Searched hist:112574 (Results 1 - 14 of 14) sorted by relevance
| /freebsd-10.3-release/etc/pam.d/ | ||
| H A D | rsh | diff 170510 Sun Jun 10 18:57:20 MDT 2007 yar Now pam_nologin(8) will provide an account management function instead of an authentication function. There are a design reason and a practical reason for that. First, the module belongs in account management because it checks availability of the account and does no authentication. Second, there are existing and potential PAM consumers that skip PAM authentication for good or for bad. E.g., sshd(8) just prefers internal routines for public key auth; OTOH, cron(8) and atrun(8) do implicit authentication when running a job on behalf of its owner, so their inability to use PAM auth is fundamental, but they can benefit from PAM account management. Document this change in the manpage. Modify /etc/pam.d files accordingly, so that pam_nologin.so is listed under the "account" function class. Bump __FreeBSD_version (mostly for ports, as this change should be invisible to C code outside pam_nologin.) PR: bin/112574 Approved by: des, re |
| H A D | imap | diff 170510 Sun Jun 10 18:57:20 MDT 2007 yar Now pam_nologin(8) will provide an account management function instead of an authentication function. There are a design reason and a practical reason for that. First, the module belongs in account management because it checks availability of the account and does no authentication. Second, there are existing and potential PAM consumers that skip PAM authentication for good or for bad. E.g., sshd(8) just prefers internal routines for public key auth; OTOH, cron(8) and atrun(8) do implicit authentication when running a job on behalf of its owner, so their inability to use PAM auth is fundamental, but they can benefit from PAM account management. Document this change in the manpage. Modify /etc/pam.d files accordingly, so that pam_nologin.so is listed under the "account" function class. Bump __FreeBSD_version (mostly for ports, as this change should be invisible to C code outside pam_nologin.) PR: bin/112574 Approved by: des, re |
| H A D | pop3 | diff 170510 Sun Jun 10 18:57:20 MDT 2007 yar Now pam_nologin(8) will provide an account management function instead of an authentication function. There are a design reason and a practical reason for that. First, the module belongs in account management because it checks availability of the account and does no authentication. Second, there are existing and potential PAM consumers that skip PAM authentication for good or for bad. E.g., sshd(8) just prefers internal routines for public key auth; OTOH, cron(8) and atrun(8) do implicit authentication when running a job on behalf of its owner, so their inability to use PAM auth is fundamental, but they can benefit from PAM account management. Document this change in the manpage. Modify /etc/pam.d files accordingly, so that pam_nologin.so is listed under the "account" function class. Bump __FreeBSD_version (mostly for ports, as this change should be invisible to C code outside pam_nologin.) PR: bin/112574 Approved by: des, re |
| H A D | telnetd | diff 170510 Sun Jun 10 18:57:20 MDT 2007 yar Now pam_nologin(8) will provide an account management function instead of an authentication function. There are a design reason and a practical reason for that. First, the module belongs in account management because it checks availability of the account and does no authentication. Second, there are existing and potential PAM consumers that skip PAM authentication for good or for bad. E.g., sshd(8) just prefers internal routines for public key auth; OTOH, cron(8) and atrun(8) do implicit authentication when running a job on behalf of its owner, so their inability to use PAM auth is fundamental, but they can benefit from PAM account management. Document this change in the manpage. Modify /etc/pam.d files accordingly, so that pam_nologin.so is listed under the "account" function class. Bump __FreeBSD_version (mostly for ports, as this change should be invisible to C code outside pam_nologin.) PR: bin/112574 Approved by: des, re |
| H A D | ftpd | diff 170510 Sun Jun 10 18:57:20 MDT 2007 yar Now pam_nologin(8) will provide an account management function instead of an authentication function. There are a design reason and a practical reason for that. First, the module belongs in account management because it checks availability of the account and does no authentication. Second, there are existing and potential PAM consumers that skip PAM authentication for good or for bad. E.g., sshd(8) just prefers internal routines for public key auth; OTOH, cron(8) and atrun(8) do implicit authentication when running a job on behalf of its owner, so their inability to use PAM auth is fundamental, but they can benefit from PAM account management. Document this change in the manpage. Modify /etc/pam.d files accordingly, so that pam_nologin.so is listed under the "account" function class. Bump __FreeBSD_version (mostly for ports, as this change should be invisible to C code outside pam_nologin.) PR: bin/112574 Approved by: des, re |
