Searched hist:8168 (Results 1 - 4 of 4) sorted by relevance
| /freebsd-10.2-release/sys/pci/ | ||
| H A D | if_rlreg.h | diff 227914 Wed Nov 23 22:16:43 MST 2011 yongari Make sure to stop TX MAC before freeing queued TX frames. For RTL8111DP, check if the TX MAC is active by reading RL_GTXSTART register. For RTL8402/8168E-VL/8168F/8411, wait until TX queue is empty. diff 227914 Wed Nov 23 22:16:43 MST 2011 yongari Make sure to stop TX MAC before freeing queued TX frames. For RTL8111DP, check if the TX MAC is active by reading RL_GTXSTART register. For RTL8402/8168E-VL/8168F/8411, wait until TX queue is empty. diff 206433 Fri Apr 09 22:57:17 MDT 2010 yongari Add preliminary support for 8168E/8111E PCIe controller. While I'm here simplify device description string. Tested by: Michael Beckmann < michael <> apfel dot de > MFC after: 5 days diff 185542 Tue Dec 02 03:54:56 MST 2008 yongari Add 8168D support. Submitted by: Andrew < andrewwtulloch <> gmail DOT com > diff 175337 Tue Jan 15 01:10:31 MST 2008 yongari Overhaul re(4). o Increased number of Rx/Tx descriptors to 256 for 8169 GigEs because it's hard to push the hardware to the limit with default 64 descriptors. TSO requires large number of Tx descriptors to pass a full sized TCP segment(65535 bytes IP packet) to hardware. Previously it consumed 32 Tx descriptors, assuming MCLBYTES DMA segment size, to send the TCP segment which means re(4) couldn't queue more than two full sized IP packets. For 8139C+ it still uses 64 Rx/Tx descriptors due to its hardware limitations. With this changes there are (very) small waste of memory for 8139C+ users but I don't think it would affect 8139C+ users for most cases. o Various bus_dma(9) fixes. - The hardware supports DAC so allow 64bit DMA operations. - Removed BUS_DMA_ALLOC_NOW flag. - Increased DMA segment size to 4096 from MCLBYTES because TSO consumes too many descriptors with MCLBYTES DMA segment size. - Tx/Rx side bus_dmamap_load_mbuf_sg(9) support. With these changes the code is more readable than previous one and got a (slightly) better performance as it doesn't need to pass/ decode arguments to/from callback function. - Removed unnecessary callback function re_dmamap_desc() and nuked rl_dmaload_arg structure which was used in the callback. - Additional protection for DMA map load failure. In case of failure reuse current map instead of returning a bogus DMA map. - Deferred DMA map unloading/sync operation for maximum performance until we really need to load new DMA map. If we happen to reuse current map(e.g. input error) there is no need to sync/unload/load again. - The number of allowable Tx DMA segments for a mbuf chains are now 32 instead of magic nseg value. If the number of available Tx descriptors are short enough to send highly fragmented mbuf chains an optimized re_defrag() is called to collapse mbuf chains which is supposed to be much faster than m_defrag(9). re_defrag() was borrowed from ath(4). - Separated Rx/Tx DMA tag from a common DMA tag such that Rx DMA tag correctly uses DMA maps that were created with DMA alignment restriction(8bytes alignments). Tx DMA tag does not have such alignment limitation. - Added additional sanity checks for DMA ring map load failure. - Added additional spare Rx DMA map for graceful handling of Rx DMA map load failure. - Fixed misused bus_dmamap_sync(9) and added missing bus_dmamap_sync(9) in re_encap()/re_txeof()/re_rxeof(). o Enabled TSO again as re(4) have reasonable number of Tx descriptors. o Don't touch DMA address of a Tx descriptor in re_txeof(). It's not needed. o Fix incorrect update of if_ierrors counter. For Rx buffer shortage it should update if_qdrops as the buffer is reused. o Added checks for unsupported H/W revisions and return ENXIO for these hardwares. This is required to remove resource allocation code in re_probe as other drivers do in device probe routine. o Modified descriptor index manipulation macros as it's now possible to have different number of descriptors for Rx/Tx. o In re_start, to save a lock operation, use IFQ_DRV_IS_EMPTY before trying to invoke IFQ_DRV_DEQUEUE. Also don't blindly call re_encap since we already know the number of available Tx descriptors in advance. o Removed RL_TX_DESC_THLD which was used to reserve RL_TX_DESC_THLD descriptors in Tx path. There is no such a limitation mentioned in 8139C+/8169/8110/8168/8101/8111 datasheet and it seems to work ok without reserving RL_TX_DESC_THLD descriptors. o Fix a comment for RL_GTXSTART. The register is 8bits register. o Added comments for 8169/8139C+ hardware restrictions on descriptors. o Removed forward declaration for "struct rl_softc", it's not needed. o Added a new structure rl_txdesc for Tx descriptor managements and a structure rl_rxdesc for Rx descriptor managements. o Removed unused member variable rl_intlock in driver softc. There are still several unused member variables which are supposed to be used to access hardware statistics counters. But it seems that accessing hardware counters were not implemented yet. diff 160843 Sun Jul 30 23:25:21 MDT 2006 wpaul Fix the following bugs in re(4) - Correct the PCI ID for the 8169SC/8110SC in the device list (I added the macro for it to if_rlreg.h before, but forgot to use it.) - Remove the extra interrupt spinlock I added previously. After giving it some more thought, it's not really needed. - Work around a hardware bug in some versions of the 8169. When sending very small IP datagrams with checksum offload enabled, a conflict can occur between the TX autopadding