Searched hist:191919 (Results 1 - 8 of 8) sorted by relevance

/freebsd-11.0-release/sys/compat/svr4/
H A Dsvr4_ioctl.hdiff 191919 Fri May 08 20:08:32 MDT 2009 ed Burn TTY ioctl bridges in compat layers.

I really don't want any pieces of code to include ioctl_compat.h, so let
the ibcs2 and svr4 compat leave sgtty alone. If they want to support
sgtty, they should emulate it on top of termios, not sgtty.

The code has been marked with BURN_BRIDGES for a long time. ibcs2 and
svr4 are not really popular pieces of code anyway.
H A Dsvr4_ioctl.cdiff 191919 Fri May 08 20:08:32 MDT 2009 ed Burn TTY ioctl bridges in compat layers.

I really don't want any pieces of code to include ioctl_compat.h, so let
the ibcs2 and svr4 compat leave sgtty alone. If they want to support
sgtty, they should emulate it on top of termios, not sgtty.

The code has been marked with BURN_BRIDGES for a long time. ibcs2 and
svr4 are not really popular pieces of code anyway.
/freebsd-11.0-release/sys/sys/
H A Dioctl_compat.hdiff 191919 Fri May 08 20:08:32 MDT 2009 ed Burn TTY ioctl bridges in compat layers.

I really don't want any pieces of code to include ioctl_compat.h, so let
the ibcs2 and svr4 compat leave sgtty alone. If they want to support
sgtty, they should emulate it on top of termios, not sgtty.

The code has been marked with BURN_BRIDGES for a long time. ibcs2 and
svr4 are not really popular pieces of code anyway.
/freebsd-11.0-release/sys/i386/ibcs2/
H A Dsyscalls.masterdiff 191919 Fri May 08 20:08:32 MDT 2009 ed Burn TTY ioctl bridges in compat layers.

I really don't want any pieces of code to include ioctl_compat.h, so let
the ibcs2 and svr4 compat leave sgtty alone. If they want to support
sgtty, they should emulate it on top of termios, not sgtty.

The code has been marked with BURN_BRIDGES for a long time. ibcs2 and
svr4 are not really popular pieces of code anyway.
H A Dibcs2_ioctl.cdiff 191919 Fri May 08 20:08:32 MDT 2009 ed Burn TTY ioctl bridges in compat layers.

I really don't want any pieces of code to include ioctl_compat.h, so let
the ibcs2 and svr4 compat leave sgtty alone. If they want to support
sgtty, they should emulate it on top of termios, not sgtty.

The code has been marked with BURN_BRIDGES for a long time. ibcs2 and
svr4 are not really popular pieces of code anyway.
/freebsd-11.0-release/sys/modules/svr4/
H A DMakefilediff 191919 Fri May 08 20:08:32 MDT 2009 ed Burn TTY ioctl bridges in compat layers.

I really don't want any pieces of code to include ioctl_compat.h, so let
the ibcs2 and svr4 compat leave sgtty alone. If they want to support
sgtty, they should emulate it on top of termios, not sgtty.

The code has been marked with BURN_BRIDGES for a long time. ibcs2 and
svr4 are not really popular pieces of code anyway.
/freebsd-11.0-release/sys/conf/
H A Dfiles.pc98diff 191919 Fri May 08 20:08:32 MDT 2009 ed Burn TTY ioctl bridges in compat layers.

I really don't want any pieces of code to include ioctl_compat.h, so let
the ibcs2 and svr4 compat leave sgtty alone. If they want to support
sgtty, they should emulate it on top of termios, not sgtty.

The code has been marked with BURN_BRIDGES for a long time. ibcs2 and
svr4 are not really popular pieces of code anyway.
H A Dfiles.i386diff 191919 Fri May 08 20:08:32 MDT 2009 ed Burn TTY ioctl bridges in compat layers.

I really don't want any pieces of code to include ioctl_compat.h, so let
the ibcs2 and svr4 compat leave sgtty alone. If they want to support
sgtty, they should emulate it on top of termios, not sgtty.

The code has been marked with BURN_BRIDGES for a long time. ibcs2 and
svr4 are not really popular pieces of code anyway.

Completed in 401 milliseconds