Searched hist:4 (Results 201 - 225 of 43670) sorted by relevance

1234567891011>>

/linux-master/scripts/dtc/include-prefixes/arm/broadcom/
H A Dbcm47094-asus-rt-ac5300.dts961dedc6 Mon Apr 22 15:50:48 MDT 2024 Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com> ARM: dts: BCM5301X: Add DT for ASUS RT-AC5300

Add the device tree for ASUS RT-AC5300 which is an AC5300 router featuring
5 Ethernet ports over the integrated Broadcom switch.

Hardware info:
* Processor: Broadcom BCM4709C0 dual-core @ 1.4 GHz
* Switch: BCM53012 in BCM4709C0
* DDR3 RAM: 512 MB
* Flash: 128 MB
* 2.4GHz: BCM4366 4x4 single chip 802.11b/g/n SoC
* 5GHz: BCM4366 4x4 two chips 802.11a/n/ac SoC
* Ports: 4 LAN Ports, 1 WAN Port

Co-developed-by: Tom Brautaset <tbrautaset@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Brautaset <tbrautaset@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240423-for-soc-asus-rt-ac3200-ac5300-v3-4-23d33cfafe7a@arinc9.com
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
961dedc6 Mon Apr 22 15:50:48 MDT 2024 Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com> ARM: dts: BCM5301X: Add DT for ASUS RT-AC5300

Add the device tree for ASUS RT-AC5300 which is an AC5300 router featuring
5 Ethernet ports over the integrated Broadcom switch.

Hardware info:
* Processor: Broadcom BCM4709C0 dual-core @ 1.4 GHz
* Switch: BCM53012 in BCM4709C0
* DDR3 RAM: 512 MB
* Flash: 128 MB
* 2.4GHz: BCM4366 4x4 single chip 802.11b/g/n SoC
* 5GHz: BCM4366 4x4 two chips 802.11a/n/ac SoC
* Ports: 4 LAN Ports, 1 WAN Port

Co-developed-by: Tom Brautaset <tbrautaset@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Brautaset <tbrautaset@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240423-for-soc-asus-rt-ac3200-ac5300-v3-4-23d33cfafe7a@arinc9.com
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
961dedc6 Mon Apr 22 15:50:48 MDT 2024 Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com> ARM: dts: BCM5301X: Add DT for ASUS RT-AC5300

Add the device tree for ASUS RT-AC5300 which is an AC5300 router featuring
5 Ethernet ports over the integrated Broadcom switch.

Hardware info:
* Processor: Broadcom BCM4709C0 dual-core @ 1.4 GHz
* Switch: BCM53012 in BCM4709C0
* DDR3 RAM: 512 MB
* Flash: 128 MB
* 2.4GHz: BCM4366 4x4 single chip 802.11b/g/n SoC
* 5GHz: BCM4366 4x4 two chips 802.11a/n/ac SoC
* Ports: 4 LAN Ports, 1 WAN Port

Co-developed-by: Tom Brautaset <tbrautaset@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Brautaset <tbrautaset@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240423-for-soc-asus-rt-ac3200-ac5300-v3-4-23d33cfafe7a@arinc9.com
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
961dedc6 Mon Apr 22 15:50:48 MDT 2024 Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com> ARM: dts: BCM5301X: Add DT for ASUS RT-AC5300

Add the device tree for ASUS RT-AC5300 which is an AC5300 router featuring
5 Ethernet ports over the integrated Broadcom switch.

Hardware info:
* Processor: Broadcom BCM4709C0 dual-core @ 1.4 GHz
* Switch: BCM53012 in BCM4709C0
* DDR3 RAM: 512 MB
* Flash: 128 MB
* 2.4GHz: BCM4366 4x4 single chip 802.11b/g/n SoC
* 5GHz: BCM4366 4x4 two chips 802.11a/n/ac SoC
* Ports: 4 LAN Ports, 1 WAN Port

Co-developed-by: Tom Brautaset <tbrautaset@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Brautaset <tbrautaset@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240423-for-soc-asus-rt-ac3200-ac5300-v3-4-23d33cfafe7a@arinc9.com
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
/linux-master/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/
H A Dbpf_iter_bpf_hash_map.cdiff 4daab713 Wed Sep 02 17:53:41 MDT 2020 Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> selftests/bpf: Add bpf_{update, delete}_map_elem in hashmap iter program

Added bpf_{updata,delete}_map_elem to the very map element the
iter program is visiting. Due to rcu protection, the visited map
elements, although stale, should still contain correct values.
$ ./test_progs -n 4/18
#4/18 bpf_hash_map:OK
#4 bpf_iter:OK
Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200902235341.2001534-1-yhs@fb.com
diff 4daab713 Wed Sep 02 17:53:41 MDT 2020 Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> selftests/bpf: Add bpf_{update, delete}_map_elem in hashmap iter program

Added bpf_{updata,delete}_map_elem to the very map element the
iter program is visiting. Due to rcu protection, the visited map
elements, although stale, should still contain correct values.
$ ./test_progs -n 4/18
#4/18 bpf_hash_map:OK
#4 bpf_iter:OK
Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200902235341.2001534-1-yhs@fb.com
diff 4daab713 Wed Sep 02 17:53:41 MDT 2020 Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> selftests/bpf: Add bpf_{update, delete}_map_elem in hashmap iter program

Added bpf_{updata,delete}_map_elem to the very map element the
iter program is visiting. Due to rcu protection, the visited map
elements, although stale, should still contain correct values.
$ ./test_progs -n 4/18
#4/18 bpf_hash_map:OK
#4 bpf_iter:OK
Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200902235341.2001534-1-yhs@fb.com
diff 4daab713 Wed Sep 02 17:53:41 MDT 2020 Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> selftests/bpf: Add bpf_{update, delete}_map_elem in hashmap iter program

Added bpf_{updata,delete}_map_elem to the very map element the
iter program is visiting. Due to rcu protection, the visited map
elements, although stale, should still contain correct values.
$ ./test_progs -n 4/18
#4/18 bpf_hash_map:OK
#4 bpf_iter:OK
Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200902235341.2001534-1-yhs@fb.com
2a7c2fff Thu Jul 23 12:41:20 MDT 2020 Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf hash map iterators

Two subtests are added.
$ ./test_progs -n 4
...
#4/18 bpf_hash_map:OK
#4/19 bpf_percpu_hash_map:OK
...

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200723184120.590916-1-yhs@fb.com
2a7c2fff Thu Jul 23 12:41:20 MDT 2020 Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf hash map iterators

Two subtests are added.
$ ./test_progs -n 4
...
#4/18 bpf_hash_map:OK
#4/19 bpf_percpu_hash_map:OK
...

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200723184120.590916-1-yhs@fb.com
2a7c2fff Thu Jul 23 12:41:20 MDT 2020 Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf hash map iterators

Two subtests are added.
$ ./test_progs -n 4
...
#4/18 bpf_hash_map:OK
#4/19 bpf_percpu_hash_map:OK
...

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200723184120.590916-1-yhs@fb.com
H A Drecvmsg6_prog.cdiff c8ed6685 Wed Mar 08 22:40:14 MST 2023 Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> selftests/bpf: fix lots of silly mistakes pointed out by compiler

Once we enable -Wall for BPF sources, compiler will complain about lots
of unused variables, variables that are set but never read, etc.

Fix all these issues first before enabling -Wall in Makefile.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230309054015.4068562-4-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
diff 4c3384d7 Wed Jan 27 16:28:53 MST 2021 Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> bpf: Enable bpf_{g,s}etsockopt in BPF_CGROUP_UDP{4,6}_RECVMSG

Those hooks run as BPF_CGROUP_RUN_SA_PROG_LOCK and operate on a locked socket.

Note that we could remove the switch for prog->expected_attach_type altogether
since all current sock_addr attach types are covered. However, it makes sense
to keep it as a safe-guard in case new sock_addr attach types are added that
might not operate on a locked socket. Therefore, avoid to let this slip through.

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210127232853.3753823-5-sdf@google.com
diff 4c3384d7 Wed Jan 27 16:28:53 MST 2021 Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> bpf: Enable bpf_{g,s}etsockopt in BPF_CGROUP_UDP{4,6}_RECVMSG

Those hooks run as BPF_CGROUP_RUN_SA_PROG_LOCK and operate on a locked socket.

Note that we could remove the switch for prog->expected_attach_type altogether
since all current sock_addr attach types are covered. However, it makes sense
to keep it as a safe-guard in case new sock_addr attach types are added that
might not operate on a locked socket. Therefore, avoid to let this slip through.

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210127232853.3753823-5-sdf@google.com
35749060 Wed Jan 27 16:28:52 MST 2021 Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> selftests/bpf: Rewrite recvmsg{4,6} asm progs to c in test_sock_addr

I'll extend them in the next patch. It's easier to work with C
than with asm.

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210127232853.3753823-4-sdf@google.com
35749060 Wed Jan 27 16:28:52 MST 2021 Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> selftests/bpf: Rewrite recvmsg{4,6} asm progs to c in test_sock_addr

I'll extend them in the next patch. It's easier to work with C
than with asm.

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210127232853.3753823-4-sdf@google.com
H A Drecvmsg4_prog.cdiff c8ed6685 Wed Mar 08 22:40:14 MST 2023 Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> selftests/bpf: fix lots of silly mistakes pointed out by compiler

Once we enable -Wall for BPF sources, compiler will complain about lots
of unused variables, variables that are set but never read, etc.

Fix all these issues first before enabling -Wall in Makefile.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230309054015.4068562-4-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
diff 4c3384d7 Wed Jan 27 16:28:53 MST 2021 Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> bpf: Enable bpf_{g,s}etsockopt in BPF_CGROUP_UDP{4,6}_RECVMSG

Those hooks run as BPF_CGROUP_RUN_SA_PROG_LOCK and operate on a locked socket.

Note that we could remove the switch for prog->expected_attach_type altogether
since all current sock_addr attach types are covered. However, it makes sense
to keep it as a safe-guard in case new sock_addr attach types are added that
might not operate on a locked socket. Therefore, avoid to let this slip through.

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210127232853.3753823-5-sdf@google.com
diff 4c3384d7 Wed Jan 27 16:28:53 MST 2021 Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> bpf: Enable bpf_{g,s}etsockopt in BPF_CGROUP_UDP{4,6}_RECVMSG

Those hooks run as BPF_CGROUP_RUN_SA_PROG_LOCK and operate on a locked socket.

Note that we could remove the switch for prog->expected_attach_type altogether
since all current sock_addr attach types are covered. However, it makes sense
to keep it as a safe-guard in case new sock_addr attach types are added that
might not operate on a locked socket. Therefore, avoid to let this slip through.

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210127232853.3753823-5-sdf@google.com
35749060 Wed Jan 27 16:28:52 MST 2021 Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> selftests/bpf: Rewrite recvmsg{4,6} asm progs to c in test_sock_addr

I'll extend them in the next patch. It's easier to work with C
than with asm.

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210127232853.3753823-4-sdf@google.com
35749060 Wed Jan 27 16:28:52 MST 2021 Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> selftests/bpf: Rewrite recvmsg{4,6} asm progs to c in test_sock_addr

I'll extend them in the next patch. It's easier to work with C
than with asm.

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210127232853.3753823-4-sdf@google.com
/linux-master/arch/x86/lib/
H A Dcopy_user_uncached_64.S034ff37d Thu Apr 20 16:13:50 MDT 2023 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> x86: rewrite '__copy_user_nocache' function

I didn't really want to do this, but as part of all the other changes to
the user copy loops, I've been looking at this horror.

I tried to clean it up multiple times, but every time I just found more
problems, and the way it's written, it's just too hard to fix them.

For example, the code is written to do quad-word alignment, and will use
regular byte accesses to get to that point. That's fairly simple, but
it means that any initial 8-byte alignment will be done with cached
copies.

However, the code then is very careful to do any 4-byte _tail_ accesses
using an uncached 4-byte write, and that was claimed to be relevant in
commit a82eee742452 ("x86/uaccess/64: Handle the caching of 4-byte
nocache copies properly in __copy_user_nocache()").

So if you do a 4-byte copy using that function, it carefully uses a
4-byte 'movnti' for the destination. But if you were to do a 12-byte
copy that is 4-byte aligned, it would _not_ do a 4-byte 'movnti'
followed by a 8-byte 'movnti' to keep it all uncached.

Instead, it would align the destination to 8 bytes using a
byte-at-a-time loop, and then do a 8-byte 'movnti' for the final 8
bytes.

The main caller that cares is __copy_user_flushcache(), which knows
about this insanity, and has odd cases for it all. But I just can't
deal with looking at this kind of "it does one case right, and another
related case entirely wrong".

And the code really wasn't fixable without hard drugs, which I try to
avoid.

So instead, rewrite it in a form that hopefully not only gets this
right, but is a bit more maintainable. Knock wood.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
034ff37d Thu Apr 20 16:13:50 MDT 2023 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> x86: rewrite '__copy_user_nocache' function

I didn't really want to do this, but as part of all the other changes to
the user copy loops, I've been looking at this horror.

I tried to clean it up multiple times, but every time I just found more
problems, and the way it's written, it's just too hard to fix them.

For example, the code is written to do quad-word alignment, and will use
regular byte accesses to get to that point. That's fairly simple, but
it means that any initial 8-byte alignment will be done with cached
copies.

However, the code then is very careful to do any 4-byte _tail_ accesses
using an uncached 4-byte write, and that was claimed to be relevant in
commit a82eee742452 ("x86/uaccess/64: Handle the caching of 4-byte
nocache copies properly in __copy_user_nocache()").

So if you do a 4-byte copy using that function, it carefully uses a
4-byte 'movnti' for the destination. But if you were to do a 12-byte
copy that is 4-byte aligned, it would _not_ do a 4-byte 'movnti'
followed by a 8-byte 'movnti' to keep it all uncached.

Instead, it would align the destination to 8 bytes using a
byte-at-a-time loop, and then do a 8-byte 'movnti' for the final 8
bytes.

The main caller that cares is __copy_user_flushcache(), which knows
about this insanity, and has odd cases for it all. But I just can't
deal with looking at this kind of "it does one case right, and another
related case entirely wrong".

And the code really wasn't fixable without hard drugs, which I try to
avoid.

So instead, rewrite it in a form that hopefully not only gets this
right, but is a bit more maintainable. Knock wood.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
034ff37d Thu Apr 20 16:13:50 MDT 2023 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> x86: rewrite '__copy_user_nocache' function

I didn't really want to do this, but as part of all the other changes to
the user copy loops, I've been looking at this horror.

I tried to clean it up multiple times, but every time I just found more
problems, and the way it's written, it's just too hard to fix them.

For example, the code is written to do quad-word alignment, and will use
regular byte accesses to get to that point. That's fairly simple, but
it means that any initial 8-byte alignment will be done with cached
copies.

However, the code then is very careful to do any 4-byte _tail_ accesses
using an uncached 4-byte write, and that was claimed to be relevant in
commit a82eee742452 ("x86/uaccess/64: Handle the caching of 4-byte
nocache copies properly in __copy_user_nocache()").

