Searched hist:223566 (Results 1 - 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
| /freebsd-10.2-release/etc/devd/ | ||
| H A D | uath.conf | diff 223566 Sun Jun 26 11:51:10 MDT 2011 gavin The SMCWUSBG is a zyd(4) device, not an uath(4) device. Remove from the latter. It appears that the addition to uath(4) came in through PR kern/135009, which had tested another device, the SMCWUSBTG2, successfully with uath(4) and included the SMCWUSBG as it "has the same chipset". I can find no other evidence that these two do actually share the same chipset. Moreover, Linux treats the SMCWUSBG as a zyd(4) device also. This reverts r223537. Discussed with: hselasky, kevlo MFC after: 1 week |
| /freebsd-10.2-release/sys/dev/usb/wlan/ | ||
| H A D | if_uath.c | diff 223566 Sun Jun 26 11:51:10 MDT 2011 gavin The SMCWUSBG is a zyd(4) device, not an uath(4) device. Remove from the latter. It appears that the addition to uath(4) came in through PR kern/135009, which had tested another device, the SMCWUSBTG2, successfully with uath(4) and included the SMCWUSBG as it "has the same chipset". I can find no other evidence that these two do actually share the same chipset. Moreover, Linux treats the SMCWUSBG as a zyd(4) device also. This reverts r223537. Discussed with: hselasky, kevlo MFC after: 1 week |
| H A D | if_zyd.c | diff 223566 Sun Jun 26 11:51:10 MDT 2011 gavin The SMCWUSBG is a zyd(4) device, not an uath(4) device. Remove from the latter. It appears that the addition to uath(4) came in through PR kern/135009, which had tested another device, the SMCWUSBTG2, successfully with uath(4) and included the SMCWUSBG as it "has the same chipset". I can find no other evidence that these two do actually share the same chipset. Moreover, Linux treats the SMCWUSBG as a zyd(4) device also. This reverts r223537. Discussed with: hselasky, kevlo MFC after: 1 week |
Completed in 64 milliseconds