feature and the hardware checksumming that can corrupt the outbound packet. This is the reason that checksum offload sometimes breaks NFS: if you're using NFS over UDP, and you're very unlucky, you might find yourself doing a fragmented NFS write where the last fragment is smaller than the minimum ethernet frame size (60 bytes). (It's rare, but if you keep NFS running long enough it'll happen.) If checksum offload is enabled, the chip will have to both autopad the fragment and calculate its checksum header. This confuses some revs of the 8169, causing the packet that appears on the wire to be corrupted. (The IP addresses and the checksum field are mangled.) This will cause the NFS write to fail. Unfortunately, when NFS retries, it sends the same write request over and over again, and it keeps failing, so NFS stays wedged. (A simple way to provoke the failure is to connect the failing system to a network with a known good machine and do "ping -s 1473 <badhost>" from the good system. The ping will fail.) Someone had previously worked around this using the heavy-handed approahch of just disabling checksum offload. The correct fix is to manually pad short frames where the TCP/IP stack has requested checksum offloading. This allows us to have checksum offload turned on by default but still let NFS work right. - Not a bug, but change the ID strings for devices with hardware rev 0x30000000 and 0x38000000 to both be 8168B/8111B. According to RealTek, they're both the same device, but 0x30000000 is an earlier silicon spin. diff 160008 Wed Jun 28 16:04:54 MDT 2006 wpaul Properly detect the RTL8168(B?) again. RealTek sent me a bunch of sample cards: the chips are all marked "RTL8111B", but they put stickers on the back that say "RTL8168B/8111B". The manual says there's only one HWREV code for both the 8111B and 8168B devices, which is 0x30000000, but the cards they sent me actually report HWREV of 0x38000000. Deciding to trust the hardware in front of me rather than a possibly incorrect manual (it wouldn't be the first time the HWREVs were incorrectly documented), I changed the 8168 revision code. It turns out this was a mistake though: 0x30000000 really is a valid for the 8168. There are two possible reasons for there to be two different HWREVs: 1) 0x30000000 is used only for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is only for the 8111B. 2) There were 8111/8168 rev A devices which both used code 0x30000000, and the 8111B/8168B both use 0x38000000. The product list on the RealTek website doesn't mention the existence of any 8168/8111 rev A chips being in production though, and I've never seen one, so until I get clarification from RealTek, I'm going to assume that 0x30000000 is just for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is for the 8111B only. So, the HWREV code for the 8168 has been put back to 0x30000000, a new 8111 HWREV code has been added, and there are now separate entries for recognizing both devices in the device list. This will allow all devices to work, though if it turns out I'm wrong I may need to change the ID strings diff 160008 Wed Jun 28 16:04:54 MDT 2006 wpaul Properly detect the RTL8168(B?) again. RealTek sent me a bunch of sample cards: the chips are all marked "RTL8111B", but they put stickers on the back that say "RTL8168B/8111B". The manual says there's only one HWREV code for both the 8111B and 8168B devices, which is 0x30000000, but the cards they sent me actually report HWREV of 0x38000000. Deciding to trust the hardware in front of me rather than a possibly incorrect manual (it wouldn't be the first time the HWREVs were incorrectly documented), I changed the 8168 revision code. It turns out this was a mistake though: 0x30000000 really is a valid for the 8168. There are two possible reasons for there to be two different HWREVs: 1) 0x30000000 is used only for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is only for the 8111B. 2) There were 8111/8168 rev A devices which both used code 0x30000000, and the 8111B/8168B both use 0x38000000. The product list on the RealTek website doesn't mention the existence of any 8168/8111 rev A chips being in production though, and I've never seen one, so until I get clarification from RealTek, I'm going to assume that 0x30000000 is just for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is for the 8111B only. So, the HWREV code for the 8168 has been put back to 0x30000000, a new 8111 HWREV code has been added, and there are now separate entries for recognizing both devices in the device list. This will allow all devices to work, though if it turns out I'm wrong I may need to change the ID strings diff 160008 Wed Jun 28 16:04:54 MDT 2006 wpaul Properly detect the RTL8168(B?) again. RealTek sent me a bunch of sample cards: the chips are all marked "RTL8111B", but they put stickers on the back that say "RTL8168B/8111B". The manual says there's only one HWREV code for both the 8111B and 8168B devices, which is 0x30000000, but the cards they sent me actually report HWREV of 0x38000000. Deciding to trust the hardware in front of me rather than a possibly incorrect manual (it wouldn't be the first time the HWREVs were incorrectly documented), I changed the 8168 revision code. It turns out this was a mistake though: 0x30000000 really is a valid for the 8168. There are two possible reasons for there to be two different HWREVs: 1) 0x30000000 is used only for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is only for the 8111B. 2) There were 8111/8168 rev A devices which