PROBLEMS revision 142425
1* System libcrypto.dylib and libssl.dylib are used by system ld on MacOS X.
2
3
4    NOTE: The problem described here only applies when OpenSSL isn't built
5    with shared library support (i.e. without the "shared" configuration
6    option).  If you build with shared library support, you will have no
7    problems as long as you set up DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH properly at all times.
8
9
10This is really a misfeature in ld, which seems to look for .dylib libraries
11along the whole library path before it bothers looking for .a libraries.  This
12means that -L switches won't matter unless OpenSSL is built with shared
13library support.
14
15The workaround may be to change the following lines in apps/Makefile and
16test/Makefile:
17
18  LIBCRYPTO=-L.. -lcrypto
19  LIBSSL=-L.. -lssl
20
21to:
22
23  LIBCRYPTO=../libcrypto.a
24  LIBSSL=../libssl.a
25
26It's possible that something similar is needed for shared library support
27as well.  That hasn't been well tested yet.
28
29
30Another solution that many seem to recommend is to move the libraries
31/usr/lib/libcrypto.0.9.dylib, /usr/lib/libssl.0.9.dylib to a different
32directory, build and install OpenSSL and anything that depends on your
33build, then move libcrypto.0.9.dylib and libssl.0.9.dylib back to their
34original places.  Note that the version numbers on those two libraries
35may differ on your machine.
36
37
38As long as Apple doesn't fix the problem with ld, this problem building
39OpenSSL will remain as is.
40
41
42* Parallell make leads to errors
43
44While running tests, running a parallell make is a bad idea.  Many test
45scripts use the same name for output and input files, which means different
46will interfere with each other and lead to test failure.
47
48The solution is simple for now: don't run parallell make when testing.
49
50
51* Bugs in gcc 3.0 triggered
52
53According to a problem report, there are bugs in gcc 3.0 that are
54triggered by some of the code in OpenSSL, more specifically in
55PEM_get_EVP_CIPHER_INFO().  The triggering code is the following:
56
57	header+=11;
58	if (*header != '4') return(0); header++;
59	if (*header != ',') return(0); header++;
60
61What happens is that gcc might optimize a little too agressively, and
62you end up with an extra incrementation when *header != '4'.
63
64We recommend that you upgrade gcc to as high a 3.x version as you can.
65
66* solaris64-sparcv9-cc SHA-1 performance with WorkShop 6 compiler.
67
68As subject suggests SHA-1 might perform poorly (4 times slower)
69if compiled with WorkShop 6 compiler and -xarch=v9. The cause for
70this seems to be the fact that compiler emits multiplication to
71perform shift operations:-( To work the problem around configure
72with './Configure solaris64-sparcv9-cc -DMD32_REG_T=int'.
73
74* Problems with hp-parisc2-cc target when used with "no-asm" flag
75
76When using the hp-parisc2-cc target, wrong bignum code is generated.
77This is due to the SIXTY_FOUR_BIT build being compiled with the +O3
78aggressive optimization.
79The problem manifests itself by the BN_kronecker test hanging in an
80endless loop. Reason: the BN_kronecker test calls BN_generate_prime()
81which itself hangs. The reason could be tracked down to the bn_mul_comba8()
82function in bn_asm.c. At some occasions the higher 32bit value of r[7]
83is off by 1 (meaning: calculated=shouldbe+1). Further analysis failed,
84as no debugger support possible at +O3 and additional fprintf()'s
85introduced fixed the bug, therefore it is most likely a bug in the
86optimizer.
87The bug was found in the BN_kronecker test but may also lead to
88failures in other parts of the code.
89(See Ticket #426.)
90
91Workaround: modify the target to +O2 when building with no-asm.
92
93* Poor support for AIX shared builds.
94
95do_aix-shared rule is not flexible enough to parameterize through a
96config-line. './Configure aix43-cc shared' is working, but not
97'./Configure aix64-gcc shared'. In latter case make fails to create shared
98libraries. It's possible to build 64-bit shared libraries by running
99'env OBJECT_MODE=64 make', but we need more elegant solution. Preferably one
100supporting even gcc shared builds. See RT#463 for background information.
101
102* Problems building shared libraries on SCO OpenServer Release 5.0.6
103  with gcc 2.95.3
104
105The symptoms appear when running the test suite, more specifically
106test/ectest, with the following result:
107
108OSSL_LIBPATH="`cd ..; pwd`"; LD_LIBRARY_PATH="$OSSL_LIBPATH:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH"; DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH="$OSSL_LIBPATH:$DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH"; SHLIB_PATH="$OSSL_LIBPATH:$SHLIB_PATH"; LIBPATH="$OSSL_LIBPATH:$LIBPATH"; if [ "debug-sco5-gcc" = "Cygwin" ]; then PATH="${LIBPATH}:$PATH"; fi; export LD_LIBRARY_PATH DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH SHLIB_PATH LIBPATH PATH; ./ectest
109ectest.c:186: ABORT
110
111The cause of the problem seems to be that isxdigit(), called from
112BN_hex2bn(), returns 0 on a perfectly legitimate hex digit.  Further
113investigation shows that any of the isxxx() macros return 0 on any
114input.  A direct look in the information array that the isxxx() use,
115called __ctype, shows that it contains all zeroes...
116
117Taking a look at the newly created libcrypto.so with nm, one can see
118that the variable __ctype is defined in libcrypto's .bss (which
119explains why it is filled with zeroes):
120
121$ nm -Pg libcrypto.so | grep __ctype
122__ctype B 0011659c
123__ctype2 U         
124
125Curiously, __ctype2 is undefined, in spite of being declared in
126/usr/include/ctype.h in exactly the same way as __ctype.
127
128Any information helping to solve this issue would be deeply
129appreciated.
130
131NOTE: building non-shared doesn't come with this problem.
132