Searched hist:193391 (Results 1 - 11 of 11) sorted by relevance
| /freebsd-10.3-release/sys/security/mac/ | ||
| H A D | mac_atalk.c | diff 193391 Wed Jun 03 19:00:07 MDT 2009 rwatson Continue work to optimize performance of "options MAC" when no MAC policy modules are loaded by avoiding mbuf label lookups when policies aren't loaded, pushing further socket locking into MAC policy modules, and avoiding locking MAC ifnet locks when no policies are loaded: - Check mac_policies_count before looking for mbuf MAC label m_tags in MAC Framework entry points. We will still pay label lookup costs if MAC policies are present but don't require labels (typically a single mbuf header field read, but perhaps further indirection if IPSEC or other m_tag consumers are in use). - Further push socket locking for socket-related access control checks and events into MAC policies from the MAC Framework, so that sockets are only locked if a policy specifically requires a lock to protect a label. This resolves lock order issues during sonewconn() and also in local domain socket cross-connect where multiple socket locks could not be held at once for the purposes of propagatig MAC labels across multiple sockets. Eliminate mac_policy_count check in some entry points where it no longer avoids locking. - Add mac_policy_count checking in some entry points relating to network interfaces that otherwise lock a global MAC ifnet lock used to protect ifnet labels. Obtained from: TrustedBSD Project |
| H A D | mac_inet6.c | diff 193391 Wed Jun 03 19:00:07 MDT 2009 rwatson Continue work to optimize performance of "options MAC" when no MAC policy modules are loaded by avoiding mbuf label lookups when policies aren't loaded, pushing further socket locking into MAC policy modules, and avoiding locking MAC ifnet locks when no policies are loaded: - Check mac_policies_count before looking for mbuf MAC label m_tags in MAC Framework entry points. We will still pay label lookup costs if MAC policies are present but don't require labels (typically a single mbuf header field read, but perhaps further indirection if IPSEC or other m_tag consumers are in use). - Further push socket locking for socket-related access control checks and events into MAC policies from the MAC Framework, so that sockets are only locked if a policy specifically requires a lock to protect a label. This resolves lock order issues during sonewconn() and also in local domain socket cross-connect where multiple socket locks could not be held at once for the purposes of propagatig MAC labels across multiple sockets. Eliminate mac_policy_count check in some entry points where it no longer avoids locking. - Add mac_policy_count checking in some entry points relating to network interfaces that otherwise lock a global MAC ifnet lock used to protect ifnet labels. Obtained from: TrustedBSD Project |
| H A D | mac_socket.c | diff 193391 Wed Jun 03 19:00:07 MDT 2009 rwatson Continue work to optimize performance of "options MAC" when no MAC policy modules are loaded by avoiding mbuf label lookups when policies aren't loaded, pushing further socket locking into MAC policy modules, and avoiding locking MAC ifnet locks when no policies are loaded: - Check mac_policies_count before looking for mbuf MAC label m_tags in MAC Framework entry points. We will still pay label lookup costs if MAC policies are present but don't require labels (typically a single mbuf header field read, but perhaps further indirection if IPSEC or other m_tag consumers are in use). - Further push socket locking for socket-related access control checks and events into MAC policies from the MAC Framework, so that sockets are only locked if a policy specifically requires a lock to protect a label. This resolves lock order issues during sonewconn() and also in local domain socket cross-connect where multiple socket locks could not be held at once for the purposes of propagatig MAC labels across multiple sockets. Eliminate mac_policy_count check in some entry points where it no longer avoids locking. - Add mac_policy_count checking in some entry points relating to network interfaces that otherwise lock a global MAC ifnet lock used to protect ifnet labels. Obtained from: TrustedBSD Project |
| H A D | mac_inet.c | diff 193391 Wed Jun 03 19:00:07 MDT 2009 rwatson Continue work to optimize performance of "options MAC" when no MAC policy modules are loaded by avoiding mbuf label lookups when policies aren't loaded, pushing further socket locking into MAC policy modules, and avoiding locking MAC ifnet locks when no policies are loaded: - Check mac_policies_count before looking for mbuf MAC label m_tags in MAC Framework entry points. We will still pay label lookup costs if MAC policies are present but don't require labels (typically a single mbuf header field read, but perhaps further indirection if IPSEC or other m_tag consumers are in use). - Further push socket locking for socket-related access control checks and events into MAC policies from the MAC Framework, so that sockets are only locked if a policy specifically requires a lock to protect a label. This resolves lock order issues during sonewconn() and also in local domain socket cross-connect where multiple socket locks could not be held at once for the purposes of propagatig MAC labels across multiple sockets. Eliminate mac_policy_count check in some entry points where it no longer avoids locking. - Add mac_policy_count checking in some entry points relating to network interfaces that otherwise lock a global MAC ifnet lock used to protect ifnet labels. Obtained from: TrustedBSD Project |
