Use and redistribution is subject to the Berkeley Software License
Agreement and your Software Agreement with AT&T (Western Electric).
@(#)p1 8.1 (Berkeley) 6/8/93
$FreeBSD: stable/10/share/doc/psd/01.cacm/p1 106202 2002-10-30 13:07:34Z ru $
.OH 'The UNIX Time-Sharing System''PSD:1-%' .EH 'PSD:1-%''The UNIX Time-Sharing System' The UNIX Time-Sharing System\f1\s10\v'-.2n'*\v'.2n'\s0 .AU D. M. Ritchie and K. Thompson .AB .FS * Copyright 1974, Association for Computing Machinery, Inc., reprinted by permission. This is a revised version of an article that appeared in Communications of the \*sACM\*n, T 17 , No. 7 (July 1974), pp. 365-375. That article was a revised version of a paper presented at the Fourth \*sACM\*n Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, \*sIBM\*n Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York, October 15-17, 1973. .FE X is a general-purpose, multi-user, interactive operating system for the larger Digital Equipment Corporation \*sPDP\*n-11 and the Interdata 8/32 computers. It offers a number of features seldom found even in larger operating systems, including
This paper discusses the nature and implementation of the file system and of the user command interface. .AE
INTRODUCTIONThere have been four versions of the X time-sharing system. The earliest (circa 1969-70) ran on the Digital Equipment Corporation \*sPDP\*n-7 and -9 computers. The second version ran on the unprotected \*sPDP\*n-11/20 computer. The third incorporated multiprogramming and ran on the \*sPDP\*n-11/34, /40, /45, /60, and /70 computers; it is the one described in the previously published version of this paper, and is also the most widely used today. This paper describes only the fourth, current system that runs on the \*sPDP\*n-11/70 and the Interdata 8/32 computers. In fact, the differences among the various systems is rather small; most of the revisions made to the originally published version of this paper, aside from those concerned with style, had to do with details of the implementation of the file system.
Since \*sPDP\*n-11 X became operational in February, 1971, over 600 installations have been put into service. Most of them are engaged in applications such as computer science education, the preparation and formatting of documents and other textual material, the collection and processing of trouble data from various switching machines within the Bell System, and recording and checking telephone service orders. Our own installation is used mainly for research in operating systems, languages, computer networks, and other topics in computer science, and also for document preparation.
Perhaps the most important achievement of X is to demonstrate that a powerful operating system for interactive use need not be expensive either in equipment or in human effort: it can run on hardware costing as little as $40,000, and less than two man-years were spent on the main system software. We hope, however, that users find that the most important characteristics of the system are its simplicity, elegance, and ease of use.
Besides the operating system proper, some major programs available under X are
C compiler Text editor based on \*sQED\*n .[ qed lampson .] Assembler, linking loader, symbolic debugger Phototypesetting and equation setting programs .[ cherry kernighan typesetting mathematics cacm .] .[ kernighan lesk ossanna document preparation bstj %Q This issue .]Dozens of languages including Fortran 77, Basic, Snobol, \*sAPL\*n, Algol 68, M6, \*sTMG\*n, Pascal There is a host of maintenance, utility, recreation and novelty programs, all written locally. The X user community, which numbers in the thousands, has contributed many more programs and languages. It is worth noting that the system is totally self-supporting. All X software is maintained on the system; likewise, this paper and all other documents in this issue were generated and formatted by the X editor and text formatting programs. II. HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE ENVIRONMENT
The \*sPDP\*n-11/70 on which the Research X system is installed is a 16-bit word (8-bit byte) computer with 768K bytes of core memory; the system kernel occupies 90K bytes about equally divided between code and data tables. This system, however, includes a very large number of device drivers and enjoys a generous allotment of space for I/O buffers and system tables; a minimal system capable of running the software mentioned above can require as little as 96K bytes of core altogether. There are even larger installations; see the description of the \*sPWB/UNIX\*n systems, .[ dolotta mashey workbench software engineering .] .[ dolotta haight mashey workbench bstj %Q This issue .] for example. There are also much smaller, though somewhat restricted, versions of the system. .[ lycklama microprocessor bstj %Q This issue .]
