1/*
2 * Copyright 2001-2009 Haiku, Inc. All rights reserved.
3 * Distributed under the terms of the MIT license.
4 *
5 * Authors:
6 *		Erik Jaesler, erik@cgsoftware.com
7 */
8
9
10/*!	Semaphore-type class for thread safety */
11
12
13#include <OS.h>
14#include <Locker.h>
15#include <SupportDefs.h>
16
17#include <stdio.h>
18
19#include "support_kit_config.h"
20
21
22// Data Member Documentation:
23//
24// The "fBenaphoreCount" member is set to 1 if the BLocker style is
25// semaphore.  If the style is benaphore, it is initialized to 0 and
26// is incremented atomically when it is acquired, decremented when it
27// is released.  By setting the benaphore count to 1 when the style is
28// semaphore, the benaphore effectively becomes a semaphore.  I was able
29// to determine this is what Be's implementation does by testing the
30// result of the CountLockRequests() member.
31//
32// The "fSemaphoreID" member holds the sem_id returned from create_sem()
33// when the BLocker is constructed.  It is used to acquire and release
34// the lock regardless of the lock style (semaphore or benaphore).
35//
36// The "fLockOwner" member holds the thread_id of the thread which
37// currently holds the lock.  If no thread holds the lock, it is set to
38// B_ERROR.
39//
40// The "fRecursiveCount" member holds a count of the number of times the
41// thread holding the lock has acquired the lock without a matching unlock.
42// It is basically the number of times the thread must call Unlock() before
43// the lock can be acquired by a different thread.
44//
45
46
47BLocker::BLocker()
48{
49	InitLocker(NULL, true);
50}
51
52
53BLocker::BLocker(const char *name)
54{
55	InitLocker(name, true);
56}
57
58
59BLocker::BLocker(bool benaphoreStyle)
60{
61	InitLocker(NULL, benaphoreStyle);
62}
63
64
65BLocker::BLocker(const char *name, bool benaphoreStyle)
66{
67	InitLocker(name, benaphoreStyle);
68}
69
70
71/*!	This constructor is not documented.  The final argument is ignored for
72	now.  In Be's headers, its called "for_IPC".  DO NOT USE THIS
73	CONSTRUCTOR!
74*/
75BLocker::BLocker(const char *name, bool benaphoreStyle,
76	bool)
77{
78	InitLocker(name, benaphoreStyle);
79}
80
81
82BLocker::~BLocker()
83{
84	delete_sem(fSemaphoreID);
85}
86
87
88status_t
89BLocker::InitCheck() const
90{
91	return fSemaphoreID >= 0 ? B_OK : fSemaphoreID;
92}
93
94
95bool
96BLocker::Lock()
97{
98	status_t result;
99	return AcquireLock(B_INFINITE_TIMEOUT, &result);
100}
101
102
103status_t
104BLocker::LockWithTimeout(bigtime_t timeout)
105{
106	status_t result;
107
108	AcquireLock(timeout, &result);
109	return result;
110}
111
112
113void
114BLocker::Unlock()
115{
116	// The Be Book explicitly allows any thread, not just the lock owner, to
117	// unlock. This is bad practice, but we must allow it for compatibility
118	// reasons. We can at least warn the developer that something is probably
119	// wrong.
120	if (!IsLocked()) {
121		fprintf(stderr, "Unlocking BLocker with sem %" B_PRId32
122			" from wrong thread %" B_PRId32 ", current holder %" B_PRId32
123			" (see issue #6400).\n", fSemaphoreID, find_thread(NULL),
124			fLockOwner);
125	}
126
127	// Decrement the number of outstanding locks this thread holds
128	// on this BLocker.
129	fRecursiveCount--;
130
131	// If the recursive count is now at 0, that means the BLocker has
132	// been released by the thread.
133	if (fRecursiveCount == 0) {
134		// The BLocker is no longer owned by any thread.
135		fLockOwner = B_ERROR;
136
137		// Decrement the benaphore count and store the undecremented
138		// value in oldBenaphoreCount.
139		int32 oldBenaphoreCount = atomic_add(&fBenaphoreCount, -1);
140
141		// If the oldBenaphoreCount is greater than 1, then there is
142		// at least one thread waiting for the lock in the case of a
143		// benaphore.
144		if (oldBenaphoreCount > 1) {
145			// Since there are threads waiting for the lock, it must
146			// be released.  Note, the old benaphore count will always be
147			// greater than 1 for a semaphore so the release is always done.
148			release_sem(fSemaphoreID);
149		}
150	}
151}
152
153
154thread_id
155BLocker::LockingThread() const
156{
157	return fLockOwner;
158}
159
160
161bool
162BLocker::IsLocked() const
163{
164	// This member returns true if the calling thread holds the lock.