| H A D | mac_net.c | diff 193391 Wed Jun 03 19:00:07 MDT 2009 rwatson Continue work to optimize performance of "options MAC" when no MAC policy modules are loaded by avoiding mbuf label lookups when policies aren't loaded, pushing further socket locking into MAC policy modules, and avoiding locking MAC ifnet locks when no policies are loaded: - Check mac_policies_count before looking for mbuf MAC label m_tags in MAC Framework entry points. We will still pay label lookup costs if MAC policies are present but don't require labels (typically a single mbuf header field read, but perhaps further indirection if IPSEC or other m_tag consumers are in use). - Further push socket locking for socket-related access control checks and events into MAC policies from the MAC Framework, so that sockets are only locked if a policy specifically requires a lock to protect a label. This resolves lock order issues during sonewconn() and also in local domain socket cross-connect where multiple socket locks could not be held at once for the purposes of propagatig MAC labels across multiple sockets. Eliminate mac_policy_count check in some entry points where it no longer avoids locking. - Add mac_policy_count checking in some entry points relating to network interfaces that otherwise lock a global MAC ifnet lock used to protect ifnet labels. Obtained from: TrustedBSD Project |
| /freebsd-10.3-release/sys/security/mac_lomac/ | ||
| H A D | mac_lomac.c | diff 193391 Wed Jun 03 19:00:07 MDT 2009 rwatson Continue work to optimize performance of "options MAC" when no MAC policy modules are loaded by avoiding mbuf label lookups when policies aren't loaded, pushing further socket locking into MAC policy modules, and avoiding locking MAC ifnet locks when no policies are loaded: - Check mac_policies_count before looking for mbuf MAC label m_tags in MAC Framework entry points. We will still pay label lookup costs if MAC policies are present but don't require labels (typically a single mbuf header field read, but perhaps further indirection if IPSEC or other m_tag consumers are in use). - Further push socket locking for socket-related access control checks and events into MAC policies from the MAC Framework, so that sockets are only locked if a policy specifically requires a lock to protect a label. This resolves lock order issues during sonewconn() and also in local domain socket cross-connect where multiple socket locks could not be held at once for the purposes of propagatig MAC labels across multiple sockets. Eliminate mac_policy_count check in some entry points where it no longer avoids locking. - Add mac_policy_count checking in some entry points relating to network interfaces that otherwise lock a global MAC ifnet lock used to protect ifnet labels. Obtained from: TrustedBSD Project |
| /freebsd-10.3-release/sys/security/mac_stub/ | ||
| H A D | mac_stub.c | diff 193391 Wed Jun 03 19:00:07 MDT 2009 rwatson Continue work to optimize performance of "options MAC" when no MAC policy modules are loaded by avoiding mbuf label lookups when policies aren't loaded, pushing further socket locking into MAC policy modules, and avoiding locking MAC ifnet locks when no policies are loaded: - Check mac_policies_count before looking for mbuf MAC label m_tags in MAC Framework entry points. We will still pay label lookup costs if MAC policies are present but don't require labels (typically a single mbuf header field read, but perhaps further indirection if IPSEC or other m_tag consumers are in use). - Further push socket locking for socket-related access control checks and events into MAC policies from the MAC Framework, so that sockets are only locked if a policy specifically requires a lock to protect a label. This resolves lock order issues during sonewconn() and also in local domain socket cross-connect where multiple socket locks could not be held at once for the purposes of propagatig MAC labels across multiple sockets. Eliminate mac_policy_count check in some entry points where it no longer avoids locking. - Add mac_policy_count checking in some entry points relating to network interfaces that otherwise lock a global MAC ifnet lock used to protect ifnet labels. Obtained from: TrustedBSD Project |
| /freebsd-10.3-release/sys/security/mac_biba/ | ||