Our own \*sPDP\*n-11 has two 200-Mb moving-head disks for file system storage and swapping. There are 20 variable-speed communications interfaces attached to 300- and 1200-baud data sets, and an additional 12 communication lines hard-wired to 9600-baud terminals and satellite computers. There are also several 2400- and 4800-baud synchronous communication interfaces used for machine-to-machine file transfer. Finally, there is a variety of miscellaneous devices including nine-track magnetic tape, a line printer, a voice synthesizer, a phototypesetter, a digital switching network, and a chess machine.
The preponderance of X software is written in the abovementioned C language. .[ c programming language kernighan ritchie prentice-hall .] Early versions of the operating system were written in assembly language, but during the summer of 1973, it was rewritten in C. The size of the new system was about one-third greater than that of the old. Since the new system not only became much easier to understand and to modify but also included many functional improvements, including multiprogramming and the ability to share reentrant code among several user programs, we consider this increase in size quite acceptable.
III. THE FILE SYSTEMThe most important role of the system is to provide a file system. From the point of view of the user, there are three kinds of files: ordinary disk files, directories, and special files.
3.1 Ordinary filesA file contains whatever information the user places on it, for example, symbolic or binary (object) programs. No particular structuring is expected by the system. A file of text consists simply of a string of characters, with lines demarcated by the newline character. Binary programs are sequences of words as they will appear in core memory when the program starts executing. A few user programs manipulate files with more structure; for example, the assembler generates, and the loader expects, an object file in a particular format. However, the structure of files is controlled by the programs that use them, not by the system.
3.2 DirectoriesDirectories provide the mapping between the names of files and the files themselves, and thus induce a structure on the file system as a whole. Each user has a directory of his own files; he may also create subdirectories to contain groups of files conveniently treated together. A directory behaves exactly like an ordinary file except that it cannot be written on by unprivileged programs, so that the system controls the contents of directories. However, anyone with appropriate permission may read a directory just like any other file.
The system maintains several directories for its own use. One of these is the root directory. All files in the system can be found by tracing a path through a chain of directories until the desired file is reached. The starting point for such searches is often the root . Other system directories contain all the programs provided for general use; that is, all the T commands . As will be seen, however, it is by no means necessary that a program reside in one of these directories for it to be executed.
Files are named by sequences of 14 or fewer characters. When the name of a file is specified to the system, it may be in the form of a T path T name , which is a sequence of directory names separated by slashes, ``/\^'', and ending in a file name. If the sequence begins with a slash, the search begins in the root directory. The name /alpha/beta/gamma causes the system to search the root for directory alpha , then to search alpha for beta , finally to find gamma in beta . gamma may be an ordinary file, a directory, or a special file. As a limiting case, the name ``/\^'' refers to the root itself.
A path name not starting with ``/\^'' causes the system to begin the search in the user's current directory. Thus, the name alpha/beta specifies the file named beta in subdirectory alpha of the current directory. The simplest kind of name, for example, alpha , refers to a file that itself is found in the current directory. As another limiting case, the null file name refers to the current directory.
The same non-directory file may appear in several directories under possibly different names. This feature is called T linking ; a directory entry for a file is sometimes called a link. The X system differs from other systems in which linking is permitted in that all links to a file have equal status. That is, a file does not exist within a particular directory; the directory entry for a file consists merely of its name and a pointer to the information actually describing the file. Thus a file exists independently of any directory entry, although in practice a file is made to disappear along with the last link to it.
Each directory always has at least two entries. The name ``\|.\|'' in each directory refers to the directory itself. Thus a program may read the current directory under the name ``\|.\|'' without knowing its complete path name. The name ``\|.\|.\|'' by convention refers to the parent of the directory in which it appears, that is, to the directory in which it was created.
The directory structure is constrained to have the form of a rooted tree. Except for the special entries ``\|\|.\|'' and ``\|.\|.\|'', each directory must appear as an entry in exactly one other directory, which is its parent. The reason for this is to simplify the writing of programs that visit subtrees of the directory structure, and more important, to avoid the separation of portions of the hierarchy. If arbitrary links to directories were permitted, it would be quite difficult to detect when the last connection from the root to a directory was severed.