So if you do a 4-byte copy using that function, it carefully uses a
4-byte 'movnti' for the destination. But if you were to do a 12-byte
copy that is 4-byte aligned, it would _not_ do a 4-byte 'movnti'
followed by a 8-byte 'movnti' to keep it all uncached.

Instead, it would align the destination to 8 bytes using a
byte-at-a-time loop, and then do a 8-byte 'movnti' for the final 8
bytes.

The main caller that cares is __copy_user_flushcache(), which knows
about this insanity, and has odd cases for it all. But I just can't
deal with looking at this kind of "it does one case right, and another
related case entirely wrong".

And the code really wasn't fixable without hard drugs, which I try to
avoid.

So instead, rewrite it in a form that hopefully not only gets this
right, but is a bit more maintainable. Knock wood.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
034ff37d Thu Apr 20 16:13:50 MDT 2023 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> x86: rewrite '__copy_user_nocache' function

I didn't really want to do this, but as part of all the other changes to
the user copy loops, I've been looking at this horror.

I tried to clean it up multiple times, but every time I just found more
problems, and the way it's written, it's just too hard to fix them.

For example, the code is written to do quad-word alignment, and will use
regular byte accesses to get to that point. That's fairly simple, but
it means that any initial 8-byte alignment will be done with cached
copies.

However, the code then is very careful to do any 4-byte _tail_ accesses
using an uncached 4-byte write, and that was claimed to be relevant in
commit a82eee742452 ("x86/uaccess/64: Handle the caching of 4-byte
nocache copies properly in __copy_user_nocache()").

So if you do a 4-byte copy using that function, it carefully uses a
4-byte 'movnti' for the destination. But if you were to do a 12-byte
copy that is 4-byte aligned, it would _not_ do a 4-byte 'movnti'
followed by a 8-byte 'movnti' to keep it all uncached.

Instead, it would align the destination to 8 bytes using a
byte-at-a-time loop, and then do a 8-byte 'movnti' for the final 8
bytes.

The main caller that cares is __copy_user_flushcache(), which knows
about this insanity, and has odd cases for it all. But I just can't
deal with looking at this kind of "it does one case right, and another
related case entirely wrong".

And the code really wasn't fixable without hard drugs, which I try to
avoid.

So instead, rewrite it in a form that hopefully not only gets this
right, but is a bit more maintainable. Knock wood.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
034ff37d Thu Apr 20 16:13:50 MDT 2023 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> x86: rewrite '__copy_user_nocache' function

I didn't really want to do this, but as part of all the other changes to
the user copy loops, I've been looking at this horror.

I tried to clean it up multiple times, but every time I just found more
problems, and the way it's written, it's just too hard to fix them.

For example, the code is written to do quad-word alignment, and will use
regular byte accesses to get to that point. That's fairly simple, but
it means that any initial 8-byte alignment will be done with cached
copies.

However, the code then is very careful to do any 4-byte _tail_ accesses
using an uncached 4-byte write, and that was claimed to be relevant in
commit a82eee742452 ("x86/uaccess/64: Handle the caching of 4-byte
nocache copies properly in __copy_user_nocache()").

So if you do a 4-byte copy using that function, it carefully uses a
4-byte 'movnti' for the destination. But if you were to do a 12-byte
copy that is 4-byte aligned, it would _not_ do a 4-byte 'movnti'
followed by a 8-byte 'movnti' to keep it all uncached.

Instead, it would align the destination to 8 bytes using a
byte-at-a-time loop, and then do a 8-byte 'movnti' for the final 8
bytes.

The main caller that cares is __copy_user_flushcache(), which knows
about this insanity, and has odd cases for it all. But I just can't
deal with looking at this kind of "it does one case right, and another
related case entirely wrong".

And the code really wasn't fixable without hard drugs, which I try to
avoid.

So instead, rewrite it in a form that hopefully not only gets this
right, but is a bit more maintainable. Knock wood.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
034ff37d Thu Apr 20 16:13:50 MDT 2023 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> x86: rewrite '__copy_user_nocache' function

I didn't really want to do this, but as part of all the other changes to
the user copy loops, I've been looking at this horror.

I tried to clean it up multiple times, but every time I just found more
problems, and the way it's written, it's just too hard to fix them.

For example, the code is written to do quad-word alignment, and will use
regular byte accesses to get to that point. That's fairly simple, but
it means that any initial 8-byte alignment will be done with cached
copies.

However, the code then is very careful to do any 4-byte _tail_ accesses
using an uncached 4-byte write, and that was claimed to be relevant in
commit a82eee742452 ("x86/uaccess/64: Handle the caching of 4-byte
nocache copies properly in __copy_user_nocache()").

So if you do a 4-byte copy using that function, it carefully uses a
4-byte 'movnti' for the destination. But if you were to do a 12-byte
copy that is 4-byte aligned, it would _not_ do a 4-byte 'movnti'
followed by a 8-byte 'movnti' to keep it all uncached.

Instead, it would align the destination to 8 bytes using a
byte-at-a-time loop, and then do a 8-byte 'movnti' for the final 8
bytes.

The main caller that cares is __copy_user_flushcache(), which knows
about this insanity, and has odd cases for it all. But I just can't
deal with looking at this kind of "it does one case right, and another
related case entirely wrong".

And the code really wasn't fixable without hard drugs, which I try to
avoid.

So instead, rewrite it in a form that hopefully not only gets this
right, but is a bit more maintainable. Knock wood.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
034ff37d Thu Apr 20 16:13:50 MDT 2023 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> x86: rewrite '__copy_user_nocache' function

I didn't really want to do this, but as part of all the other changes to
the user copy loops, I've been looking at this horror.

I tried to clean it up multiple times, but every time I just found more
problems, and the way it's written, it's just too hard to fix them.

For example, the code is written to do quad-word alignment, and will use
regular byte accesses to get to that point. That's fairly simple, but
it means that any initial 8-byte alignment will be done with cached
copies.

However, the code then is very careful to do any 4-byte _tail_ accesses
using an uncached 4-byte write, and that was claimed to be relevant in
commit a82eee742452 ("x86/uaccess/64: Handle the caching of 4-byte
nocache copies properly in __copy_user_nocache()").

So if you do a 4-byte copy using that function, it carefully uses a
4-byte 'movnti' for the destination. But if you were to do a 12-byte
copy that is 4-byte aligned, it would _not_ do a 4-byte 'movnti'
followed by a 8-byte 'movnti' to keep it all uncached.

Instead, it would align the destination to 8 bytes using a
byte-at-a-time loop, and then do a 8-byte 'movnti' for the final 8
bytes.

The main caller that cares is __copy_user_flushcache(), which knows
about this insanity, and has odd cases for it all. But I just can't
deal with looking at this kind of "it does one case right, and another
related case entirely wrong".

And the code really wasn't fixable without hard drugs, which I try to
avoid.

So instead, rewrite it in a form that hopefully not only gets this
right, but is a bit more maintainable. Knock wood.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
/linux-master/scripts/dtc/include-prefixes/arm64/rockchip/
H A Drk3588s-coolpi-4b.dtsdiff 604552d0 Sat Mar 30 04:01:34 MDT 2024 Andy Yan <andyshrk@163.com> arm64: dts: rockchip: Enable gpu on Cool Pi 4B

Enable mali gpu node and add the board specific supply-regulator.

Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andyshrk@163.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240330100134.3588223-2-andyshrk@163.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
diff a41f91b4 Thu Feb 01 05:11:03 MST 2024 Andy Yan <andyshrk@163.com> arm64: dts: rockchip: aliase sdmmc as mmc1 for Cool Pi 4B

Follow others rk3588 based boards, and u-boot only use mmc0/1
as mmc boot targets, so aliase sdmmc as mmc1.

Fixes: 3f5d336d64d6 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Add support for rk3588s based board Cool Pi 4B")
Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andyshrk@163.com>
Reviewed-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240201121106.1471301-1-andyshrk@163.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
diff a41f91b4 Thu Feb 01 05:11:03 MST 2024 Andy Yan <andyshrk@163.com> arm64: dts: rockchip: aliase sdmmc as mmc1 for Cool Pi 4B

Follow others rk3588 based boards, and u-boot only use mmc0/1
as mmc boot targets, so aliase sdmmc as mmc1.

Fixes: 3f5d336d64d6 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Add support for rk3588s based board Cool Pi 4B")
Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andyshrk@163.com>
Reviewed-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240201121106.1471301-1-andyshrk@163.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
3f5d336d Tue Dec 12 05:42:53 MST 2023 Andy Yan <andyshrk@163.com> arm64: dts: rockchip: Add support for rk3588s based board Cool Pi 4B

CoolPi 4B is a rk3588s based SBC.
Specification:
- Rockchip RK3588S
- LPDDR4 2/4/8/16 GB
- TF scard slot
- eMMC 8/32/64/128 GB module
- Gigabit ethernet drived by PCIE with RTL8111HS
- HDMI Type D out
- Mini DP out
- USB 2.0 Host x 2
- USB 3.0 OTG x 1
- USB 3.0 Host x 1
- WIFI/BT module AIC8800
- 40 pin header

Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andyshrk@163.com>

arm64: dts: rockchip: Add support for rk3588s based board Cool Pi 4B
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231212124253.1897438-1-andyshrk@163.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
3f5d336d Tue Dec 12 05:42:53 MST 2023 Andy Yan <andyshrk@163.com> arm64: dts: rockchip: Add support for rk3588s based board Cool Pi 4B

CoolPi 4B is a rk3588s based SBC.
Specification:
- Rockchip RK3588S
- LPDDR4 2/4/8/16 GB
- TF scard slot
- eMMC 8/32/64/128 GB module
- Gigabit ethernet drived by PCIE with RTL8111HS
- HDMI Type D out
- Mini DP out
- USB 2.0 Host x 2
- USB 3.0 OTG x 1
- USB 3.0 Host x 1
- WIFI/BT module AIC8800
- 40 pin header

Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andyshrk@163.com>

arm64: dts: rockchip: Add support for rk3588s based board Cool Pi 4B
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231212124253.1897438-1-andyshrk@163.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
3f5d336d Tue Dec 12 05:42:53 MST 2023 Andy Yan <andyshrk@163.com> arm64: dts: rockchip: Add support for rk3588s based board Cool Pi 4B

CoolPi 4B is a rk3588s based SBC.
Specification:
- Rockchip RK3588S
- LPDDR4 2/4/8/16 GB
- TF scard slot
- eMMC 8/32/64/128 GB module
- Gigabit ethernet drived by PCIE with RTL8111HS
- HDMI Type D out
- Mini DP out
- USB 2.0 Host x 2
- USB 3.0 OTG x 1
- USB 3.0 Host x 1
- WIFI/BT module AIC8800
- 40 pin header

Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andyshrk@163.com>

arm64: dts: rockchip: Add support for rk3588s based board Cool Pi 4B
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231212124253.1897438-1-andyshrk@163.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
3f5d336d Tue Dec 12 05:42:53 MST 2023 Andy Yan <andyshrk@163.com> arm64: dts: rockchip: Add support for rk3588s based board Cool Pi 4B

CoolPi 4B is a rk3588s based SBC.
Specification:
- Rockchip RK3588S
- LPDDR4 2/4/8/16 GB
- TF scard slot
- eMMC 8/32/64/128 GB module
- Gigabit ethernet drived by PCIE with RTL8111HS
- HDMI Type D out
- Mini DP out
- USB 2.0 Host x 2
- USB 3.0 OTG x 1
- USB 3.0 Host x 1
- WIFI/BT module AIC8800
- 40 pin header

Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andyshrk@163.com>

arm64: dts: rockchip: Add support for rk3588s based board Cool Pi 4B
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231212124253.1897438-1-andyshrk@163.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
H A Drk3399-rock-pi-4.dtsidiff f720dd9b Wed Mar 27 13:26:37 MDT 2024 Folker Schwesinger <dev@folker-schwesinger.de> arm64: dts: rockchip: Add enable-strobe-pulldown to emmc phy on ROCK Pi 4

Commit 8b5c2b45b8f0 disabled the internal pull-down for the strobe line
causing I/O errors in HS400 mode for various eMMC modules.

Enable the internal strobe pull-down for ROCK Pi 4 boards. Also re-enable
HS400 mode, that was replaced with HS200 mode as a workaround for the
stability issues in:
cee572756aa2 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Disable HS400 for eMMC on ROCK Pi 4").

This was tested on ROCK 4SE and ROCK Pi 4B+.

Fixes: 8b5c2b45b8f0 ("phy: rockchip: set pulldown for strobe line in dts")
Signed-off-by: Folker Schwesinger <dev@folker-schwesinger.de>
Reviewed-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240327192641.14220-2-dev@folker-schwesinger.de
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
diff f720dd9b Wed Mar 27 13:26:37 MDT 2024 Folker Schwesinger <dev@folker-schwesinger.de> arm64: dts: rockchip: Add enable-strobe-pulldown to emmc phy on ROCK Pi 4

Commit 8b5c2b45b8f0 disabled the internal pull-down for the strobe line
causing I/O errors in HS400 mode for various eMMC modules.

Enable the internal strobe pull-down for ROCK Pi 4 boards. Also re-enable
HS400 mode, that was replaced with HS200 mode as a workaround for the
stability issues in:
cee572756aa2 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Disable HS400 for eMMC on ROCK Pi 4").

This was tested on ROCK 4SE and ROCK Pi 4B+.

Fixes: 8b5c2b45b8f0 ("phy: rockchip: set pulldown for strobe line in dts")
Signed-off-by: Folker Schwesinger <dev@folker-schwesinger.de>
Reviewed-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240327192641.14220-2-dev@folker-schwesinger.de
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
diff f720dd9b Wed Mar 27 13:26:37 MDT 2024 Folker Schwesinger <dev@folker-schwesinger.de> arm64: dts: rockchip: Add enable-strobe-pulldown to emmc phy on ROCK Pi 4

Commit 8b5c2b45b8f0 disabled the internal pull-down for the strobe line
causing I/O errors in HS400 mode for various eMMC modules.

Enable the internal strobe pull-down for ROCK Pi 4 boards. Also re-enable
HS400 mode, that was replaced with HS200 mode as a workaround for the
stability issues in:
cee572756aa2 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Disable HS400 for eMMC on ROCK Pi 4").

This was tested on ROCK 4SE and ROCK Pi 4B+.

Fixes: 8b5c2b45b8f0 ("phy: rockchip: set pulldown for strobe line in dts")
Signed-off-by: Folker Schwesinger <dev@folker-schwesinger.de>
Reviewed-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240327192641.14220-2-dev@folker-schwesinger.de
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
diff f720dd9b Wed Mar 27 13:26:37 MDT 2024 Folker Schwesinger <dev@folker-schwesinger.de> arm64: dts: rockchip: Add enable-strobe-pulldown to emmc phy on ROCK Pi 4

Commit 8b5c2b45b8f0 disabled the internal pull-down for the strobe line
causing I/O errors in HS400 mode for various eMMC modules.

Enable the internal strobe pull-down for ROCK Pi 4 boards. Also re-enable
HS400 mode, that was replaced with HS200 mode as a workaround for the
stability issues in:
cee572756aa2 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Disable HS400 for eMMC on ROCK Pi 4").

