smtp_rcpt.c revision 1.1
1/*	$NetBSD: smtp_rcpt.c,v 1.1 2009/06/23 10:08:54 tron Exp $	*/
2
3/*++
4/* NAME
5/*	smtp_rcpt 3
6/* SUMMARY
7/*	application-specific recipient list operations
8/* SYNOPSIS
9/*	#include <smtp.h>
10/*
11/*	SMTP_RCPT_INIT(state)
12/*	SMTP_STATE *state;
13/*
14/*	SMTP_RCPT_DROP(state, rcpt)
15/*	SMTP_STATE *state;
16/*	RECIPIENT *rcpt;
17/*
18/*	SMTP_RCPT_KEEP(state, rcpt)
19/*	SMTP_STATE *state;
20/*	RECIPIENT *rcpt;
21/*
22/*	SMTP_RCPT_ISMARKED(rcpt)
23/*	RECIPIENT *rcpt;
24/*
25/*	void	smtp_rcpt_cleanup(SMTP_STATE *state)
26/*	SMTP_STATE *state;
27/*
28/*	int	SMTP_RCPT_LEFT(state)
29/*	SMTP_STATE *state;
30/*
31/*	void	smtp_rcpt_done(state, resp, rcpt)
32/*	SMTP_STATE *state;
33/*	SMTP_RESP *resp;
34/*	RECIPIENT *rcpt;
35/* DESCRIPTION
36/*	This module implements application-specific mark and sweep
37/*	operations on recipient lists. Operation is as follows:
38/* .IP \(bu
39/*	In the course of a delivery attempt each recipient is
40/*	marked either as DROP (remove from recipient list) or KEEP
41/*	(deliver to alternate mail server).
42/* .IP \(bu
43/*	After a delivery attempt any recipients marked DROP are deleted
44/*	from the request, and the left-over recipients are unmarked.
45/* .PP
46/*	The mark/sweep algorithm is implemented in a redundant manner,
47/*	and ensures that all recipients are explicitly accounted for.
48/*
49/*	Operations with upper case names are implemented by macros
50/*	whose arguments may be evaluated more than once.
51/*
52/*	SMTP_RCPT_INIT() initializes application-specific recipient
53/*	information and must be called before the first delivery attempt.
54/*
55/*	SMTP_RCPT_DROP() marks the specified recipient as DROP (remove
56/*	from recipient list). It is an error to mark an already marked
57/*	recipient.
58/*
59/*	SMTP_RCPT_KEEP() marks the specified recipient as KEEP (deliver
60/*	to alternate mail server). It is an error to mark an already
61/*	marked recipient.
62/*
63/*	SMTP_RCPT_ISMARKED() returns non-zero when the specified
64/*	recipient is marked.
65/*
66/*	SMTP_RCPT_LEFT() returns the number of left_over recipients
67/*	(the total number of marked and non-marked recipients).
68/*
69/*	smtp_rcpt_cleanup() cleans up the in-memory recipient list.
70/*	It removes the recipients marked DROP from the left-over
71/*	recipients, unmarks the left-over recipients, and enforces
72/*	the requirement that all recipients are marked upon entry.
73/*
74/*	smtp_rcpt_done() logs that a recipient is completed and upon
75/*	success it marks the recipient as done in the queue file.
76/*	Finally, it marks the in-memory recipient as DROP.
77/*
78/*	Note: smtp_rcpt_done() may change the order of the recipient
79/*	list.
80/* DIAGNOSTICS
81/*	Panic: interface violation.
82/*
83/*	When a recipient can't be logged as completed, the recipient is
84/*	logged as deferred instead.
85/* BUGS
86/*	The single recipient list abstraction dates from the time
87/*	that the SMTP client would give up after one SMTP session,
88/*	so that each recipient was either bounced, delivered or
89/*	deferred. Implicitly, all recipients were marked as DROP.
90/*
91/*	This abstraction is less convenient when an SMTP client
92/*	must be able to deliver left-over recipients to a backup
93/*	host. It might be more natural to have an input list with
94/*      recipients to deliver, and an output list with left-over
95/*      recipients.
96/* LICENSE
97/* .ad
98/* .fi
99/*	The Secure Mailer license must be distributed with this software.
