Searched hist:103714 (Results 1 - 13 of 13) sorted by relevance
/freebsd-10.1-release/sys/dev/ofw/ | ||
H A D | ofw_disk.c | diff 103714 Fri Sep 20 17:36:05 MDT 2002 phk (This commit touches about 15 disk device drivers in a very consistent and predictable way, and I apologize if I have gotten it wrong anywhere, getting prior review on a patch like this is not feasible, considering the number of people involved and hardware availability etc.) If struct disklabel is the messenger: kill the messenger. Inside struct disk we had a struct disklabel which disk drivers used to communicate certain metrics to the disklayer above (GEOM or the disk mini-layer). This commit changes this communication to use four explicit fields instead. Amongst the benefits is that the fields do not get overwritten by wrong or bogus on-disk disklabels. Once that is clear, <sys/disk.h> which is included in the drivers no longer need to pull <sys/disklabel.h> and <sys/diskslice.h> in, the few places that needs them, have gotten explicit #includes for them. The disklabel inside struct disk is now only for internal use in the disk mini-layer, so instead of embedding it, we malloc it as we need it. This concludes (modulus any mistakes) the series of disklabel related commits. I belive it all amounts to a NOP for all the rest of you :-) Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. |
/freebsd-10.1-release/sys/dev/pst/ | ||
H A D | pst-raid.c | diff 103714 Fri Sep 20 17:36:05 MDT 2002 phk (This commit touches about 15 disk device drivers in a very consistent and predictable way, and I apologize if I have gotten it wrong anywhere, getting prior review on a patch like this is not feasible, considering the number of people involved and hardware availability etc.) If struct disklabel is the messenger: kill the messenger. Inside struct disk we had a struct disklabel which disk drivers used to communicate certain metrics to the disklayer above (GEOM or the disk mini-layer). This commit changes this communication to use four explicit fields instead. Amongst the benefits is that the fields do not get overwritten by wrong or bogus on-disk disklabels. Once that is clear, <sys/disk.h> which is included in the drivers no longer need to pull <sys/disklabel.h> and <sys/diskslice.h> in, the few places that needs them, have gotten explicit #includes for them. The disklabel inside struct disk is now only for internal use in the disk mini-layer, so instead of embedding it, we malloc it as we need it. This concludes (modulus any mistakes) the series of disklabel related commits. I belive it all amounts to a NOP for all the rest of you :-) Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. |
/freebsd-10.1-release/sys/dev/aac/ | ||
H A D | aac_disk.c | diff 103714 Fri Sep 20 17:36:05 MDT 2002 phk (This commit touches about 15 disk device drivers in a very consistent and predictable way, and I apologize if I have gotten it wrong anywhere, getting prior review on a patch like this is not feasible, considering the number of people involved and hardware availability etc.) If struct disklabel is the messenger: kill the messenger. Inside struct disk we had a struct disklabel which disk drivers used to communicate certain metrics to the disklayer above (GEOM or the disk mini-layer). This commit changes this communication to use four explicit fields instead. Amongst the benefits is that the fields do not get overwritten by wrong or bogus on-disk disklabels. Once that is clear, <sys/disk.h> which is included in the drivers no longer need to pull <sys/disklabel.h> and <sys/diskslice.h> in, the few places that needs them, have gotten explicit #includes for them. The disklabel inside struct disk is now only for internal use in the disk mini-layer, so instead of embedding it, we malloc it as we need it. This concludes (modulus any mistakes) the series of disklabel related commits. I belive it all amounts to a NOP for all the rest of you :-) Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. |
/freebsd-10.1-release/sys/dev/amr/ | ||
H A D | amr_disk.c | diff 103714 Fri Sep 20 17:36:05 MDT 2002 phk (This commit touches about 15 disk device drivers in a very consistent and predictable way, and I apologize if I have gotten it wrong anywhere, getting prior review on a patch like this is not feasible, considering the number of people involved and hardware availability etc.) If struct disklabel is the messenger: kill the messenger. Inside struct disk we had a struct disklabel which disk drivers used to communicate certain metrics to the disklayer above (GEOM or the disk mini-layer). This commit changes this communication to use four explicit fields instead. Amongst the benefits is that the fields do not get overwritten by wrong or bogus on-disk disklabels. Once that is clear, <sys/disk.h> which is included in the drivers no longer need to pull <sys/disklabel.h> and <sys/diskslice.h> in, the few places that needs them, have gotten explicit #includes for them. The disklabel inside struct disk is now only for internal use in the disk mini-layer, so instead of embedding it, we malloc it as we need it. This concludes (modulus any mistakes) the series of disklabel related commits. I belive it all amounts to a NOP for all the rest of you :-) Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. |
/freebsd-10.1-release/sys/dev/ida/ | ||