| H A D | mac_biba.c | diff 193391 Wed Jun 03 19:00:07 MDT 2009 rwatson Continue work to optimize performance of "options MAC" when no MAC policy modules are loaded by avoiding mbuf label lookups when policies aren't loaded, pushing further socket locking into MAC policy modules, and avoiding locking MAC ifnet locks when no policies are loaded: - Check mac_policies_count before looking for mbuf MAC label m_tags in MAC Framework entry points. We will still pay label lookup costs if MAC policies are present but don't require labels (typically a single mbuf header field read, but perhaps further indirection if IPSEC or other m_tag consumers are in use). - Further push socket locking for socket-related access control checks and events into MAC policies from the MAC Framework, so that sockets are only locked if a policy specifically requires a lock to protect a label. This resolves lock order issues during sonewconn() and also in local domain socket cross-connect where multiple socket locks could not be held at once for the purposes of propagatig MAC labels across multiple sockets. Eliminate mac_policy_count check in some entry points where it no longer avoids locking. - Add mac_policy_count checking in some entry points relating to network interfaces that otherwise lock a global MAC ifnet lock used to protect ifnet labels. Obtained from: TrustedBSD Project |
| /freebsd-10.3-release/sys/security/mac_mls/ | ||
| H A D | mac_mls.c | diff 193391 Wed Jun 03 19:00:07 MDT 2009 rwatson Continue work to optimize performance of "options MAC" when no MAC policy modules are loaded by avoiding mbuf label lookups when policies aren't loaded, pushing further socket locking into MAC policy modules, and avoiding locking MAC ifnet locks when no policies are loaded: - Check mac_policies_count before looking for mbuf MAC label m_tags in MAC Framework entry points. We will still pay label lookup costs if MAC policies are present but don't require labels (typically a single mbuf header field read, but perhaps further indirection if IPSEC or other m_tag consumers are in use). - Further push socket locking for socket-related access control checks and events into MAC policies from the MAC Framework, so that sockets are only locked if a policy specifically requires a lock to protect a label. This resolves lock order issues during sonewconn() and also in local domain socket cross-connect where multiple socket locks could not be held at once for the purposes of propagatig MAC labels across multiple sockets. Eliminate mac_policy_count check in some entry points where it no longer avoids locking. - Add mac_policy_count checking in some entry points relating to network interfaces that otherwise lock a global MAC ifnet lock used to protect ifnet labels. Obtained from: TrustedBSD Project |
| /freebsd-10.3-release/sys/security/mac_test/ | ||
| H A D | mac_test.c | diff 193391 Wed Jun 03 19:00:07 MDT 2009 rwatson Continue work to optimize performance of "options MAC" when no MAC policy modules are loaded by avoiding mbuf label lookups when policies aren't loaded, pushing further socket locking into MAC policy modules, and avoiding locking MAC ifnet locks when no policies are loaded: - Check mac_policies_count before looking for mbuf MAC label m_tags in MAC Framework entry points. We will still pay label lookup costs if MAC policies are present but don't require labels (typically a single mbuf header field read, but perhaps further indirection if IPSEC or other m_tag consumers are in use). - Further push socket locking for socket-related access control checks and events into MAC policies from the MAC Framework, so that sockets are only locked if a policy specifically requires a lock to protect a label. This resolves lock order issues during sonewconn() and also in local domain socket cross-connect where multiple socket locks could not be held at once for the purposes of propagatig MAC labels across multiple sockets. Eliminate mac_policy_count check in some entry points where it no longer avoids locking. - Add mac_policy_count checking in some entry points relating to network interfaces that otherwise lock a global MAC ifnet lock used to protect ifnet labels. Obtained from: TrustedBSD Project |
| /freebsd-10.3-release/sys/netinet/ | ||
| H A D | in_pcb.c | diff 193391 Wed Jun 03 19:00:07 MDT 2009 rwatson Continue work to optimize performance of "options MAC" when no MAC policy modules are loaded by avoiding mbuf label lookups when policies aren't loaded, pushing further socket locking into MAC policy modules, and avoiding locking MAC ifnet locks when no policies are loaded: - Check mac_policies_count before looking for mbuf MAC label m_tags in MAC Framework entry points. We will still pay label lookup costs if MAC policies are present but don't require labels (typically a single mbuf header field read, but perhaps further indirection if IPSEC or other m_tag consumers are in use). - Further push socket locking for socket-related access control checks and events into MAC policies from the MAC Framework, so that sockets are only locked if a policy specifically requires a lock to protect a label. This resolves lock order issues during sonewconn() and also in local domain socket cross-connect where multiple socket locks could not be held at once for the purposes of propagatig MAC labels across multiple sockets. Eliminate mac_policy_count check in some entry points where it no longer avoids locking. - Add mac_policy_count checking in some entry points relating to network interfaces that otherwise lock a global MAC ifnet lock used to protect ifnet labels. Obtained from: TrustedBSD Project |
Completed in 361 milliseconds