This was tested on ROCK 4SE and ROCK Pi 4B+.

Fixes: 8b5c2b45b8f0 ("phy: rockchip: set pulldown for strobe line in dts")
Signed-off-by: Folker Schwesinger <dev@folker-schwesinger.de>
Reviewed-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240327192641.14220-2-dev@folker-schwesinger.de
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
diff f720dd9b Wed Mar 27 13:26:37 MDT 2024 Folker Schwesinger <dev@folker-schwesinger.de> arm64: dts: rockchip: Add enable-strobe-pulldown to emmc phy on ROCK Pi 4

Commit 8b5c2b45b8f0 disabled the internal pull-down for the strobe line
causing I/O errors in HS400 mode for various eMMC modules.

Enable the internal strobe pull-down for ROCK Pi 4 boards. Also re-enable
HS400 mode, that was replaced with HS200 mode as a workaround for the
stability issues in:
cee572756aa2 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Disable HS400 for eMMC on ROCK Pi 4").

This was tested on ROCK 4SE and ROCK Pi 4B+.

Fixes: 8b5c2b45b8f0 ("phy: rockchip: set pulldown for strobe line in dts")
Signed-off-by: Folker Schwesinger <dev@folker-schwesinger.de>
Reviewed-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240327192641.14220-2-dev@folker-schwesinger.de
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
diff 8cd79b72 Thu Oct 12 17:47:27 MDT 2023 Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard@collabora.com> arm64: dts: rockchip: Fix i2s0 pin conflict on ROCK Pi 4 boards

Commit 91419ae0420f ("arm64: dts: rockchip: use BCLK to GPIO switch on
rk3399") modified i2s0 to switch the corresponding pins off when idle.
For the ROCK Pi 4 boards, this means that i2s0 has the following pinctrl
setting:

pinctrl-names = "bclk_on", "bclk_off";
pinctrl-0 = <&i2s0_2ch_bus>;
pinctrl-1 = <&i2s0_8ch_bus_bclk_off>;

Due to this change, i2s0 fails to probe on my Radxa ROCK 4SE and ROCK Pi
4B boards:

rockchip-pinctrl pinctrl: pin gpio3-29 already requested by leds; cannot claim for ff880000.i2s
rockchip-pinctrl pinctrl: pin-125 (ff880000.i2s) status -22
rockchip-pinctrl pinctrl: could not request pin 125 (gpio3-29) from group i2s0-8ch-bus-bclk-off on device rockchip-pinctrl
rockchip-i2s ff880000.i2s: Error applying setting, reverse things back
rockchip-i2s ff880000.i2s: bclk disable failed -22

A pin requested for i2s0_8ch_bus_bclk_off has already been requested by
user_led2, so whichever driver probes first will have the pin allocated.

The hardware uses 2-channel i2s so fix this error by setting pinctl-1 to
i2s0_2ch_bus_bclk_off which doesn't contain the pin allocated to user_led2.

I checked the schematics for all Radxa boards based on ROCK Pi 4 and this
change is compatible with all boards.

Fixes: 91419ae0420f ("arm64: dts: rockchip: use BCLK to GPIO switch on rk3399")
Signed-off-by: Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231013114737.494410-3-chris.obbard@collabora.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
diff 8cd79b72 Thu Oct 12 17:47:27 MDT 2023 Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard@collabora.com> arm64: dts: rockchip: Fix i2s0 pin conflict on ROCK Pi 4 boards

Commit 91419ae0420f ("arm64: dts: rockchip: use BCLK to GPIO switch on
rk3399") modified i2s0 to switch the corresponding pins off when idle.
For the ROCK Pi 4 boards, this means that i2s0 has the following pinctrl
setting:

pinctrl-names = "bclk_on", "bclk_off";
pinctrl-0 = <&i2s0_2ch_bus>;
pinctrl-1 = <&i2s0_8ch_bus_bclk_off>;

Due to this change, i2s0 fails to probe on my Radxa ROCK 4SE and ROCK Pi
4B boards:

rockchip-pinctrl pinctrl: pin gpio3-29 already requested by leds; cannot claim for ff880000.i2s
rockchip-pinctrl pinctrl: pin-125 (ff880000.i2s) status -22
rockchip-pinctrl pinctrl: could not request pin 125 (gpio3-29) from group i2s0-8ch-bus-bclk-off on device rockchip-pinctrl
rockchip-i2s ff880000.i2s: Error applying setting, reverse things back
rockchip-i2s ff880000.i2s: bclk disable failed -22

A pin requested for i2s0_8ch_bus_bclk_off has already been requested by
user_led2, so whichever driver probes first will have the pin allocated.

The hardware uses 2-channel i2s so fix this error by setting pinctl-1 to
i2s0_2ch_bus_bclk_off which doesn't contain the pin allocated to user_led2.

I checked the schematics for all Radxa boards based on ROCK Pi 4 and this
change is compatible with all boards.

Fixes: 91419ae0420f ("arm64: dts: rockchip: use BCLK to GPIO switch on rk3399")
Signed-off-by: Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231013114737.494410-3-chris.obbard@collabora.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
diff 8cd79b72 Thu Oct 12 17:47:27 MDT 2023 Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard@collabora.com> arm64: dts: rockchip: Fix i2s0 pin conflict on ROCK Pi 4 boards

Commit 91419ae0420f ("arm64: dts: rockchip: use BCLK to GPIO switch on
rk3399") modified i2s0 to switch the corresponding pins off when idle.
For the ROCK Pi 4 boards, this means that i2s0 has the following pinctrl
setting:

pinctrl-names = "bclk_on", "bclk_off";
pinctrl-0 = <&i2s0_2ch_bus>;
pinctrl-1 = <&i2s0_8ch_bus_bclk_off>;

Due to this change, i2s0 fails to probe on my Radxa ROCK 4SE and ROCK Pi
4B boards:

rockchip-pinctrl pinctrl: pin gpio3-29 already requested by leds; cannot claim for ff880000.i2s
rockchip-pinctrl pinctrl: pin-125 (ff880000.i2s) status -22
rockchip-pinctrl pinctrl: could not request pin 125 (gpio3-29) from group i2s0-8ch-bus-bclk-off on device rockchip-pinctrl
rockchip-i2s ff880000.i2s: Error applying setting, reverse things back
rockchip-i2s ff880000.i2s: bclk disable failed -22

A pin requested for i2s0_8ch_bus_bclk_off has already been requested by
user_led2, so whichever driver probes first will have the pin allocated.

The hardware uses 2-channel i2s so fix this error by setting pinctl-1 to
i2s0_2ch_bus_bclk_off which doesn't contain the pin allocated to user_led2.

I checked the schematics for all Radxa boards based on ROCK Pi 4 and this
change is compatible with all boards.

Fixes: 91419ae0420f ("arm64: dts: rockchip: use BCLK to GPIO switch on rk3399")
Signed-off-by: Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231013114737.494410-3-chris.obbard@collabora.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
diff 8cd79b72 Thu Oct 12 17:47:27 MDT 2023 Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard@collabora.com> arm64: dts: rockchip: Fix i2s0 pin conflict on ROCK Pi 4 boards

Commit 91419ae0420f ("arm64: dts: rockchip: use BCLK to GPIO switch on
rk3399") modified i2s0 to switch the corresponding pins off when idle.
For the ROCK Pi 4 boards, this means that i2s0 has the following pinctrl
setting:

pinctrl-names = "bclk_on", "bclk_off";
pinctrl-0 = <&i2s0_2ch_bus>;
pinctrl-1 = <&i2s0_8ch_bus_bclk_off>;

Due to this change, i2s0 fails to probe on my Radxa ROCK 4SE and ROCK Pi
4B boards:

rockchip-pinctrl pinctrl: pin gpio3-29 already requested by leds; cannot claim for ff880000.i2s
rockchip-pinctrl pinctrl: pin-125 (ff880000.i2s) status -22
rockchip-pinctrl pinctrl: could not request pin 125 (gpio3-29) from group i2s0-8ch-bus-bclk-off on device rockchip-pinctrl
rockchip-i2s ff880000.i2s: Error applying setting, reverse things back
rockchip-i2s ff880000.i2s: bclk disable failed -22

A pin requested for i2s0_8ch_bus_bclk_off has already been requested by
user_led2, so whichever driver probes first will have the pin allocated.

The hardware uses 2-channel i2s so fix this error by setting pinctl-1 to
i2s0_2ch_bus_bclk_off which doesn't contain the pin allocated to user_led2.

I checked the schematics for all Radxa boards based on ROCK Pi 4 and this
change is compatible with all boards.

Fixes: 91419ae0420f ("arm64: dts: rockchip: use BCLK to GPIO switch on rk3399")
Signed-off-by: Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231013114737.494410-3-chris.obbard@collabora.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
diff 8cd79b72 Thu Oct 12 17:47:27 MDT 2023 Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard@collabora.com> arm64: dts: rockchip: Fix i2s0 pin conflict on ROCK Pi 4 boards

Commit 91419ae0420f ("arm64: dts: rockchip: use BCLK to GPIO switch on
rk3399") modified i2s0 to switch the corresponding pins off when idle.
For the ROCK Pi 4 boards, this means that i2s0 has the following pinctrl
setting:

pinctrl-names = "bclk_on", "bclk_off";
pinctrl-0 = <&i2s0_2ch_bus>;
pinctrl-1 = <&i2s0_8ch_bus_bclk_off>;

Due to this change, i2s0 fails to probe on my Radxa ROCK 4SE and ROCK Pi
4B boards:

rockchip-pinctrl pinctrl: pin gpio3-29 already requested by leds; cannot claim for ff880000.i2s
rockchip-pinctrl pinctrl: pin-125 (ff880000.i2s) status -22
rockchip-pinctrl pinctrl: could not request pin 125 (gpio3-29) from group i2s0-8ch-bus-bclk-off on device rockchip-pinctrl
rockchip-i2s ff880000.i2s: Error applying setting, reverse things back
rockchip-i2s ff880000.i2s: bclk disable failed -22

A pin requested for i2s0_8ch_bus_bclk_off has already been requested by
user_led2, so whichever driver probes first will have the pin allocated.

The hardware uses 2-channel i2s so fix this error by setting pinctl-1 to
i2s0_2ch_bus_bclk_off which doesn't contain the pin allocated to user_led2.

I checked the schematics for all Radxa boards based on ROCK Pi 4 and this
change is compatible with all boards.

Fixes: 91419ae0420f ("arm64: dts: rockchip: use BCLK to GPIO switch on rk3399")
Signed-off-by: Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231013114737.494410-3-chris.obbard@collabora.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
/linux-master/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/
H A Drk3588s-coolpi-4b.dtsdiff 604552d0 Sat Mar 30 04:01:34 MDT 2024 Andy Yan <andyshrk@163.com> arm64: dts: rockchip: Enable gpu on Cool Pi 4B

Enable mali gpu node and add the board specific supply-regulator.

Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andyshrk@163.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240330100134.3588223-2-andyshrk@163.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
diff a41f91b4 Thu Feb 01 05:11:03 MST 2024 Andy Yan <andyshrk@163.com> arm64: dts: rockchip: aliase sdmmc as mmc1 for Cool Pi 4B

Follow others rk3588 based boards, and u-boot only use mmc0/1
as mmc boot targets, so aliase sdmmc as mmc1.

Fixes: 3f5d336d64d6 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Add support for rk3588s based board Cool Pi 4B")
Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andyshrk@163.com>
Reviewed-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240201121106.1471301-1-andyshrk@163.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
diff a41f91b4 Thu Feb 01 05:11:03 MST 2024 Andy Yan <andyshrk@163.com> arm64: dts: rockchip: aliase sdmmc as mmc1 for Cool Pi 4B

Follow others rk3588 based boards, and u-boot only use mmc0/1
as mmc boot targets, so aliase sdmmc as mmc1.

Fixes: 3f5d336d64d6 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Add support for rk3588s based board Cool Pi 4B")
Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andyshrk@163.com>
Reviewed-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240201121106.1471301-1-andyshrk@163.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
3f5d336d Tue Dec 12 05:42:53 MST 2023 Andy Yan <andyshrk@163.com> arm64: dts: rockchip: Add support for rk3588s based board Cool Pi 4B

CoolPi 4B is a rk3588s based SBC.
Specification:
- Rockchip RK3588S
- LPDDR4 2/4/8/16 GB
- TF scard slot
- eMMC 8/32/64/128 GB module
- Gigabit ethernet drived by PCIE with RTL8111HS
- HDMI Type D out
- Mini DP out
- USB 2.0 Host x 2
- USB 3.0 OTG x 1
- USB 3.0 Host x 1
- WIFI/BT module AIC8800
- 40 pin header

Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andyshrk@163.com>

arm64: dts: rockchip: Add support for rk3588s based board Cool Pi 4B
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231212124253.1897438-1-andyshrk@163.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
3f5d336d Tue Dec 12 05:42:53 MST 2023 Andy Yan <andyshrk@163.com> arm64: dts: rockchip: Add support for rk3588s based board Cool Pi 4B

CoolPi 4B is a rk3588s based SBC.
Specification:
- Rockchip RK3588S
- LPDDR4 2/4/8/16 GB
- TF scard slot
- eMMC 8/32/64/128 GB module
- Gigabit ethernet drived by PCIE with RTL8111HS
- HDMI Type D out
- Mini DP out
- USB 2.0 Host x 2
- USB 3.0 OTG x 1
- USB 3.0 Host x 1
- WIFI/BT module AIC8800
- 40 pin header

Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andyshrk@163.com>

arm64: dts: rockchip: Add support for rk3588s based board Cool Pi 4B
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231212124253.1897438-1-andyshrk@163.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
3f5d336d Tue Dec 12 05:42:53 MST 2023 Andy Yan <andyshrk@163.com> arm64: dts: rockchip: Add support for rk3588s based board Cool Pi 4B

CoolPi 4B is a rk3588s based SBC.
Specification:
- Rockchip RK3588S
- LPDDR4 2/4/8/16 GB
- TF scard slot
- eMMC 8/32/64/128 GB module
- Gigabit ethernet drived by PCIE with RTL8111HS
- HDMI Type D out
- Mini DP out
- USB 2.0 Host x 2
- USB 3.0 OTG x 1
- USB 3.0 Host x 1
- WIFI/BT module AIC8800
- 40 pin header

Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andyshrk@163.com>

arm64: dts: rockchip: Add support for rk3588s based board Cool Pi 4B
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231212124253.1897438-1-andyshrk@163.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
3f5d336d Tue Dec 12 05:42:53 MST 2023 Andy Yan <andyshrk@163.com> arm64: dts: rockchip: Add support for rk3588s based board Cool Pi 4B

CoolPi 4B is a rk3588s based SBC.
Specification:
- Rockchip RK3588S
- LPDDR4 2/4/8/16 GB
- TF scard slot
- eMMC 8/32/64/128 GB module
- Gigabit ethernet drived by PCIE with RTL8111HS
- HDMI Type D out
- Mini DP out
- USB 2.0 Host x 2
- USB 3.0 OTG x 1
- USB 3.0 Host x 1
- WIFI/BT module AIC8800
- 40 pin header

Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andyshrk@163.com>

arm64: dts: rockchip: Add support for rk3588s based board Cool Pi 4B
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231212124253.1897438-1-andyshrk@163.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
H A Drk3399-rock-pi-4.dtsidiff f720dd9b Wed Mar 27 13:26:37 MDT 2024 Folker Schwesinger <dev@folker-schwesinger.de> arm64: dts: rockchip: Add enable-strobe-pulldown to emmc phy on ROCK Pi 4

Commit 8b5c2b45b8f0 disabled the internal pull-down for the strobe line
causing I/O errors in HS400 mode for various eMMC modules.