H A D | ida_disk.c | diff 103714 Fri Sep 20 17:36:05 MDT 2002 phk (This commit touches about 15 disk device drivers in a very consistent and predictable way, and I apologize if I have gotten it wrong anywhere, getting prior review on a patch like this is not feasible, considering the number of people involved and hardware availability etc.) If struct disklabel is the messenger: kill the messenger. Inside struct disk we had a struct disklabel which disk drivers used to communicate certain metrics to the disklayer above (GEOM or the disk mini-layer). This commit changes this communication to use four explicit fields instead. Amongst the benefits is that the fields do not get overwritten by wrong or bogus on-disk disklabels. Once that is clear, <sys/disk.h> which is included in the drivers no longer need to pull <sys/disklabel.h> and <sys/diskslice.h> in, the few places that needs them, have gotten explicit #includes for them. The disklabel inside struct disk is now only for internal use in the disk mini-layer, so instead of embedding it, we malloc it as we need it. This concludes (modulus any mistakes) the series of disklabel related commits. I belive it all amounts to a NOP for all the rest of you :-) Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. |
/freebsd-10.1-release/sys/dev/mlx/ | ||
H A D | mlx_disk.c | diff 103714 Fri Sep 20 17:36:05 MDT 2002 phk (This commit touches about 15 disk device drivers in a very consistent and predictable way, and I apologize if I have gotten it wrong anywhere, getting prior review on a patch like this is not feasible, considering the number of people involved and hardware availability etc.) If struct disklabel is the messenger: kill the messenger. Inside struct disk we had a struct disklabel which disk drivers used to communicate certain metrics to the disklayer above (GEOM or the disk mini-layer). This commit changes this communication to use four explicit fields instead. Amongst the benefits is that the fields do not get overwritten by wrong or bogus on-disk disklabels. Once that is clear, <sys/disk.h> which is included in the drivers no longer need to pull <sys/disklabel.h> and <sys/diskslice.h> in, the few places that needs them, have gotten explicit #includes for them. The disklabel inside struct disk is now only for internal use in the disk mini-layer, so instead of embedding it, we malloc it as we need it. This concludes (modulus any mistakes) the series of disklabel related commits. I belive it all amounts to a NOP for all the rest of you :-) Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. |
/freebsd-10.1-release/sys/dev/twe/ | ||
H A D | twe_freebsd.c | diff 103714 Fri Sep 20 17:36:05 MDT 2002 phk (This commit touches about 15 disk device drivers in a very consistent and predictable way, and I apologize if I have gotten it wrong anywhere, getting prior review on a patch like this is not feasible, considering the number of people involved and hardware availability etc.) If struct disklabel is the messenger: kill the messenger. Inside struct disk we had a struct disklabel which disk drivers used to communicate certain metrics to the disklayer above (GEOM or the disk mini-layer). This commit changes this communication to use four explicit fields instead. Amongst the benefits is that the fields do not get overwritten by wrong or bogus on-disk disklabels. Once that is clear, <sys/disk.h> which is included in the drivers no longer need to pull <sys/disklabel.h> and <sys/diskslice.h> in, the few places that needs them, have gotten explicit #includes for them. The disklabel inside struct disk is now only for internal use in the disk mini-layer, so instead of embedding it, we malloc it as we need it. This concludes (modulus any mistakes) the series of disklabel related commits. I belive it all amounts to a NOP for all the rest of you :-) Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. |
/freebsd-10.1-release/sys/sys/ | ||
H A D | disk.h | diff 103714 Fri Sep 20 17:36:05 MDT 2002 phk (This commit touches about 15 disk device drivers in a very consistent and predictable way, and I apologize if I have gotten it wrong anywhere, getting prior review on a patch like this is not feasible, considering the number of people involved and hardware availability etc.) If struct disklabel is the messenger: kill the messenger. Inside struct disk we had a struct disklabel which disk drivers used to communicate certain metrics to the disklayer above (GEOM or the disk mini-layer). This commit changes this communication to use four explicit fields instead. Amongst the benefits is that the fields do not get overwritten by wrong or bogus on-disk disklabels. Once that is clear, <sys/disk.h> which is included in the drivers no longer need to pull <sys/disklabel.h> and <sys/diskslice.h> in, the few places that needs them, have gotten explicit #includes for them. The disklabel inside struct disk is now only for internal use in the disk mini-layer, so instead of embedding it, we malloc it as we need it. This concludes (modulus any mistakes) the series of disklabel related commits. I belive it all amounts to a NOP for all the rest of you :-) Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. |
/freebsd-10.1-release/sys/kern/ | ||
H A D | subr_disk.c | diff 103714 Fri Sep 20 17:36:05 MDT 2002 phk (This commit touches about 15 disk device drivers in a very consistent and predictable way, and I apologize if I have gotten it wrong anywhere, getting prior review on a patch like this is not feasible, considering the number of people involved and hardware availability etc.) If struct disklabel is the messenger: kill the messenger. Inside struct disk we had a struct disklabel which disk drivers used to communicate certain metrics to the disklayer above (GEOM or the disk mini-layer). This commit changes this communication to use four explicit fields instead. Amongst the benefits is that the fields do not get overwritten by wrong or bogus on-disk disklabels. Once that is clear, <sys/disk.h> which is included in the drivers no longer need to pull <sys/disklabel.h> and <sys/diskslice.h> in, the few places that needs them, have gotten explicit #includes for them. The disklabel inside struct disk is now only for internal use in the disk mini-layer, so instead of embedding it, we malloc it as we need it. This concludes (modulus any mistakes) the series of disklabel related commits. I belive it all amounts to a NOP for all the rest of you :-) Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. |
