History log of /freebsd-10.1-release/sys/x86/isa/orm.c
Revision Date Author Comments
(<<< Hide modified files)
(Show modified files >>>)
# 272461 02-Oct-2014 gjb

Copy stable/10@r272459 to releng/10.1 as part of
the 10.1-RELEASE process.

Approved by: re (implicit)
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation

# 256281 10-Oct-2013 gjb

Copy head (r256279) to stable/10 as part of the 10.0-RELEASE cycle.

Approved by: re (implicit)
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation


# 204309 25-Feb-2010 attilio

Introduce the new kernel sub-tree x86 which should contain all the code
shared and generalized between our current amd64, i386 and pc98.

This is just an initial step that should lead to a more complete effort.
For the moment, a very simple porting of cpufreq modules, BIOS calls and
the whole MD specific ISA bus part is added to the sub-tree but ideally
a lot of code might be added and more shared support should grow.

Sponsored by: Sandvine Incorporated
Reviewed by: emaste, kib, jhb, imp
Discussed on: arch
MFC: 3 weeks


# 131636 05-Jul-2004 imp

These option roms are defined in the ISA standard, and in the ISA
hole, so call them ISA Options rom(s).


# 127135 17-Mar-2004 njl

Convert callers to the new bus_alloc_resource_any(9) API.

Submitted by: Mark Santcroos <marks@ripe.net>
Reviewed by: imp, dfr, bde


# 116181 10-Jun-2003 obrien

Use __FBSDID().


# 112589 25-Mar-2003 mdodd

Correct an argument to bus_alloc_resource().


# 77596 01-Jun-2001 imp

The orm device. This device gobbles up the Option ROMs in the ISA
memory I/O space. Otherwise, our resource allocation system might
mistakenly assign pccard, plug and play devices or other things
addresses that conflict with ROMs.

I cleaned up his code a little from the submited driver: style(9)
issues, commentary on why something that looks incorrect really is
correct. Also noted that while a checksum field is defined for the
ROMs, enough common hardware neglects it to make it not worthwhile
checking.

Submitted by: Nikolai Saoukh <nms@otdel-1.org>
PR: 22078