100/* AUTHOR(S)
101/*	Wietse Venema
102/*	IBM T.J. Watson Research
103/*	P.O. Box 704
104/*	Yorktown Heights, NY 10598, USA
105/*--*/
106
107/* System  library. */
108
109#include <sys_defs.h>
110#include <stdlib.h>			/* smtp_rcpt_cleanup  */
111#include <string.h>
112
113/* Utility  library. */
114
115#include <msg.h>
116#include <stringops.h>
117#include <mymalloc.h>
118
119/* Global library. */
120
121#include <mail_params.h>
122#include <deliver_request.h>		/* smtp_rcpt_done */
123#include <deliver_completed.h>		/* smtp_rcpt_done */
124#include <sent.h>			/* smtp_rcpt_done */
125#include <dsn_mask.h>			/* smtp_rcpt_done */
126
127/* Application-specific. */
128
129#include <smtp.h>
130
131/* smtp_rcpt_done - mark recipient as done or else */
132
133void    smtp_rcpt_done(SMTP_STATE *state, SMTP_RESP *resp, RECIPIENT *rcpt)
134{
135    DELIVER_REQUEST *request = state->request;
136    SMTP_SESSION *session = state->session;
137    DSN_BUF *why = state->why;
138    const char *dsn_action = "relayed";
139    int     status;
140
141    /*
142     * Assume this was intermediate delivery when the server announced DSN
143     * support, and don't send a DSN "SUCCESS" notification.
144     */
145    if (session->features & SMTP_FEATURE_DSN)
146	rcpt->dsn_notify &= ~DSN_NOTIFY_SUCCESS;
147
148    /*
149     * Assume this was final delivery when the LMTP server announced no DSN
150     * support. In backwards compatibility mode, send a "relayed" instead of
151     * a "delivered" DSN "SUCCESS" notification. Do not attempt to "simplify"
152     * the expression. The redundancy is for clarity. It is trivially
153     * eliminated by the compiler. There is no need to sacrifice clarity for
154     * the sake of "performance".
155     */
156    if ((session->features & SMTP_FEATURE_DSN) == 0
157	&& (state->misc_flags & SMTP_MISC_FLAG_USE_LMTP) != 0
158	&& var_lmtp_assume_final != 0)
159	dsn_action = "delivered";
160
161    /*
162     * Report success and delete the recipient from the delivery request.
163     * Defer if the success can't be reported.
164     *
165     * Note: the DSN action is ignored in case of address probes.
166     */
167    dsb_update(why, resp->dsn, dsn_action, DSB_MTYPE_DNS, session->host,
168	       DSB_DTYPE_SMTP, resp->str, "%s", resp->str);
169
170    status = sent(DEL_REQ_TRACE_FLAGS(request->flags),
171		  request->queue_id, &request->msg_stats, rcpt,
172		  session->namaddrport, DSN_FROM_DSN_BUF(why));
173    if (status == 0)
174	if (request->flags & DEL_REQ_FLAG_SUCCESS)
175	    deliver_completed(state->src, rcpt->offset);
176    SMTP_RCPT_DROP(state, rcpt);
177    state->status |= status;
178}
179
180/* smtp_rcpt_cleanup_callback - qsort callback */
181
182static int smtp_rcpt_cleanup_callback(const void *a, const void *b)
183{
184    return (((RECIPIENT *) a)->u.status - ((RECIPIENT *) b)->u.status);
185}
186
187/* smtp_rcpt_cleanup - purge completed recipients from request */
188
189void    smtp_rcpt_cleanup(SMTP_STATE *state)
190{
191    RECIPIENT_LIST *rcpt_list = &state->request->rcpt_list;
192    RECIPIENT *rcpt;
193
194    /*
195     * Sanity checks.
196     */
197    if (state->rcpt_drop + state->rcpt_keep != state->rcpt_left)
198	msg_panic("smtp_rcpt_cleanup: recipient count mismatch: %d+%d!=%d",
199		  state->rcpt_drop, state->rcpt_keep, state->rcpt_left);
200
201    /*
202     * Recipients marked KEEP sort before recipients marked DROP. Skip the
203     * sorting in the common case that all recipients are marked the same.
204     */
205    if (state->rcpt_drop > 0 && state->rcpt_keep > 0)
206	qsort((void *) rcpt_list->info, state->rcpt_left,
207	      sizeof(rcpt_list->info[0]), smtp_rcpt_cleanup_callback);
208
209    /*
210     * Truncate the recipient list and unmark the left-over recipients.
211     */
212    state->rcpt_left = state->rcpt_keep;
213    for (rcpt = rcpt_list->info; rcpt < rcpt_list->info + state->rcpt_left; rcpt++)
214	rcpt->u.status = 0;
215    state->rcpt_drop = state->rcpt_keep = 0;
216}
217