Searched hist:20097 (Results 1 - 25 of 28) sorted by relevance

12

/freebsd-9.3-release/lib/libc/sys/
H A D	chdir.2	diff 20097 Mon Dec 02 18:03:58 MST 1996 wosch upgrade STANDARDS from POSIX 1003.1-88 to 1003.1-90 using .St macro use ``is expected to conform to'' phrase, not ``conforms to'' Pointed out by: Bruce->NIST-PCTS
H A D	getgid.2	diff 20097 Mon Dec 02 18:03:58 MST 1996 wosch upgrade STANDARDS from POSIX 1003.1-88 to 1003.1-90 using .St macro use ``is expected to conform to'' phrase, not ``conforms to'' Pointed out by: Bruce->NIST-PCTS
H A D	getuid.2	diff 20097 Mon Dec 02 18:03:58 MST 1996 wosch upgrade STANDARDS from POSIX 1003.1-88 to 1003.1-90 using .St macro use ``is expected to conform to'' phrase, not ``conforms to'' Pointed out by: Bruce->NIST-PCTS
H A D	umask.2	diff 20097 Mon Dec 02 18:03:58 MST 1996 wosch upgrade STANDARDS from POSIX 1003.1-88 to 1003.1-90 using .St macro use ``is expected to conform to'' phrase, not ``conforms to'' Pointed out by: Bruce->NIST-PCTS
H A D	_exit.2	diff 20097 Mon Dec 02 18:03:58 MST 1996 wosch upgrade STANDARDS from POSIX 1003.1-88 to 1003.1-90 using .St macro use ``is expected to conform to'' phrase, not ``conforms to'' Pointed out by: Bruce->NIST-PCTS
H A D	chown.2	diff 20097 Mon Dec 02 18:03:58 MST 1996 wosch upgrade STANDARDS from POSIX 1003.1-88 to 1003.1-90 using .St macro use ``is expected to conform to'' phrase, not ``conforms to'' Pointed out by: Bruce->NIST-PCTS
H A D	getpgrp.2	diff 20097 Mon Dec 02 18:03:58 MST 1996 wosch upgrade STANDARDS from POSIX 1003.1-88 to 1003.1-90 using .St macro use ``is expected to conform to'' phrase, not ``conforms to'' Pointed out by: Bruce->NIST-PCTS
H A D	getpid.2	diff 20097 Mon Dec 02 18:03:58 MST 1996 wosch upgrade STANDARDS from POSIX 1003.1-88 to 1003.1-90 using .St macro use ``is expected to conform to'' phrase, not ``conforms to'' Pointed out by: Bruce->NIST-PCTS
H A D	mkfifo.2	diff 20097 Mon Dec 02 18:03:58 MST 1996 wosch upgrade STANDARDS from POSIX 1003.1-88 to 1003.1-90 using .St macro use ``is expected to conform to'' phrase, not ``conforms to'' Pointed out by: Bruce->NIST-PCTS
H A D	setpgid.2	diff 20097 Mon Dec 02 18:03:58 MST 1996 wosch upgrade STANDARDS from POSIX 1003.1-88 to 1003.1-90 using .St macro use ``is expected to conform to'' phrase, not ``conforms to'' Pointed out by: Bruce->NIST-PCTS
H A D	setsid.2	diff 20097 Mon Dec 02 18:03:58 MST 1996 wosch upgrade STANDARDS from POSIX 1003.1-88 to 1003.1-90 using .St macro use ``is expected to conform to'' phrase, not ``conforms to'' Pointed out by: Bruce->NIST-PCTS
H A D	sigpending.2	diff 20097 Mon Dec 02 18:03:58 MST 1996 wosch upgrade STANDARDS from POSIX 1003.1-88 to 1003.1-90 using .St macro use ``is expected to conform to'' phrase, not ``conforms to'' Pointed out by: Bruce->NIST-PCTS
