Searched hist:158349 (Results 1 - 8 of 8) sorted by relevance
| /freebsd-10.1-release/sys/conf/ | ||
| H A D | options.amd64 | diff 158349 Sun May 07 16:12:18 MDT 2006 netchild - change the example of compiling only specific modules to not contain the linux module, since it is not cross-platform - move linprocfs from "files" and "options" to architecture specific files, since it only makes sense to build this for those architectures, where we also have a linuxolator - disable the build of the linuxolator on our tier-2 architecture "Alpha": * we don't have a linux_base port which supports Alpha and at the same time is not outdated/obsoleted upstream/in a good condition/ currently working * the upcomming new default linux base port is based upon Fedora Core 3 (security support via http://www.fedoralegacy.org), which isn't available for Alpha (like the current default linux base port which is based upon Red Hat 8) * nobody answered my request for testing it ~1 month ago on current@ and alpha@ (it doesn't surprises me, see above) * a SoC student wouldn't have to waste time on something which nobody is willing to test This does not remove the alpha specific MD files of the linuxolator yet. Discussed on: arch (mostly silence) Spiritual support by: scottl |
| H A D | options.pc98 | diff 158349 Sun May 07 16:12:18 MDT 2006 netchild - change the example of compiling only specific modules to not contain the linux module, since it is not cross-platform - move linprocfs from "files" and "options" to architecture specific files, since it only makes sense to build this for those architectures, where we also have a linuxolator - disable the build of the linuxolator on our tier-2 architecture "Alpha": * we don't have a linux_base port which supports Alpha and at the same time is not outdated/obsoleted upstream/in a good condition/ currently working * the upcomming new default linux base port is based upon Fedora Core 3 (security support via http://www.fedoralegacy.org), which isn't available for Alpha (like the current default linux base port which is based upon Red Hat 8) * nobody answered my request for testing it ~1 month ago on current@ and alpha@ (it doesn't surprises me, see above) * a SoC student wouldn't have to waste time on something which nobody is willing to test This does not remove the alpha specific MD files of the linuxolator yet. Discussed on: arch (mostly silence) Spiritual support by: scottl |
| H A D | files.pc98 | diff 158349 Sun May 07 16:12:18 MDT 2006 netchild - change the example of compiling only specific modules to not contain the linux module, since it is not cross-platform - move linprocfs from "files" and "options" to architecture specific files, since it only makes sense to build this for those architectures, where we also have a linuxolator - disable the build of the linuxolator on our tier-2 architecture "Alpha": * we don't have a linux_base port which supports Alpha and at the same time is not outdated/obsoleted upstream/in a good condition/ currently working * the upcomming new default linux base port is based upon Fedora Core 3 (security support via http://www.fedoralegacy.org), which isn't available for Alpha (like the current default linux base port which is based upon Red Hat 8) * nobody answered my request for testing it ~1 month ago on current@ and alpha@ (it doesn't surprises me, see above) * a SoC student wouldn't have to waste time on something which nobody is willing to test This does not remove the alpha specific MD files of the linuxolator yet. Discussed on: arch (mostly silence) Spiritual support by: scottl |
| H A D | options.i386 | diff 158349 Sun May 07 16:12:18 MDT 2006 netchild - change the example of compiling only specific modules to not contain the linux module, since it is not cross-platform - move linprocfs from "files" and "options" to architecture specific files, since it only makes sense to build this for those architectures, where we also have a linuxolator - disable the build of the linuxolator on our tier-2 architecture "Alpha": * we don't have a linux_base port which supports Alpha and at the same time is not outdated/obsoleted upstream/in a good condition/ currently working * the upcomming new default linux base port is based upon Fedora Core 3 (security support via http://www.fedoralegacy.org), which isn't available for Alpha (like the current default linux base port which is based upon Red Hat 8) * nobody answered my request for testing it ~1 month ago on current@ and alpha@ (it doesn't surprises me, see above) * a SoC student wouldn't have to waste time on something which nobody is willing to test This does not remove the alpha specific MD files of the linuxolator yet. Discussed on: arch (mostly silence) Spiritual support by: scottl |