| H A D | login | diff 170510 Sun Jun 10 18:57:20 MDT 2007 yar Now pam_nologin(8) will provide an account management function instead of an authentication function. There are a design reason and a practical reason for that. First, the module belongs in account management because it checks availability of the account and does no authentication. Second, there are existing and potential PAM consumers that skip PAM authentication for good or for bad. E.g., sshd(8) just prefers internal routines for public key auth; OTOH, cron(8) and atrun(8) do implicit authentication when running a job on behalf of its owner, so their inability to use PAM auth is fundamental, but they can benefit from PAM account management. Document this change in the manpage. Modify /etc/pam.d files accordingly, so that pam_nologin.so is listed under the "account" function class. Bump __FreeBSD_version (mostly for ports, as this change should be invisible to C code outside pam_nologin.) PR: bin/112574 Approved by: des, re |
| H A D | other | diff 170510 Sun Jun 10 18:57:20 MDT 2007 yar Now pam_nologin(8) will provide an account management function instead of an authentication function. There are a design reason and a practical reason for that. First, the module belongs in account management because it checks availability of the account and does no authentication. Second, there are existing and potential PAM consumers that skip PAM authentication for good or for bad. E.g., sshd(8) just prefers internal routines for public key auth; OTOH, cron(8) and atrun(8) do implicit authentication when running a job on behalf of its owner, so their inability to use PAM auth is fundamental, but they can benefit from PAM account management. Document this change in the manpage. Modify /etc/pam.d files accordingly, so that pam_nologin.so is listed under the "account" function class. Bump __FreeBSD_version (mostly for ports, as this change should be invisible to C code outside pam_nologin.) PR: bin/112574 Approved by: des, re |
| H A D | sshd | diff 170510 Sun Jun 10 18:57:20 MDT 2007 yar Now pam_nologin(8) will provide an account management function instead of an authentication function. There are a design reason and a practical reason for that. First, the module belongs in account management because it checks availability of the account and does no authentication. Second, there are existing and potential PAM consumers that skip PAM authentication for good or for bad. E.g., sshd(8) just prefers internal routines for public key auth; OTOH, cron(8) and atrun(8) do implicit authentication when running a job on behalf of its owner, so their inability to use PAM auth is fundamental, but they can benefit from PAM account management. Document this change in the manpage. Modify /etc/pam.d files accordingly, so that pam_nologin.so is listed under the "account" function class. Bump __FreeBSD_version (mostly for ports, as this change should be invisible to C code outside pam_nologin.) PR: bin/112574 Approved by: des, re |
| H A D | xdm | diff 170510 Sun Jun 10 18:57:20 MDT 2007 yar Now pam_nologin(8) will provide an account management function instead of an authentication function. There are a design reason and a practical reason for that. First, the module belongs in account management because it checks availability of the account and does no authentication. Second, there are existing and potential PAM consumers that skip PAM authentication for good or for bad. E.g., sshd(8) just prefers internal routines for public key auth; OTOH, cron(8) and atrun(8) do implicit authentication when running a job on behalf of its owner, so their inability to use PAM auth is fundamental, but they can benefit from PAM account management. Document this change in the manpage. Modify /etc/pam.d files accordingly, so that pam_nologin.so is listed under the "account" function class. Bump __FreeBSD_version (mostly for ports, as this change should be invisible to C code outside pam_nologin.) PR: bin/112574 Approved by: des, re |
| /freebsd-10.3-release/lib/libpam/modules/pam_nologin/ | ||
