Searched hist:286705 (Results 1 - 25 of 38) sorted by relevance
| /freebsd-11.0-release/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/ | ||
| H A D | bqueue.c | 286705 Wed Aug 12 22:42:01 MDT 2015 mav MFV r286704: 5960 zfs recv should prefetch indirect blocks 5925 zfs receive -o origin= Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Author: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> While running 'zfs recv' we noticed that every 128th 8K block required a read. We were seeing that restore_write() was calling dmu_tx_hold_write() and the indirect block was not cached. We should prefetch upcoming indirect blocks to avoid having to go to disk and blocking the restore_write(). Allow an incremental send stream to be received as a clone, even if the stream does not mark it as a clone. |
| H A D | bptree.c | diff 286705 Wed Aug 12 22:42:01 MDT 2015 mav MFV r286704: 5960 zfs recv should prefetch indirect blocks 5925 zfs receive -o origin= Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Author: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> While running 'zfs recv' we noticed that every 128th 8K block required a read. We were seeing that restore_write() was calling dmu_tx_hold_write() and the indirect block was not cached. We should prefetch upcoming indirect blocks to avoid having to go to disk and blocking the restore_write(). Allow an incremental send stream to be received as a clone, even if the stream does not mark it as a clone. |
| H A D | dmu_object.c | diff 286705 Wed Aug 12 22:42:01 MDT 2015 mav MFV r286704: 5960 zfs recv should prefetch indirect blocks 5925 zfs receive -o origin= Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Author: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> While running 'zfs recv' we noticed that every 128th 8K block required a read. We were seeing that restore_write() was calling dmu_tx_hold_write() and the indirect block was not cached. We should prefetch upcoming indirect blocks to avoid having to go to disk and blocking the restore_write(). Allow an incremental send stream to be received as a clone, even if the stream does not mark it as a clone. |
| H A D | dmu_diff.c | diff 286705 Wed Aug 12 22:42:01 MDT 2015 mav MFV r286704: 5960 zfs recv should prefetch indirect blocks 5925 zfs receive -o origin= Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Author: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> While running 'zfs recv' we noticed that every 128th 8K block required a read. We were seeing that restore_write() was calling dmu_tx_hold_write() and the indirect block was not cached. We should prefetch upcoming indirect blocks to avoid having to go to disk and blocking the restore_write(). Allow an incremental send stream to be received as a clone, even if the stream does not mark it as a clone. |
| H A D | dmu_zfetch.c | diff 286705 Wed Aug 12 22:42:01 MDT 2015 mav MFV r286704: 5960 zfs recv should prefetch indirect blocks 5925 zfs receive -o origin= Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Author: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> While running 'zfs recv' we noticed that every 128th 8K block required a read. We were seeing that restore_write() was calling dmu_tx_hold_write() and the indirect block was not cached. We should prefetch upcoming indirect blocks to avoid having to go to disk and blocking the restore_write(). Allow an incremental send stream to be received as a clone, even if the stream does not mark it as a clone. |
| H A D | dsl_destroy.c | diff 286705 Wed Aug 12 22:42:01 MDT 2015 mav MFV r286704: 5960 zfs recv should prefetch indirect blocks 5925 zfs receive -o origin= Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Author: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> While running 'zfs recv' we noticed that every 128th 8K block required a read. We were seeing that restore_write() was calling dmu_tx_hold_write() and the indirect block was not cached. We should prefetch upcoming indirect blocks to avoid having to go to disk and blocking the restore_write(). Allow an incremental send stream to be received as a clone, even if the stream does not mark it as a clone. |
| H A D | dnode_sync.c | diff 286705 Wed Aug 12 22:42:01 MDT 2015 mav MFV r286704: 5960 zfs recv should prefetch indirect blocks 5925 zfs receive -o origin= Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Author: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> While running 'zfs recv' we noticed that every 128th 8K block required a read. We were seeing that restore_write() was calling dmu_tx_hold_write() and the indirect block was not cached. We should prefetch upcoming indirect blocks to avoid having to go to disk and blocking the restore_write(). Allow an incremental send stream to be received as a clone, even if the stream does not mark it as a clone. |
| H A D | dsl_scan.c | diff 286705 Wed Aug 12 22:42:01 MDT 2015 mav MFV r286704: 5960 zfs recv should prefetch indirect blocks 5925 zfs receive -o origin= Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Author: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> While running 'zfs recv' we noticed that every 128th 8K block required a read. We were seeing that restore_write() was calling dmu_tx_hold_write() and the indirect block was not cached. We should prefetch upcoming indirect blocks to avoid having to go to disk and blocking the restore_write(). Allow an incremental send stream to be received as a clone, even if the stream does not mark it as a clone. |
| H A D | space_map.c | diff 286705 Wed Aug 12 22:42:01 MDT 2015 mav MFV r286704: 5960 zfs recv should prefetch indirect blocks 5925 zfs receive -o origin= Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Author: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> While running 'zfs recv' we noticed that every 128th 8K block required a read. We were seeing that restore_write() was calling dmu_tx_hold_write() and the indirect block was not cached. We should prefetch upcoming indirect blocks to avoid having to go to disk and blocking the restore_write(). Allow an incremental send stream to be received as a clone, even if the stream does not mark it as a clone. |
