 01-Mar-2013 ru

Fixed documented prototype of kinfo_getproc(3).


# 233520 26-Mar-2012 joel

mdoc: sort prologue macros.


# 232157 25-Feb-2012 gjb

Fix various typos in manual pages.

Submitted by: amdmi3
PR: 165431
MFC after: 1 week


# 221807 12-May-2011 stas

- Commit work from libprocstat project. These patches add support for runtime
file and processes information retrieval from the running kernel via sysctl
in the form of new library, libprocstat. The library also supports KVM backend
for analyzing memory crash dumps. Both procstat(1) and fstat(1) utilities have
been modified to take advantage of the library (as the bonus point the fstat(1)
utility no longer need superuser privileges to operate), and the procstat(1)
utility is now able to display information from memory dumps as well.

The newly introduced fuser(1) utility also uses this library and able to operate
via sysctl and kvm backends.

The library is by no means complete (e.g. KVM backend is missing vnode name
resolution routines, and there're no manpages for the library itself) so I
plan to improve it further. I'm commiting it so it will get wider exposure
and review.

We won't be able to MFC this work as it relies on changes in HEAD, which
was introduced some time ago, that break kernel ABI. OTOH we may be able
to merge the library with KVM backend if we really need it there.

Discussed with: rwatson