both used code 0x30000000, and the 8111B/8168B both use 0x38000000. The product list on the RealTek website doesn't mention the existence of any 8168/8111 rev A chips being in production though, and I've never seen one, so until I get clarification from RealTek, I'm going to assume that 0x30000000 is just for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is for the 8111B only. So, the HWREV code for the 8168 has been put back to 0x30000000, a new 8111 HWREV code has been added, and there are now separate entries for recognizing both devices in the device list. This will allow all devices to work, though if it turns out I'm wrong I may need to change the ID strings diff 160008 Wed Jun 28 16:04:54 MDT 2006 wpaul Properly detect the RTL8168(B?) again. RealTek sent me a bunch of sample cards: the chips are all marked "RTL8111B", but they put stickers on the back that say "RTL8168B/8111B". The manual says there's only one HWREV code for both the 8111B and 8168B devices, which is 0x30000000, but the cards they sent me actually report HWREV of 0x38000000. Deciding to trust the hardware in front of me rather than a possibly incorrect manual (it wouldn't be the first time the HWREVs were incorrectly documented), I changed the 8168 revision code. It turns out this was a mistake though: 0x30000000 really is a valid for the 8168. There are two possible reasons for there to be two different HWREVs: 1) 0x30000000 is used only for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is only for the 8111B. 2) There were 8111/8168 rev A devices which both used code 0x30000000, and the 8111B/8168B both use 0x38000000. The product list on the RealTek website doesn't mention the existence of any 8168/8111 rev A chips being in production though, and I've never seen one, so until I get clarification from RealTek, I'm going to assume that 0x30000000 is just for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is for the 8111B only. So, the HWREV code for the 8168 has been put back to 0x30000000, a new 8111 HWREV code has been added, and there are now separate entries for recognizing both devices in the device list. This will allow all devices to work, though if it turns out I'm wrong I may need to change the ID strings diff 160008 Wed Jun 28 16:04:54 MDT 2006 wpaul Properly detect the RTL8168(B?) again. RealTek sent me a bunch of sample cards: the chips are all marked "RTL8111B", but they put stickers on the back that say "RTL8168B/8111B". The manual says there's only one HWREV code for both the 8111B and 8168B devices, which is 0x30000000, but the cards they sent me actually report HWREV of 0x38000000. Deciding to trust the hardware in front of me rather than a possibly incorrect manual (it wouldn't be the first time the HWREVs were incorrectly documented), I changed the 8168 revision code. It turns out this was a mistake though: 0x30000000 really is a valid for the 8168. There are two possible reasons for there to be two different HWREVs: 1) 0x30000000 is used only for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is only for the 8111B. 2) There were 8111/8168 rev A devices which both used code 0x30000000, and the 8111B/8168B both use 0x38000000. The product list on the RealTek website doesn't mention the existence of any 8168/8111 rev A chips being in production though, and I've never seen one, so until I get clarification from RealTek, I'm going to assume that 0x30000000 is just for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is for the 8111B only. So, the HWREV code for the 8168 has been put back to 0x30000000, a new 8111 HWREV code has been added, and there are now separate entries for recognizing both devices in the device list. This will allow all devices to work, though if it turns out I'm wrong I may need to change the ID strings diff 160008 Wed Jun 28 16:04:54 MDT 2006 wpaul Properly detect the RTL8168(B?) again. RealTek sent me a bunch of sample cards: the chips are all marked "RTL8111B", but they put stickers on the back that say "RTL8168B/8111B". The manual says there's only one HWREV code for both the 8111B and 8168B devices, which is 0x30000000, but the cards they sent me actually report HWREV of 0x38000000. Deciding to trust the hardware in front of me rather than a possibly incorrect manual (it wouldn't be the first time the HWREVs were incorrectly documented), I changed the 8168 revision code. It turns out this was a mistake though: 0x30000000 really is a valid for the 8168. There are two possible reasons for there to be two different HWREVs: 1) 0x30000000 is used only for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is only for the 8111B. 2) There were 8111/8168 rev A devices which both used code 0x30000000, and the 8111B/8168B both use 0x38000000. The product list on the RealTek website doesn't mention the existence of any 8168/8111 rev A chips being in production though, and I've never seen one, so until I get clarification from RealTek, I'm going to assume that 0x30000000 is just for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is for the 8111B only. So, the HWREV code for the 8168 has been put back to 0x30000000, a new 8111 HWREV code has been added, and there are now separate entries for recognizing both devices in the device list. This will allow all devices to work, though if it turns out I'm wrong I may need to change the ID strings diff 160008 Wed Jun 28 16:04:54 MDT 2006 wpaul Properly detect the RTL8168(B?) again. RealTek sent me a bunch of sample cards: the chips are all marked "RTL8111B", but they put