Searched hist:170472 (Results 1 - 4 of 4) sorted by relevance
/freebsd-10-stable/sys/sys/ | ||
H A D | resourcevar.h | diff 170472 Sat Jun 09 19:48:44 MDT 2007 attilio rufetch and calcru sometimes should be called atomically together. This patch fixes places where they should be called atomically changing their locking requirements (both assume per-proc spinlock held) and introducing rufetchcalc which wrappers both calls to be performed in atomic way. Reviewed by: jeff Approved by: jeff (mentor) |
/freebsd-10-stable/sys/fs/procfs/ | ||
H A D | procfs_status.c | diff 170472 Sat Jun 09 19:48:44 MDT 2007 attilio rufetch and calcru sometimes should be called atomically together. This patch fixes places where they should be called atomically changing their locking requirements (both assume per-proc spinlock held) and introducing rufetchcalc which wrappers both calls to be performed in atomic way. Reviewed by: jeff Approved by: jeff (mentor) |
/freebsd-10-stable/sys/kern/ | ||
H A D | kern_acct.c | diff 170472 Sat Jun 09 19:48:44 MDT 2007 attilio rufetch and calcru sometimes should be called atomically together. This patch fixes places where they should be called atomically changing their locking requirements (both assume per-proc spinlock held) and introducing rufetchcalc which wrappers both calls to be performed in atomic way. Reviewed by: jeff Approved by: jeff (mentor) |
/freebsd-10-stable/sys/compat/linux/ | ||
H A D | linux_misc.c | diff 170472 Sat Jun 09 19:48:44 MDT 2007 attilio rufetch and calcru sometimes should be called atomically together. This patch fixes places where they should be called atomically changing their locking requirements (both assume per-proc spinlock held) and introducing rufetchcalc which wrappers both calls to be performed in atomic way. Reviewed by: jeff Approved by: jeff (mentor) |
Completed in 179 milliseconds