Enable the internal strobe pull-down for ROCK Pi 4 boards. Also re-enable
HS400 mode, that was replaced with HS200 mode as a workaround for the
stability issues in:
cee572756aa2 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Disable HS400 for eMMC on ROCK Pi 4").

This was tested on ROCK 4SE and ROCK Pi 4B+.

Fixes: 8b5c2b45b8f0 ("phy: rockchip: set pulldown for strobe line in dts")
Signed-off-by: Folker Schwesinger <dev@folker-schwesinger.de>
Reviewed-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240327192641.14220-2-dev@folker-schwesinger.de
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
diff f720dd9b Wed Mar 27 13:26:37 MDT 2024 Folker Schwesinger <dev@folker-schwesinger.de> arm64: dts: rockchip: Add enable-strobe-pulldown to emmc phy on ROCK Pi 4

Commit 8b5c2b45b8f0 disabled the internal pull-down for the strobe line
causing I/O errors in HS400 mode for various eMMC modules.

Enable the internal strobe pull-down for ROCK Pi 4 boards. Also re-enable
HS400 mode, that was replaced with HS200 mode as a workaround for the
stability issues in:
cee572756aa2 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Disable HS400 for eMMC on ROCK Pi 4").

This was tested on ROCK 4SE and ROCK Pi 4B+.

Fixes: 8b5c2b45b8f0 ("phy: rockchip: set pulldown for strobe line in dts")
Signed-off-by: Folker Schwesinger <dev@folker-schwesinger.de>
Reviewed-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240327192641.14220-2-dev@folker-schwesinger.de
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
diff f720dd9b Wed Mar 27 13:26:37 MDT 2024 Folker Schwesinger <dev@folker-schwesinger.de> arm64: dts: rockchip: Add enable-strobe-pulldown to emmc phy on ROCK Pi 4

Commit 8b5c2b45b8f0 disabled the internal pull-down for the strobe line
causing I/O errors in HS400 mode for various eMMC modules.

Enable the internal strobe pull-down for ROCK Pi 4 boards. Also re-enable
HS400 mode, that was replaced with HS200 mode as a workaround for the
stability issues in:
cee572756aa2 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Disable HS400 for eMMC on ROCK Pi 4").

This was tested on ROCK 4SE and ROCK Pi 4B+.

Fixes: 8b5c2b45b8f0 ("phy: rockchip: set pulldown for strobe line in dts")
Signed-off-by: Folker Schwesinger <dev@folker-schwesinger.de>
Reviewed-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240327192641.14220-2-dev@folker-schwesinger.de
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
diff f720dd9b Wed Mar 27 13:26:37 MDT 2024 Folker Schwesinger <dev@folker-schwesinger.de> arm64: dts: rockchip: Add enable-strobe-pulldown to emmc phy on ROCK Pi 4

Commit 8b5c2b45b8f0 disabled the internal pull-down for the strobe line
causing I/O errors in HS400 mode for various eMMC modules.

Enable the internal strobe pull-down for ROCK Pi 4 boards. Also re-enable
HS400 mode, that was replaced with HS200 mode as a workaround for the
stability issues in:
cee572756aa2 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Disable HS400 for eMMC on ROCK Pi 4").

This was tested on ROCK 4SE and ROCK Pi 4B+.

Fixes: 8b5c2b45b8f0 ("phy: rockchip: set pulldown for strobe line in dts")
Signed-off-by: Folker Schwesinger <dev@folker-schwesinger.de>
Reviewed-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240327192641.14220-2-dev@folker-schwesinger.de
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
diff f720dd9b Wed Mar 27 13:26:37 MDT 2024 Folker Schwesinger <dev@folker-schwesinger.de> arm64: dts: rockchip: Add enable-strobe-pulldown to emmc phy on ROCK Pi 4

Commit 8b5c2b45b8f0 disabled the internal pull-down for the strobe line
causing I/O errors in HS400 mode for various eMMC modules.

Enable the internal strobe pull-down for ROCK Pi 4 boards. Also re-enable
HS400 mode, that was replaced with HS200 mode as a workaround for the
stability issues in:
cee572756aa2 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Disable HS400 for eMMC on ROCK Pi 4").

This was tested on ROCK 4SE and ROCK Pi 4B+.

Fixes: 8b5c2b45b8f0 ("phy: rockchip: set pulldown for strobe line in dts")
Signed-off-by: Folker Schwesinger <dev@folker-schwesinger.de>
Reviewed-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240327192641.14220-2-dev@folker-schwesinger.de
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
diff 8cd79b72 Thu Oct 12 17:47:27 MDT 2023 Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard@collabora.com> arm64: dts: rockchip: Fix i2s0 pin conflict on ROCK Pi 4 boards

Commit 91419ae0420f ("arm64: dts: rockchip: use BCLK to GPIO switch on
rk3399") modified i2s0 to switch the corresponding pins off when idle.
For the ROCK Pi 4 boards, this means that i2s0 has the following pinctrl
setting:

pinctrl-names = "bclk_on", "bclk_off";
pinctrl-0 = <&i2s0_2ch_bus>;
pinctrl-1 = <&i2s0_8ch_bus_bclk_off>;

Due to this change, i2s0 fails to probe on my Radxa ROCK 4SE and ROCK Pi
4B boards:

rockchip-pinctrl pinctrl: pin gpio3-29 already requested by leds; cannot claim for ff880000.i2s
rockchip-pinctrl pinctrl: pin-125 (ff880000.i2s) status -22
rockchip-pinctrl pinctrl: could not request pin 125 (gpio3-29) from group i2s0-8ch-bus-bclk-off on device rockchip-pinctrl
rockchip-i2s ff880000.i2s: Error applying setting, reverse things back
rockchip-i2s ff880000.i2s: bclk disable failed -22

A pin requested for i2s0_8ch_bus_bclk_off has already been requested by
user_led2, so whichever driver probes first will have the pin allocated.

The hardware uses 2-channel i2s so fix this error by setting pinctl-1 to
i2s0_2ch_bus_bclk_off which doesn't contain the pin allocated to user_led2.

I checked the schematics for all Radxa boards based on ROCK Pi 4 and this
change is compatible with all boards.

Fixes: 91419ae0420f ("arm64: dts: rockchip: use BCLK to GPIO switch on rk3399")
Signed-off-by: Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231013114737.494410-3-chris.obbard@collabora.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
diff 8cd79b72 Thu Oct 12 17:47:27 MDT 2023 Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard@collabora.com> arm64: dts: rockchip: Fix i2s0 pin conflict on ROCK Pi 4 boards

Commit 91419ae0420f ("arm64: dts: rockchip: use BCLK to GPIO switch on
rk3399") modified i2s0 to switch the corresponding pins off when idle.
For the ROCK Pi 4 boards, this means that i2s0 has the following pinctrl
setting:

pinctrl-names = "bclk_on", "bclk_off";
pinctrl-0 = <&i2s0_2ch_bus>;
pinctrl-1 = <&i2s0_8ch_bus_bclk_off>;

Due to this change, i2s0 fails to probe on my Radxa ROCK 4SE and ROCK Pi
4B boards:

rockchip-pinctrl pinctrl: pin gpio3-29 already requested by leds; cannot claim for ff880000.i2s
rockchip-pinctrl pinctrl: pin-125 (ff880000.i2s) status -22
rockchip-pinctrl pinctrl: could not request pin 125 (gpio3-29) from group i2s0-8ch-bus-bclk-off on device rockchip-pinctrl
rockchip-i2s ff880000.i2s: Error applying setting, reverse things back
rockchip-i2s ff880000.i2s: bclk disable failed -22

A pin requested for i2s0_8ch_bus_bclk_off has already been requested by
user_led2, so whichever driver probes first will have the pin allocated.

The hardware uses 2-channel i2s so fix this error by setting pinctl-1 to
i2s0_2ch_bus_bclk_off which doesn't contain the pin allocated to user_led2.

I checked the schematics for all Radxa boards based on ROCK Pi 4 and this
change is compatible with all boards.

Fixes: 91419ae0420f ("arm64: dts: rockchip: use BCLK to GPIO switch on rk3399")
Signed-off-by: Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231013114737.494410-3-chris.obbard@collabora.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
diff 8cd79b72 Thu Oct 12 17:47:27 MDT 2023 Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard@collabora.com> arm64: dts: rockchip: Fix i2s0 pin conflict on ROCK Pi 4 boards

Commit 91419ae0420f ("arm64: dts: rockchip: use BCLK to GPIO switch on
rk3399") modified i2s0 to switch the corresponding pins off when idle.
For the ROCK Pi 4 boards, this means that i2s0 has the following pinctrl
setting:

pinctrl-names = "bclk_on", "bclk_off";
pinctrl-0 = <&i2s0_2ch_bus>;
pinctrl-1 = <&i2s0_8ch_bus_bclk_off>;

Due to this change, i2s0 fails to probe on my Radxa ROCK 4SE and ROCK Pi
4B boards:

rockchip-pinctrl pinctrl: pin gpio3-29 already requested by leds; cannot claim for ff880000.i2s
rockchip-pinctrl pinctrl: pin-125 (ff880000.i2s) status -22
rockchip-pinctrl pinctrl: could not request pin 125 (gpio3-29) from group i2s0-8ch-bus-bclk-off on device rockchip-pinctrl
rockchip-i2s ff880000.i2s: Error applying setting, reverse things back
rockchip-i2s ff880000.i2s: bclk disable failed -22

A pin requested for i2s0_8ch_bus_bclk_off has already been requested by
user_led2, so whichever driver probes first will have the pin allocated.

The hardware uses 2-channel i2s so fix this error by setting pinctl-1 to
i2s0_2ch_bus_bclk_off which doesn't contain the pin allocated to user_led2.

I checked the schematics for all Radxa boards based on ROCK Pi 4 and this
change is compatible with all boards.

Fixes: 91419ae0420f ("arm64: dts: rockchip: use BCLK to GPIO switch on rk3399")
Signed-off-by: Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231013114737.494410-3-chris.obbard@collabora.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
diff 8cd79b72 Thu Oct 12 17:47:27 MDT 2023 Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard@collabora.com> arm64: dts: rockchip: Fix i2s0 pin conflict on ROCK Pi 4 boards

Commit 91419ae0420f ("arm64: dts: rockchip: use BCLK to GPIO switch on
rk3399") modified i2s0 to switch the corresponding pins off when idle.
For the ROCK Pi 4 boards, this means that i2s0 has the following pinctrl
setting:

pinctrl-names = "bclk_on", "bclk_off";
pinctrl-0 = <&i2s0_2ch_bus>;
pinctrl-1 = <&i2s0_8ch_bus_bclk_off>;

Due to this change, i2s0 fails to probe on my Radxa ROCK 4SE and ROCK Pi
4B boards:

rockchip-pinctrl pinctrl: pin gpio3-29 already requested by leds; cannot claim for ff880000.i2s
rockchip-pinctrl pinctrl: pin-125 (ff880000.i2s) status -22
rockchip-pinctrl pinctrl: could not request pin 125 (gpio3-29) from group i2s0-8ch-bus-bclk-off on device rockchip-pinctrl
rockchip-i2s ff880000.i2s: Error applying setting, reverse things back
rockchip-i2s ff880000.i2s: bclk disable failed -22

A pin requested for i2s0_8ch_bus_bclk_off has already been requested by
user_led2, so whichever driver probes first will have the pin allocated.

The hardware uses 2-channel i2s so fix this error by setting pinctl-1 to
i2s0_2ch_bus_bclk_off which doesn't contain the pin allocated to user_led2.

I checked the schematics for all Radxa boards based on ROCK Pi 4 and this
change is compatible with all boards.

Fixes: 91419ae0420f ("arm64: dts: rockchip: use BCLK to GPIO switch on rk3399")
Signed-off-by: Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231013114737.494410-3-chris.obbard@collabora.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
diff 8cd79b72 Thu Oct 12 17:47:27 MDT 2023 Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard@collabora.com> arm64: dts: rockchip: Fix i2s0 pin conflict on ROCK Pi 4 boards

Commit 91419ae0420f ("arm64: dts: rockchip: use BCLK to GPIO switch on
rk3399") modified i2s0 to switch the corresponding pins off when idle.
For the ROCK Pi 4 boards, this means that i2s0 has the following pinctrl
setting:

pinctrl-names = "bclk_on", "bclk_off";
pinctrl-0 = <&i2s0_2ch_bus>;
pinctrl-1 = <&i2s0_8ch_bus_bclk_off>;

Due to this change, i2s0 fails to probe on my Radxa ROCK 4SE and ROCK Pi
4B boards:

rockchip-pinctrl pinctrl: pin gpio3-29 already requested by leds; cannot claim for ff880000.i2s
rockchip-pinctrl pinctrl: pin-125 (ff880000.i2s) status -22
rockchip-pinctrl pinctrl: could not request pin 125 (gpio3-29) from group i2s0-8ch-bus-bclk-off on device rockchip-pinctrl
rockchip-i2s ff880000.i2s: Error applying setting, reverse things back
rockchip-i2s ff880000.i2s: bclk disable failed -22

A pin requested for i2s0_8ch_bus_bclk_off has already been requested by
user_led2, so whichever driver probes first will have the pin allocated.

The hardware uses 2-channel i2s so fix this error by setting pinctl-1 to
i2s0_2ch_bus_bclk_off which doesn't contain the pin allocated to user_led2.

I checked the schematics for all Radxa boards based on ROCK Pi 4 and this
change is compatible with all boards.

Fixes: 91419ae0420f ("arm64: dts: rockchip: use BCLK to GPIO switch on rk3399")
Signed-off-by: Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231013114737.494410-3-chris.obbard@collabora.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
/linux-master/arch/um/include/shared/skas/
H A Dskas.hdiff d0b5e15f Wed Mar 18 14:31:27 MDT 2015 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> um: Remove SKAS3/4 support

Before we had SKAS0 UML had two modes of operation
TT (tracing thread) and SKAS3/4 (separated kernel address space).
TT was known to be insecure and got removed a long time ago.
SKAS3/4 required a few (3 or 4) patches on the host side which never went
mainline. The last host patch is 10 years old.

With SKAS0 mode (separated kernel address space using 0 host patches),
default since 2005, SKAS3/4 is obsolete and can be removed.

Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
diff d0b5e15f Wed Mar 18 14:31:27 MDT 2015 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> um: Remove SKAS3/4 support

Before we had SKAS0 UML had two modes of operation
TT (tracing thread) and SKAS3/4 (separated kernel address space).
TT was known to be insecure and got removed a long time ago.
SKAS3/4 required a few (3 or 4) patches on the host side which never went
mainline. The last host patch is 10 years old.

With SKAS0 mode (separated kernel address space using 0 host patches),
default since 2005, SKAS3/4 is obsolete and can be removed.

Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
diff d0b5e15f Wed Mar 18 14:31:27 MDT 2015 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> um: Remove SKAS3/4 support

Before we had SKAS0 UML had two modes of operation
TT (tracing thread) and SKAS3/4 (separated kernel address space).
TT was known to be insecure and got removed a long time ago.
SKAS3/4 required a few (3 or 4) patches on the host side which never went
mainline. The last host patch is 10 years old.

With SKAS0 mode (separated kernel address space using 0 host patches),
default since 2005, SKAS3/4 is obsolete and can be removed.

Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
diff d0b5e15f Wed Mar 18 14:31:27 MDT 2015 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> um: Remove SKAS3/4 support

Before we had SKAS0 UML had two modes of operation
TT (tracing thread) and SKAS3/4 (separated kernel address space).
TT was known to be insecure and got removed a long time ago.
SKAS3/4 required a few (3 or 4) patches on the host side which never went
mainline. The last host patch is 10 years old.

With SKAS0 mode (separated kernel address space using 0 host patches),
default since 2005, SKAS3/4 is obsolete and can be removed.

Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
diff d0b5e15f Wed Mar 18 14:31:27 MDT 2015 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> um: Remove SKAS3/4 support

Before we had SKAS0 UML had two modes of operation
TT (tracing thread) and SKAS3/4 (separated kernel address space).
TT was known to be insecure and got removed a long time ago.
SKAS3/4 required a few (3 or 4) patches on the host side which never went
mainline. The last host patch is 10 years old.

With SKAS0 mode (separated kernel address space using 0 host patches),
default since 2005, SKAS3/4 is obsolete and can be removed.

Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
/linux-master/drivers/firmware/imx/
H A Dmisc.cdiff f5bfeff4 Thu Feb 20 09:29:36 MST 2020 Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com> firmware: imx: Align imx_sc_msg_req_cpu_start to 4

The imx SC api strongly assumes that messages are composed out of
4-bytes words but some of our message structs have odd sizeofs.

This produces many oopses with CONFIG_KASAN=y.

Fix by marking with __aligned(4).

Fixes: d90bf296ae18 ("firmware: imx: Add support to start/stop a CPU")
Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
diff f5bfeff4 Thu Feb 20 09:29:36 MST 2020 Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com> firmware: imx: Align imx_sc_msg_req_cpu_start to 4

The imx SC api strongly assumes that messages are composed out of
4-bytes words but some of our message structs have odd sizeofs.

This produces many oopses with CONFIG_KASAN=y.

Fix by marking with __aligned(4).

Fixes: d90bf296ae18 ("firmware: imx: Add support to start/stop a CPU")
Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
diff f5bfeff4 Thu Feb 20 09:29:36 MST 2020 Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com> firmware: imx: Align imx_sc_msg_req_cpu_start to 4

The imx SC api strongly assumes that messages are composed out of
4-bytes words but some of our message structs have odd sizeofs.

This produces many oopses with CONFIG_KASAN=y.

Fix by marking with __aligned(4).

Fixes: d90bf296ae18 ("firmware: imx: Add support to start/stop a CPU")
Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
diff 1e6a4eba Thu Feb 20 09:29:34 MST 2020 Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com> firmware: imx: misc: Align imx sc msg structs to 4

The imx SC api strongly assumes that messages are composed out of
4-bytes words but some of our message structs have odd sizeofs.

This produces many oopses with CONFIG_KASAN=y:

BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in imx_mu_send_data+0x108/0x1f0

It shouldn't cause an issues in normal use because these structs are
always allocated on the stack.

Fixes: 15e1f2bc8b3b ("firmware: imx: add misc svc support")
Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
diff 1e6a4eba Thu Feb 20 09:29:34 MST 2020 Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com> firmware: imx: misc: Align imx sc msg structs to 4

The imx SC api strongly assumes that messages are composed out of
4-bytes words but some of our message structs have odd sizeofs.

This produces many oopses with CONFIG_KASAN=y:

BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in imx_mu_send_data+0x108/0x1f0

It shouldn't cause an issues in normal use because these structs are
always allocated on the stack.

Fixes: 15e1f2bc8b3b ("firmware: imx: add misc svc support")
Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
/linux-master/tools/testing/selftests/timens/
H A Dgettime_perf.c1854b97e Mon Nov 11 18:27:22 MST 2019 Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com> selftests/timens: Add a simple perf test for clock_gettime()

Output on success:
1..4
ok 1 host: clock: monotonic cycles: 148323947
ok 2 host: clock: boottime cycles: 148577503
ok 3 ns: clock: monotonic cycles: 137659217
ok 4 ns: clock: boottime cycles: 137959154
# Pass 4 Fail 0 Xfail 0 Xpass 0 Skip 0 Error 0

Output with lack of permissions:
1..4
ok 1 host: clock: monotonic cycles: 145671139
ok 2 host: clock: boottime cycles: 146958357
not ok 3 # SKIP need to run as root

Output without support of time namespaces:
1..4
ok 1 host: clock: monotonic cycles: 145671139
ok 2 host: clock: boottime cycles: 146958357
not ok 3 # SKIP Time namespaces are not supported

Co-developed-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191112012724.250792-34-dima@arista.com
1854b97e Mon Nov 11 18:27:22 MST 2019 Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com> selftests/timens: Add a simple perf test for clock_gettime()

Output on success:
1..4
ok 1 host: clock: monotonic cycles: 148323947
ok 2 host: clock: boottime cycles: 148577503
ok 3 ns: clock: monotonic cycles: 137659217
ok 4 ns: clock: boottime cycles: 137959154
# Pass 4 Fail 0 Xfail 0 Xpass 0 Skip 0 Error 0

Output with lack of permissions:
1..4
ok 1 host: clock: monotonic cycles: 145671139
ok 2 host: clock: boottime cycles: 146958357
not ok 3 # SKIP need to run as root

Output without support of time namespaces:
1..4
ok 1 host: clock: monotonic cycles: 145671139
ok 2 host: clock: boottime cycles: 146958357
not ok 3 # SKIP Time namespaces are not supported

Co-developed-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191112012724.250792-34-dima@arista.com
1854b97e Mon Nov 11 18:27:22 MST 2019 Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com> selftests/timens: Add a simple perf test for clock_gettime()

Output on success:
1..4
ok 1 host: clock: monotonic cycles: 148323947
ok 2 host: clock: boottime cycles: 148577503
ok 3 ns: clock: monotonic cycles: 137659217
ok 4 ns: clock: boottime cycles: 137959154
# Pass 4 Fail 0 Xfail 0 Xpass 0 Skip 0 Error 0

Output with lack of permissions:
1..4
ok 1 host: clock: monotonic cycles: 145671139
ok 2 host: clock: boottime cycles: 146958357
not ok 3 # SKIP need to run as root

Output without support of time namespaces:
1..4
ok 1 host: clock: monotonic cycles: 145671139
ok 2 host: clock: boottime cycles: 146958357
not ok 3 # SKIP Time namespaces are not supported

Co-developed-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191112012724.250792-34-dima@arista.com
1854b97e Mon Nov 11 18:27:22 MST 2019 Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com> selftests/timens: Add a simple perf test for clock_gettime()

Output on success:
1..4
ok 1 host: clock: monotonic cycles: 148323947
ok 2 host: clock: boottime cycles: 148577503
ok 3 ns: clock: monotonic cycles: 137659217
ok 4 ns: clock: boottime cycles: 137959154
# Pass 4 Fail 0 Xfail 0 Xpass 0 Skip 0 Error 0

Output with lack of permissions:
1..4
ok 1 host: clock: monotonic cycles: 145671139
ok 2 host: clock: boottime cycles: 146958357
not ok 3 # SKIP need to run as root

Output without support of time namespaces:
1..4
ok 1 host: clock: monotonic cycles: 145671139
ok 2 host: clock: boottime cycles: 146958357
not ok 3 # SKIP Time namespaces are not supported

Co-developed-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191112012724.250792-34-dima@arista.com
1854b97e Mon Nov 11 18:27:22 MST 2019 Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com> selftests/timens: Add a simple perf test for clock_gettime()

Output on success:
1..4
ok 1 host: clock: monotonic cycles: 148323947
ok 2 host: clock: boottime cycles: 148577503
ok 3 ns: clock: monotonic cycles: 137659217
ok 4 ns: clock: boottime cycles: 137959154
# Pass 4 Fail 0 Xfail 0 Xpass 0 Skip 0 Error 0

Output with lack of permissions:
1..4
ok 1 host: clock: monotonic cycles: 145671139
ok 2 host: clock: boottime cycles: 146958357
not ok 3 # SKIP need to run as root

Output without support of time namespaces:
1..4
ok 1 host: clock: monotonic cycles: 145671139
ok 2 host: clock: boottime cycles: 146958357
not ok 3 # SKIP Time namespaces are not supported

Co-developed-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191112012724.250792-34-dima@arista.com
/linux-master/arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/
H A Dmachine_check.cdiff 4f8e78c0 Fri Aug 06 19:02:36 MDT 2021 Xiongwei Song <sxwjean@gmail.com> powerpc: Add esr as a synonym for pt_regs.dsisr

Create an anonymous union for dsisr and esr regsiters, we can reference
esr to get the exception detail when CONFIG_4xx=y or CONFIG_BOOKE=y.
Otherwise, reference dsisr. This makes code more clear.

Signed-off-by: Xiongwei Song <sxwjean@gmail.com>
[mpe: Reword commit title]
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210807010239.416055-2-sxwjean@me.com
0d0935b3 Tue Aug 08 00:39:21 MDT 2017 Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> powerpc/4xx: Move machine_check_4xx() into platforms/4xx

Now that we have 4xx platform directory we can move the 4xx machine
check handler in there. Again we drop get_mc_reason() and replace it
with regs->dsisr directly (which is actually SPRN_ESR).

Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
0d0935b3 Tue Aug 08 00:39:21 MDT 2017 Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> powerpc/4xx: Move machine_check_4xx() into platforms/4xx

Now that we have 4xx platform directory we can move the 4xx machine
check handler in there. Again we drop get_mc_reason() and replace it
with regs->dsisr directly (which is actually SPRN_ESR).

Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
0d0935b3 Tue Aug 08 00:39:21 MDT 2017 Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> powerpc/4xx: Move machine_check_4xx() into platforms/4xx

Now that we have 4xx platform directory we can move the 4xx machine
check handler in there. Again we drop get_mc_reason() and replace it
with regs->dsisr directly (which is actually SPRN_ESR).

Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
0d0935b3 Tue Aug 08 00:39:21 MDT 2017 Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> powerpc/4xx: Move machine_check_4xx() into platforms/4xx

Now that we have 4xx platform directory we can move the 4xx machine
check handler in there. Again we drop get_mc_reason() and replace it
with regs->dsisr directly (which is actually SPRN_ESR).

Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
H A Duic.cdiff 7dac7cf1 Thu Aug 17 08:27:23 MDT 2023 Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> powerpc/4xx: Add missing includes to fix no previous prototype errors

A W=1 build of ppc40x_defconfig throws the followings errors:

CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.o
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.c:274:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'uic_init_tree' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
274 | void __init uic_init_tree(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.c:319:14: warning: no previous prototype for 'uic_get_irq' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
319 | unsigned int uic_get_irq(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/machine_check.o
CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/soc.o
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/soc.c:193:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'ppc4xx_reset_system' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
193 | void ppc4xx_reset_system(char *cmd)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Add missing includes to get the missing prototypes.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/c8253017e355638132737ff47936e290df8738d1.1692282432.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
diff 7dac7cf1 Thu Aug 17 08:27:23 MDT 2023 Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> powerpc/4xx: Add missing includes to fix no previous prototype errors

A W=1 build of ppc40x_defconfig throws the followings errors:

CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.o
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.c:274:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'uic_init_tree' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
274 | void __init uic_init_tree(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.c:319:14: warning: no previous prototype for 'uic_get_irq' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
319 | unsigned int uic_get_irq(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/machine_check.o
CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/soc.o
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/soc.c:193:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'ppc4xx_reset_system' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
193 | void ppc4xx_reset_system(char *cmd)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Add missing includes to get the missing prototypes.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/c8253017e355638132737ff47936e290df8738d1.1692282432.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
diff 7dac7cf1 Thu Aug 17 08:27:23 MDT 2023 Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> powerpc/4xx: Add missing includes to fix no previous prototype errors

A W=1 build of ppc40x_defconfig throws the followings errors:

CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.o
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.c:274:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'uic_init_tree' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
274 | void __init uic_init_tree(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.c:319:14: warning: no previous prototype for 'uic_get_irq' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
319 | unsigned int uic_get_irq(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/machine_check.o
CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/soc.o
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/soc.c:193:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'ppc4xx_reset_system' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
193 | void ppc4xx_reset_system(char *cmd)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Add missing includes to get the missing prototypes.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/c8253017e355638132737ff47936e290df8738d1.1692282432.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
diff 7dac7cf1 Thu Aug 17 08:27:23 MDT 2023 Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> powerpc/4xx: Add missing includes to fix no previous prototype errors

A W=1 build of ppc40x_defconfig throws the followings errors:

CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.o
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.c:274:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'uic_init_tree' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
274 | void __init uic_init_tree(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.c:319:14: warning: no previous prototype for 'uic_get_irq' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
319 | unsigned int uic_get_irq(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/machine_check.o
CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/soc.o
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/soc.c:193:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'ppc4xx_reset_system' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
193 | void ppc4xx_reset_system(char *cmd)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Add missing includes to get the missing prototypes.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/c8253017e355638132737ff47936e290df8738d1.1692282432.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
diff 7dac7cf1 Thu Aug 17 08:27:23 MDT 2023 Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> powerpc/4xx: Add missing includes to fix no previous prototype errors

A W=1 build of ppc40x_defconfig throws the followings errors:

CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.o
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.c:274:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'uic_init_tree' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
274 | void __init uic_init_tree(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.c:319:14: warning: no previous prototype for 'uic_get_irq' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
319 | unsigned int uic_get_irq(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/machine_check.o
CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/soc.o
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/soc.c:193:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'ppc4xx_reset_system' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
193 | void ppc4xx_reset_system(char *cmd)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Add missing includes to get the missing prototypes.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/c8253017e355638132737ff47936e290df8738d1.1692282432.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
diff 7dac7cf1 Thu Aug 17 08:27:23 MDT 2023 Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> powerpc/4xx: Add missing includes to fix no previous prototype errors

A W=1 build of ppc40x_defconfig throws the followings errors:

CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.o
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.c:274:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'uic_init_tree' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
274 | void __init uic_init_tree(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.c:319:14: warning: no previous prototype for 'uic_get_irq' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
319 | unsigned int uic_get_irq(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/machine_check.o
CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/soc.o
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/soc.c:193:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'ppc4xx_reset_system' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
193 | void ppc4xx_reset_system(char *cmd)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Add missing includes to get the missing prototypes.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/c8253017e355638132737ff47936e290df8738d1.1692282432.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
diff 7dac7cf1 Thu Aug 17 08:27:23 MDT 2023 Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> powerpc/4xx: Add missing includes to fix no previous prototype errors

A W=1 build of ppc40x_defconfig throws the followings errors:

CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.o
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.c:274:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'uic_init_tree' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
274 | void __init uic_init_tree(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.c:319:14: warning: no previous prototype for 'uic_get_irq' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
319 | unsigned int uic_get_irq(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/machine_check.o
CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/soc.o
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/soc.c:193:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'ppc4xx_reset_system' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
193 | void ppc4xx_reset_system(char *cmd)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Add missing includes to get the missing prototypes.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/c8253017e355638132737ff47936e290df8738d1.1692282432.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
diff 3ab3a068 Sat Jun 15 09:23:13 MDT 2019 Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@gmail.com> powerpc/4xx/uic: clear pending interrupt after irq type/pol change

When testing out gpio-keys with a button, a spurious
interrupt (and therefore a key press or release event)
gets triggered as soon as the driver enables the irq
line for the first time.