stickers on the back that say "RTL8168B/8111B". The manual says there's only one HWREV code for both the 8111B and 8168B devices, which is 0x30000000, but the cards they sent me actually report HWREV of 0x38000000. Deciding to trust the hardware in front of me rather than a possibly incorrect manual (it wouldn't be the first time the HWREVs were incorrectly documented), I changed the 8168 revision code. It turns out this was a mistake though: 0x30000000 really is a valid for the 8168. There are two possible reasons for there to be two different HWREVs: 1) 0x30000000 is used only for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is only for the 8111B. 2) There were 8111/8168 rev A devices which both used code 0x30000000, and the 8111B/8168B both use 0x38000000. The product list on the RealTek website doesn't mention the existence of any 8168/8111 rev A chips being in production though, and I've never seen one, so until I get clarification from RealTek, I'm going to assume that 0x30000000 is just for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is for the 8111B only. So, the HWREV code for the 8168 has been put back to 0x30000000, a new 8111 HWREV code has been added, and there are now separate entries for recognizing both devices in the device list. This will allow all devices to work, though if it turns out I'm wrong I may need to change the ID strings diff 160008 Wed Jun 28 16:04:54 MDT 2006 wpaul Properly detect the RTL8168(B?) again. RealTek sent me a bunch of sample cards: the chips are all marked "RTL8111B", but they put stickers on the back that say "RTL8168B/8111B". The manual says there's only one HWREV code for both the 8111B and 8168B devices, which is 0x30000000, but the cards they sent me actually report HWREV of 0x38000000. Deciding to trust the hardware in front of me rather than a possibly incorrect manual (it wouldn't be the first time the HWREVs were incorrectly documented), I changed the 8168 revision code. It turns out this was a mistake though: 0x30000000 really is a valid for the 8168. There are two possible reasons for there to be two different HWREVs: 1) 0x30000000 is used only for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is only for the 8111B. 2) There were 8111/8168 rev A devices which both used code 0x30000000, and the 8111B/8168B both use 0x38000000. The product list on the RealTek website doesn't mention the existence of any 8168/8111 rev A chips being in production though, and I've never seen one, so until I get clarification from RealTek, I'm going to assume that 0x30000000 is just for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is for the 8111B only. So, the HWREV code for the 8168 has been put back to 0x30000000, a new 8111 HWREV code has been added, and there are now separate entries for recognizing both devices in the device list. This will allow all devices to work, though if it turns out I'm wrong I may need to change the ID strings diff 160008 Wed Jun 28 16:04:54 MDT 2006 wpaul Properly detect the RTL8168(B?) again. RealTek sent me a bunch of sample cards: the chips are all marked "RTL8111B", but they put stickers on the back that say "RTL8168B/8111B". The manual says there's only one HWREV code for both the 8111B and 8168B devices, which is 0x30000000, but the cards they sent me actually report HWREV of 0x38000000. Deciding to trust the hardware in front of me rather than a possibly incorrect manual (it wouldn't be the first time the HWREVs were incorrectly documented), I changed the 8168 revision code. It turns out this was a mistake though: 0x30000000 really is a valid for the 8168. There are two possible reasons for there to be two different HWREVs: 1) 0x30000000 is used only for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is only for the 8111B. 2) There were 8111/8168 rev A devices which both used code 0x30000000, and the 8111B/8168B both use 0x38000000. The product list on the RealTek website doesn't mention the existence of any 8168/8111 rev A chips being in production though, and I've never seen one, so until I get clarification from RealTek, I'm going to assume that 0x30000000 is just for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is for the 8111B only. So, the HWREV code for the 8168 has been put back to 0x30000000, a new 8111 HWREV code has been added, and there are now separate entries for recognizing both devices in the device list. This will allow all devices to work, though if it turns out I'm wrong I may need to change the ID strings |
| /freebsd-10.2-release/sys/dev/re/ | ||
| H A D | if_re.c | diff 227914 Wed Nov 23 22:16:43 MST 2011 yongari Make sure to stop TX MAC before freeing queued TX frames. For RTL8111DP, check if the TX MAC is active by reading RL_GTXSTART register. For RTL8402/8168E-VL/8168F/8411, wait until TX queue is empty. diff 227914 Wed Nov 23 22:16:43 MST 2011 yongari Make sure to stop TX MAC before freeing queued TX frames. For RTL8111DP, check if the TX MAC is active by reading RL_GTXSTART register. For RTL8402/8168E-VL/8168F/8411, wait until TX queue is empty. diff 206433 Fri Apr 09 22:57:17 MDT 2010 yongari Add preliminary support for 8168E/8111E PCIe controller. While I'm here simplify device description string. Tested by: Michael Beckmann < michael <> apfel dot de > MFC after: 5 days diff 185542 Tue Dec 02 03:54:56 MST 2008 yongari Add 8168D support. Submitted by: Andrew < andrewwtulloch <> gmail DOT com > diff 175337 Tue Jan 15 01:10:31 MST 2008 yongari Overhaul re(4). o Increased number of Rx/Tx descriptors to 256 for 8169 