3.3 Special filesSpecial files constitute the most unusual feature of the X file system. Each supported I/O device is associated with at least one such file. Special files are read and written just like ordinary disk files, but requests to read or write result in activation of the associated device. An entry for each special file resides in directory /dev , although a link may be made to one of these files just as it may to an ordinary file. Thus, for example, to write on a magnetic tape one may write on the file /dev/mt . Special files exist for each communication line, each disk, each tape drive, and for physical main memory. Of course, the active disks and the memory special file are protected from indiscriminate access.
There is a threefold advantage in treating I/O devices this way: file and device I/O are as similar as possible; file and device names have the same syntax and meaning, so that a program expecting a file name as a parameter can be passed a device name; finally, special files are subject to the same protection mechanism as regular files.
3.4 Removable file systemsAlthough the root of the file system is always stored on the same device, it is not necessary that the entire file system hierarchy reside on this device. There is a mount system request with two arguments: the name of an existing ordinary file, and the name of a special file whose associated storage volume (e.g., a disk pack) should have the structure of an independent file system containing its own directory hierarchy. The effect of mount is to cause references to the heretofore ordinary file to refer instead to the root directory of the file system on the removable volume. In effect, mount replaces a leaf of the hierarchy tree (the ordinary file) by a whole new subtree (the hierarchy stored on the removable volume). After the mount , there is virtually no distinction between files on the removable volume and those in the permanent file system. In our installation, for example, the root directory resides on a small partition of one of our disk drives, while the other drive, which contains the user's files, is mounted by the system initialization sequence. A mountable file system is generated by writing on its corresponding special file. A utility program is available to create an empty file system, or one may simply copy an existing file system.
There is only one exception to the rule of identical treatment of files on different devices: no link may exist between one file system hierarchy and another. This restriction is enforced so as to avoid the elaborate bookkeeping that would otherwise be required to assure removal of the links whenever the removable volume is dismounted.
3.5 ProtectionAlthough the access control scheme is quite simple, it has some unusual features. Each user of the system is assigned a unique user identification number. When a file is created, it is marked with the user \*sID\*n of its owner. Also given for new files is a set of ten protection bits. Nine of these specify independently read, write, and execute permission for the owner of the file, for other members of his group, and for all remaining users.
If the tenth bit is on, the system will temporarily change the user identification (hereafter, user \*sID\*n) of the current user to that of the creator of the file whenever the file is executed as a program. This change in user \*sID\*n is effective only during the execution of the program that calls for it. The set-user-\*sID\*n feature provides for privileged programs that may use files inaccessible to other users. For example, a program may keep an accounting file that should neither be read nor changed except by the program itself. If the set-user-\*sID\*n bit is on for the program, it may access the file although this access might be forbidden to other programs invoked by the given program's user. Since the actual user \*sID\*n of the invoker of any program is always available, set-user-\*sID\*n programs may take any measures desired to satisfy themselves as to their invoker's credentials. This mechanism is used to allow users to execute the carefully written commands that call privileged system entries. For example, there is a system entry invokable only by the ``super-user'' (below) that creates an empty directory. As indicated above, directories are expected to have entries for ``\|.\|'' and ``\|.\|.\|''. The command which creates a directory is owned by the super-user and has the set-user-\*sID\*n bit set. After it checks its invoker's authorization to create the specified directory, it creates it and makes the entries for ``\|.\|'' and ``\|.\|.\|''.
Because anyone may set the set-user-\*sID\*n bit on one of his own files, this mechanism is generally available without administrative intervention. For example, this protection scheme easily solves the \*sMOO\*n accounting problem posed by ``Aleph-null.'' .[ aleph null software practice .]
The system recognizes one particular user \*sID\*n (that of the ``super-user'') as exempt from the usual constraints on file access; thus (for example), programs may be written to dump and reload the file system without unwanted interference from the protection system.