/freebsd-10.1-release/sys/geom/ | ||
H A D | geom_ccd.c | diff 103714 Fri Sep 20 17:36:05 MDT 2002 phk (This commit touches about 15 disk device drivers in a very consistent and predictable way, and I apologize if I have gotten it wrong anywhere, getting prior review on a patch like this is not feasible, considering the number of people involved and hardware availability etc.) If struct disklabel is the messenger: kill the messenger. Inside struct disk we had a struct disklabel which disk drivers used to communicate certain metrics to the disklayer above (GEOM or the disk mini-layer). This commit changes this communication to use four explicit fields instead. Amongst the benefits is that the fields do not get overwritten by wrong or bogus on-disk disklabels. Once that is clear, <sys/disk.h> which is included in the drivers no longer need to pull <sys/disklabel.h> and <sys/diskslice.h> in, the few places that needs them, have gotten explicit #includes for them. The disklabel inside struct disk is now only for internal use in the disk mini-layer, so instead of embedding it, we malloc it as we need it. This concludes (modulus any mistakes) the series of disklabel related commits. I belive it all amounts to a NOP for all the rest of you :-) Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. |
/freebsd-10.1-release/sys/cam/scsi/ | ||
H A D | scsi_cd.c | diff 103714 Fri Sep 20 17:36:05 MDT 2002 phk (This commit touches about 15 disk device drivers in a very consistent and predictable way, and I apologize if I have gotten it wrong anywhere, getting prior review on a patch like this is not feasible, considering the number of people involved and hardware availability etc.) If struct disklabel is the messenger: kill the messenger. Inside struct disk we had a struct disklabel which disk drivers used to communicate certain metrics to the disklayer above (GEOM or the disk mini-layer). This commit changes this communication to use four explicit fields instead. Amongst the benefits is that the fields do not get overwritten by wrong or bogus on-disk disklabels. Once that is clear, <sys/disk.h> which is included in the drivers no longer need to pull <sys/disklabel.h> and <sys/diskslice.h> in, the few places that needs them, have gotten explicit #includes for them. The disklabel inside struct disk is now only for internal use in the disk mini-layer, so instead of embedding it, we malloc it as we need it. This concludes (modulus any mistakes) the series of disklabel related commits. I belive it all amounts to a NOP for all the rest of you :-) Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. |
H A D | scsi_da.c | diff 103714 Fri Sep 20 17:36:05 MDT 2002 phk (This commit touches about 15 disk device drivers in a very consistent and predictable way, and I apologize if I have gotten it wrong anywhere, getting prior review on a patch like this is not feasible, considering the number of people involved and hardware availability etc.) If struct disklabel is the messenger: kill the messenger. Inside struct disk we had a struct disklabel which disk drivers used to communicate certain metrics to the disklayer above (GEOM or the disk mini-layer). This commit changes this communication to use four explicit fields instead. Amongst the benefits is that the fields do not get overwritten by wrong or bogus on-disk disklabels. Once that is clear, <sys/disk.h> which is included in the drivers no longer need to pull <sys/disklabel.h> and <sys/diskslice.h> in, the few places that needs them, have gotten explicit #includes for them. The disklabel inside struct disk is now only for internal use in the disk mini-layer, so instead of embedding it, we malloc it as we need it. This concludes (modulus any mistakes) the series of disklabel related commits. I belive it all amounts to a NOP for all the rest of you :-) Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. |
/freebsd-10.1-release/sys/dev/md/ | ||
H A D | md.c | diff 103714 Fri Sep 20 17:36:05 MDT 2002 phk (This commit touches about 15 disk device drivers in a very consistent and predictable way, and I apologize if I have gotten it wrong anywhere, getting prior review on a patch like this is not feasible, considering the number of people involved and hardware availability etc.) If struct disklabel is the messenger: kill the messenger. Inside struct disk we had a struct disklabel which disk drivers used to communicate certain metrics to the disklayer above (GEOM or the disk mini-layer). This commit changes this communication to use four explicit fields instead. Amongst the benefits is that the fields do not get overwritten by wrong or bogus on-disk disklabels. Once that is clear, <sys/disk.h> which is included in the drivers no longer need to pull <sys/disklabel.h> and <sys/diskslice.h> in, the few places that needs them, have gotten explicit #includes for them. The disklabel inside struct disk is now only for internal use in the disk mini-layer, so instead of embedding it, we malloc it as we need it. This concludes (modulus any mistakes) the series of disklabel related commits. I belive it all amounts to a NOP for all the rest of you :-) Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. |
Completed in 567 milliseconds