GigEs because it's hard to push the hardware to the limit with default 64 descriptors. TSO requires large number of Tx descriptors to pass a full sized TCP segment(65535 bytes IP packet) to hardware. Previously it consumed 32 Tx descriptors, assuming MCLBYTES DMA segment size, to send the TCP segment which means re(4) couldn't queue more than two full sized IP packets. For 8139C+ it still uses 64 Rx/Tx descriptors due to its hardware limitations. With this changes there are (very) small waste of memory for 8139C+ users but I don't think it would affect 8139C+ users for most cases. o Various bus_dma(9) fixes. - The hardware supports DAC so allow 64bit DMA operations. - Removed BUS_DMA_ALLOC_NOW flag. - Increased DMA segment size to 4096 from MCLBYTES because TSO consumes too many descriptors with MCLBYTES DMA segment size. - Tx/Rx side bus_dmamap_load_mbuf_sg(9) support. With these changes the code is more readable than previous one and got a (slightly) better performance as it doesn't need to pass/ decode arguments to/from callback function. - Removed unnecessary callback function re_dmamap_desc() and nuked rl_dmaload_arg structure which was used in the callback. - Additional protection for DMA map load failure. In case of failure reuse current map instead of returning a bogus DMA map. - Deferred DMA map unloading/sync operation for maximum performance until we really need to load new DMA map. If we happen to reuse current map(e.g. input error) there is no need to sync/unload/load again. - The number of allowable Tx DMA segments for a mbuf chains are now 32 instead of magic nseg value. If the number of available Tx descriptors are short enough to send highly fragmented mbuf chains an optimized re_defrag() is called to collapse mbuf chains which is supposed to be much faster than m_defrag(9). re_defrag() was borrowed from ath(4). - Separated Rx/Tx DMA tag from a common DMA tag such that Rx DMA tag correctly uses DMA maps that were created with DMA alignment restriction(8bytes alignments). Tx DMA tag does not have such alignment limitation. - Added additional sanity checks for DMA ring map load failure. - Added additional spare Rx DMA map for graceful handling of Rx DMA map load failure. - Fixed misused bus_dmamap_sync(9) and added missing bus_dmamap_sync(9) in re_encap()/re_txeof()/re_rxeof(). o Enabled TSO again as re(4) have reasonable number of Tx descriptors. o Don't touch DMA address of a Tx descriptor in re_txeof(). It's not needed. o Fix incorrect update of if_ierrors counter. For Rx buffer shortage it should update if_qdrops as the buffer is reused. o Added checks for unsupported H/W revisions and return ENXIO for these hardwares. This is required to remove resource allocation code in re_probe as other drivers do in device probe routine. o Modified descriptor index manipulation macros as it's now possible to have different number of descriptors for Rx/Tx. o In re_start, to save a lock operation, use IFQ_DRV_IS_EMPTY before trying to invoke IFQ_DRV_DEQUEUE. Also don't blindly call re_encap since we already know the number of available Tx descriptors in advance. o Removed RL_TX_DESC_THLD which was used to reserve RL_TX_DESC_THLD descriptors in Tx path. There is no such a limitation mentioned in 8139C+/8169/8110/8168/8101/8111 datasheet and it seems to work ok without reserving RL_TX_DESC_THLD descriptors. o Fix a comment for RL_GTXSTART. The register is 8bits register. o Added comments for 8169/8139C+ hardware restrictions on descriptors. o Removed forward declaration for "struct rl_softc", it's not needed. o Added a new structure rl_txdesc for Tx descriptor managements and a structure rl_rxdesc for Rx descriptor managements. o Removed unused member variable rl_intlock in driver softc. There are still several unused member variables which are supposed to be used to access hardware statistics counters. But it seems that accessing hardware counters were not implemented yet. diff 166223 Thu Jan 25 17:30:30 MST 2007 wpaul The TCP checksum offload handling in the 8111B/8168B and 8101E PCIe can apparently be confused by short TCP segments that have been manually padded to the minimum ethernet frame size. The driver does short frame padding in software as a workaround for a bug in the 8169 PCI devices that causes short IP fragments to be corrupted due to an apparent conflict between the hardware autopadding and hardware IP checksumming. To fix this, we avoid software padding for short TCP segments, since the hardware seems to autopad and checksum these correctly (even the older 8169 NICs get these right). Short UDP packets appear to be handled correctly in all cases. This should work around the IP header checksum bug in the 8169 while not tripping the TCP checksum bug in the 8111B/8168B and 8101E. diff 166223 Thu Jan 25 17:30:30 MST 2007 wpaul The TCP checksum offload handling in the 8111B/8168B and 8101E PCIe can apparently be confused by short TCP segments that have been manually padded to the minimum ethernet frame size. The driver does short frame padding in software as a workaround for a bug in the 8169 PCI devices that causes short IP fragments to be corrupted due to an apparent conflict between the hardware autopadding and hardware IP checksumming. To fix this, we avoid software padding for short TCP segments, since the hardware seems to autopad and checksum these correctly (even the older 8169 NICs get these right). Short UDP packets appear to be handled correctly in all cases. This should work around the IP header checksum bug in the 8169 