Searched hist:138916 (Results 1 - 14 of 14) sorted by relevance
/freebsd-10.3-release/usr.bin/make/ | ||
H A D | lst.h | diff 138916 Thu Dec 16 16:14:16 MST 2004 harti Instead of dynamically allocating list heads allocated them statically now that their size is only two pointers. This eliminates a lot of calls to Lst_Init and from there to malloc together with many calls to Lst_Destroy (in places where the list is obviously empty). This also reduces the chance to leave a list uninitilized so we can remove more NULL pointer checks and probably eliminates a couple of memory leaks. |
H A D | for.c | diff 138916 Thu Dec 16 16:14:16 MST 2004 harti Instead of dynamically allocating list heads allocated them statically now that their size is only two pointers. This eliminates a lot of calls to Lst_Init and from there to malloc together with many calls to Lst_Destroy (in places where the list is obviously empty). This also reduces the chance to leave a list uninitilized so we can remove more NULL pointer checks and probably eliminates a couple of memory leaks. |
H A D | make.c | diff 138916 Thu Dec 16 16:14:16 MST 2004 harti Instead of dynamically allocating list heads allocated them statically now that their size is only two pointers. This eliminates a lot of calls to Lst_Init and from there to malloc together with many calls to Lst_Destroy (in places where the list is obviously empty). This also reduces the chance to leave a list uninitilized so we can remove more NULL pointer checks and probably eliminates a couple of memory leaks. |
H A D | make.h | diff 138916 Thu Dec 16 16:14:16 MST 2004 harti Instead of dynamically allocating list heads allocated them statically now that their size is only two pointers. This eliminates a lot of calls to Lst_Init and from there to malloc together with many calls to Lst_Destroy (in places where the list is obviously empty). This also reduces the chance to leave a list uninitilized so we can remove more NULL pointer checks and probably eliminates a couple of memory leaks. |
H A D | targ.c | diff 138916 Thu Dec 16 16:14:16 MST 2004 harti Instead of dynamically allocating list heads allocated them statically now that their size is only two pointers. This eliminates a lot of calls to Lst_Init and from there to malloc together with many calls to Lst_Destroy (in places where the list is obviously empty). This also reduces the chance to leave a list uninitilized so we can remove more NULL pointer checks and probably eliminates a couple of memory leaks. |
H A D | arch.c | diff 138916 Thu Dec 16 16:14:16 MST 2004 harti Instead of dynamically allocating list heads allocated them statically now that their size is only two pointers. This eliminates a lot of calls to Lst_Init and from there to malloc together with many calls to Lst_Destroy (in places where the list is obviously empty). This also reduces the chance to leave a list uninitilized so we can remove more NULL pointer checks and probably eliminates a couple of memory leaks. |
H A D | cond.c | diff 138916 Thu Dec 16 16:14:16 MST 2004 harti Instead of dynamically allocating list heads allocated them statically now that their size is only two pointers. This eliminates a lot of calls to Lst_Init and from there to malloc together with many calls to Lst_Destroy (in places where the list is obviously empty). This also reduces the chance to leave a list uninitilized so we can remove more NULL pointer checks and probably eliminates a couple of memory leaks. |
H A D | dir.c | diff 138916 Thu Dec 16 16:14:16 MST 2004 harti Instead of dynamically allocating list heads allocated them statically now that their size is only two pointers. This eliminates a lot of calls to Lst_Init and from there to malloc together with many calls to Lst_Destroy (in places where the list is obviously empty). This also reduces the chance to leave a list uninitilized so we can remove more NULL pointer checks and probably eliminates a couple of memory leaks. |
H A D | suff.c | diff 138916 Thu Dec 16 16:14:16 MST 2004 harti Instead of dynamically allocating list heads allocated them statically now that their size is only two pointers. This eliminates a lot of calls to Lst_Init and from there to malloc together with many calls to Lst_Destroy (in places where the list is obviously empty). This also reduces the chance to leave a list uninitilized so we can remove more NULL pointer checks and probably eliminates a couple of memory leaks. |
H A D | Makefile | diff 138916 Thu Dec 16 16:14:16 MST 2004 harti Instead of dynamically allocating list heads allocated them statically now that their size is only two pointers. This eliminates a lot of calls to Lst_Init and from there to malloc together with many calls to Lst_Destroy (in places where the list is obviously empty). This also reduces the chance to leave a list uninitilized so we can remove more NULL pointer checks and probably eliminates a couple of memory leaks. |
H A D | job.c | diff 138916 Thu Dec 16 16:14:16 MST 2004 harti Instead of dynamically allocating list heads allocated them statically now that their size is only two pointers. This eliminates a lot of calls to Lst_Init and from there to malloc together with many calls to Lst_Destroy (in places where the list is obviously empty). This also reduces the chance to leave a list uninitilized so we can remove more NULL pointer checks and probably eliminates a couple of memory leaks. |
H A D | parse.c | diff 138916 Thu Dec 16 16:14:16 MST 2004 harti Instead of dynamically allocating list heads allocated them statically now that their size is only two pointers. This eliminates a lot of calls to Lst_Init and from there to malloc together with many calls to Lst_Destroy (in places where the list is obviously empty). This also reduces the chance to leave a list uninitilized so we can remove more NULL pointer checks and probably eliminates a couple of memory leaks. |
H A D | main.c | diff 138916 Thu Dec 16 16:14:16 MST 2004 harti Instead of dynamically allocating list heads allocated them statically now that their size is only two pointers. This eliminates a lot of calls to Lst_Init and from there to malloc together with many calls to Lst_Destroy (in places where the list is obviously empty). This also reduces the chance to leave a list uninitilized so we can remove more NULL pointer checks and probably eliminates a couple of memory leaks. |
H A D | var.c | diff 138916 Thu Dec 16 16:14:16 MST 2004 harti Instead of dynamically allocating list heads allocated them statically now that their size is only two pointers. This eliminates a lot of calls to Lst_Init and from there to malloc together with many calls to Lst_Destroy (in places where the list is obviously empty). This also reduces the chance to leave a list uninitilized so we can remove more NULL pointer checks and probably eliminates a couple of memory leaks. |
Completed in 213 milliseconds