165	// The easiest way to determine this is to compare the result of
166	// find_thread() to the fLockOwner.
167	return find_thread(NULL) == fLockOwner;
168}
169
170
171int32
172BLocker::CountLocks() const
173{
174	return fRecursiveCount;
175}
176
177
178int32
179BLocker::CountLockRequests() const
180{
181	return fBenaphoreCount;
182}
183
184
185sem_id
186BLocker::Sem() const
187{
188	return fSemaphoreID;
189}
190
191
192void
193BLocker::InitLocker(const char *name, bool benaphore)
194{
195	if (name == NULL)
196		name = "some BLocker";
197
198	if (benaphore && !BLOCKER_ALWAYS_SEMAPHORE_STYLE) {
199		// Because this is a benaphore, initialize the benaphore count and
200		// create the semaphore.  Because this is a benaphore, the semaphore
201		// count starts at 0 (ie acquired).
202		fBenaphoreCount = 0;
203		fSemaphoreID = create_sem(0, name);
204	} else {
205		// Because this is a semaphore, initialize the benaphore count to -1
206		// and create the semaphore.  Because this is semaphore style, the
207		// semaphore count starts at 1 so that one thread can acquire it and
208		// the next thread to acquire it will block.
209		fBenaphoreCount = 1;
210		fSemaphoreID = create_sem(1, name);
211	}
212
213	// The lock is currently not acquired so there is no owner.
214	fLockOwner = B_ERROR;
215
216	// The lock is currently not acquired so the recursive count is zero.
217	fRecursiveCount = 0;
218}
219
220
221bool
222BLocker::AcquireLock(bigtime_t timeout, status_t *error)
223{
224	// By default, return no error.
225	status_t status = B_OK;
226
227	// Only try to acquire the lock if the thread doesn't already own it.
228	if (!IsLocked()) {
229		// Increment the benaphore count and test to see if it was already
230		// greater than 0. If it is greater than 0, then some thread already has
231		// the benaphore or the style is a semaphore. Either way, we need to
232		// acquire the semaphore in this case.
233		int32 oldBenaphoreCount = atomic_add(&fBenaphoreCount, 1);
234		if (oldBenaphoreCount > 0) {
235			do {
236				status = acquire_sem_etc(fSemaphoreID, 1, B_RELATIVE_TIMEOUT,
237					timeout);
238			} while (status == B_INTERRUPTED);
239
240			// Note, if the lock here does time out, the benaphore count
241			// is not decremented.  By doing this, the benaphore count will
242			// never go back to zero.  This means that the locking essentially
243			// changes to semaphore style if this was a benaphore.
244			//
245			// Doing the decrement of the benaphore count when the acquisition
246			// fails is a risky thing to do.  If you decrement the counter at
247			// the same time the thread which holds the benaphore does an
248			// Unlock(), there is serious risk of a race condition.
249			//
250			// If the Unlock() sees a positive count and releases the semaphore
251			// and then the timed out thread decrements the count to 0, there
252			// is no one to take the semaphore.  The next two threads will be
253			// able to acquire the benaphore at the same time!  The first will
254			// increment the counter and acquire the lock.  The second will
255			// acquire the semaphore and therefore the lock.  Not good.
256			//
257			// This has been discussed on the becodetalk mailing list and
258			// Trey from Be had this to say:
259			//
260			// I looked at the LockWithTimeout() code, and it does not have
261			// _this_ (ie the race condition) problem.  It circumvents it by
262			// NOT doing the atomic_add(&count, -1) if the semaphore
263			// acquisition fails.  This means that if a
264			// BLocker::LockWithTimeout() times out, all other Lock*() attempts
265			// turn into guaranteed semaphore grabs, _with_ the overhead of a
266			// (now) useless atomic_add().
267			//
268			// Given Trey's comments, it looks like Be took the same approach
269			// I did.  The output of CountLockRequests() of Be's implementation
270			// confirms Trey's comments also.
271			//
272			// Finally some thoughts for the future with this code:
273			//   - If 2^31 timeouts occur on a 32-bit machine (ie today),
274			//     the benaphore count will wrap to a negative number.  This
275			//     would have unknown consequences on the ability of the BLocker
276			//     to continue to function.
277			//
278		}
279	}
280
281	// If the lock has successfully been acquired.
282	if (status == B_OK) {
283		// Set the lock owner to this thread and increment the recursive count
284		// by one.  The recursive count is incremented because one more Unlock()
285		// is now required to release the lock (ie, 0 => 1, 1 => 2 etc).
286		if (fLockOwner < 0) {
287			fLockOwner = find_thread(NULL);
288			fRecursiveCount = 1;
289		} else
290			fRecursiveCount++;
291	}
292
293	if (error != NULL)
294		*error = status;
295
296	// Return true if the lock has been acquired.
297	return (status == B_OK);
298}
299