Searched hist:138253 (Results 1 - 9 of 9) sorted by relevance
| /freebsd-10.3-release/sys/ia64/include/ | ||
| H A D | gdb_machdep.h | diff 138253 Wed Dec 01 06:40:35 MST 2004 marcel Change gdb_cpu_setreg() to not take the value to which to set the specified register, but a pointer to the in-memory representation of that value. The reason for this is twofold: 1. Not all registers can be represented by a register_t. In particular FP registers fall in that category. Passing the new register value by reference instead of by value makes this point moot. 2. When we receive a G or P packet, both are for writing a register, the packet will have the register value in target-byte order and in the memory representation (modulo the fact that bytes are sent as 2 printable hexadecimal numbers of course). We only need to decode the packet to have a pointer to the register value. This change fixes the bug of extracting the register value of the P packet as a hexadecimal number instead of as a bit array. The quick (and dirty) fix to bswap the register value in gdb_cpu_setreg() as it has been added on i386 and amd64 can therefore be removed and has in fact been that. Tested on: alpha, amd64, i386, ia64, sparc64 |
| /freebsd-10.3-release/sys/sparc64/include/ | ||
| H A D | gdb_machdep.h | diff 138253 Wed Dec 01 06:40:35 MST 2004 marcel Change gdb_cpu_setreg() to not take the value to which to set the specified register, but a pointer to the in-memory representation of that value. The reason for this is twofold: 1. Not all registers can be represented by a register_t. In particular FP registers fall in that category. Passing the new register value by reference instead of by value makes this point moot. 2. When we receive a G or P packet, both are for writing a register, the packet will have the register value in target-byte order and in the memory representation (modulo the fact that bytes are sent as 2 printable hexadecimal numbers of course). We only need to decode the packet to have a pointer to the register value. This change fixes the bug of extracting the register value of the P packet as a hexadecimal number instead of as a bit array. The quick (and dirty) fix to bswap the register value in gdb_cpu_setreg() as it has been added on i386 and amd64 can therefore be removed and has in fact been that. Tested on: alpha, amd64, i386, ia64, sparc64 |
| /freebsd-10.3-release/sys/sparc64/sparc64/ | ||
| H A D | gdb_machdep.c | diff 138253 Wed Dec 01 06:40:35 MST 2004 marcel Change gdb_cpu_setreg() to not take the value to which to set the specified register, but a pointer to the in-memory representation of that value. The reason for this is twofold: 1. Not all registers can be represented by a register_t. In particular FP registers fall in that category. Passing the new register value by reference instead of by value makes this point moot. 2. When we receive a G or P packet, both are for writing a register, the packet will have the register value in target-byte order and in the memory representation (modulo the fact that bytes are sent as 2 printable hexadecimal numbers of course). We only need to decode the packet to have a pointer to the register value. This change fixes the bug of extracting the register value of the P packet as a hexadecimal number instead of as a bit array. The quick (and dirty) fix to bswap the register value in gdb_cpu_setreg() as it has been added on i386 and amd64 can therefore be removed and has in fact been that. Tested on: alpha, amd64, i386, ia64, sparc64 |
| /freebsd-10.3-release/sys/i386/include/ | ||
| H A D | gdb_machdep.h | diff 138253 Wed Dec 01 06:40:35 MST 2004 marcel Change gdb_cpu_setreg() to not take the value to which to set the specified register, but a pointer to the in-memory representation of that value. The reason for this is twofold: 1. Not all registers can be represented by a register_t. In particular FP registers fall in that category. Passing the new register value by reference instead of by value makes this point moot. 2. When we receive a G or P packet, both are for writing a register, the packet will have the register value in target-byte order and in the memory representation (modulo the fact that bytes are sent as 2 printable hexadecimal numbers of course). We only need to decode the packet to have a pointer to the register value. This change fixes the bug of extracting the register value of the P packet as a hexadecimal number instead of as a bit array. The quick (and dirty) fix to bswap the register value in gdb_cpu_setreg() as it has been added on i386 and amd64 can therefore be removed and has in fact been that. Tested on: alpha, amd64, i386, ia64, sparc64 |
| /freebsd-10.3-release/sys/i386/i386/ | ||
