Searched hist:179947 (Results 1 - 7 of 7) sorted by relevance
/freebsd-10.2-release/lib/libc/gen/ | ||
H A D | posix_spawn.c | diff 179947 Mon Jun 23 05:22:58 MDT 2008 ed Turn execvpe() into an internal libc routine. Adding exevpe() has caused some ports to break. Even though execvpe() is a useful routine, it does not conform to any standards. This patch is a little bit different from the patch sent to the mailing list. I forgot to remove execvpe from the Symbol.map (which does not seem to miscompile libc, though). Reviewed by: davidxu Approved by: philip |
H A D | exec.3 | diff 179947 Mon Jun 23 05:22:58 MDT 2008 ed Turn execvpe() into an internal libc routine. Adding exevpe() has caused some ports to break. Even though execvpe() is a useful routine, it does not conform to any standards. This patch is a little bit different from the patch sent to the mailing list. I forgot to remove execvpe from the Symbol.map (which does not seem to miscompile libc, though). Reviewed by: davidxu Approved by: philip |
H A D | exec.c | diff 179947 Mon Jun 23 05:22:58 MDT 2008 ed Turn execvpe() into an internal libc routine. Adding exevpe() has caused some ports to break. Even though execvpe() is a useful routine, it does not conform to any standards. This patch is a little bit different from the patch sent to the mailing list. I forgot to remove execvpe from the Symbol.map (which does not seem to miscompile libc, though). Reviewed by: davidxu Approved by: philip |
H A D | Symbol.map | diff 179947 Mon Jun 23 05:22:58 MDT 2008 ed Turn execvpe() into an internal libc routine. Adding exevpe() has caused some ports to break. Even though execvpe() is a useful routine, it does not conform to any standards. This patch is a little bit different from the patch sent to the mailing list. I forgot to remove execvpe from the Symbol.map (which does not seem to miscompile libc, though). Reviewed by: davidxu Approved by: philip |
H A D | Makefile.inc | diff 179947 Mon Jun 23 05:22:58 MDT 2008 ed Turn execvpe() into an internal libc routine. Adding exevpe() has caused some ports to break. Even though execvpe() is a useful routine, it does not conform to any standards. This patch is a little bit different from the patch sent to the mailing list. I forgot to remove execvpe from the Symbol.map (which does not seem to miscompile libc, though). Reviewed by: davidxu Approved by: philip |
/freebsd-10.2-release/lib/libc/include/ | ||
H A D | libc_private.h | diff 179947 Mon Jun 23 05:22:58 MDT 2008 ed Turn execvpe() into an internal libc routine. Adding exevpe() has caused some ports to break. Even though execvpe() is a useful routine, it does not conform to any standards. This patch is a little bit different from the patch sent to the mailing list. I forgot to remove execvpe from the Symbol.map (which does not seem to miscompile libc, though). Reviewed by: davidxu Approved by: philip |
/freebsd-10.2-release/include/ | ||
H A D | unistd.h | diff 179947 Mon Jun 23 05:22:58 MDT 2008 ed Turn execvpe() into an internal libc routine. Adding exevpe() has caused some ports to break. Even though execvpe() is a useful routine, it does not conform to any standards. This patch is a little bit different from the patch sent to the mailing list. I forgot to remove execvpe from the Symbol.map (which does not seem to miscompile libc, though). Reviewed by: davidxu Approved by: philip |
Completed in 185 milliseconds