Searched hist:196653 (Results 1 - 5 of 5) sorted by relevance

/freebsd-11.0-release/sys/i386/i386/
H A Delf_machdep.cdiff 196653 Sun Aug 30 14:40:02 MDT 2009 bz Make sure FreeBSD binaries without .note.ABI-tag section work
correctly and do not match a colliding Debian GNU/kFreeBSD
brandinfo statements.
For this mark the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD brandinfo that it must have
an .note.ABI-tag section and ignore the old EI_OSABI brandinfo
when comparing a possibly colliding set of options.

Due to SYSINIT we add the brandinfo in a non-deterministic order,
so native FreeBSD is not always first. We may want to consider
to force native FreeBSD to come first as well.

The only way a problem could currently be noticed is when running an
i386 binary without the .note.ABI-tag on amd64 and the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD
brandinfo was matched first, as the fallback to ld-elf32.so.1 does
not exist in that case.

Reported and tested by: ticso
In collaboration with: kib
MFC after: 3 days
/freebsd-11.0-release/sys/sys/
H A Dimgact_elf.hdiff 196653 Sun Aug 30 14:40:02 MDT 2009 bz Make sure FreeBSD binaries without .note.ABI-tag section work
correctly and do not match a colliding Debian GNU/kFreeBSD
brandinfo statements.
For this mark the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD brandinfo that it must have
an .note.ABI-tag section and ignore the old EI_OSABI brandinfo
when comparing a possibly colliding set of options.

Due to SYSINIT we add the brandinfo in a non-deterministic order,
so native FreeBSD is not always first. We may want to consider
to force native FreeBSD to come first as well.

The only way a problem could currently be noticed is when running an
i386 binary without the .note.ABI-tag on amd64 and the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD
brandinfo was matched first, as the fallback to ld-elf32.so.1 does
not exist in that case.

Reported and tested by: ticso
In collaboration with: kib
MFC after: 3 days
/freebsd-11.0-release/sys/compat/ia32/
H A Dia32_sysvec.cdiff 196653 Sun Aug 30 14:40:02 MDT 2009 bz Make sure FreeBSD binaries without .note.ABI-tag section work
correctly and do not match a colliding Debian GNU/kFreeBSD
brandinfo statements.
For this mark the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD brandinfo that it must have
an .note.ABI-tag section and ignore the old EI_OSABI brandinfo
when comparing a possibly colliding set of options.

Due to SYSINIT we add the brandinfo in a non-deterministic order,
so native FreeBSD is not always first. We may want to consider
to force native FreeBSD to come first as well.

The only way a problem could currently be noticed is when running an
i386 binary without the .note.ABI-tag on amd64 and the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD
brandinfo was matched first, as the fallback to ld-elf32.so.1 does
not exist in that case.

Reported and tested by: ticso
In collaboration with: kib
MFC after: 3 days
/freebsd-11.0-release/sys/amd64/amd64/
H A Delf_machdep.cdiff 196653 Sun Aug 30 14:40:02 MDT 2009 bz Make sure FreeBSD binaries without .note.ABI-tag section work
correctly and do not match a colliding Debian GNU/kFreeBSD
brandinfo statements.
For this mark the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD brandinfo that it must have
an .note.ABI-tag section and ignore the old EI_OSABI brandinfo
when comparing a possibly colliding set of options.

Due to SYSINIT we add the brandinfo in a non-deterministic order,
so native FreeBSD is not always first. We may want to consider
to force native FreeBSD to come first as well.

The only way a problem could currently be noticed is when running an
i386 binary without the .note.ABI-tag on amd64 and the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD
brandinfo was matched first, as the fallback to ld-elf32.so.1 does
not exist in that case.

Reported and tested by: ticso
In collaboration with: kib
MFC after: 3 days
/freebsd-11.0-release/sys/kern/
H A Dimgact_elf.cdiff 196653 Sun Aug 30 14:40:02 MDT 2009 bz Make sure FreeBSD binaries without .note.ABI-tag section work
correctly and do not match a colliding Debian GNU/kFreeBSD
brandinfo statements.
For this mark the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD brandinfo that it must have
an .note.ABI-tag section and ignore the old EI_OSABI brandinfo
when comparing a possibly colliding set of options.

Due to SYSINIT we add the brandinfo in a non-deterministic order,
so native FreeBSD is not always first. We may want to consider
to force native FreeBSD to come first as well.

The only way a problem could currently be noticed is when running an
i386 binary without the .note.ABI-tag on amd64 and the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD
brandinfo was matched first, as the fallback to ld-elf32.so.1 does
not exist in that case.

Reported and tested by: ticso
In collaboration with: kib
MFC after: 3 days

Completed in 235 milliseconds