Searched hist:69168 (Results 1 - 4 of 4) sorted by relevance
| /freebsd-10.0-release/sys/dev/random/ | ||
| H A D | hash.c | diff 69168 Sat Nov 25 15:09:01 MST 2000 markm Stop explicitly using nanotime(9) and use the new get_cyclecounter(9) call instead. This makes a pretty dramatic difference to the amount of work that the harvester needs to do - it is much friendlier on the system. (80386 and 80486 class machines will notice little, as the new get_cyclecounter() call is a wrapper round nanotime(9) for them). |
| H A D | harvest.c | diff 69168 Sat Nov 25 15:09:01 MST 2000 markm Stop explicitly using nanotime(9) and use the new get_cyclecounter(9) call instead. This makes a pretty dramatic difference to the amount of work that the harvester needs to do - it is much friendlier on the system. (80386 and 80486 class machines will notice little, as the new get_cyclecounter() call is a wrapper round nanotime(9) for them). |
| H A D | yarrow.h | diff 69168 Sat Nov 25 15:09:01 MST 2000 markm Stop explicitly using nanotime(9) and use the new get_cyclecounter(9) call instead. This makes a pretty dramatic difference to the amount of work that the harvester needs to do - it is much friendlier on the system. (80386 and 80486 class machines will notice little, as the new get_cyclecounter() call is a wrapper round nanotime(9) for them). |
| H A D | yarrow.c | diff 69168 Sat Nov 25 15:09:01 MST 2000 markm Stop explicitly using nanotime(9) and use the new get_cyclecounter(9) call instead. This makes a pretty dramatic difference to the amount of work that the harvester needs to do - it is much friendlier on the system. (80386 and 80486 class machines will notice little, as the new get_cyclecounter() call is a wrapper round nanotime(9) for them). |
Completed in 91 milliseconds