| H A D | zap.c | diff 286705 Wed Aug 12 22:42:01 MDT 2015 mav MFV r286704: 5960 zfs recv should prefetch indirect blocks 5925 zfs receive -o origin= Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Author: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> While running 'zfs recv' we noticed that every 128th 8K block required a read. We were seeing that restore_write() was calling dmu_tx_hold_write() and the indirect block was not cached. We should prefetch upcoming indirect blocks to avoid having to go to disk and blocking the restore_write(). Allow an incremental send stream to be received as a clone, even if the stream does not mark it as a clone. |
| H A D | dmu_traverse.c | diff 286705 Wed Aug 12 22:42:01 MDT 2015 mav MFV r286704: 5960 zfs recv should prefetch indirect blocks 5925 zfs receive -o origin= Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Author: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> While running 'zfs recv' we noticed that every 128th 8K block required a read. We were seeing that restore_write() was calling dmu_tx_hold_write() and the indirect block was not cached. We should prefetch upcoming indirect blocks to avoid having to go to disk and blocking the restore_write(). Allow an incremental send stream to be received as a clone, even if the stream does not mark it as a clone. |
| H A D | dmu_tx.c | diff 286705 Wed Aug 12 22:42:01 MDT 2015 mav MFV r286704: 5960 zfs recv should prefetch indirect blocks 5925 zfs receive -o origin= Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Author: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> While running 'zfs recv' we noticed that every 128th 8K block required a read. We were seeing that restore_write() was calling dmu_tx_hold_write() and the indirect block was not cached. We should prefetch upcoming indirect blocks to avoid having to go to disk and blocking the restore_write(). Allow an incremental send stream to be received as a clone, even if the stream does not mark it as a clone. |
| H A D | dnode.c | diff 286705 Wed Aug 12 22:42:01 MDT 2015 mav MFV r286704: 5960 zfs recv should prefetch indirect blocks 5925 zfs receive -o origin= Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Author: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> While running 'zfs recv' we noticed that every 128th 8K block required a read. We were seeing that restore_write() was calling dmu_tx_hold_write() and the indirect block was not cached. We should prefetch upcoming indirect blocks to avoid having to go to disk and blocking the restore_write(). Allow an incremental send stream to be received as a clone, even if the stream does not mark it as a clone. |
| /freebsd-11.0-release/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/sys/ | ||
| H A D | bqueue.h | 286705 Wed Aug 12 22:42:01 MDT 2015 mav MFV r286704: 5960 zfs recv should prefetch indirect blocks 5925 zfs receive -o origin= Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Author: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> While running 'zfs recv' we noticed that every 128th 8K block required a read. We were seeing that restore_write() was calling dmu_tx_hold_write() and the indirect block was not cached. We should prefetch upcoming indirect blocks to avoid having to go to disk and blocking the restore_write(). Allow an incremental send stream to be received as a clone, even if the stream does not mark it as a clone. |
| H A D | zio_priority.h | 286705 Wed Aug 12 22:42:01 MDT 2015 mav MFV r286704: 5960 zfs recv should prefetch indirect blocks 5925 zfs receive -o origin= Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Author: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> While running 'zfs recv' we noticed that every 128th 8K block required a read. We were seeing that restore_write() was calling dmu_tx_hold_write() and the indirect block was not cached. We should prefetch upcoming indirect blocks to avoid having to go to disk and blocking the restore_write(). Allow an incremental send stream to be received as a clone, even if the stream does not mark it as a clone. |
| H A D | zio_checksum.h | diff 286705 Wed Aug 12 22:42:01 MDT 2015 mav MFV r286704: 5960 zfs recv should prefetch indirect blocks 5925 zfs receive -o origin= Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Author: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> While running 'zfs recv' we noticed that every 128th 8K block required a read. We were seeing that restore_write() was calling dmu_tx_hold_write() and the indirect block was not cached. We should prefetch upcoming indirect blocks to avoid having to go to disk and blocking the restore_write(). Allow an incremental send stream to be received as a clone, even if the stream does not mark it as a clone. |
| H A D | dbuf.h | diff 286705 Wed Aug 12 22:42:01 MDT 2015 mav MFV r286704: 5960 zfs recv should prefetch indirect blocks 5925 zfs receive -o origin= Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Author: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> While running 'zfs recv' we noticed that every 128th 8K block required a read. We were seeing that restore_write() was calling dmu_tx_hold_write() and the indirect block was not cached. We should prefetch upcoming indirect blocks to avoid having to go to disk and blocking the restore_write(). Allow an incremental send stream to be received as a clone, even if the stream does not mark it as a clone. |
| /freebsd-11.0-release/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/ | ||