while not tripping the TCP checksum bug in the 8111B/8168B and 8101E. diff 160843 Sun Jul 30 23:25:21 MDT 2006 wpaul Fix the following bugs in re(4) - Correct the PCI ID for the 8169SC/8110SC in the device list (I added the macro for it to if_rlreg.h before, but forgot to use it.) - Remove the extra interrupt spinlock I added previously. After giving it some more thought, it's not really needed. - Work around a hardware bug in some versions of the 8169. When sending very small IP datagrams with checksum offload enabled, a conflict can occur between the TX autopadding feature and the hardware checksumming that can corrupt the outbound packet. This is the reason that checksum offload sometimes breaks NFS: if you're using NFS over UDP, and you're very unlucky, you might find yourself doing a fragmented NFS write where the last fragment is smaller than the minimum ethernet frame size (60 bytes). (It's rare, but if you keep NFS running long enough it'll happen.) If checksum offload is enabled, the chip will have to both autopad the fragment and calculate its checksum header. This confuses some revs of the 8169, causing the packet that appears on the wire to be corrupted. (The IP addresses and the checksum field are mangled.) This will cause the NFS write to fail. Unfortunately, when NFS retries, it sends the same write request over and over again, and it keeps failing, so NFS stays wedged. (A simple way to provoke the failure is to connect the failing system to a network with a known good machine and do "ping -s 1473 <badhost>" from the good system. The ping will fail.) Someone had previously worked around this using the heavy-handed approahch of just disabling checksum offload. The correct fix is to manually pad short frames where the TCP/IP stack has requested checksum offloading. This allows us to have checksum offload turned on by default but still let NFS work right. - Not a bug, but change the ID strings for devices with hardware rev 0x30000000 and 0x38000000 to both be 8168B/8111B. According to RealTek, they're both the same device, but 0x30000000 is an earlier silicon spin. diff 160008 Wed Jun 28 16:04:54 MDT 2006 wpaul Properly detect the RTL8168(B?) again. RealTek sent me a bunch of sample cards: the chips are all marked "RTL8111B", but they put stickers on the back that say "RTL8168B/8111B". The manual says there's only one HWREV code for both the 8111B and 8168B devices, which is 0x30000000, but the cards they sent me actually report HWREV of 0x38000000. Deciding to trust the hardware in front of me rather than a possibly incorrect manual (it wouldn't be the first time the HWREVs were incorrectly documented), I changed the 8168 revision code. It turns out this was a mistake though: 0x30000000 really is a valid for the 8168. There are two possible reasons for there to be two different HWREVs: 1) 0x30000000 is used only for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is only for the 8111B. 2) There were 8111/8168 rev A devices which both used code 0x30000000, and the 8111B/8168B both use 0x38000000. The product list on the RealTek website doesn't mention the existence of any 8168/8111 rev A chips being in production though, and I've never seen one, so until I get clarification from RealTek, I'm going to assume that 0x30000000 is just for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is for the 8111B only. So, the HWREV code for the 8168 has been put back to 0x30000000, a new 8111 HWREV code has been added, and there are now separate entries for recognizing both devices in the device list. This will allow all devices to work, though if it turns out I'm wrong I may need to change the ID strings diff 160008 Wed Jun 28 16:04:54 MDT 2006 wpaul Properly detect the RTL8168(B?) again. RealTek sent me a bunch of sample cards: the chips are all marked "RTL8111B", but they put stickers on the back that say "RTL8168B/8111B". The manual says there's only one HWREV code for both the 8111B and 8168B devices, which is 0x30000000, but the cards they sent me actually report HWREV of 0x38000000. Deciding to trust the hardware in front of me rather than a possibly incorrect manual (it wouldn't be the first time the HWREVs were incorrectly documented), I changed the 8168 revision code. It turns out this was a mistake though: 0x30000000 really is a valid for the 8168. There are two possible reasons for there to be two different HWREVs: 1) 0x30000000 is used only for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is only for the 8111B. 2) There were 8111/8168 rev A devices which both used code 0x30000000, and the 8111B/8168B both use 0x38000000. The product list on the RealTek website doesn't mention the existence of any 8168/8111 rev A chips being in production though, and I've never seen one, so until I get clarification from RealTek, I'm going to assume that 0x30000000 is just for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is for the 8111B only. So, the HWREV code for the 8168 has been put back to 0x30000000, a new 8111 HWREV code has been added, and there are now separate entries for recognizing both devices in the device list. This will allow all devices to work, though if it turns out I'm wrong I may need to change the ID strings diff 160008 Wed Jun 28 16:04:54 MDT 2006 wpaul Properly detect the RTL8168(B?) again. RealTek sent me a bunch of sample cards: the chips are all marked "RTL8111B", but they put stickers on the back that say "RTL8168B/8111B". The manual says there's only one HWREV code for both the 8111B and 8168B devices, which