Searched hist:2061 (Results 1 - 5 of 5) sorted by relevance
| /freebsd-current/sbin/ifconfig/ | ||
| H A D | ifvxlan.c | diff 08992b20 Mon Jun 19 11:37:52 MDT 2023 John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> ifconfig: Avoid issues with trying to negate unsigned values. The if_flags and if_cap fields hold a bitmask of flags. If a flag is the MSB of the field, then the logic in setifflags and setifcap which uses a < 0 check does the wrong thing (it tries to clear the flag rather than setting it). Also, trying to use -<FOO> doesn't actually work as the result is a nop. To fix, stop overloading setifcap and setifflags and instead add new dedicated action functions clearifcap and clearifflags for clearing a flag. The value passed in the argument to the command is now always the raw flag. This was reported by a GCC warning after raising WARNS: sbin/ifconfig/ifconfig.c:2061:33: error: integer overflow in expression '-2147483648' of type 'int' results in '-2147483648' [-Werror=overflow] 2061 | DEF_CMD("-txtlsrtlmt", -IFCAP_TXTLS_RTLMT, setifcap), | ^ Reviewed by: emaste Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D40608 diff 08992b20 Mon Jun 19 11:37:52 MDT 2023 John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> ifconfig: Avoid issues with trying to negate unsigned values. The if_flags and if_cap fields hold a bitmask of flags. If a flag is the MSB of the field, then the logic in setifflags and setifcap which uses a < 0 check does the wrong thing (it tries to clear the flag rather than setting it). Also, trying to use -<FOO> doesn't actually work as the result is a nop. To fix, stop overloading setifcap and setifflags and instead add new dedicated action functions clearifcap and clearifflags for clearing a flag. The value passed in the argument to the command is now always the raw flag. This was reported by a GCC warning after raising WARNS: sbin/ifconfig/ifconfig.c:2061:33: error: integer overflow in expression '-2147483648' of type 'int' results in '-2147483648' [-Werror=overflow] 2061 | DEF_CMD("-txtlsrtlmt", -IFCAP_TXTLS_RTLMT, setifcap), | ^ Reviewed by: emaste Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D40608 |
| H A D | ifvlan.c | diff 08992b20 Mon Jun 19 11:37:52 MDT 2023 John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> ifconfig: Avoid issues with trying to negate unsigned values. The if_flags and if_cap fields hold a bitmask of flags. If a flag is the MSB of the field, then the logic in setifflags and setifcap which uses a < 0 check does the wrong thing (it tries to clear the flag rather than setting it). Also, trying to use -<FOO> doesn't actually work as the result is a nop. To fix, stop overloading setifcap and setifflags and instead add new dedicated action functions clearifcap and clearifflags for clearing a flag. The value passed in the argument to the command is now always the raw flag. This was reported by a GCC warning after raising WARNS: sbin/ifconfig/ifconfig.c:2061:33: error: integer overflow in expression '-2147483648' of type 'int' results in '-2147483648' [-Werror=overflow] 2061 | DEF_CMD("-txtlsrtlmt", -IFCAP_TXTLS_RTLMT, setifcap), | ^ Reviewed by: emaste Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D40608 diff 08992b20 Mon Jun 19 11:37:52 MDT 2023 John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> ifconfig: Avoid issues with trying to negate unsigned values. The if_flags and if_cap fields hold a bitmask of flags. If a flag is the MSB of the field, then the logic in setifflags and setifcap which uses a < 0 check does the wrong thing (it tries to clear the flag rather than setting it). Also, trying to use -<FOO> doesn't actually work as the result is a nop. To fix, stop overloading setifcap and setifflags and instead add new dedicated action functions clearifcap and clearifflags for clearing a flag. The value passed in the argument to the command is now always the raw flag. This was reported by a GCC warning after raising WARNS: sbin/ifconfig/ifconfig.c:2061:33: error: integer overflow in expression '-2147483648' of type 'int' results in '-2147483648' [-Werror=overflow] 2061 | DEF_CMD("-txtlsrtlmt", -IFCAP_TXTLS_RTLMT, setifcap), | ^ Reviewed by: emaste Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D40608 |
