Searched hist:177599 (Results 26 - 29 of 29) sorted by relevance

12

/freebsd-9.3-release/sys/sys/
H A Dmbuf.hdiff 177599 Tue Mar 25 07:39:02 MDT 2008 ru Replaced the misleading uses of a historical artefact M_TRYWAIT with M_WAIT.
Removed dead code that assumed that M_TRYWAIT can return NULL; it's not true
since the advent of MBUMA.

Reviewed by: arch

There are ongoing disputes as to whether we want to switch to directly using
UMA flags M_WAITOK/M_NOWAIT for mbuf(9) allocation.
/freebsd-9.3-release/sys/kern/
H A Duipc_syscalls.cdiff 177599 Tue Mar 25 07:39:02 MDT 2008 ru Replaced the misleading uses of a historical artefact M_TRYWAIT with M_WAIT.
Removed dead code that assumed that M_TRYWAIT can return NULL; it's not true
since the advent of MBUMA.

Reviewed by: arch

There are ongoing disputes as to whether we want to switch to directly using
UMA flags M_WAITOK/M_NOWAIT for mbuf(9) allocation.
H A Duipc_socket.cdiff 177599 Tue Mar 25 07:39:02 MDT 2008 ru Replaced the misleading uses of a historical artefact M_TRYWAIT with M_WAIT.
Removed dead code that assumed that M_TRYWAIT can return NULL; it's not true
since the advent of MBUMA.

Reviewed by: arch

There are ongoing disputes as to whether we want to switch to directly using
UMA flags M_WAITOK/M_NOWAIT for mbuf(9) allocation.
/freebsd-9.3-release/sys/netinet/
H A Dip_output.cdiff 177599 Tue Mar 25 07:39:02 MDT 2008 ru Replaced the misleading uses of a historical artefact M_TRYWAIT with M_WAIT.
Removed dead code that assumed that M_TRYWAIT can return NULL; it's not true
since the advent of MBUMA.

Reviewed by: arch

There are ongoing disputes as to whether we want to switch to directly using
UMA flags M_WAITOK/M_NOWAIT for mbuf(9) allocation.

Completed in 232 milliseconds

12