Searched hist:821 (Results 1 - 5 of 5) sorted by relevance
| /freebsd-10.3-release/sys/dev/ata/chipsets/ | ||
| H A D | ata-ite.c | diff 200753 Sun Dec 20 15:16:13 MST 2009 mav Fairly set master/slave shared PIO/WDMA timings on ITE 821x controllers. Previous implementation could only limit mode, but not rise it back. |
| /freebsd-10.3-release/sys/dev/iir/ | ||
| H A D | iir_pci.c | diff 192097 Thu May 14 13:48:59 MDT 2009 brueffer Compare the correct variable against NULL. Reviewed by: scottl Found with: Coverity Prevent(tm) CID: 821 MFC after: 2 weeks |
| /freebsd-10.3-release/sys/ufs/ffs/ | ||
| H A D | ffs_balloc.c | diff 105422 Fri Oct 18 22:52:41 MDT 2002 dillon Fix a file-rewrite performance case for UFS[2]. When rewriting portions of a file in chunks that are less then the filesystem block size, if the data is not already cached the system will perform a read-before-write. The problem is that it does this on a block-by-block basis, breaking up the I/Os and making clustering impossible for the writes. Programs such as INN using cyclic file buffers suffer greatly. This problem is only going to get worse as we use larger and larger filesystem block sizes. The solution is to extend the sequential heuristic so UFS[2] can perform a far larger read and readahead when dealing with this case. (note: maximum disk write bandwidth is 27MB/sec thru filesystem) (note: filesystem blocksize in test is 8K (1K frag)) dd if=/dev/zero of=test.dat bs=1k count=2m conv=notrunc Before: (note half of these are reads) tty da0 da1 acd0 cpu tin tout KB/t tps MB/s KB/t tps MB/s KB/t tps MB/s us ni sy in id 0 76 14.21 598 8.30 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 7 1 92 0 76 14.09 813 11.19 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 9 5 86 0 76 14.28 821 11.45 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 8 1 91 After: (note half of these are reads) tty da0 da1 acd0 cpu tin tout KB/t tps MB/s KB/t tps MB/s KB/t tps MB/s us ni sy in id 0 76 63.62 434 26.99 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 18 1 80 0 76 63.58 424 26.30 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 17 2 82 0 76 63.82 438 27.32 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 1 0 19 2 79 Reviewed by: mckusick Approved by: re X-MFC after: immediately (was heavily tested in -stable for 4 months) |
| H A D | ffs_vnops.c | diff 105422 Fri Oct 18 22:52:41 MDT 2002 dillon Fix a file-rewrite performance case for UFS[2]. When rewriting portions of a file in chunks that are less then the filesystem block size, if the data is not already cached the system will perform a read-before-write. The problem is that it does this on a block-by-block basis, breaking up the I/Os and making clustering impossible for the writes. Programs such as INN using cyclic file buffers suffer greatly. This problem is only going to get worse as we use larger and larger filesystem block sizes. The solution is to extend the sequential heuristic so UFS[2] can perform a far larger read and readahead when dealing with this case. (note: maximum disk write bandwidth is 27MB/sec thru filesystem) (note: filesystem blocksize in test is 8K (1K frag)) dd if=/dev/zero of=test.dat bs=1k count=2m conv=notrunc Before: (note half of these are reads) tty da0 da1 acd0 cpu tin tout KB/t tps MB/s KB/t tps MB/s KB/t tps MB/s us ni sy in id 0 76 14.21 598 8.30 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 7 1 92 0 76 14.09 813 11.19 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 9 5 86 0 76 14.28 821 11.45 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 8 1 91 After: (note half of these are reads) tty da0 da1 acd0 cpu tin tout KB/t tps MB/s KB/t tps MB/s KB/t tps MB/s us ni sy in id 0 76 63.62 434 26.99 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 18 1 80 0 76 63.58 424 26.30 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 17 2 82 0 76 63.82 438 27.32 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 1 0 19 2 79 Reviewed by: mckusick Approved by: re X-MFC after: immediately (was heavily tested in -stable for 4 months) |
| /freebsd-10.3-release/sys/ufs/ufs/ | ||
| H A D | ufs_extern.h | diff 105422 Fri Oct 18 22:52:41 MDT 2002 dillon Fix a file-rewrite performance case for UFS[2]. When rewriting portions of a file in chunks that are less then the filesystem block size, if the data is not already cached the system will perform a read-before-write. The problem is that it does this on a block-by-block basis, breaking up the I/Os and making clustering impossible for the writes. Programs such as INN using cyclic file buffers suffer greatly. This problem is only going to get worse as we use larger and larger filesystem block sizes. The solution is to extend the sequential heuristic so UFS[2] can perform a far larger read and readahead when dealing with this case. (note: maximum disk write bandwidth is 27MB/sec thru filesystem) (note: filesystem blocksize in test is 8K (1K frag)) dd if=/dev/zero of=test.dat bs=1k count=2m conv=notrunc Before: (note half of these are reads) tty da0 da1 acd0 cpu tin tout KB/t tps MB/s KB/t tps MB/s KB/t tps MB/s us ni sy in id 0 76 14.21 598 8.30 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 7 1 92 0 76 14.09 813 11.19 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 9 5 86 0 76 14.28 821 11.45 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 8 1 91 After: (note half of these are reads) tty da0 da1 acd0 cpu tin tout KB/t tps MB/s KB/t tps MB/s KB/t tps MB/s us ni sy in id 0 76 63.62 434 26.99 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 18 1 80 0 76 63.58 424 26.30 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 17 2 82 0 76 63.82 438 27.32 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 1 0 19 2 79 Reviewed by: mckusick Approved by: re X-MFC after: immediately (was heavily tested in -stable for 4 months) |
Completed in 180 milliseconds