is 0x30000000, but the cards they sent me actually report HWREV of 0x38000000. Deciding to trust the hardware in front of me rather than a possibly incorrect manual (it wouldn't be the first time the HWREVs were incorrectly documented), I changed the 8168 revision code. It turns out this was a mistake though: 0x30000000 really is a valid for the 8168. There are two possible reasons for there to be two different HWREVs: 1) 0x30000000 is used only for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is only for the 8111B. 2) There were 8111/8168 rev A devices which both used code 0x30000000, and the 8111B/8168B both use 0x38000000. The product list on the RealTek website doesn't mention the existence of any 8168/8111 rev A chips being in production though, and I've never seen one, so until I get clarification from RealTek, I'm going to assume that 0x30000000 is just for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is for the 8111B only. So, the HWREV code for the 8168 has been put back to 0x30000000, a new 8111 HWREV code has been added, and there are now separate entries for recognizing both devices in the device list. This will allow all devices to work, though if it turns out I'm wrong I may need to change the ID strings diff 160008 Wed Jun 28 16:04:54 MDT 2006 wpaul Properly detect the RTL8168(B?) again. RealTek sent me a bunch of sample cards: the chips are all marked "RTL8111B", but they put stickers on the back that say "RTL8168B/8111B". The manual says there's only one HWREV code for both the 8111B and 8168B devices, which is 0x30000000, but the cards they sent me actually report HWREV of 0x38000000. Deciding to trust the hardware in front of me rather than a possibly incorrect manual (it wouldn't be the first time the HWREVs were incorrectly documented), I changed the 8168 revision code. It turns out this was a mistake though: 0x30000000 really is a valid for the 8168. There are two possible reasons for there to be two different HWREVs: 1) 0x30000000 is used only for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is only for the 8111B. 2) There were 8111/8168 rev A devices which both used code 0x30000000, and the 8111B/8168B both use 0x38000000. The product list on the RealTek website doesn't mention the existence of any 8168/8111 rev A chips being in production though, and I've never seen one, so until I get clarification from RealTek, I'm going to assume that 0x30000000 is just for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is for the 8111B only. So, the HWREV code for the 8168 has been put back to 0x30000000, a new 8111 HWREV code has been added, and there are now separate entries for recognizing both devices in the device list. This will allow all devices to work, though if it turns out I'm wrong I may need to change the ID strings diff 160008 Wed Jun 28 16:04:54 MDT 2006 wpaul Properly detect the RTL8168(B?) again. RealTek sent me a bunch of sample cards: the chips are all marked "RTL8111B", but they put stickers on the back that say "RTL8168B/8111B". The manual says there's only one HWREV code for both the 8111B and 8168B devices, which is 0x30000000, but the cards they sent me actually report HWREV of 0x38000000. Deciding to trust the hardware in front of me rather than a possibly incorrect manual (it wouldn't be the first time the HWREVs were incorrectly documented), I changed the 8168 revision code. It turns out this was a mistake though: 0x30000000 really is a valid for the 8168. There are two possible reasons for there to be two different HWREVs: 1) 0x30000000 is used only for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is only for the 8111B. 2) There were 8111/8168 rev A devices which both used code 0x30000000, and the 8111B/8168B both use 0x38000000. The product list on the RealTek website doesn't mention the existence of any 8168/8111 rev A chips being in production though, and I've never seen one, so until I get clarification from RealTek, I'm going to assume that 0x30000000 is just for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is for the 8111B only. So, the HWREV code for the 8168 has been put back to 0x30000000, a new 8111 HWREV code has been added, and there are now separate entries for recognizing both devices in the device list. This will allow all devices to work, though if it turns out I'm wrong I may need to change the ID strings diff 160008 Wed Jun 28 16:04:54 MDT 2006 wpaul Properly detect the RTL8168(B?) again. RealTek sent me a bunch of sample cards: the chips are all marked "RTL8111B", but they put stickers on the back that say "RTL8168B/8111B". The manual says there's only one HWREV code for both the 8111B and 8168B devices, which is 0x30000000, but the cards they sent me actually report HWREV of 0x38000000. Deciding to trust the hardware in front of me rather than a possibly incorrect manual (it wouldn't be the first time the HWREVs were incorrectly documented), I changed the 8168 revision code. It turns out this was a mistake though: 0x30000000 really is a valid for the 8168. There are two possible reasons for there to be two different HWREVs: 1) 0x30000000 is used only for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is only for the 8111B. 2) There were 8111/8168 rev A devices which both used code 0x30000000, and the 8111B/8168B both use 0x38000000. The product list on the RealTek website doesn't mention the existence of any 8168/8111 rev A chips being in production though, and I've never seen one, so until I get clarification from RealTek, I'm going to assume