| H A D | gdb_machdep.c | diff 138253 Wed Dec 01 06:40:35 MST 2004 marcel Change gdb_cpu_setreg() to not take the value to which to set the specified register, but a pointer to the in-memory representation of that value. The reason for this is twofold: 1. Not all registers can be represented by a register_t. In particular FP registers fall in that category. Passing the new register value by reference instead of by value makes this point moot. 2. When we receive a G or P packet, both are for writing a register, the packet will have the register value in target-byte order and in the memory representation (modulo the fact that bytes are sent as 2 printable hexadecimal numbers of course). We only need to decode the packet to have a pointer to the register value. This change fixes the bug of extracting the register value of the P packet as a hexadecimal number instead of as a bit array. The quick (and dirty) fix to bswap the register value in gdb_cpu_setreg() as it has been added on i386 and amd64 can therefore be removed and has in fact been that. Tested on: alpha, amd64, i386, ia64, sparc64 |
| /freebsd-10.3-release/sys/ia64/ia64/ | ||
| H A D | gdb_machdep.c | diff 138253 Wed Dec 01 06:40:35 MST 2004 marcel Change gdb_cpu_setreg() to not take the value to which to set the specified register, but a pointer to the in-memory representation of that value. The reason for this is twofold: 1. Not all registers can be represented by a register_t. In particular FP registers fall in that category. Passing the new register value by reference instead of by value makes this point moot. 2. When we receive a G or P packet, both are for writing a register, the packet will have the register value in target-byte order and in the memory representation (modulo the fact that bytes are sent as 2 printable hexadecimal numbers of course). We only need to decode the packet to have a pointer to the register value. This change fixes the bug of extracting the register value of the P packet as a hexadecimal number instead of as a bit array. The quick (and dirty) fix to bswap the register value in gdb_cpu_setreg() as it has been added on i386 and amd64 can therefore be removed and has in fact been that. Tested on: alpha, amd64, i386, ia64, sparc64 |
| /freebsd-10.3-release/sys/amd64/amd64/ | ||
| H A D | gdb_machdep.c | diff 138253 Wed Dec 01 06:40:35 MST 2004 marcel Change gdb_cpu_setreg() to not take the value to which to set the specified register, but a pointer to the in-memory representation of that value. The reason for this is twofold: 1. Not all registers can be represented by a register_t. In particular FP registers fall in that category. Passing the new register value by reference instead of by value makes this point moot. 2. When we receive a G or P packet, both are for writing a register, the packet will have the register value in target-byte order and in the memory representation (modulo the fact that bytes are sent as 2 printable hexadecimal numbers of course). We only need to decode the packet to have a pointer to the register value. This change fixes the bug of extracting the register value of the P packet as a hexadecimal number instead of as a bit array. The quick (and dirty) fix to bswap the register value in gdb_cpu_setreg() as it has been added on i386 and amd64 can therefore be removed and has in fact been that. Tested on: alpha, amd64, i386, ia64, sparc64 |
| /freebsd-10.3-release/sys/amd64/include/ | ||
| H A D | gdb_machdep.h | diff 138253 Wed Dec 01 06:40:35 MST 2004 marcel Change gdb_cpu_setreg() to not take the value to which to set the specified register, but a pointer to the in-memory representation of that value. The reason for this is twofold: 1. Not all registers can be represented by a register_t. In particular FP registers fall in that category. Passing the new register value by reference instead of by value makes this point moot. 2. When we receive a G or P packet, both are for writing a register, the packet will have the register value in target-byte order and in the memory representation (modulo the fact that bytes are sent as 2 printable hexadecimal numbers of course). We only need to decode the packet to have a pointer to the register value. This change fixes the bug of extracting the register value of the P packet as a hexadecimal number instead of as a bit array. The quick (and dirty) fix to bswap the register value in gdb_cpu_setreg() as it has been added on i386 and amd64 can therefore be removed and has in fact been that. Tested on: alpha, amd64, i386, ia64, sparc64 |
| /freebsd-10.3-release/sys/gdb/ | ||
| H A D | gdb_main.c | diff 138253 Wed Dec 01 06:40:35 MST 2004 marcel Change gdb_cpu_setreg() to not take the value to which to set the specified register, but a pointer to the in-memory representation of that value. The reason for this is twofold: 1. Not all registers can be represented by a register_t. In particular FP registers fall in that category. Passing the new register value by reference instead of by value makes this point moot. 2. When we receive a G or P packet, both are for writing a register, the packet will have the register value in target-byte order and in the memory representation (modulo the fact that bytes are sent as 2 printable hexadecimal numbers of course). We only need to decode the packet to have a pointer to the register value. This change fixes the bug of extracting the register value of the P packet as a hexadecimal number instead of as a bit array. The quick (and dirty) fix to bswap the register value in gdb_cpu_setreg() as it has been added on i386 and amd64 can therefore be removed and has in fact been that. Tested on: alpha, amd64, i386, ia64, sparc64 |
Completed in 145 milliseconds