| H A D | files.amd64 | diff 158349 Sun May 07 16:12:18 MDT 2006 netchild - change the example of compiling only specific modules to not contain the linux module, since it is not cross-platform - move linprocfs from "files" and "options" to architecture specific files, since it only makes sense to build this for those architectures, where we also have a linuxolator - disable the build of the linuxolator on our tier-2 architecture "Alpha": * we don't have a linux_base port which supports Alpha and at the same time is not outdated/obsoleted upstream/in a good condition/ currently working * the upcomming new default linux base port is based upon Fedora Core 3 (security support via http://www.fedoralegacy.org), which isn't available for Alpha (like the current default linux base port which is based upon Red Hat 8) * nobody answered my request for testing it ~1 month ago on current@ and alpha@ (it doesn't surprises me, see above) * a SoC student wouldn't have to waste time on something which nobody is willing to test This does not remove the alpha specific MD files of the linuxolator yet. Discussed on: arch (mostly silence) Spiritual support by: scottl |
| H A D | files.i386 | diff 158349 Sun May 07 16:12:18 MDT 2006 netchild - change the example of compiling only specific modules to not contain the linux module, since it is not cross-platform - move linprocfs from "files" and "options" to architecture specific files, since it only makes sense to build this for those architectures, where we also have a linuxolator - disable the build of the linuxolator on our tier-2 architecture "Alpha": * we don't have a linux_base port which supports Alpha and at the same time is not outdated/obsoleted upstream/in a good condition/ currently working * the upcomming new default linux base port is based upon Fedora Core 3 (security support via http://www.fedoralegacy.org), which isn't available for Alpha (like the current default linux base port which is based upon Red Hat 8) * nobody answered my request for testing it ~1 month ago on current@ and alpha@ (it doesn't surprises me, see above) * a SoC student wouldn't have to waste time on something which nobody is willing to test This does not remove the alpha specific MD files of the linuxolator yet. Discussed on: arch (mostly silence) Spiritual support by: scottl |
| H A D | options | diff 158349 Sun May 07 16:12:18 MDT 2006 netchild - change the example of compiling only specific modules to not contain the linux module, since it is not cross-platform - move linprocfs from "files" and "options" to architecture specific files, since it only makes sense to build this for those architectures, where we also have a linuxolator - disable the build of the linuxolator on our tier-2 architecture "Alpha": * we don't have a linux_base port which supports Alpha and at the same time is not outdated/obsoleted upstream/in a good condition/ currently working * the upcomming new default linux base port is based upon Fedora Core 3 (security support via http://www.fedoralegacy.org), which isn't available for Alpha (like the current default linux base port which is based upon Red Hat 8) * nobody answered my request for testing it ~1 month ago on current@ and alpha@ (it doesn't surprises me, see above) * a SoC student wouldn't have to waste time on something which nobody is willing to test This does not remove the alpha specific MD files of the linuxolator yet. Discussed on: arch (mostly silence) Spiritual support by: scottl |
| H A D | NOTES | diff 158349 Sun May 07 16:12:18 MDT 2006 netchild - change the example of compiling only specific modules to not contain the linux module, since it is not cross-platform - move linprocfs from "files" and "options" to architecture specific files, since it only makes sense to build this for those architectures, where we also have a linuxolator - disable the build of the linuxolator on our tier-2 architecture "Alpha": * we don't have a linux_base port which supports Alpha and at the same time is not outdated/obsoleted upstream/in a good condition/ currently working * the upcomming new default linux base port is based upon Fedora Core 3 (security support via http://www.fedoralegacy.org), which isn't available for Alpha (like the current default linux base port which is based upon Red Hat 8) * nobody answered my request for testing it ~1 month ago on current@ and alpha@ (it doesn't surprises me, see above) * a SoC student wouldn't have to waste time on something which nobody is willing to test This does not remove the alpha specific MD files of the linuxolator yet. Discussed on: arch (mostly silence) Spiritual support by: scottl |
Completed in 835 milliseconds