This patch clears any potential bogus generated interrupt
that was caused by the switching of the associated irq's
type and polarity.

Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
bfa9a2eb Tue Aug 08 00:39:20 MDT 2017 Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> powerpc/4xx: Create 4xx pseudo-platform in platforms/4xx

We have a lot of code in sysdev for supporting 4xx, ie. either 40x or
44x. Instead it would be cleaner if it was all in platforms/4xx.

This is slightly odd in that we don't actually define any machines in
the 4xx platform, as is usual for a platform directory. But still it
seems like a better result to have all this related code in a directory
by itself.

Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
bfa9a2eb Tue Aug 08 00:39:20 MDT 2017 Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> powerpc/4xx: Create 4xx pseudo-platform in platforms/4xx

We have a lot of code in sysdev for supporting 4xx, ie. either 40x or
44x. Instead it would be cleaner if it was all in platforms/4xx.

This is slightly odd in that we don't actually define any machines in
the 4xx platform, as is usual for a platform directory. But still it
seems like a better result to have all this related code in a directory
by itself.

Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
bfa9a2eb Tue Aug 08 00:39:20 MDT 2017 Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> powerpc/4xx: Create 4xx pseudo-platform in platforms/4xx

We have a lot of code in sysdev for supporting 4xx, ie. either 40x or
44x. Instead it would be cleaner if it was all in platforms/4xx.

This is slightly odd in that we don't actually define any machines in
the 4xx platform, as is usual for a platform directory. But still it
seems like a better result to have all this related code in a directory
by itself.

Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
bfa9a2eb Tue Aug 08 00:39:20 MDT 2017 Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> powerpc/4xx: Create 4xx pseudo-platform in platforms/4xx

We have a lot of code in sysdev for supporting 4xx, ie. either 40x or
44x. Instead it would be cleaner if it was all in platforms/4xx.

This is slightly odd in that we don't actually define any machines in
the 4xx platform, as is usual for a platform directory. But still it
seems like a better result to have all this related code in a directory
by itself.

Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
bfa9a2eb Tue Aug 08 00:39:20 MDT 2017 Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> powerpc/4xx: Create 4xx pseudo-platform in platforms/4xx

We have a lot of code in sysdev for supporting 4xx, ie. either 40x or
44x. Instead it would be cleaner if it was all in platforms/4xx.

This is slightly odd in that we don't actually define any machines in
the 4xx platform, as is usual for a platform directory. But still it
seems like a better result to have all this related code in a directory
by itself.

Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
bfa9a2eb Tue Aug 08 00:39:20 MDT 2017 Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> powerpc/4xx: Create 4xx pseudo-platform in platforms/4xx

We have a lot of code in sysdev for supporting 4xx, ie. either 40x or
44x. Instead it would be cleaner if it was all in platforms/4xx.

This is slightly odd in that we don't actually define any machines in
the 4xx platform, as is usual for a platform directory. But still it
seems like a better result to have all this related code in a directory
by itself.

Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
H A Dsoc.cdiff 7dac7cf1 Thu Aug 17 08:27:23 MDT 2023 Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> powerpc/4xx: Add missing includes to fix no previous prototype errors

A W=1 build of ppc40x_defconfig throws the followings errors:

CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.o
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.c:274:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'uic_init_tree' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
274 | void __init uic_init_tree(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.c:319:14: warning: no previous prototype for 'uic_get_irq' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
319 | unsigned int uic_get_irq(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/machine_check.o
CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/soc.o
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/soc.c:193:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'ppc4xx_reset_system' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
193 | void ppc4xx_reset_system(char *cmd)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Add missing includes to get the missing prototypes.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/c8253017e355638132737ff47936e290df8738d1.1692282432.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
diff 7dac7cf1 Thu Aug 17 08:27:23 MDT 2023 Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> powerpc/4xx: Add missing includes to fix no previous prototype errors

A W=1 build of ppc40x_defconfig throws the followings errors:

CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.o
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.c:274:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'uic_init_tree' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
274 | void __init uic_init_tree(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.c:319:14: warning: no previous prototype for 'uic_get_irq' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
319 | unsigned int uic_get_irq(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/machine_check.o
CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/soc.o
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/soc.c:193:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'ppc4xx_reset_system' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
193 | void ppc4xx_reset_system(char *cmd)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Add missing includes to get the missing prototypes.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/c8253017e355638132737ff47936e290df8738d1.1692282432.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
diff 7dac7cf1 Thu Aug 17 08:27:23 MDT 2023 Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> powerpc/4xx: Add missing includes to fix no previous prototype errors

A W=1 build of ppc40x_defconfig throws the followings errors:

CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.o
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.c:274:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'uic_init_tree' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
274 | void __init uic_init_tree(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.c:319:14: warning: no previous prototype for 'uic_get_irq' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
319 | unsigned int uic_get_irq(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/machine_check.o
CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/soc.o
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/soc.c:193:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'ppc4xx_reset_system' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
193 | void ppc4xx_reset_system(char *cmd)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Add missing includes to get the missing prototypes.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/c8253017e355638132737ff47936e290df8738d1.1692282432.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
diff 7dac7cf1 Thu Aug 17 08:27:23 MDT 2023 Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> powerpc/4xx: Add missing includes to fix no previous prototype errors

A W=1 build of ppc40x_defconfig throws the followings errors:

CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.o
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.c:274:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'uic_init_tree' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
274 | void __init uic_init_tree(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.c:319:14: warning: no previous prototype for 'uic_get_irq' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
319 | unsigned int uic_get_irq(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/machine_check.o
CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/soc.o
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/soc.c:193:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'ppc4xx_reset_system' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
193 | void ppc4xx_reset_system(char *cmd)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Add missing includes to get the missing prototypes.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/c8253017e355638132737ff47936e290df8738d1.1692282432.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
diff 7dac7cf1 Thu Aug 17 08:27:23 MDT 2023 Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> powerpc/4xx: Add missing includes to fix no previous prototype errors

A W=1 build of ppc40x_defconfig throws the followings errors:

CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.o
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.c:274:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'uic_init_tree' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
274 | void __init uic_init_tree(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.c:319:14: warning: no previous prototype for 'uic_get_irq' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
319 | unsigned int uic_get_irq(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/machine_check.o
CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/soc.o
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/soc.c:193:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'ppc4xx_reset_system' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
193 | void ppc4xx_reset_system(char *cmd)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Add missing includes to get the missing prototypes.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/c8253017e355638132737ff47936e290df8738d1.1692282432.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
diff 7dac7cf1 Thu Aug 17 08:27:23 MDT 2023 Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> powerpc/4xx: Add missing includes to fix no previous prototype errors

A W=1 build of ppc40x_defconfig throws the followings errors:

CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.o
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.c:274:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'uic_init_tree' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
274 | void __init uic_init_tree(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.c:319:14: warning: no previous prototype for 'uic_get_irq' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
319 | unsigned int uic_get_irq(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/machine_check.o
CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/soc.o
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/soc.c:193:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'ppc4xx_reset_system' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
193 | void ppc4xx_reset_system(char *cmd)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Add missing includes to get the missing prototypes.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/c8253017e355638132737ff47936e290df8738d1.1692282432.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
diff 7dac7cf1 Thu Aug 17 08:27:23 MDT 2023 Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> powerpc/4xx: Add missing includes to fix no previous prototype errors

A W=1 build of ppc40x_defconfig throws the followings errors:

CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.o
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.c:274:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'uic_init_tree' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
274 | void __init uic_init_tree(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/uic.c:319:14: warning: no previous prototype for 'uic_get_irq' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
319 | unsigned int uic_get_irq(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/machine_check.o
CC arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/soc.o
arch/powerpc/platforms/4xx/soc.c:193:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'ppc4xx_reset_system' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
193 | void ppc4xx_reset_system(char *cmd)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Add missing includes to get the missing prototypes.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/c8253017e355638132737ff47936e290df8738d1.1692282432.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
diff 84dbc69a Mon Aug 27 12:40:26 MDT 2018 Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> powerpc: 4xx: get cpu node with of_get_cpu_node

"device_type" use is deprecated for FDT though it has continued to be used
for nodes like cpu nodes. Use of_get_cpu_node() instead which works using
node names by default. This will allow the eventually removal of cpu
device_type properties.

Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
bfa9a2eb Tue Aug 08 00:39:20 MDT 2017 Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> powerpc/4xx: Create 4xx pseudo-platform in platforms/4xx

We have a lot of code in sysdev for supporting 4xx, ie. either 40x or
44x. Instead it would be cleaner if it was all in platforms/4xx.

This is slightly odd in that we don't actually define any machines in
the 4xx platform, as is usual for a platform directory. But still it
seems like a better result to have all this related code in a directory
by itself.

Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
bfa9a2eb Tue Aug 08 00:39:20 MDT 2017 Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> powerpc/4xx: Create 4xx pseudo-platform in platforms/4xx

We have a lot of code in sysdev for supporting 4xx, ie. either 40x or
44x. Instead it would be cleaner if it was all in platforms/4xx.

This is slightly odd in that we don't actually define any machines in
the 4xx platform, as is usual for a platform directory. But still it
seems like a better result to have all this related code in a directory
by itself.

Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
bfa9a2eb Tue Aug 08 00:39:20 MDT 2017 Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> powerpc/4xx: Create 4xx pseudo-platform in platforms/4xx

We have a lot of code in sysdev for supporting 4xx, ie. either 40x or
44x. Instead it would be cleaner if it was all in platforms/4xx.

This is slightly odd in that we don't actually define any machines in
the 4xx platform, as is usual for a platform directory. But still it
seems like a better result to have all this related code in a directory
by itself.

Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
bfa9a2eb Tue Aug 08 00:39:20 MDT 2017 Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> powerpc/4xx: Create 4xx pseudo-platform in platforms/4xx

We have a lot of code in sysdev for supporting 4xx, ie. either 40x or
44x. Instead it would be cleaner if it was all in platforms/4xx.

This is slightly odd in that we don't actually define any machines in
the 4xx platform, as is usual for a platform directory. But still it
seems like a better result to have all this related code in a directory
by itself.

Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
bfa9a2eb Tue Aug 08 00:39:20 MDT 2017 Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> powerpc/4xx: Create 4xx pseudo-platform in platforms/4xx

We have a lot of code in sysdev for supporting 4xx, ie. either 40x or
44x. Instead it would be cleaner if it was all in platforms/4xx.

This is slightly odd in that we don't actually define any machines in
the 4xx platform, as is usual for a platform directory. But still it
seems like a better result to have all this related code in a directory
by itself.

Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
bfa9a2eb Tue Aug 08 00:39:20 MDT 2017 Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> powerpc/4xx: Create 4xx pseudo-platform in platforms/4xx

We have a lot of code in sysdev for supporting 4xx, ie. either 40x or
44x. Instead it would be cleaner if it was all in platforms/4xx.

This is slightly odd in that we don't actually define any machines in
the 4xx platform, as is usual for a platform directory. But still it
seems like a better result to have all this related code in a directory
by itself.

Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
/linux-master/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/
H A Dahci-fsl-qoriq.txtdiff 4afb4744 Tue Sep 13 02:09:58 MDT 2016 Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@nxp.com> dt-bindings: ahci-fsl-qoriq: updated for SoC ls1046a

Signed-off-by: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@nxp.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
/linux-master/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/
H A Diss4xx-mpic.dtsb4e8c8dd Fri Mar 05 03:45:54 MST 2010 Torez Smith <lnxtorez@linux.vnet.ibm.com> powerpc/4xx: Simple platform for the ISS 4xx simulator

This is a trivial 4xx plaform that uses the new simple bsp from
Josh and is handy to use in simulators such as ISS or even Mambo
who don't properly implement most of the actual devices in the
SoC but really only the core.

Signed-off-by: Torez Smith <lnxtorez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
b4e8c8dd Fri Mar 05 03:45:54 MST 2010 Torez Smith <lnxtorez@linux.vnet.ibm.com> powerpc/4xx: Simple platform for the ISS 4xx simulator

This is a trivial 4xx plaform that uses the new simple bsp from
Josh and is handy to use in simulators such as ISS or even Mambo
who don't properly implement most of the actual devices in the
SoC but really only the core.

Signed-off-by: Torez Smith <lnxtorez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
b4e8c8dd Fri Mar 05 03:45:54 MST 2010 Torez Smith <lnxtorez@linux.vnet.ibm.com> powerpc/4xx: Simple platform for the ISS 4xx simulator

This is a trivial 4xx plaform that uses the new simple bsp from
Josh and is handy to use in simulators such as ISS or even Mambo
who don't properly implement most of the actual devices in the
SoC but really only the core.

Signed-off-by: Torez Smith <lnxtorez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
/linux-master/scripts/dtc/include-prefixes/powerpc/
H A Diss4xx-mpic.dtsb4e8c8dd Fri Mar 05 03:45:54 MST 2010 Torez Smith <lnxtorez@linux.vnet.ibm.com> powerpc/4xx: Simple platform for the ISS 4xx simulator

This is a trivial 4xx plaform that uses the new simple bsp from
Josh and is handy to use in simulators such as ISS or even Mambo
who don't properly implement most of the actual devices in the
SoC but really only the core.

Signed-off-by: Torez Smith <lnxtorez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
b4e8c8dd Fri Mar 05 03:45:54 MST 2010 Torez Smith <lnxtorez@linux.vnet.ibm.com> powerpc/4xx: Simple platform for the ISS 4xx simulator

This is a trivial 4xx plaform that uses the new simple bsp from
Josh and is handy to use in simulators such as ISS or even Mambo
who don't properly implement most of the actual devices in the
SoC but really only the core.

Signed-off-by: Torez Smith <lnxtorez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
b4e8c8dd Fri Mar 05 03:45:54 MST 2010 Torez Smith <lnxtorez@linux.vnet.ibm.com> powerpc/4xx: Simple platform for the ISS 4xx simulator

This is a trivial 4xx plaform that uses the new simple bsp from
Josh and is handy to use in simulators such as ISS or even Mambo
who don't properly implement most of the actual devices in the
SoC but really only the core.