H A D	sigsuspend.2	diff 20097 Mon Dec 02 18:03:58 MST 1996 wosch upgrade STANDARDS from POSIX 1003.1-88 to 1003.1-90 using .St macro use ``is expected to conform to'' phrase, not ``conforms to'' Pointed out by: Bruce->NIST-PCTS
H A D	access.2	diff 20097 Mon Dec 02 18:03:58 MST 1996 wosch upgrade STANDARDS from POSIX 1003.1-88 to 1003.1-90 using .St macro use ``is expected to conform to'' phrase, not ``conforms to'' Pointed out by: Bruce->NIST-PCTS
H A D	chmod.2	diff 20097 Mon Dec 02 18:03:58 MST 1996 wosch upgrade STANDARDS from POSIX 1003.1-88 to 1003.1-90 using .St macro use ``is expected to conform to'' phrase, not ``conforms to'' Pointed out by: Bruce->NIST-PCTS
H A D	close.2	diff 20097 Mon Dec 02 18:03:58 MST 1996 wosch upgrade STANDARDS from POSIX 1003.1-88 to 1003.1-90 using .St macro use ``is expected to conform to'' phrase, not ``conforms to'' Pointed out by: Bruce->NIST-PCTS
H A D	dup.2	diff 20097 Mon Dec 02 18:03:58 MST 1996 wosch upgrade STANDARDS from POSIX 1003.1-88 to 1003.1-90 using .St macro use ``is expected to conform to'' phrase, not ``conforms to'' Pointed out by: Bruce->NIST-PCTS
H A D	kill.2	diff 20097 Mon Dec 02 18:03:58 MST 1996 wosch upgrade STANDARDS from POSIX 1003.1-88 to 1003.1-90 using .St macro use ``is expected to conform to'' phrase, not ``conforms to'' Pointed out by: Bruce->NIST-PCTS
H A D	link.2	diff 20097 Mon Dec 02 18:03:58 MST 1996 wosch upgrade STANDARDS from POSIX 1003.1-88 to 1003.1-90 using .St macro use ``is expected to conform to'' phrase, not ``conforms to'' Pointed out by: Bruce->NIST-PCTS
H A D	lseek.2	diff 20097 Mon Dec 02 18:03:58 MST 1996 wosch upgrade STANDARDS from POSIX 1003.1-88 to 1003.1-90 using .St macro use ``is expected to conform to'' phrase, not ``conforms to'' Pointed out by: Bruce->NIST-PCTS
H A D	mkdir.2	diff 20097 Mon Dec 02 18:03:58 MST 1996 wosch upgrade STANDARDS from POSIX 1003.1-88 to 1003.1-90 using .St macro use ``is expected to conform to'' phrase, not ``conforms to'' Pointed out by: Bruce->NIST-PCTS
H A D	rename.2	diff 20097 Mon Dec 02 18:03:58 MST 1996 wosch upgrade STANDARDS from POSIX 1003.1-88 to 1003.1-90 using .St macro use ``is expected to conform to'' phrase, not ``conforms to'' Pointed out by: Bruce->NIST-PCTS
H A D	setuid.2	diff 20097 Mon Dec 02 18:03:58 MST 1996 wosch upgrade STANDARDS from POSIX 1003.1-88 to 1003.1-90 using .St macro use ``is expected to conform to'' phrase, not ``conforms to'' Pointed out by: Bruce->NIST-PCTS
H A D	sigprocmask.2	diff 20097 Mon Dec 02 18:03:58 MST 1996 wosch upgrade STANDARDS from POSIX 1003.1-88 to 1003.1-90 using .St macro use ``is expected to conform to'' phrase, not ``conforms to'' Pointed out by: Bruce->NIST-PCTS
H A D	write.2	diff 20097 Mon Dec 02 18:03:58 MST 1996 wosch upgrade STANDARDS from POSIX 1003.1-88 to 1003.1-90 using .St macro use ``is expected to conform to'' phrase, not ``conforms to'' Pointed out by: Bruce->NIST-PCTS

Completed in 151 milliseconds

12

Indexes created Fri Jun 14 05:58:36 MDT 2024