Searched hist:148453 (Results 1 - 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
| /freebsd-11-stable/sys/arm/include/ | ||
| H A D | atomic-v4.h | diff 148453 Wed Jul 27 18:01:45 MDT 2005 jhb Add extra constraints to tell the compiler that the memory be modified in the arm __swp() and sparc64 casa() and casax() functions is actually being used as an input and output and not just the value of the register that points to the memory location. This was the underlying source of the mbuf refcount problems on sparc64 a while back. For arm this should be a nop because __swp() has a constraint to clobber all memory which can probably be removed now. Reviewed by: alc, cognet MFC after: 1 week |
| H A D | atomic.h | diff 148453 Wed Jul 27 18:01:45 MDT 2005 jhb Add extra constraints to tell the compiler that the memory be modified in the arm __swp() and sparc64 casa() and casax() functions is actually being used as an input and output and not just the value of the register that points to the memory location. This was the underlying source of the mbuf refcount problems on sparc64 a while back. For arm this should be a nop because __swp() has a constraint to clobber all memory which can probably be removed now. Reviewed by: alc, cognet MFC after: 1 week |
| H A D | atomic-v6.h | diff 148453 Wed Jul 27 18:01:45 MDT 2005 jhb Add extra constraints to tell the compiler that the memory be modified in the arm __swp() and sparc64 casa() and casax() functions is actually being used as an input and output and not just the value of the register that points to the memory location. This was the underlying source of the mbuf refcount problems on sparc64 a while back. For arm this should be a nop because __swp() has a constraint to clobber all memory which can probably be removed now. Reviewed by: alc, cognet MFC after: 1 week |
Completed in 166 milliseconds