Searched hist:32216 (Results 1 - 1 of 1) sorted by relevance
| /linux-master/fs/xfs/ | ||
| H A D | xfs_inode.c | diff 2cf7f0da Wed Oct 29 23:59:06 MDT 2008 Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com> [XFS] Wait for all I/O on truncate to zero file size It's possible to have outstanding xfs_ioend_t's queued when the file size is zero. This can happen in the direct I/O path when a direct I/O write fails due to ENOSPC. In this case the xfs_ioend_t will still be queued (ie xfs_end_io_direct() does not know that the I/O failed so can't force the xfs_ioend_t to be flushed synchronously). When we truncate a file on unlink we don't know to wait for these xfs_ioend_ts and we can have a use-after-free situation if the inode is reclaimed before the xfs_ioend_t is finally processed. As was suggested by Dave Chinner lets wait for all I/Os to complete when truncating the file size to zero. SGI-PV: 981668 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:32216a Signed-off-by: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> diff d112f298 Wed Oct 29 23:59:06 MDT 2008 Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com> [XFS] Wait for all I/O on truncate to zero file size It's possible to have outstanding xfs_ioend_t's queued when the file size is zero. This can happen in the direct I/O path when a direct I/O write fails due to ENOSPC. In this case the xfs_ioend_t will still be queued (ie xfs_end_io_direct() does not know that the I/O failed so can't force the xfs_ioend_t to be flushed synchronously). When we truncate a file on unlink we don't know to wait for these xfs_ioend_ts and we can have a use-after-free situation if the inode is reclaimed before the xfs_ioend_t is finally processed. As was suggested by Dave Chinner lets wait for all I/Os to complete when truncating the file size to zero. SGI-PV: 981668 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:32216a Signed-off-by: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> |
Completed in 329 milliseconds