| H A D | ifconfig.h | diff 08992b20 Mon Jun 19 11:37:52 MDT 2023 John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> ifconfig: Avoid issues with trying to negate unsigned values. The if_flags and if_cap fields hold a bitmask of flags. If a flag is the MSB of the field, then the logic in setifflags and setifcap which uses a < 0 check does the wrong thing (it tries to clear the flag rather than setting it). Also, trying to use -<FOO> doesn't actually work as the result is a nop. To fix, stop overloading setifcap and setifflags and instead add new dedicated action functions clearifcap and clearifflags for clearing a flag. The value passed in the argument to the command is now always the raw flag. This was reported by a GCC warning after raising WARNS: sbin/ifconfig/ifconfig.c:2061:33: error: integer overflow in expression '-2147483648' of type 'int' results in '-2147483648' [-Werror=overflow] 2061 | DEF_CMD("-txtlsrtlmt", -IFCAP_TXTLS_RTLMT, setifcap), | ^ Reviewed by: emaste Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D40608 diff 08992b20 Mon Jun 19 11:37:52 MDT 2023 John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> ifconfig: Avoid issues with trying to negate unsigned values. The if_flags and if_cap fields hold a bitmask of flags. If a flag is the MSB of the field, then the logic in setifflags and setifcap which uses a < 0 check does the wrong thing (it tries to clear the flag rather than setting it). Also, trying to use -<FOO> doesn't actually work as the result is a nop. To fix, stop overloading setifcap and setifflags and instead add new dedicated action functions clearifcap and clearifflags for clearing a flag. The value passed in the argument to the command is now always the raw flag. This was reported by a GCC warning after raising WARNS: sbin/ifconfig/ifconfig.c:2061:33: error: integer overflow in expression '-2147483648' of type 'int' results in '-2147483648' [-Werror=overflow] 2061 | DEF_CMD("-txtlsrtlmt", -IFCAP_TXTLS_RTLMT, setifcap), | ^ Reviewed by: emaste Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D40608 |
| H A D | ifconfig.c | diff 08992b20 Mon Jun 19 11:37:52 MDT 2023 John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> ifconfig: Avoid issues with trying to negate unsigned values. The if_flags and if_cap fields hold a bitmask of flags. If a flag is the MSB of the field, then the logic in setifflags and setifcap which uses a < 0 check does the wrong thing (it tries to clear the flag rather than setting it). Also, trying to use -<FOO> doesn't actually work as the result is a nop. To fix, stop overloading setifcap and setifflags and instead add new dedicated action functions clearifcap and clearifflags for clearing a flag. The value passed in the argument to the command is now always the raw flag. This was reported by a GCC warning after raising WARNS: sbin/ifconfig/ifconfig.c:2061:33: error: integer overflow in expression '-2147483648' of type 'int' results in '-2147483648' [-Werror=overflow] 2061 | DEF_CMD("-txtlsrtlmt", -IFCAP_TXTLS_RTLMT, setifcap), | ^ Reviewed by: emaste Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D40608 diff 08992b20 Mon Jun 19 11:37:52 MDT 2023 John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> ifconfig: Avoid issues with trying to negate unsigned values. The if_flags and if_cap fields hold a bitmask of flags. If a flag is the MSB of the field, then the logic in setifflags and setifcap which uses a < 0 check does the wrong thing (it tries to clear the flag rather than setting it). Also, trying to use -<FOO> doesn't actually work as the result is a nop. To fix, stop overloading setifcap and setifflags and instead add new dedicated action functions clearifcap and clearifflags for clearing a flag. The value passed in the argument to the command is now always the raw flag. This was reported by a GCC warning after raising WARNS: sbin/ifconfig/ifconfig.c:2061:33: error: integer overflow in expression '-2147483648' of type 'int' results in '-2147483648' [-Werror=overflow] 2061 | DEF_CMD("-txtlsrtlmt", -IFCAP_TXTLS_RTLMT, setifcap), | ^ Reviewed by: emaste Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D40608 |
| /freebsd-current/sys/ufs/ffs/ | ||
| H A D | ffs_softdep.c | diff 84ad0a66 Wed Dec 22 17:38:57 MST 2010 Kirk McKusick <mckusick@FreeBSD.org> This patch fixes a soft update panic while running perl 5.12 tests which produced: panic: indir_trunc: Index out of range -148 parent -2061 lbn -305164 Reported by: Dimitry Andric Fixed by: Jeff Roberson |
Completed in 209 milliseconds