| H A D | Makefile.files | diff 286705 Wed Aug 12 22:42:01 MDT 2015 mav MFV r286704: 5960 zfs recv should prefetch indirect blocks 5925 zfs receive -o origin= Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Author: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> While running 'zfs recv' we noticed that every 128th 8K block required a read. We were seeing that restore_write() was calling dmu_tx_hold_write() and the indirect block was not cached. We should prefetch upcoming indirect blocks to avoid having to go to disk and blocking the restore_write(). Allow an incremental send stream to be received as a clone, even if the stream does not mark it as a clone. |
| /freebsd-11.0-release/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libzfs/common/ | ||
| H A D | libzfs_pool.c | diff 286705 Wed Aug 12 22:42:01 MDT 2015 mav MFV r286704: 5960 zfs recv should prefetch indirect blocks 5925 zfs receive -o origin= Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Author: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> While running 'zfs recv' we noticed that every 128th 8K block required a read. We were seeing that restore_write() was calling dmu_tx_hold_write() and the indirect block was not cached. We should prefetch upcoming indirect blocks to avoid having to go to disk and blocking the restore_write(). Allow an incremental send stream to be received as a clone, even if the stream does not mark it as a clone. |
| H A D | libzfs_sendrecv.c | diff 286705 Wed Aug 12 22:42:01 MDT 2015 mav MFV r286704: 5960 zfs recv should prefetch indirect blocks 5925 zfs receive -o origin= Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Author: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> While running 'zfs recv' we noticed that every 128th 8K block required a read. We were seeing that restore_write() was calling dmu_tx_hold_write() and the indirect block was not cached. We should prefetch upcoming indirect blocks to avoid having to go to disk and blocking the restore_write(). Allow an incremental send stream to be received as a clone, even if the stream does not mark it as a clone. |
| H A D | libzfs.h | diff 286705 Wed Aug 12 22:42:01 MDT 2015 mav MFV r286704: 5960 zfs recv should prefetch indirect blocks 5925 zfs receive -o origin= Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Author: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> While running 'zfs recv' we noticed that every 128th 8K block required a read. We were seeing that restore_write() was calling dmu_tx_hold_write() and the indirect block was not cached. We should prefetch upcoming indirect blocks to avoid having to go to disk and blocking the restore_write(). Allow an incremental send stream to be received as a clone, even if the stream does not mark it as a clone. |
| /freebsd-11.0-release/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/cmd/zdb/ | ||
| H A D | zdb.c | diff 286705 Wed Aug 12 22:42:01 MDT 2015 mav MFV r286704: 5960 zfs recv should prefetch indirect blocks 5925 zfs receive -o origin= Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Author: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> While running 'zfs recv' we noticed that every 128th 8K block required a read. We were seeing that restore_write() was calling dmu_tx_hold_write() and the indirect block was not cached. We should prefetch upcoming indirect blocks to avoid having to go to disk and blocking the restore_write(). Allow an incremental send stream to be received as a clone, even if the stream does not mark it as a clone. |
| /freebsd-11.0-release/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/cmd/zfs/ | ||
| H A D | zfs_main.c | diff 286705 Wed Aug 12 22:42:01 MDT 2015 mav MFV r286704: 5960 zfs recv should prefetch indirect blocks 5925 zfs receive -o origin= Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Author: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> While running 'zfs recv' we noticed that every 128th 8K block required a read. We were seeing that restore_write() was calling dmu_tx_hold_write() and the indirect block was not cached. We should prefetch upcoming indirect blocks to avoid having to go to disk and blocking the restore_write(). Allow an incremental send stream to be received as a clone, even if the stream does not mark it as a clone. |
| /freebsd-11.0-release/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/cmd/ztest/ | ||
| H A D | ztest.c | diff 286705 Wed Aug 12 22:42:01 MDT 2015 mav MFV r286704: 5960 zfs recv should prefetch indirect blocks 5925 zfs receive -o origin= Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Author: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> While running 'zfs recv' we noticed that every 128th 8K block required a read. We were seeing that restore_write() was calling dmu_tx_hold_write() and the indirect block was not cached. We should prefetch upcoming indirect blocks to avoid having to go to disk and blocking the restore_write(). Allow an incremental send stream to be received as a clone, even if the stream does not mark it as a clone. |
| /freebsd-11.0-release/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libzpool/common/sys/ | ||
| H A D | zfs_context.h | diff 286705 Wed Aug 12 22:42:01 MDT 2015 mav MFV r286704: 5960 zfs recv should prefetch indirect blocks 5925 zfs receive -o origin= Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com> Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Author: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com> While running 'zfs recv' we noticed that every 128th 8K block required a read. We were seeing that restore_write() was calling dmu_tx_hold_write() and the indirect block was not cached. We should prefetch upcoming indirect blocks to avoid having to go to disk and blocking the restore_write(). Allow an incremental send stream to be received as a clone, even if the stream does not mark it as a clone. |
Completed in 271 milliseconds