that 0x30000000 is just for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is for the 8111B only. So, the HWREV code for the 8168 has been put back to 0x30000000, a new 8111 HWREV code has been added, and there are now separate entries for recognizing both devices in the device list. This will allow all devices to work, though if it turns out I'm wrong I may need to change the ID strings diff 160008 Wed Jun 28 16:04:54 MDT 2006 wpaul Properly detect the RTL8168(B?) again. RealTek sent me a bunch of sample cards: the chips are all marked "RTL8111B", but they put stickers on the back that say "RTL8168B/8111B". The manual says there's only one HWREV code for both the 8111B and 8168B devices, which is 0x30000000, but the cards they sent me actually report HWREV of 0x38000000. Deciding to trust the hardware in front of me rather than a possibly incorrect manual (it wouldn't be the first time the HWREVs were incorrectly documented), I changed the 8168 revision code. It turns out this was a mistake though: 0x30000000 really is a valid for the 8168. There are two possible reasons for there to be two different HWREVs: 1) 0x30000000 is used only for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is only for the 8111B. 2) There were 8111/8168 rev A devices which both used code 0x30000000, and the 8111B/8168B both use 0x38000000. The product list on the RealTek website doesn't mention the existence of any 8168/8111 rev A chips being in production though, and I've never seen one, so until I get clarification from RealTek, I'm going to assume that 0x30000000 is just for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is for the 8111B only. So, the HWREV code for the 8168 has been put back to 0x30000000, a new 8111 HWREV code has been added, and there are now separate entries for recognizing both devices in the device list. This will allow all devices to work, though if it turns out I'm wrong I may need to change the ID strings diff 160008 Wed Jun 28 16:04:54 MDT 2006 wpaul Properly detect the RTL8168(B?) again. RealTek sent me a bunch of sample cards: the chips are all marked "RTL8111B", but they put stickers on the back that say "RTL8168B/8111B". The manual says there's only one HWREV code for both the 8111B and 8168B devices, which is 0x30000000, but the cards they sent me actually report HWREV of 0x38000000. Deciding to trust the hardware in front of me rather than a possibly incorrect manual (it wouldn't be the first time the HWREVs were incorrectly documented), I changed the 8168 revision code. It turns out this was a mistake though: 0x30000000 really is a valid for the 8168. There are two possible reasons for there to be two different HWREVs: 1) 0x30000000 is used only for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is only for the 8111B. 2) There were 8111/8168 rev A devices which both used code 0x30000000, and the 8111B/8168B both use 0x38000000. The product list on the RealTek website doesn't mention the existence of any 8168/8111 rev A chips being in production though, and I've never seen one, so until I get clarification from RealTek, I'm going to assume that 0x30000000 is just for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is for the 8111B only. So, the HWREV code for the 8168 has been put back to 0x30000000, a new 8111 HWREV code has been added, and there are now separate entries for recognizing both devices in the device list. This will allow all devices to work, though if it turns out I'm wrong I may need to change the ID strings diff 160008 Wed Jun 28 16:04:54 MDT 2006 wpaul Properly detect the RTL8168(B?) again. RealTek sent me a bunch of sample cards: the chips are all marked "RTL8111B", but they put stickers on the back that say "RTL8168B/8111B". The manual says there's only one HWREV code for both the 8111B and 8168B devices, which is 0x30000000, but the cards they sent me actually report HWREV of 0x38000000. Deciding to trust the hardware in front of me rather than a possibly incorrect manual (it wouldn't be the first time the HWREVs were incorrectly documented), I changed the 8168 revision code. It turns out this was a mistake though: 0x30000000 really is a valid for the 8168. There are two possible reasons for there to be two different HWREVs: 1) 0x30000000 is used only for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is only for the 8111B. 2) There were 8111/8168 rev A devices which both used code 0x30000000, and the 8111B/8168B both use 0x38000000. The product list on the RealTek website doesn't mention the existence of any 8168/8111 rev A chips being in production though, and I've never seen one, so until I get clarification from RealTek, I'm going to assume that 0x30000000 is just for the 8168B and 0x38000000 is for the 8111B only. So, the HWREV code for the 8168 has been put back to 0x30000000, a new 8111 HWREV code has been added, and there are now separate entries for recognizing both devices in the device list. This will allow all devices to work, though if it turns out I'm wrong I may need to change the ID strings |
| /freebsd-10.2-release/bin/stty/ | ||
| H A D | stty.c | diff 8168 Sat Apr 29 15:00:34 MDT 1995 bde Fix `stty' on the output of `stty -g'. The changes for the gfmt1 option weren't TIOCSETD'd unless another option changed something. |
| /freebsd-10.2-release/sys/dev/ppbus/ | ||
| H A D | if_plip.c | diff 40039 Wed Oct 07 14:42:24 MDT 1998 des Add missing newline in probe message. PR: kern/8168 Submitted by: Stefan Eggers <seggers@semyam.dinoco.de> |
Completed in 170 milliseconds