Signed-off-by: Torez Smith <lnxtorez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
/linux-master/include/net/9p/
H A D9p.hdiff 348b5901 Sat Aug 06 13:16:59 MDT 2011 Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> net/9p: Convert net/9p protocol dumps to tracepoints

This helps in more control over debugging.
root@qemu-img-64:~# ls /pass/123
ls: cannot access /pass/123: No such file or directory
root@qemu-img-64:~# cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace
# tracer: nop
#
# TASK-PID CPU# TIMESTAMP FUNCTION
# | | | | |
ls-1536 [001] 70.928584: 9p_protocol_dump: clnt 18446612132784021504 P9_TWALK(tag = 1)
000: 16 00 00 00 6e 01 00 01 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 01
010: 00 03 00 31 32 33 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff 00 00 00

ls-1536 [001] 70.928587: <stack trace>
=> trace_9p_protocol_dump
=> p9pdu_finalize
=> p9_client_rpc
=> p9_client_walk
=> v9fs_vfs_lookup
=> d_alloc_and_lookup
=> walk_component
=> path_lookupat
ls-1536 [000] 70.929696: 9p_protocol_dump: clnt 18446612132784021504 P9_RLERROR(tag = 1)
000: 0b 00 00 00 07 01 00 02 00 00 00 4e 03 00 02 00
010: 00 00 00 00 03 00 02 00 00 00 00 00 ff 43 00 00

ls-1536 [000] 70.929697: <stack trace>
=> trace_9p_protocol_dump
=> p9_client_rpc
=> p9_client_walk
=> v9fs_vfs_lookup
=> d_alloc_and_lookup
=> walk_component
=> path_lookupat
=> do_path_lookup

Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
diff 48e370ff Tue Jun 28 04:11:18 MDT 2011 Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> fs/9p: add 9P2000.L unlinkat operation

unlinkat - Remove a directory entry

size[4] Tunlinkat tag[2] dirfid[4] name[s] flag[4]
size[4] Runlinkat tag[2]

older Tremove have the below request format

size[4] Tremove tag[2] fid[4]

The remove message is used to remove a directory entry either file or directory
The remove opreation is actually a directory opertation and should ideally have
dirfid, if not we cannot represent the fid on server with anything other than
name. We will have to derive the directory name from fid in the Tremove request.

NOTE: The operation doesn't clunk the unlink fid.

Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
diff 48e370ff Tue Jun 28 04:11:18 MDT 2011 Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> fs/9p: add 9P2000.L unlinkat operation

unlinkat - Remove a directory entry

size[4] Tunlinkat tag[2] dirfid[4] name[s] flag[4]
size[4] Runlinkat tag[2]

older Tremove have the below request format

size[4] Tremove tag[2] fid[4]

The remove message is used to remove a directory entry either file or directory
The remove opreation is actually a directory opertation and should ideally have
dirfid, if not we cannot represent the fid on server with anything other than
name. We will have to derive the directory name from fid in the Tremove request.

NOTE: The operation doesn't clunk the unlink fid.

Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
diff 48e370ff Tue Jun 28 04:11:18 MDT 2011 Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> fs/9p: add 9P2000.L unlinkat operation

unlinkat - Remove a directory entry

size[4] Tunlinkat tag[2] dirfid[4] name[s] flag[4]
size[4] Runlinkat tag[2]

older Tremove have the below request format

size[4] Tremove tag[2] fid[4]

The remove message is used to remove a directory entry either file or directory
The remove opreation is actually a directory opertation and should ideally have
dirfid, if not we cannot represent the fid on server with anything other than
name. We will have to derive the directory name from fid in the Tremove request.

NOTE: The operation doesn't clunk the unlink fid.

Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
diff 48e370ff Tue Jun 28 04:11:18 MDT 2011 Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> fs/9p: add 9P2000.L unlinkat operation

unlinkat - Remove a directory entry

size[4] Tunlinkat tag[2] dirfid[4] name[s] flag[4]
size[4] Runlinkat tag[2]

older Tremove have the below request format

size[4] Tremove tag[2] fid[4]

The remove message is used to remove a directory entry either file or directory
The remove opreation is actually a directory opertation and should ideally have
dirfid, if not we cannot represent the fid on server with anything other than
name. We will have to derive the directory name from fid in the Tremove request.

NOTE: The operation doesn't clunk the unlink fid.

Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
diff 48e370ff Tue Jun 28 04:11:18 MDT 2011 Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> fs/9p: add 9P2000.L unlinkat operation

unlinkat - Remove a directory entry

size[4] Tunlinkat tag[2] dirfid[4] name[s] flag[4]
size[4] Runlinkat tag[2]

older Tremove have the below request format

size[4] Tremove tag[2] fid[4]

The remove message is used to remove a directory entry either file or directory
The remove opreation is actually a directory opertation and should ideally have
dirfid, if not we cannot represent the fid on server with anything other than
name. We will have to derive the directory name from fid in the Tremove request.

NOTE: The operation doesn't clunk the unlink fid.

Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
diff 48e370ff Tue Jun 28 04:11:18 MDT 2011 Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> fs/9p: add 9P2000.L unlinkat operation

unlinkat - Remove a directory entry

size[4] Tunlinkat tag[2] dirfid[4] name[s] flag[4]
size[4] Runlinkat tag[2]

older Tremove have the below request format

size[4] Tremove tag[2] fid[4]

The remove message is used to remove a directory entry either file or directory
The remove opreation is actually a directory opertation and should ideally have
dirfid, if not we cannot represent the fid on server with anything other than
name. We will have to derive the directory name from fid in the Tremove request.

NOTE: The operation doesn't clunk the unlink fid.

Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
diff 9e8fb38e Tue Jun 28 04:11:16 MDT 2011 Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> fs/9p: add 9P2000.L renameat operation

renameat - change name of file or directory

size[4] Trenameat tag[2] olddirfid[4] oldname[s] newdirfid[4] newname[s]
size[4] Rrenameat tag[2]

older Trename have the below request format

size[4] Trename tag[2] fid[4] newdirfid[4] name[s]

The rename message is used to change the name of a file, possibly moving it
to a new directory. The rename opreation is actually a directory opertation
and should ideally have olddirfid, if not we cannot represent the fid on server
with anything other than name. We will have to derive the old directory name
from fid in the Trename request.

Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
diff 9e8fb38e Tue Jun 28 04:11:16 MDT 2011 Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> fs/9p: add 9P2000.L renameat operation

renameat - change name of file or directory

size[4] Trenameat tag[2] olddirfid[4] oldname[s] newdirfid[4] newname[s]
size[4] Rrenameat tag[2]

older Trename have the below request format

size[4] Trename tag[2] fid[4] newdirfid[4] name[s]

The rename message is used to change the name of a file, possibly moving it
to a new directory. The rename opreation is actually a directory opertation
and should ideally have olddirfid, if not we cannot represent the fid on server
with anything other than name. We will have to derive the old directory name
from fid in the Trename request.

Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
diff 9e8fb38e Tue Jun 28 04:11:16 MDT 2011 Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> fs/9p: add 9P2000.L renameat operation

renameat - change name of file or directory

size[4] Trenameat tag[2] olddirfid[4] oldname[s] newdirfid[4] newname[s]
size[4] Rrenameat tag[2]

older Trename have the below request format

size[4] Trename tag[2] fid[4] newdirfid[4] name[s]

The rename message is used to change the name of a file, possibly moving it
to a new directory. The rename opreation is actually a directory opertation
and should ideally have olddirfid, if not we cannot represent the fid on server
with anything other than name. We will have to derive the old directory name
from fid in the Trename request.

Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
diff 9e8fb38e Tue Jun 28 04:11:16 MDT 2011 Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> fs/9p: add 9P2000.L renameat operation

renameat - change name of file or directory

size[4] Trenameat tag[2] olddirfid[4] oldname[s] newdirfid[4] newname[s]
size[4] Rrenameat tag[2]

older Trename have the below request format

size[4] Trename tag[2] fid[4] newdirfid[4] name[s]

The rename message is used to change the name of a file, possibly moving it
to a new directory. The rename opreation is actually a directory opertation
and should ideally have olddirfid, if not we cannot represent the fid on server
with anything other than name. We will have to derive the old directory name
from fid in the Trename request.

Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
diff 9e8fb38e Tue Jun 28 04:11:16 MDT 2011 Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> fs/9p: add 9P2000.L renameat operation

renameat - change name of file or directory

size[4] Trenameat tag[2] olddirfid[4] oldname[s] newdirfid[4] newname[s]
size[4] Rrenameat tag[2]

older Trename have the below request format

size[4] Trename tag[2] fid[4] newdirfid[4] name[s]

The rename message is used to change the name of a file, possibly moving it
to a new directory. The rename opreation is actually a directory opertation
and should ideally have olddirfid, if not we cannot represent the fid on server
with anything other than name. We will have to derive the old directory name
from fid in the Trename request.

Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
diff 9e8fb38e Tue Jun 28 04:11:16 MDT 2011 Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> fs/9p: add 9P2000.L renameat operation

renameat - change name of file or directory

size[4] Trenameat tag[2] olddirfid[4] oldname[s] newdirfid[4] newname[s]
size[4] Rrenameat tag[2]

older Trename have the below request format

size[4] Trename tag[2] fid[4] newdirfid[4] name[s]

The rename message is used to change the name of a file, possibly moving it
to a new directory. The rename opreation is actually a directory opertation
and should ideally have olddirfid, if not we cannot represent the fid on server
with anything other than name. We will have to derive the old directory name
from fid in the Trename request.

Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
diff 9e8fb38e Tue Jun 28 04:11:16 MDT 2011 Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> fs/9p: add 9P2000.L renameat operation

renameat - change name of file or directory

size[4] Trenameat tag[2] olddirfid[4] oldname[s] newdirfid[4] newname[s]
size[4] Rrenameat tag[2]

older Trename have the below request format

size[4] Trename tag[2] fid[4] newdirfid[4] name[s]

The rename message is used to change the name of a file, possibly moving it
to a new directory. The rename opreation is actually a directory opertation
and should ideally have olddirfid, if not we cannot represent the fid on server
with anything other than name. We will have to derive the old directory name
from fid in the Trename request.

Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
/linux-master/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/
H A Di915_hwmon.cdiff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
diff 71b21877 Mon Mar 11 14:34:58 MDT 2024 Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> drm/i915/hwmon: Fix locking inversion in sysfs getter

In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:

<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> &gt->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(&gt->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100

Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.

v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).

Fixes: 1b44019a93e2 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
/linux-master/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/
H A Dacpi.hdiff d03aeddf Fri Apr 12 05:57:28 MDT 2024 Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> wifi: rtw89: acpi: process 6 GHz SP policy from ACPI DSM

Realtek ACPI DSM func 7, RTW89_ACPI_DSM_FUNC_6GHZ_SP_SUP, accepts a format
via ACPI buffer as below.

| index | description |
--------------------------------------------
| [0-3] | signature |
| [4] | revision |
| [5] | override driver settings, or not |
| [6] | configuration if override |
| [7] | reserved |

where field of [6] is a bitmap by country,
and for now, only define BIT(0) is for US.

Through this function with overriding, BIOS can indicate to allow/block
6 GHz SP power by country.

Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240412115729.8316-8-pkshih@realtek.com
diff d3c84636 Fri Apr 12 05:57:27 MDT 2024 Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> wifi: rtw89: regd: extend policy of UNII-4 for IC regulatory

Originally, we have an ACPI function to determine whether to enable UNII-4.
Since IC (Industry Canada) has allowed UNII-4, the ACPI result is extended
to be two bits as below.
* BIT(0): determine if rtw89_regd::FCC enable UNII-4
* BIT(1): determine if rtw89_regd::IC enable UNII-4

Besides, to take old platforms into account, we enable UNII-4 on IC if and
only if BIOS configuration enable it.

Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240412115729.8316-7-pkshih@realtek.com
diff d3c84636 Fri Apr 12 05:57:27 MDT 2024 Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> wifi: rtw89: regd: extend policy of UNII-4 for IC regulatory

Originally, we have an ACPI function to determine whether to enable UNII-4.
Since IC (Industry Canada) has allowed UNII-4, the ACPI result is extended
to be two bits as below.
* BIT(0): determine if rtw89_regd::FCC enable UNII-4
* BIT(1): determine if rtw89_regd::IC enable UNII-4

Besides, to take old platforms into account, we enable UNII-4 on IC if and
only if BIOS configuration enable it.

Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240412115729.8316-7-pkshih@realtek.com
diff d3c84636 Fri Apr 12 05:57:27 MDT 2024 Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> wifi: rtw89: regd: extend policy of UNII-4 for IC regulatory

Originally, we have an ACPI function to determine whether to enable UNII-4.
Since IC (Industry Canada) has allowed UNII-4, the ACPI result is extended
to be two bits as below.
* BIT(0): determine if rtw89_regd::FCC enable UNII-4
* BIT(1): determine if rtw89_regd::IC enable UNII-4

Besides, to take old platforms into account, we enable UNII-4 on IC if and
only if BIOS configuration enable it.

Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240412115729.8316-7-pkshih@realtek.com
diff d3c84636 Fri Apr 12 05:57:27 MDT 2024 Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> wifi: rtw89: regd: extend policy of UNII-4 for IC regulatory

Originally, we have an ACPI function to determine whether to enable UNII-4.
Since IC (Industry Canada) has allowed UNII-4, the ACPI result is extended
to be two bits as below.
* BIT(0): determine if rtw89_regd::FCC enable UNII-4
* BIT(1): determine if rtw89_regd::IC enable UNII-4

Besides, to take old platforms into account, we enable UNII-4 on IC if and
only if BIOS configuration enable it.

Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240412115729.8316-7-pkshih@realtek.com
diff d3c84636 Fri Apr 12 05:57:27 MDT 2024 Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> wifi: rtw89: regd: extend policy of UNII-4 for IC regulatory

Originally, we have an ACPI function to determine whether to enable UNII-4.
Since IC (Industry Canada) has allowed UNII-4, the ACPI result is extended
to be two bits as below.
* BIT(0): determine if rtw89_regd::FCC enable UNII-4
* BIT(1): determine if rtw89_regd::IC enable UNII-4

Besides, to take old platforms into account, we enable UNII-4 on IC if and
only if BIOS configuration enable it.

Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240412115729.8316-7-pkshih@realtek.com
diff d3c84636 Fri Apr 12 05:57:27 MDT 2024 Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> wifi: rtw89: regd: extend policy of UNII-4 for IC regulatory

Originally, we have an ACPI function to determine whether to enable UNII-4.
Since IC (Industry Canada) has allowed UNII-4, the ACPI result is extended
to be two bits as below.
* BIT(0): determine if rtw89_regd::FCC enable UNII-4
* BIT(1): determine if rtw89_regd::IC enable UNII-4

Besides, to take old platforms into account, we enable UNII-4 on IC if and
only if BIOS configuration enable it.

Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240412115729.8316-7-pkshih@realtek.com
diff 665ecff7 Tue Nov 14 02:13:57 MST 2023 Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> wifi: rtw89: acpi: process 6 GHz band policy from DSM

Realtek ACPI DSM func 4, RTW89_ACPI_DSM_FUNC_6G_BP,
accepts a configuration via ACPI buffer as below.

| index | description |
-------------------------
| [0-2] | signature |
| [3] | reserved |
| [4] | policy mode |
| [5] | country count |
| [6-] | country list |

Through this function, BIOS can indicate to allow/block
6 GHz on some specific countries. Still, driver should
follow regd first before taking this configuration into
account.

Besides, add a bit in debug mask for ACPI.

Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231114091359.50664-2-pkshih@realtek.com
diff 665ecff7 Tue Nov 14 02:13:57 MST 2023 Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> wifi: rtw89: acpi: process 6 GHz band policy from DSM

Realtek ACPI DSM func 4, RTW89_ACPI_DSM_FUNC_6G_BP,
accepts a configuration via ACPI buffer as below.

| index | description |
-------------------------
| [0-2] | signature |
| [3] | reserved |
| [4] | policy mode |
| [5] | country count |
| [6-] | country list |

Through this function, BIOS can indicate to allow/block
6 GHz on some specific countries. Still, driver should
follow regd first before taking this configuration into
account.

Besides, add a bit in debug mask for ACPI.

Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231114091359.50664-2-pkshih@realtek.com
/linux-master/arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/
H A Dzynqmp-zc1232-revA.dtsdiff 1d831cad Mon May 22 08:59:50 MDT 2023 Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com> arm64: zynqmp: Set qspi tx-buswidth to 4

All ZynqMP boards are setting up tx-buswidth to 1. Due to this the
framework only issues 1-1-1 write commands to the GQSPI driver. But the
GQSPI controller is capable of handling 1-4-4 write commands, so updated
the tx-buswidth to 4.
Using all 4 lines will increase the tx data transfer rate, as now the
tx data will be transferred on four lines instead on single line.

Signed-off-by: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1f1b0028106d83aa06e0777e91862a07df100fa1.1684767562.git.michal.simek@amd.com
diff 1d831cad Mon May 22 08:59:50 MDT 2023 Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com> arm64: zynqmp: Set qspi tx-buswidth to 4

All ZynqMP boards are setting up tx-buswidth to 1. Due to this the
framework only issues 1-1-1 write commands to the GQSPI driver. But the
GQSPI controller is capable of handling 1-4-4 write commands, so updated
the tx-buswidth to 4.
Using all 4 lines will increase the tx data transfer rate, as now the
tx data will be transferred on four lines instead on single line.

Signed-off-by: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1f1b0028106d83aa06e0777e91862a07df100fa1.1684767562.git.michal.simek@amd.com
diff 1d831cad Mon May 22 08:59:50 MDT 2023 Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com> arm64: zynqmp: Set qspi tx-buswidth to 4

All ZynqMP boards are setting up tx-buswidth to 1. Due to this the
framework only issues 1-1-1 write commands to the GQSPI driver. But the
GQSPI controller is capable of handling 1-4-4 write commands, so updated
the tx-buswidth to 4.
Using all 4 lines will increase the tx data transfer rate, as now the
tx data will be transferred on four lines instead on single line.

Signed-off-by: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1f1b0028106d83aa06e0777e91862a07df100fa1.1684767562.git.michal.simek@amd.com
diff 1d831cad Mon May 22 08:59:50 MDT 2023 Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com> arm64: zynqmp: Set qspi tx-buswidth to 4

All ZynqMP boards are setting up tx-buswidth to 1. Due to this the
framework only issues 1-1-1 write commands to the GQSPI driver. But the
GQSPI controller is capable of handling 1-4-4 write commands, so updated
the tx-buswidth to 4.
Using all 4 lines will increase the tx data transfer rate, as now the
tx data will be transferred on four lines instead on single line.

Signed-off-by: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1f1b0028106d83aa06e0777e91862a07df100fa1.1684767562.git.michal.simek@amd.com
diff 1d831cad Mon May 22 08:59:50 MDT 2023 Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com> arm64: zynqmp: Set qspi tx-buswidth to 4

All ZynqMP boards are setting up tx-buswidth to 1. Due to this the
framework only issues 1-1-1 write commands to the GQSPI driver. But the
GQSPI controller is capable of handling 1-4-4 write commands, so updated
the tx-buswidth to 4.
Using all 4 lines will increase the tx data transfer rate, as now the
tx data will be transferred on four lines instead on single line.

Signed-off-by: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1f1b0028106d83aa06e0777e91862a07df100fa1.1684767562.git.michal.simek@amd.com
diff 4e4ddd3d Mon May 29 16:42:41 MDT 2023 Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com> arm64: zynqmp: Switch to amd.com emails

Update my and DPs email address to match current setup.

Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/108cbbbab29e13d386d38a779fd582f10844a030.1685443337.git.michal.simek@amd.com
H A Dzynqmp-zc1254-revA.dtsdiff 1d831cad Mon May 22 08:59:50 MDT 2023 Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com> arm64: zynqmp: Set qspi tx-buswidth to 4

All ZynqMP boards are setting up tx-buswidth to 1. Due to this the
framework only issues 1-1-1 write commands to the GQSPI driver. But the
GQSPI controller is capable of handling 1-4-4 write commands, so updated
the tx-buswidth to 4.
Using all 4 lines will increase the tx data transfer rate, as now the
tx data will be transferred on four lines instead on single line.

Signed-off-by: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1f1b0028106d83aa06e0777e91862a07df100fa1.1684767562.git.michal.simek@amd.com
diff 1d831cad Mon May 22 08:59:50 MDT 2023 Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com> arm64: zynqmp: Set qspi tx-buswidth to 4

All ZynqMP boards are setting up tx-buswidth to 1. Due to this the
framework only issues 1-1-1 write commands to the GQSPI driver. But the
GQSPI controller is capable of handling 1-4-4 write commands, so updated
the tx-buswidth to 4.
Using all 4 lines will increase the tx data transfer rate, as now the
tx data will be transferred on four lines instead on single line.

Signed-off-by: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1f1b0028106d83aa06e0777e91862a07df100fa1.1684767562.git.michal.simek@amd.com
diff 1d831cad Mon May 22 08:59:50 MDT 2023 Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com> arm64: zynqmp: Set qspi tx-buswidth to 4

All ZynqMP boards are setting up tx-buswidth to 1. Due to this the
framework only issues 1-1-1 write commands to the GQSPI driver. But the
GQSPI controller is capable of handling 1-4-4 write commands, so updated
the tx-buswidth to 4.
Using all 4 lines will increase the tx data transfer rate, as now the
tx data will be transferred on four lines instead on single line.

Signed-off-by: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1f1b0028106d83aa06e0777e91862a07df100fa1.1684767562.git.michal.simek@amd.com
diff 1d831cad Mon May 22 08:59:50 MDT 2023 Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com> arm64: zynqmp: Set qspi tx-buswidth to 4

All ZynqMP boards are setting up tx-buswidth to 1. Due to this the
framework only issues 1-1-1 write commands to the GQSPI driver. But the
GQSPI controller is capable of handling 1-4-4 write commands, so updated
the tx-buswidth to 4.
Using all 4 lines will increase the tx data transfer rate, as now the
tx data will be transferred on four lines instead on single line.

Signed-off-by: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1f1b0028106d83aa06e0777e91862a07df100fa1.1684767562.git.michal.simek@amd.com
diff 1d831cad Mon May 22 08:59:50 MDT 2023 Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com> arm64: zynqmp: Set qspi tx-buswidth to 4

All ZynqMP boards are setting up tx-buswidth to 1. Due to this the
framework only issues 1-1-1 write commands to the GQSPI driver. But the
GQSPI controller is capable of handling 1-4-4 write commands, so updated
the tx-buswidth to 4.
Using all 4 lines will increase the tx data transfer rate, as now the
tx data will be transferred on four lines instead on single line.

Signed-off-by: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1f1b0028106d83aa06e0777e91862a07df100fa1.1684767562.git.michal.simek@amd.com
diff 4e4ddd3d Mon May 29 16:42:41 MDT 2023 Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com> arm64: zynqmp: Switch to amd.com emails

Update my and DPs email address to match current setup.

Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/108cbbbab29e13d386d38a779fd582f10844a030.1685443337.git.michal.simek@amd.com
/linux-master/scripts/dtc/include-prefixes/arm64/xilinx/
H A Dzynqmp-zc1232-revA.dtsdiff 1d831cad Mon May 22 08:59:50 MDT 2023 Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com> arm64: zynqmp: Set qspi tx-buswidth to 4

All ZynqMP boards are setting up tx-buswidth to 1. Due to this the
framework only issues 1-1-1 write commands to the GQSPI driver. But the
GQSPI controller is capable of handling 1-4-4 write commands, so updated
the tx-buswidth to 4.
Using all 4 lines will increase the tx data transfer rate, as now the
tx data will be transferred on four lines instead on single line.

Signed-off-by: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1f1b0028106d83aa06e0777e91862a07df100fa1.1684767562.git.michal.simek@amd.com
diff 1d831cad Mon May 22 08:59:50 MDT 2023 Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com> arm64: zynqmp: Set qspi tx-buswidth to 4

All ZynqMP boards are setting up tx-buswidth to 1. Due to this the
framework only issues 1-1-1 write commands to the GQSPI driver. But the
GQSPI controller is capable of handling 1-4-4 write commands, so updated
the tx-buswidth to 4.
Using all 4 lines will increase the tx data transfer rate, as now the
tx data will be transferred on four lines instead on single line.

Signed-off-by: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1f1b0028106d83aa06e0777e91862a07df100fa1.1684767562.git.michal.simek@amd.com
diff 1d831cad Mon May 22 08:59:50 MDT 2023 Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com> arm64: zynqmp: Set qspi tx-buswidth to 4

All ZynqMP boards are setting up tx-buswidth to 1. Due to this the
framework only issues 1-1-1 write commands to the GQSPI driver. But the
GQSPI controller is capable of handling 1-4-4 write commands, so updated
the tx-buswidth to 4.
Using all 4 lines will increase the tx data transfer rate, as now the
tx data will be transferred on four lines instead on single line.

Signed-off-by: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1f1b0028106d83aa06e0777e91862a07df100fa1.1684767562.git.michal.simek@amd.com
diff 1d831cad Mon May 22 08:59:50 MDT 2023 Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com> arm64: zynqmp: Set qspi tx-buswidth to 4

All ZynqMP boards are setting up tx-buswidth to 1. Due to this the
framework only issues 1-1-1 write commands to the GQSPI driver. But the
GQSPI controller is capable of handling 1-4-4 write commands, so updated
the tx-buswidth to 4.
Using all 4 lines will increase the tx data transfer rate, as now the
tx data will be transferred on four lines instead on single line.

Signed-off-by: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1f1b0028106d83aa06e0777e91862a07df100fa1.1684767562.git.michal.simek@amd.com
diff 1d831cad Mon May 22 08:59:50 MDT 2023 Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com> arm64: zynqmp: Set qspi tx-buswidth to 4

All ZynqMP boards are setting up tx-buswidth to 1. Due to this the
framework only issues 1-1-1 write commands to the GQSPI driver. But the
GQSPI controller is capable of handling 1-4-4 write commands, so updated
the tx-buswidth to 4.
Using all 4 lines will increase the tx data transfer rate, as now the
tx data will be transferred on four lines instead on single line.

Signed-off-by: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1f1b0028106d83aa06e0777e91862a07df100fa1.1684767562.git.michal.simek@amd.com
diff 4e4ddd3d Mon May 29 16:42:41 MDT 2023 Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com> arm64: zynqmp: Switch to amd.com emails

Update my and DPs email address to match current setup.

Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/108cbbbab29e13d386d38a779fd582f10844a030.1685443337.git.michal.simek@amd.com
H A Dzynqmp-zc1254-revA.dtsdiff 1d831cad Mon May 22 08:59:50 MDT 2023 Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com> arm64: zynqmp: Set qspi tx-buswidth to 4

All ZynqMP boards are setting up tx-buswidth to 1. Due to this the
framework only issues 1-1-1 write commands to the GQSPI driver. But the
GQSPI controller is capable of handling 1-4-4 write commands, so updated
the tx-buswidth to 4.
Using all 4 lines will increase the tx data transfer rate, as now the
tx data will be transferred on four lines instead on single line.

Signed-off-by: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1f1b0028106d83aa06e0777e91862a07df100fa1.1684767562.git.michal.simek@amd.com
diff 1d831cad Mon May 22 08:59:50 MDT 2023 Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com> arm64: zynqmp: Set qspi tx-buswidth to 4

All ZynqMP boards are setting up tx-buswidth to 1. Due to this the
framework only issues 1-1-1 write commands to the GQSPI driver. But the
GQSPI controller is capable of handling 1-4-4 write commands, so updated
the tx-buswidth to 4.
Using all 4 lines will increase the tx data transfer rate, as now the
tx data will be transferred on four lines instead on single line.

Signed-off-by: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1f1b0028106d83aa06e0777e91862a07df100fa1.1684767562.git.michal.simek@amd.com
diff 1d831cad Mon May 22 08:59:50 MDT 2023 Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com> arm64: zynqmp: Set qspi tx-buswidth to 4

All ZynqMP boards are setting up tx-buswidth to 1. Due to this the
framework only issues 1-1-1 write commands to the GQSPI driver. But the
GQSPI controller is capable of handling 1-4-4 write commands, so updated
the tx-buswidth to 4.
Using all 4 lines will increase the tx data transfer rate, as now the
tx data will be transferred on four lines instead on single line.

Signed-off-by: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1f1b0028106d83aa06e0777e91862a07df100fa1.1684767562.git.michal.simek@amd.com
diff 1d831cad Mon May 22 08:59:50 MDT 2023 Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com> arm64: zynqmp: Set qspi tx-buswidth to 4

All ZynqMP boards are setting up tx-buswidth to 1. Due to this the
framework only issues 1-1-1 write commands to the GQSPI driver. But the
GQSPI controller is capable of handling 1-4-4 write commands, so updated
the tx-buswidth to 4.
Using all 4 lines will increase the tx data transfer rate, as now the
tx data will be transferred on four lines instead on single line.

Signed-off-by: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1f1b0028106d83aa06e0777e91862a07df100fa1.1684767562.git.michal.simek@amd.com
diff 1d831cad Mon May 22 08:59:50 MDT 2023 Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com> arm64: zynqmp: Set qspi tx-buswidth to 4

All ZynqMP boards are setting up tx-buswidth to 1. Due to this the
framework only issues 1-1-1 write commands to the GQSPI driver. But the
GQSPI controller is capable of handling 1-4-4 write commands, so updated
the tx-buswidth to 4.
Using all 4 lines will increase the tx data transfer rate, as now the
tx data will be transferred on four lines instead on single line.

Signed-off-by: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1f1b0028106d83aa06e0777e91862a07df100fa1.1684767562.git.michal.simek@amd.com
diff 4e4ddd3d Mon May 29 16:42:41 MDT 2023 Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com> arm64: zynqmp: Switch to amd.com emails

Update my and DPs email address to match current setup.

Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/108cbbbab29e13d386d38a779fd582f10844a030.1685443337.git.michal.simek@amd.com

Completed in 705 milliseconds

1234567891011>>