| H A D | pam_nologin.8 | diff 170510 Sun Jun 10 18:57:20 MDT 2007 yar Now pam_nologin(8) will provide an account management function instead of an authentication function. There are a design reason and a practical reason for that. First, the module belongs in account management because it checks availability of the account and does no authentication. Second, there are existing and potential PAM consumers that skip PAM authentication for good or for bad. E.g., sshd(8) just prefers internal routines for public key auth; OTOH, cron(8) and atrun(8) do implicit authentication when running a job on behalf of its owner, so their inability to use PAM auth is fundamental, but they can benefit from PAM account management. Document this change in the manpage. Modify /etc/pam.d files accordingly, so that pam_nologin.so is listed under the "account" function class. Bump __FreeBSD_version (mostly for ports, as this change should be invisible to C code outside pam_nologin.) PR: bin/112574 Approved by: des, re |
| H A D | pam_nologin.c | diff 170510 Sun Jun 10 18:57:20 MDT 2007 yar Now pam_nologin(8) will provide an account management function instead of an authentication function. There are a design reason and a practical reason for that. First, the module belongs in account management because it checks availability of the account and does no authentication. Second, there are existing and potential PAM consumers that skip PAM authentication for good or for bad. E.g., sshd(8) just prefers internal routines for public key auth; OTOH, cron(8) and atrun(8) do implicit authentication when running a job on behalf of its owner, so their inability to use PAM auth is fundamental, but they can benefit from PAM account management. Document this change in the manpage. Modify /etc/pam.d files accordingly, so that pam_nologin.so is listed under the "account" function class. Bump __FreeBSD_version (mostly for ports, as this change should be invisible to C code outside pam_nologin.) PR: bin/112574 Approved by: des, re |
| /freebsd-10.3-release/sys/security/mac_biba/ | ||
| H A D | mac_biba.c | diff 112574 Tue Mar 25 01:10:54 MST 2003 rwatson Expand scope of the Biba policy to include some of the new entry points available for enforcement: mac_biba_check_sysarch_ioperm() - Require Biba privilege to make use of privileged machine-dependent interfaces, protecting against bypass of the policy via various mechanisms. mac_biba_check_system_swapoff() - Require Biba privilege to disable swapping against a vnode target. Obtained from: TrustedBSD Project Sponsored by: DARPA, Network Associates Laboratories |
| /freebsd-10.3-release/ | ||
| H A D | UPDATING | diff 170510 Sun Jun 10 18:57:20 MDT 2007 yar Now pam_nologin(8) will provide an account management function instead of an authentication function. There are a design reason and a practical reason for that. First, the module belongs in account management because it checks availability of the account and does no authentication. Second, there are existing and potential PAM consumers that skip PAM authentication for good or for bad. E.g., sshd(8) just prefers internal routines for public key auth; OTOH, cron(8) and atrun(8) do implicit authentication when running a job on behalf of its owner, so their inability to use PAM auth is fundamental, but they can benefit from PAM account management. Document this change in the manpage. Modify /etc/pam.d files accordingly, so that pam_nologin.so is listed under the "account" function class. Bump __FreeBSD_version (mostly for ports, as this change should be invisible to C code outside pam_nologin.) PR: bin/112574 Approved by: des, re |
| /freebsd-10.3-release/sys/sys/ | ||
| H A D | param.h | diff 170510 Sun Jun 10 18:57:20 MDT 2007 yar Now pam_nologin(8) will provide an account management function instead of an authentication function. There are a design reason and a practical reason for that. First, the module belongs in account management because it checks availability of the account and does no authentication. Second, there are existing and potential PAM consumers that skip PAM authentication for good or for bad. E.g., sshd(8) just prefers internal routines for public key auth; OTOH, cron(8) and atrun(8) do implicit authentication when running a job on behalf of its owner, so their inability to use PAM auth is fundamental, but they can benefit from PAM account management. Document this change in the manpage. Modify /etc/pam.d files accordingly, so that pam_nologin.so is listed under the "account" function class. Bump __FreeBSD_version (mostly for ports, as this change should be invisible to C code outside pam_nologin.) PR: bin/112574 Approved by: des, re |
Completed in 364 milliseconds