Searched refs:loss (Results 1 - 9 of 9) sorted by relevance
/freebsd-10.0-release/sbin/ipfw/ |
H A D | dummynet.c | 270 double loss; local 274 loss = p->loss_level; 275 loss /= p->samples_no; 276 printf("\t profile: name \"%s\" loss %f samples %d\n", 277 p->name, loss, p->samples_no); 424 * L +-- loss-level x 452 * loss-level L 454 * (0.0 <= L <= 1.0, default 1.0 i.e. no loss); 478 loss-level 0.86 495 #define ED_TOK_LOSS "loss 601 double loss = -1.0; local [all...] |
/freebsd-10.0-release/contrib/traceroute/ |
H A D | traceroute.c | 956 int loss; local 959 for (probe = 0, loss = 0; probe < nprobes; ++probe) { 1126 loss++; 1132 Printf(" (%d%% loss)", (loss * 100) / nprobes);
|
/freebsd-10.0-release/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libzfs/common/ |
H A D | libzfs_pool.c | 1445 int64_t loss = -1; local 1459 (void) nvlist_lookup_int64(nv, ZPOOL_CONFIG_REWIND_TIME, &loss); 1473 if (loss > 120) { 1477 (loss + 30) / 60); 1480 } else if (loss > 0) { 1483 dryrun ? "Would discard" : "Discarded", loss); 1495 int64_t loss = -1; local 1515 (void) nvlist_lookup_int64(nv, ZPOOL_CONFIG_REWIND_TIME, &loss); 1520 "Recovery is possible, but will result in some data loss.\n")); 1534 if (loss > 12 [all...] |
/freebsd-10.0-release/sys/conf/ |
H A D | kern.mk | 48 # it is probably an overall loss as it makes the code bigger (less efficient
|
/freebsd-10.0-release/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/ |
H A D | spa.c | 1838 int64_t loss = 0; local 1844 loss = spa->spa_last_ubsync_txg_ts - spa->spa_load_txg_ts; 1848 ZPOOL_CONFIG_REWIND_TIME, loss) == 0);
|
/freebsd-10.0-release/sys/contrib/ngatm/netnatm/msg/ |
H A D | uni_ie.c | 2808 MKT(UNI_AAL1_ECM_LOSS, loss),
|
/freebsd-10.0-release/contrib/amd/doc/ |
H A D | texinfo.tex | 5932 % is a loss. Therefore, we give the text of the node name again, so it
|
/freebsd-10.0-release/contrib/gcc/doc/include/ |
H A D | texinfo.tex | 6130 % is a loss. Therefore, we give the text of the node name again, so it
|
/freebsd-10.0-release/contrib/groff/doc/ |
H A D | texinfo.tex | 6004 % is a loss. Therefore, we give the text of the node name again, so it
|
Completed in 292 milliseconds